<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.8" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">acag</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Acta Agronómica</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Acta Agron.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0120-2812</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Universidad Nacional de Colombia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/acag.v68n4.75939</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Artículos originales</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Genome size and ploidy variations in pearl millet <italic>(Pennisetum glaucum)</italic> and napier grass <italic>(Pennisetum purpureum</italic>) genotypes</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
					<trans-title>Tamaño de genoma y variaciones de ploidía en genotipos de <italic>Pennisetum glaucum</italic> y <italic>Pennisetum purpureum</italic></trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Animasaun</surname>
						<given-names>David Adedayo</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>
 <italic>1</italic>
</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>
 <italic>2</italic>
</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1"><sup>
 <italic>*</italic> 
</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Morakinyo</surname>
						<given-names>Joseph Akintade</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>
 <italic>1</italic>
</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Mustapha</surname>
						<given-names>Oba Toyin</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>
 <italic>1</italic>
</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Krishnamurthy</surname>
						<given-names>Rama</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>
 <italic>1</italic>
</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>
 <italic>2</italic>
</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>l</label>
				<institution content-type="original">.Department of Plant Biology, University of llorín, llorín, Kwara State, Nigeria.</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">University of llorín</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>llorín</city>
					<state>Kwara State</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="NG">Nigeria</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">. C. G. Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, Gujarat, India.</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">C. G. Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Uka Tarsadia University</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Bardoli</city>
					<state>Gujarat</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="IN">India</country>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label>*</label> Author for correspondence: <email>animasaun.ad@unilorin.edu.ng</email>
					<email>biostanleydayor@yahoo.com.au</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
				<season>Oct-Dec</season>
				<year>2019</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>68</volume>
			<issue>4</issue>
			<fpage>299</fpage>
			<lpage>305</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>02</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2018</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>10</day>
					<month>09</month>
					<year>2019</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p><italic>Pennisetum glaucum</italic> (Pearl millet) and <italic>P. purpureum</italic> (Napier grass) are economically important members of the genus <bold>
 <italic>Pennisetum<bold>
 <italic>.</italic>
</bold> 
</italic> 
</bold> The knowledge of variability in chromosome number, size and genomic content of the species could provide clues on the mechanisms responsible for decrease or increase in genomic content in the evolutionary pathway. In the present study, twenty nine genotypes consisting of 24 pearl millet and 5 Napier grass were assessed for inter- and intra-variations in chromosome number, ploidy status and genome content. Conventional cytogenetic was used for chromosome counting and flow cytometry technique for assessing genomic contents of the genotypes. Pearl millet genotypes were diploid (2n = 14) while Napier grass were mainly polyploid (2n = 28). Despite differences in the ploidy levels, the basic chromosome number was 7. The average 2C values was 4.86 pg and 4.58 pg for pearl millet and Napier grass genotypes respectively. The DNA content per haploid cell was higher among pearl millet genotypes and the genomic size were negatively related to chromosome number and ploidy levels, meanwhile, the GC richness was directly proportional to genomic size of the genotype. The mean channel values showed that the genotypes were nuclear haploid. The present study suggests that evolution and development of polyploidy was accompanied with loss in genomic content in Napier grass. It was also discovered that pearl millet with less number of chromosome, had higher genome size than Napier grass.</p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
				<title>Resumen</title>
				<p><italic>Pennisetum glaucum</italic> y <italic>P. purpureum</italic> son miembros económicamente importantes del género <bold>
 <italic>Pennisetum<bold>
 <italic>.</italic>
</bold> 
</italic> 
</bold> El conocimiento de la variabilidad en el número de cromosomas, el tamaño y el contenido genómico de la especie podría proporcionar pistas sobre los mecanismos responsables de la disminución o el aumento del contenido genómico en la vía evolutiva. En el presente estudio se evaluaron veintinueve genotipos que constaban de 24 <italic>P. glaucum</italic> y 5 <italic>P. purpureum</italic> para determinar las variaciones inter e intra del número de cromosomas, el estado de la ploidía y el contenido del genoma. Se usó la citogenética convencional para el conteo de cromosomas y la técnica de citometría de flujo para evaluar el contenido genómico de los genotipos. Los genotipos de <italic>P. glaucum</italic> fueron diploides (2n = 14) mientras que el pasto <italic>P. purpureum</italic> fue principalmente poliploide (2n = 28). A pesar de las diferencias en los niveles de ploidía, el número básico de cromosomas fue 7. Los valores promedio de 2C fueron 4.86 pg y 4.58 pg para los genotipos de <italic>P. glaucum</italic> y <bold>
 <italic>P. purpureum<bold>
 <italic>,</italic>
</bold> 
</italic> 
</bold> respectivamente. El contenido de ADN por célula haploide fue mayor entre los genotipos de <italic>P. glaucum</italic> y el tamaño genómico se relacionó negativamente con el número de cromosomas y los niveles de ploidía, mientras que la riqueza de GC fue directamente proporcional al tamaño genómico del genotipo. Los valores medios del canal mostraron que los genotipos eran haploides nucleares. El presente estudio sugiere que la evolución y el desarrollo de la poliploidía se acompañó con una pérdida en el contenido genómico en <bold>
 <italic>P. purpureum<bold>
 <italic>.</italic>
</bold> 
</italic> 
</bold> También se descubrió que el <italic>P. glaucum</italic> con un menor número de cromosomas tenía un mayor tamaño del genoma que <bold>
 <italic>P. purpureum<bold>
 <italic>.</italic>
</bold> 
</italic> 
</bold></p>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Key words:</title>
				<kwd>Genome size</kwd>
				<kwd>flow cytometry</kwd>
				<kwd>Napier grass</kwd>
				<kwd>pearl millet</kwd>
				<kwd>Pennisetum</kwd>
				<kwd>ploidy analysis</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras clave:</title>
				<kwd>Tamaño del genoma</kwd>
				<kwd>citometría de flujo</kwd>
				<kwd>Pennisetum glaucum</kwd>
				<kwd>Pennisetum purpureum</kwd>
				<kwd>Pennisetum</kwd>
				<kwd>análisis de ploidía.</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="2"/>
				<table-count count="2"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="36"/>
				<page-count count="7"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>The genome size and ploidy level varies extensively among organisms and various species. Among the flowering plants for instance, there are intra- and inter-species variation in genomic size and ploidy status among the members of a family, genus and species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dolezel et al., 1992</xref>). This has given rise to speculations regarding the ancestral genome size of these plants and trends in their genome evolution. The genome size and genomic ploidy level, chromosome number and size variation between and within a species may be of great importance in the study of evolution and development of a breeding programme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bennett and Leitch, 1995</xref>). In addition, the knowledge of genomic size and ploidy status of a plant could provide clues on the mechanisms responsible for decrease or increase in genomic content in the evolutionary pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bennetzen and Kellogg, 1997</xref>).</p>
			<p>Variation in chromosome number among the members of a genus of flowering plants are variously documented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Techio et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ogra et al., 2009</xref>). Also, intraspecific variations in genome size have been reported in maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Rayburn et al., 1989</xref>) and pea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arumuganathan and Earle, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Beranyi and Greilhuber, 1995</xref>). A comprehensive study on angiosperm genome size variation was conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Soltis et al. (2003)</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Walker et al. (2005)</xref>) on nuclear DNA content and ploidy status of <italic>Atriplex halimus.</italic> Genome size in angiosperms varied from small values (0.05 pg) in <italic>Cardamine amara</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bennett and Smith, 1991</xref>) to huge (127.4 pg) in <italic>Fritillaria assyriaca</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bennett and Smith, 1976</xref>). Despite this huge range in DNA contents, the basic complement of genes required for normal growth and development appears to be essentially the same. Meanwhile, chromosomal aberrations could create structural and sequence composition differences between genomes of closely related species. Such changes often affect chromosome behaviors at meiosis resulting into divergence and evolution of species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Rees et al., 1982</xref>).</p>
			<p>Pearl millet <italic>(Pennisetum glaucum)</italic> and Napier grass (P. <italic>purpureum)</italic> are the most economically important members of the genus <italic>Pennisetum</italic>, which consists of heterogeneous assemblage of species with varying reproductive behaviors. The basic chromosome numbers are x = 5, 7, 8, and 9 while ploidy levels ranges from diploid to octaploid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Techio et al., 2006</xref>). The primary pool consists of cultivated and wild diploids, the secondary pool has solely Napier grass and the tertiary pool includes many distantly related species of various ploidy levels which do not naturally interbreed with the primary pool.</p>
			<p>Considering differences in chromosome number and ploidy status of pearl millet and napier grass, the higher ploidy level of napier grass over pearl millet has raised the question ¿which of the species has higher genome content? ¿Could higher ploidy status be linked to smaller chromosome and less genome size? To this end, using conventional cytogenetics and flow cytometry techniques we assessed the ploidy status and genomic content of the species. The aim was to determine the intra- and inter-specific variations in chromosome number and genome size of pearl millet and Napier grass accessions with the view of increasing the understanding of the relationship between chromosome number, ploidy status and nuclear DNA content as it affects species complexity and evolution.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Material and methods Plant material</title>
			<p>Twenty-four genotypes of pearl millet collected from farmer’s field and research institutes in India and Nigeria were used for the study. Also, clones of five Napier grass genotypes; two wild and three cultivated were collected from different sources as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Name and source of genotypes of pearl millet and Napier grass used for genomic size and ploidy analysis.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="0120-2812-acag-68-04-299-gt1.jpg"/>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p>NACGRAB: National Centre for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Ibadan, Nigeria. ICRISAT: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patanchera, Andhra Pradesh, India. † Collected from farmers’ field, in Surat District of Gujarat State, India. ††Omuo-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria. †††Department of Forage Crop, Tamil Nadu University of Agriculture, Coimbatore, India.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<sec>
				<title>Plant germination and growth</title>
				<p>The genotypes were grown in the green house at C. G Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, India. Two millet seedlings were raised in a planting bag while stem cutting of about two nodes were used to propagate the Napier grass genotypes. For each of the genotypes, five replicates were provided. Observations were made on reproductive behaviors and life cycle.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Chromosome number and ploidy determination</title>
				<p>Seeds of the pearl millet genotypes were harvested from the grown plants. The seeds were germinated on moist filter paper in placed in petri dish in the Biotechnology Laboratory at CGBIBT. Root tips (0.3 - 0.5 cm) were harvested and pretreated with 8-hydroxyquinoline (2 mM) for 4 hours at 4 <sup>o</sup>C. The pretreated roots were fixed in ethanol acetic acid (3:1). Feulgen staining and squashing methods were carried out as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Khalfallah et al. (1993)</xref>). Chromosome number and ploidy level were determined by viewing the slides under light microscope (Labophot, Nikon Corp., Japan) mounted with digital camera (Nikon DXM1200, Nikon Corp, Japan).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Flow Cytometry Analysis</title>
				<p>Flow Cytometry determination of the nuclear DNA and genomic ploidy status was carried out using fresh young leaf tissues. About 20 mg of the leaf tissues were taken from expanding leaves for each of the genotypes of pearl millet and Napier grass. <italic>Pisum sativum</italic> (2C DNA = 8.76 pg and DNA diploid) grown under greenhouse conditions was used as an internal standard (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dolezel et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Godelle et al., 1993</xref>). We used intercalating Propidium iodide (PI) as fluorescence stain for the genomic size determination and base specific mithramycin (MI) dye for GC % determination (Dolezel et al., 1992; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Crissman and Steinkamp, 1993</xref>). The leaf tissues of each genotype were chopped and finely diced with a razor blade in a petri dish containing 0.5 ml of nuclei extraction buffer. The extraction process followed the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rounsaville and Ranney (2010)</xref>). The resultant mixture was filtered into a small test tube. A solution consisting 2 ml staining buffer, 6 μl RNase A and 12 μl PI (Cystain PI Absolute P Nuclei Extraction Buffer; Partec GMBH, Munster, Germany) was added to the filtrate to give the final PI and RNase concentrations of 50 μg μl<sup>-1</sup> and 17.5 μgl<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The sample solutions were stored at 4 <sup>o</sup>C for 1 hour.</p>
				<p>FACS Calibur (Becton and Dicknson, San Jose USA) Flow Cytometer was used for the analysis. A minimum of 2000 counts was carried out for each sample to estimate the nuclei DNA by internal standard method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dolezel, 1997</xref>). Analysis were conducted in five replicates. The DNA was estimated by using the ratio of the pearl millet<italic>/Pisum sativum</italic> and Napier grass/ <italic>Pisum</italic> G1 positions, respectively, and the coefficients of variation observed for the peak within each histogram were recorded. Haploid, 2C genome size was calculated as: 2C = genome size of standard multiply by mean fluorescence value of sample in relation to mean fluorescence of the standard. The mean DNA content per chromosome was estimated as: DNA content in 2C nucleus (pg)/total chromosome number to compare the genome size at chromosome level for the genotypes. The two complementary estimates of base-composition of each of the genotype relative to a standard of known genome size and base composition <italic>(Pisum sativum;</italic> 40.5 GC %) was determined by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Godelle et al. (1993)</xref>). The nuclear DNA was analyzed using Cell Quest Pro Software and the result compared and validated by FloJo, a third party software.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>
			<p>Cytological results showed that pearl millet genotypes were diploid with 14 chromosomes (2n = 2x =14). All the Napier grass genotypes were tetraploid with 28 chromosomes (2n = 28) except COM-CO-3 (2n = 21) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>). Observations on the reproductive behavior of the genotypes showed that all pearl millet were sexual, flower and fruit bearing. Napier grass genotypes Omuo green, COM-CO-3 and COM-CO-4 flowered while Omuo purple, and COM-CO-3 Napier grass did not flower during the period of the experiment. All pearl millet genotypes were annual with a life cycle of 2-3 months. The Napier grass on the other hand were perennial (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f1">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>(<bold>a</bold>): 2n = 14 chromosome numbers of all genotypes of pearl millet; (<bold>b</bold>): 2n = 21 chromosome numbers of Napier grass COM-CO3 genotype; (<bold>c</bold>): 2n = 28 chromosome numbers of Napier grass genotypes Omuo-green, Omuo-purple, COM-CO-2 and COM-CO-4.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="0120-2812-acag-68-04-299-gf1.jpg"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>DNA amount and base composition of pearl millet and Napier grass genotypes determined by flow cytometry.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="0120-2812-acag-68-04-299-gt2.jpg"/>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<p>2n = number of chromosomes, 2x = diploid, 3x = triploid, 4x = tetraploid, 2C is the total genome in the accessions and %GC stands for percentage richness of Guanine and Cytosine base in the genome. *1 pg = 987 Mbp.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The DNA content per nucleus ranged from 2.96-4.86 pg and 2.70-4.58 pg for pearl millet and Napier grass genotypes, respectively. The highest amount of DNA (4.86 pg) was found in pearl millet NGB01263 genotype and the least value (2.96 pg) was recorded in IP3616 which is an ICRISAT genotype (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Among the Napier grass, the highest DNA content was found in COM-CO-2, while COM-CO-3 contained the least amount of DNA (2.70 pg) per nucleus. The mean DNA content per haploid set of genome varied, genotypes with higher ploidy levels (triploid and tetraploid) had less amount of DNA per haploid set. Similarly, the higher the ploidy status, the less the amount of DNA per chromosome.</p>
			<p>The base composition (%GC) for the genotypes ranged from 40.01 to 44.44% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), the genomic size was directly proportional to the %GC composition. With respect to DNA ploidy level, all the studied genotypes had mean channel values less than 300 in comparison with the internal standard <italic>(Pisum sativum)</italic> which had &gt;400 as against 156.99 - 248.66 among the pearl millet and Napier grass genotypes. Histograms of fluorescence intensities and peaks associated with nuclei isolated from leaves of pearl millet and Napier grass genotypes by flow cytometry analysis is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>. The peaks of the histograms marked the properties and sorting of events associated with nuclei counts of the cells from leaves of pearl millet and Napier grass in the determination of the genomic ploidy analysis by the flow cytometry procedure.</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f2">
					<label>Figure 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Representative histograms of fluorescence intensities, markers properties and events associated with nuclei isolated from leaves of peal millet and Napier grass genotypes by Flow Cytometry technique</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="0120-2812-acag-68-04-299-gf2.jpg">/</graphic>
				</fig>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>
			<p>In the present study, we observed a consistent chromosome number of 2n = 14 among the pearl millet genotypes irrespective of their sources while Napier grass had 28 chromosomes with the exception of COM-CO-3 (2n = 21). However, despite variations in the chromosome number, basic chromosome number of x =7 was maintained for the species. Earlier reports have indicated that basic chromosome number in <italic>Pennisetum</italic> varied from x = 5, x = 7, x = 8 and x = 9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Harlan and de Wet, 1971</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Morakinyo and Adebola, 1991</xref>; Techio et al., 2006). Pearl millet and Napier grass belong to the group of x=7, thus our findings agreed with the earlier reports. Cytological observation showed fewer chromosome number in pearl millet, but the chromosome sizes are larger than those of Napier grass. The fairly large chromosomes of the studied genotypes is in tandem with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Jauhar (1981)</xref>), who noted that generally the x =7 members of the genus <italic>Pennisetum</italic> have larger chromosome sizes compared with other groups.</p>
			<p>Ployploidization is a significant phenomenon that can play a role in genome rearrangement, adaptation, reproductive isolation and ultimately speciation. It is important in plant breeding because it can influence hybridization, fertility and gene expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adam and Wendel, 2005</xref>). The triploid Napier grass genotype is most likely a product of hybridization between pearl millet and Napier grass as elucidated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dowling et al. (2014)</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al. (1997)</xref>), although strong reproductive barriers exist between pearl millet and Napier grass, triploid hybrids that are partially sterile do occur in nature. Due to their allogamy nature, hybridization between the species produced <italic>AA’B</italic> genome during meiosis in such hybrids, i.e. the <italic>A’</italic> and <italic>A</italic> genomes of Napier grass and pearl millet associate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Jauhar and Hanna, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dowling <italic>et al.,</italic> 2014</xref>). Partial sterility of the resultant hybrid could therefore be attributed to reduction in paring of smaller A’ chromosomes of Napier grass with the larger <italic>A</italic> chromosomes of pearl millet. Since members of <italic>A</italic> and B genomes do not pair with one another, the <italic>B</italic> genome members remained univalent lagging behind the other chromosomes during anaphase I and II and may not be included in the developing nuclei, thus resulting in sterility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Jauhar, 1968</xref>).</p>
			<p>Although the genomic size varied among the genotypes, the DNA contents of the pearl millet genotypes were close. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al. (1997)</xref>) reported DNA content of 4.71 and 4.59 pg for pearl millet and Napier grass, respectively, which is congruent to our present findings. Whereas the previous report was exclusively based on representative genotypes of the genus<italic>,</italic> a larger number of genotypes of pearl millet and Napier grass were sampled in our study. Our observations lend credence to hypotheses of genome constitution of Napier grass propounded by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Jauhar (1981)</xref>) and reinforced the allotetraploid origin of Napier grass by amphiploid mechanism through unreduced gamete and consequently decrease in chromosome size. Such decreases in chromosome size in our view, undoubtedly led to reduced genome per chromosome. Averagely, the amount of DNA in the Napier grass is similar, despite the difference in chromosome number and ploidy levels. Apparently, the genotypes of pearl millet which are cultivated species must have evolved from a common ancestor but ecologically isolated by domestication and human agricultural activities which invariably accounts for different genomic contents observed.</p>
			<p>Alternatively, in the opinion of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al. (1997)</xref>), Napier grass likely evolved from the fragmentation of large chromosomes of a diploid hypothetic ancestor (2n = 14). The variation in nuclear DNA among the polyploid Napier grass may reflect their independent evolution from diploid species of primary gene pool via auto or allopolyploidization as opined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Soltis and Soltis (2000)</xref>). Different B&gt;’ chromosome number may contribute to variations in DNA content and compromise fertility of interspecific hybrids due to chromosomal sterility. Earlier, difference in nuclear DNA content was suggested to confer adaptation to different environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Walbot and Cullies, 1985</xref>). In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Walker et al. (2005)</xref>), noted no significant differences in nuclear DNA content of <italic>Atriplex halimus</italic> grown under different temperatures and humidity. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Price et al. (2000)</xref>), the presence of secondary compounds in the plant tissues can affect nuclear DNA content directly or interfere with the staining and/or the fluorescence during analysis procedure.</p>
			<p>The amount of DNA per chromosome was reduced among the Napier grass genotypes. This is likely due to decrease in chromosome size although chromosome number and ploidy level increase, without corresponding increase in the genome content. Thus, reduction in chromosome size could lead to reduced DNA content per haploid set of genome, this statement may be relative and true for the genotypes evaluated. </p>
			<p>Sometimes, genomic size may vary independent of chromosome number. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Walker et al. (2005)</xref>) observed that some tetraploid populations of <italic>Atripex halimus</italic> have more than double the diploid amount of DNA which may be due to amplification of retrotransposons, accumulation of retro-elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bennetzen and Kellogg, 1997</xref>) or gain of restriction fragments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Song et al., 1995</xref>). The existence of different ploidy levels in Napier grass could confer a greater genetic heterozygosity at both individual and population levels and this may enhance selective advantage in unsuitable environments. As demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Walker et al. (2005)</xref>, remarkable environmental tolerance in polyploid members of the <italic>Artiplex halimus</italic> was due to their greater heterozygosity.</p>
			<p>Among flowering plants, chromosome number and genome size varies tremendously and there is a considerable speculation regarding both the original genome size and base chromosome number of the angiosperms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arumuganathan and Earle, 1991</xref>). It was proposed that the original base chromosome number and genome size for monocot was small (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Soltis et al., 2003</xref>). From the histograms of C-values for about 2802 species constructed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Leitch et al. (1998)</xref>), species with C-values of 1.4 pg and 3.5 pg were designated as very small and small genomes, respectively. Consequently, since the pearl millet genotypes in the present study had less than 3.5 pg C-values and therefore belong to the category of small genome plants while the Napier grass (C-value &lt; 1.4 pg) has very small genome per haploid chromosome. The small C-values we obtained for Napier grass genotypes suggest an evolutionary lineage that have experienced decrease in genome size over the years.</p>
			<p>Genome size and base composition are directly proportional and genotypes with higher genome size are also richer in the %GC. The %GC obtained here was relatively similar and concurred with the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al. (1997)</xref>). Meanwhile, the base composition between 40.21 43.23% we reported for pearl millet genotypes is less than the values documented for its wild relatives <italic>P. mollissium</italic> (46.5%) and <italic>P. viola</italic> (47.2%) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Martel et al. (1997)</xref>. Variation in base composition have been noted in some plant species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cerbah et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Godelle et al., 1993</xref>). It is important to mention that variation in base composition did not provide concise information of genome sequence that could have changed in the evolutionary process. In addition, the relationship between base composition richness and genomic size may not always be linear with respect to other species. There is a correlation between mean channel number of the nuclei analysis and DNA ploidy status. The channel number obtained in this study for all the assessed genotypes was less than 300, thus indicated that all the genotypes are nuclear haploid because, channel number approximately 400 and above signifies diploid species as obtained in the internal standard <italic>Pisum satium</italic>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusion</title>
			<p>The understanding of nuclear genome and its components could provide clues to the mechanisms that could be responsible for genome increase or decrease in the evolutionary pathway. In the present study, the difference in C-values of genotypes of pearl millet was not remarkable, but genome size of pearl millet was slightly larger than Napier grass despite the higher chromosome number and ploidy levels of the latter. The bigger chromosome size in pearl millet possibly accounts for its higher DNA content per haploid set even though the chromosomes are fewer than in Napier grass. It was possible that in the course of polyploidy evolution of the Napier grass from its hypothetical ancestor, genomic materials are lost and the evolved smaller chromosome size had reduced genome content. The information provided by the genomic and ploidy analysis of these two most economically important members of <italic>Pennisetum</italic> will enrich the existing knowledge of their genetics and enhance development of improved cultivars.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors are thankful to Management of Central Imaging and Flow Cytometry Facility Centre for Cellular and Molecular Platforms, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore India for permission to use their facilities and the technical support provided.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Adams, K. L.; Wendel, J. 2005. Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploidy plants. Trends in Genetics 21:539-543.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Adams</surname>
							<given-names>K. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wendel</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploidy plants</article-title>
					<source>Trends in Genetics</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>539</fpage>
					<lpage>543</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Arumuganathan, K.; Earle, E. D. 1991. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology Research 9:208-218.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Arumuganathan</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Earle</surname>
							<given-names>E. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species</article-title>
					<source>Plant Molecular Biology Research</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>208</fpage>
					<lpage>218</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Bennett, M. D.; Leitch, U. 1995. Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms. Annals of Botany 76:113-176.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leitch</surname>
							<given-names>U</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms</article-title>
					<source>Annals of Botany</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<fpage>113</fpage>
					<lpage>176</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Bennett, M. D.; Smith, J. B. 1976. Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 274:227-274.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Smith</surname>
							<given-names>J. B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1976</year>
					<article-title>Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms</article-title>
					<source>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences</source>
					<volume>274</volume>
					<fpage>227</fpage>
					<lpage>274</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Bennett, M. D; Smith, J. B. 1991. Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 334:309-345.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Smith</surname>
							<given-names>J. B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms</article-title>
					<source>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences</source>
					<volume>334</volume>
					<fpage>309</fpage>
					<lpage>345</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Bennett, M. D.; Bhandol, P.; Leitch, I. J. 2000. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperm and their modern uses -807 new estimates. Annals of Botany 86:859-909</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bhandol</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leitch</surname>
							<given-names>I. J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperm and their modern uses -807 new estimates</article-title>
					<source>Annals of Botany</source>
					<volume>86</volume>
					<fpage>859</fpage>
					<lpage>909</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Bennett, M. D.; Leitch, I. J.; Hanson, L. 1998. DNA amounts in two samples of angiosperm weed. Annals Botany 82(Supplement A) 121-134</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leitch</surname>
							<given-names>I. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hanson</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>DNA amounts in two samples of angiosperm weed</article-title>
					<source>Annals Botany</source>
					<volume>82</volume>
					<supplement>Supplement A</supplement>
					<fpage>121</fpage>
					<lpage>134</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Bennetzen, J. L.; Kellogg, E. A. 1997. Do plant have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell 9:1509-1514</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennetzen</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kellogg</surname>
							<given-names>E. A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Do plant have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity?</article-title>
					<source>Plant Cell</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>1509</fpage>
					<lpage>1514</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Beranyi, M.; Greilhuber, J. 1995. Flow cytometric analysis of genome size variations in cultivated and wild Pisum sativum (Fabaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 194:231-239.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Beranyi</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Greilhuber</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Flow cytometric analysis of genome size variations in cultivated and wild Pisum sativum (Fabaceae)</article-title>
					<source>Plant Systematics and Evolution</source>
					<volume>194</volume>
					<fpage>231</fpage>
					<lpage>239</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Cerbah, M.; Couleau, J.; Godelle, B.; Slljak-Yakoviev, S. 1995. Genome size, fluorochrome banding, and karyotype evolution in some Hypochoeris species. Genome, 38:689-695.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cerbah</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Couleau</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Godelle</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Slljak-Yakoviev</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Genome size, fluorochrome banding, and karyotype evolution in some Hypochoeris species</article-title>
					<source>Genome</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>689</fpage>
					<lpage>695</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Crissman, J.; Steinkamp, J. A.; 1993. Cell cycle-related changes in chromatin structure detected by flow cytometry using multiple DNA fluorochromes. European Journal of Histochemistry 37(2):129-38.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Crissman</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Steinkamp</surname>
							<given-names>J. A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<article-title>Cell cycle-related changes in chromatin structure detected by flow cytometry using multiple DNA fluorochromes</article-title>
					<source>European Journal of Histochemistry</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>129</fpage>
					<lpage>138</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Dolezel, J. 1997. Application of flow cytometry for the study of plant genomes. Journal of Applied Genetics 38:285-302</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dolezel</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Application of flow cytometry for the study of plant genomes</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Applied Genetics</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>285</fpage>
					<lpage>302</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Dolezel, J.: Sgorbati, S.; Lacretti, S.; 1992. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 85:625-631.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dolezel</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lacretti</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants</article-title>
					<source>Physiologia Plantarum</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>625</fpage>
					<lpage>631</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Dolezel, J.; Gr,eilhuber, J.; Lucretti, S.; Lysak, M. A.; Nardi, L.; Obermayer, R. 1998. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Annals of Botany 82:17-26</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dolezel</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gr,eilhuber</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lucretti</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lysak</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nardi</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Obermayer</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison</article-title>
					<source>Annals of Botany</source>
					<volume>82</volume>
					<fpage>17</fpage>
					<lpage>26</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Dowling, C. D.; Burson, B. L.; Jessup, R. W. 2014. Marker-assisted verification of Kinggrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumch. X Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.). Plant Omics Journal 7(2):72-79</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dowling</surname>
							<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Burson</surname>
							<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jessup</surname>
							<given-names>R. W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Marker-assisted verification of Kinggrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumch. X Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.)</article-title>
					<source>Plant Omics Journal</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>72</fpage>
					<lpage>79</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Godelle, B.; Cartler, D.; Marie, D.; Brown, S.; Slljak-Yakovlev, S. 1993. Heterochromatln study demonstrating the non-linearity of fluorometry useful for calculating genomic base-composition. Cytometry 14:618-626.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Godelle</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cartler</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marie</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brown</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Slljak-Yakovlev</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<article-title>Heterochromatln study demonstrating the non-linearity of fluorometry useful for calculating genomic base-composition</article-title>
					<source>Cytometry</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<fpage>618</fpage>
					<lpage>626</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Harlan, J. R.; de Wet, J. M. J. 1971. Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509-517.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Harlan</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>de Wet</surname>
							<given-names>J. M. J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1971</year>
					<article-title>Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants</article-title>
					<source>Taxon</source>
					<volume>20</volume>
					<fpage>509</fpage>
					<lpage>517</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Jauhar, P. P. 1968. Inter-and Intra-genomal chromosome pairing in an Inter-specific hybrid and its bearing on the basic chromosome number in Pennisetum. Genetica 39:360-370.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jauhar</surname>
							<given-names>P. P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1968</year>
					<article-title>Inter-and Intra-genomal chromosome pairing in an Inter-specific hybrid and its bearing on the basic chromosome number in Pennisetum</article-title>
					<source>Genetica</source>
					<volume>39</volume>
					<fpage>360</fpage>
					<lpage>370</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Jauhar, P. P. 1981. Cytogenetic and breeding of pearl millet and related species. Alan R. Uss. New York</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jauhar</surname>
							<given-names>P. P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<source>Cytogenetic and breeding of pearl millet and related species</source>
					<publisher-name>Alan R. Uss</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Jauhar, P. P.; Hanna, W. W. 1998. Cytogenetic and genetics of pearl millet. Advances in Agronomy 64:1-26.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jauhar</surname>
							<given-names>P. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hanna</surname>
							<given-names>W. W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Cytogenetic and genetics of pearl millet</article-title>
					<source>Advances in Agronomy</source>
					<volume>64</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>26</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Khalfallah, N.; Sarr, A.; Siljak-Yakovlev, S. 1993. Karyological study of some cultivated and wild stocks of pearl millet from Africa (Pennisetum typhoides Stapf et Hubb. and P. violaceum (Lam.) L. Rich. Caryologia 46:127-138.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Khalfallah</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sarr</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Siljak-Yakovlev</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<article-title>Karyological study of some cultivated and wild stocks of pearl millet from Africa (Pennisetum typhoides Stapf et Hubb. and P. violaceum (Lam.) L. Rich</article-title>
					<source>Caryologia</source>
					<volume>46</volume>
					<fpage>127</fpage>
					<lpage>138</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Leitch, I. J.; Chase, M. W.; Bennett, M. D. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence of small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 82, 85-94</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Leitch</surname>
							<given-names>I. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chase</surname>
							<given-names>M. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence of small ancestral genome size in flowering plants</article-title>
					<source>Annals of Botany</source>
					<volume>82</volume>
					<fpage>85</fpage>
					<lpage>94</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Martel, E.; De Nay, D.; Siljak-Yakovlev, S.; Brown, S.; Sarr, A. 1997. Genome size variation of basic chromosome number in pearl millet and fourteen related Pennisetum species. Journal of Heredity 88:139-143.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Martel</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>De Nay</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Siljak-Yakovlev</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brown</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sarr</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Genome size variation of basic chromosome number in pearl millet and fourteen related Pennisetum species</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Heredity</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>139</fpage>
					<lpage>143</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Morakinyo, J. A.; Adebola, P. O. 1991. Karyotype analysis and meiotic chromosome behaviour in Pennisetum americanum, P. purpureum and P. pedicellatum. Nigerian Journal of Botany 4:127-134</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Morakinyo</surname>
							<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Adebola</surname>
							<given-names>P. O</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Karyotype analysis and meiotic chromosome behaviour in Pennisetum americanum, P. purpureum and P. pedicellatum</article-title>
					<source>Nigerian Journal of Botany</source>
					<volume>4</volume>
					<fpage>127</fpage>
					<lpage>134</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Ogar, R. K.; Mohanpuria, P.; Sharma, U. K.; Sharma, M. ; Siha, A. K.; Ahuja, P. S. 2009. India calamus (Acorus calamus L.): not a tetraploid. Current Sciences 97:1644-1647</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ogar</surname>
							<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mohanpuria</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharma</surname>
							<given-names>U. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharma</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Siha</surname>
							<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ahuja</surname>
							<given-names>P. S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>India calamus (Acorus calamus L.): not a tetraploid</article-title>
					<source>Current Sciences</source>
					<volume>97</volume>
					<fpage>1644</fpage>
					<lpage>1647</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Price, H. J. 1976. Evolution of DNA content in higher plants. Botanical Review 42:27-52.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Price</surname>
							<given-names>H. J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1976</year>
					<article-title>Evolution of DNA content in higher plants</article-title>
					<source>Botanical Review</source>
					<volume>42</volume>
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>52</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Price, H. J.; Hodnett, G.; Johnston, J. S. 2000. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) leaves contain compounds that reduce nuclear propidium iodide fluorescence. Annals of Botany , 86 929-934</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Price</surname>
							<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hodnett</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Johnston</surname>
							<given-names>J. S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) leaves contain compounds that reduce nuclear propidium iodide fluorescence</article-title>
					<source>Annals of Botany</source>
					<volume>86</volume>
					<fpage>929</fpage>
					<lpage>934</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Rayburn, A. L.; Auger, J. A.; Benzlnger, E. A.; Hepburn, A. G. 1989. Detection of intraspecific DNA content variation in Zea mays L. by flow cytometry. Journal of Experimental Botany 40:1179- 1183.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rayburn</surname>
							<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Auger</surname>
							<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Benzlnger</surname>
							<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hepburn</surname>
							<given-names>A. G</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1989</year>
					<article-title>Detection of intraspecific DNA content variation in Zea mays L. by flow cytometry</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source>
					<volume>40</volume>
					<fpage>1179</fpage>
					<lpage> 1183</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Rees, H.; Jenkins, G.; Seal, A. G.; Hutchinson, J. 1982. Assays of the phenotypic effects of changes in DNA amounts. In: Dover, D. A. and Flavell, R. B. (eds.) Genome evolution. Academic Press, London. pp. 287-297.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rees</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jenkins</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Seal</surname>
							<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hutchinson</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<chapter-title>Assays of the phenotypic effects of changes in DNA amounts</chapter-title>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Dover</surname>
							<given-names>D. A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Flavell</surname>
							<given-names>R. B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<source>Genome evolution</source>
					<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>287</fpage>
					<lpage>297</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Rounsaville, T. J.; Ranney, T. G. 2010. Ploidy levels and genomic sizes of Berberis L. and Mahonia Nutt. species, hybrids and cultivars. HortScience 47(7):1029-1033</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rounsaville</surname>
							<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ranney</surname>
							<given-names>T. G</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Ploidy levels and genomic sizes of Berberis L. and Mahonia Nutt. species, hybrids and cultivars</article-title>
					<source>HortScience</source>
					<volume>47</volume>
					<issue>7</issue>
					<fpage>1029</fpage>
					<lpage>1033</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Song, K.; Lu, P.; Tang, K.; Osborn, T. C. 1995. Rapid genome changes in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implication for polyploidy evolution. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA. 92:7719-7723.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lu</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tang</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Osborn</surname>
							<given-names>T. C</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Rapid genome changes in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implication for polyploidy evolution</article-title>
					<source>Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA</source>
					<volume>92</volume>
					<fpage>7719</fpage>
					<lpage>7723</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Soltis, P. E.; Soltis, D. E. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA 97:7051-7057</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Soltis</surname>
							<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soltis</surname>
							<given-names>D. E</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids</article-title>
					<source>Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA</source>
					<volume>97</volume>
					<fpage>7051</fpage>
					<lpage>7057</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Soltis, D. E.; Soltis, P. S.; Bennett, M. D.; Leitch, I. 2003. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 90(11):1595-1603</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Soltis</surname>
							<given-names>D. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soltis</surname>
							<given-names>P. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leitch</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms</article-title>
					<source>American Journal of Botany</source>
					<volume>90</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<fpage>1595</fpage>
					<lpage>1603</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Techio; V. H.; Davide, L. C.; Pereira, A. V. 2006. Meiosis in elephant grass (Pennisetumpurpureum) (Poaceae, Poales) and their interspecific hybrids. Genetics and Molecular Biology 29(2):415-423</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">TechioV. H.<name>
							<surname>Davide</surname>
							<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>A. V</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Meiosis in elephant grass (Pennisetumpurpureum) (Poaceae, Poales) and their interspecific hybrids</article-title>
					<source>Genetics and Molecular Biology</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>415</fpage>
					<lpage>423</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Walbot, V.; Cullis, C. A. 1985. Rapid genomic change in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 36:367-396</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Walbot</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cullis</surname>
							<given-names>C. A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1985</year>
					<article-title>Rapid genomic change in higher plants</article-title>
					<source>Annual Review of Plant Physiology</source>
					<volume>36</volume>
					<fpage>367</fpage>
					<lpage>396</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Walker, D. J.; Monino; I.; Gonzalez, E.; Frayssinet, N.; Correal, E. 2005. Determination of ploidy and nuclear DNA content in populations of Atriplex halimus (Chenopodiaceae). Botanica Journal of Linnaean Society 147:441-448.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Walker</surname>
							<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
						</name>MoninoI.<name>
							<surname>Gonzalez</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Frayssinet</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Correal</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Determination of ploidy and nuclear DNA content in populations of Atriplex halimus (Chenopodiaceae)</article-title>
					<source>Botanica Journal of Linnaean Society</source>
					<volume>147</volume>
					<fpage>441</fpage>
					<lpage>448</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>Conflict of Interests We declare there are no conflicts of interest in whatsoever form between the authors in research design, execution, manuscript preparation and choice of journal.Conflict of Interests We declare there are no conflicts of interest in whatsoever form between the authors in research design, execution, manuscript preparation and choice of journal.</back>
</article>