Publicado
Evaluación radiográfica de la estabilidad en medidas cefalométricas de pacientes Clase III sometidos a cirugía ortognática bimaxilar
Radiographic evaluation of stability in cephalometric measurements of Class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/aoc.v10n1.81069Palabras clave:
Cirugia ortognatica, prognatismo, ortodoncia, maloclusion, cefalometria (es)Orthognathic surgery, pronathism, orthodontics, malocclusion, cephalometry (en)
Objetivo: evaluar, a través de medidas cefalométricas de los planos sagital y vertical, la estabilidad de pacientes con maloclusión clase III sometidos a cirugía ortognática bimaxilar. Métodos: se aplicó estudio longitudinal en 20 pacientes (11 mujeres), en un promedio de edad de 22.5 años y con diagnóstico de hipoplasia del tercio medio facial y prognatismo mandibular, tratados con ortodoncia y cirugía ortognática bimaxilar. Se realizaron tres radiografías cefálicas laterales por cada paciente: la primera, previa al procedimiento quirúrgico (T1), otra a los 8 meses posquirúrgicos (T2) y la tercera, a los 18 meses posquirúrgicos (T3). Posteriormente, se evaluaron los cambios en el plano X y Y en los tres tiempos realizando las pruebas estadísticas pertinentes con el fin de observar diferencias. Resultados: se encontraron medidas más estables en el maxilar superior en sentido vertical y sagital, y se observó que la mandíbula es menos estable a los movimientos quirúrgicos, principalmente en sentido vertical (diferencias estadísticamente significativas p<0.05). Conclusión: la cirugía ortognática bimaxilar en casos de clase III es muy estable (especialmente en el maxilar); dicha estabilidad fue definida solamente con medidas cefalométricas, sin tener en cuenta variables como la función o las características clínicas de los pacientes.
Objective: To evaluate cephalometric stability in the sagittal and vertical planes of class III malocclusion patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery Class III skeletal malocclusion is reported as the most frequently dentofacial alteration treated in combination with orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. It is important to evaluate the stability or relapse of the surgical treatment performed on these patients. Methods: A longitudinal study were conducted in 20 patients (11 women), with an average of 22.5 years old, diagnosis of hypoplasia of the facial middle third and mandibular prognathism, treated with orthodontics and bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Three lateral cephalic radiographs were taken for each patient: one prior to the surgical procedure (T1), another at 8 post-surgical months (T2) and finally at 18 post-surgical months (T3). The changes on the X and Y planes were evaluated the same three times, performing the relevant statistical tests in order to observe differences. Results: More stable measurements were found in the upper jaw in the vertical and sagittal direction, while the mandible is less stable to surgical movements, mainly in the vertical direction (statistically significant differences p<0.05). Conclusion: bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in class III malocclusion is very stable (especially in the maxilla). It is important to keep in mind the maxillary biomechanics in order to offer an accurate treatment to these patients. Further studies are required in order to investigate possible associated predictor factors.
Referencias
Jakobsone G, Stenvik A, Sandvik L, Espeland L. Three -years follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal class III malocclusion: stability and risk factors for relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(1):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.050.
Dowling PA, Espeland L, Sandvik L, Mobarak KA, Hogevold HE. LeFort I maxillary advancement: 3-year stability and risk factors for relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(5):560-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.051
Mobarak KA, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T. Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000;15(2):83-95.
Chou JI, Fong HJ, Kuang SH, Gi LY, Hwang FY, Lai YC, Chang RC, Kao SY. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(3):355-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.228
Politi M, Costa F, Cian R, Polini F, Robiony M. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62(2):169-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.010
Kor HS, Yang HJ, Hwang SJ. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42(5):230- 238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.013
Choi SH, Yoo HJ, Lee JY, Jung YS, Choi JW, Lee KJ. Stability of pre-orthodontic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO. J Craniomaxillofac Surg .2016;44(9):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Jul 25
Lee YS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Larson BE, Lee NK. Comparison of the stability after mandibular setback with minimal orthodontics of class III patients with different facial types. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(7):1464e1-1464e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Larson BE, Lee NK, Jang MJ, Yun PY, Kim JW, Kim YK. Comparing stability of mandibular setback versus 2-jaw surgery in class III patients with minimal presurgical orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75(6):1240-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Choi SH, Hwang CJ, Baik HS, Jung YS, Lee KJ. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus conventional treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74(3):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
Houstoun WJB. The analysis of error in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983; 83:382-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6
Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstand O, Lyberg T. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement surgery: predictability and long-term outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119(4): 353-67. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112258
Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Hunter WS. An atlas of Craniofacial Growth: Cephalometric Standards from the university school growth study. Monograph 2, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: 1975.
Proffit WR, Phillips C, Turvey TA. Stability after surgical-orthodontic corrective of skeletal class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1991;6(4):211-25.
Costa F, Robiony M, Sembroni S, Pollini F, Politi M. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2001;16(3):179-92.
Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages. Ann Plast Surg 2009;63(4):396-403. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318190322f.
Ueki K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, Yoshida K, Shimizu C, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Comparison of maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy for occlusal cant correction surgery and maxillary advanced surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(1):38-43. Epub 2007 Mar 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.018
Proffit WR, Bailey LJ, Phillips C, Turvey TA. Long-term stability of surgical open-bite correction by Le Fort I Osteotomy. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(2):112-7.
Sim KH, Joo YH, Jung HS. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42(5):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Oct 3
Mucedero M, Coviello A, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Stability factor after double-jaw surgery in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2008;78(6); 1141-52. doi: 10.2319/101807-498.1.
Politi M, Costa F, Robiony M, Soldano F, Isola M. Stability of maxillary advancement for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: preliminary results of an active control equivalence trial for semirigid and rigid fixation of the maxilla. In J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002;17(2):98-110.
Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages. Ann Plast Surg 2009;63(4):396-403. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819032 2f.
Costa F, Robiony M, Zorzan E, Zerman N, Politi M. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(4):642-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.043
Hye-Rim A, Young-Soo J, Kee-Joo L, Hyoung-Seon B. Evaluation of stability after pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using cone-beam computed tomography: A comparison with conventional treatment. Korean J Orthod 2016; 46(5): 301-309. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.5.301
Zhou Y, Li Z, Wang X, Zou B, Zhou Y. Progressive changes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated by 2-jaw surgery with minimal and conventional presurgical orthodontics: A comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2016;149(2):244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.018.
Park KH, Sandor GK, Kim YD. Skeletal stability of surgery-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal class III malocclusion, using standardized criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(1): 35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 PEDRO MARIA JARAMILLO VALLEJO
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la licencia Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
- Una vez sometido el artículo no se aceptaran cambios respecto a la incorporación o retiro de autores.
