<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">dyna</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>DYNA</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Dyna rev.fac.nac.minas</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0012-7353</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2346-2183</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Universidad Nacional de Colombia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/dyna.v90n225.103922</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Metamodel simulation for designing monopole telecommunication antenna support structures</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
					<trans-title>Simulación del metamodelo para el diseño de estructuras soporte de antenas de telecomunicaciones tipo monopolo</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3119-7139</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Sánchez-Guerrero</surname>
						<given-names>Johnny Homero</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>a</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-2488-9265</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Lagos-Zamora</surname>
						<given-names>Christian David</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>a</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-0140-3827</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Peña-Jordán</surname>
						<given-names>Francisco Agustín</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>a</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5656-7549</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Arroba-Arroba</surname>
						<given-names>Cesar Hernán</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>a</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<aff id="aff1">
					<label>a</label>
					<institution content-type="original">Facultad de Ingeniería Civil y Mecánica, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ecuador, jsanchez6913@uta.edu.ec, clagos6629@uta.edu.ec, fa.pena@uta.edu.ec, ch.arroba@uta.edu.ec</institution>
					<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Técnica de Ambato</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Facultad de Ingeniería Civil y Mecánica</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Ambato</institution>
					<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
					<email>jsanchez6913@uta.edu.ec</email>
					<email>clagos6629@uta.edu.ec</email>
					<email>fa.pena@uta.edu.ec</email>
					<email>ch.arroba@uta.edu.ec</email>
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>15</day>
				<month>02</month>
				<year>2024</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<season>Jan-Mar</season>
				<year>2023</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>90</volume>
			<issue>225</issue>
			<fpage>140</fpage>
			<lpage>146</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>26</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="rev-recd">
					<day>31</day>
					<month>01</month>
					<year>2023</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>28</day>
					<month>02</month>
					<year>2023</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p>Finite element analysis is used to estimate the displacements and forces present in each element of a structure. This type of analysis is time consuming in pre-processing, processing, and post-processing. It also incurs considerable computational costs. A simplified methodology is therefore required to reduce design time considerably. The research involved the development and application of an experimental methodology and a simulation, using Ansys Research software’s LS-DYNA module, in which loads are applied in accordance with the ANSI/TIA 222-G standard used in the telecommunications industry. The matrix method was applied, obtaining results for nodal displacement that were compared with the results of physical tests and a metamodel, showing a variation range of 8.44%. In addition, it was shown that a metamodel can be used during the pre-design stage, significantly reducing the time required for analysis.</p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
				<title>Resumen</title>
				<p>El análisis por el método de los elementos finitos se utiliza para estimar los desplazamientos y fuerzas presentes en cada elemento de una estructura. Este tipo de análisis requiere mucho tiempo de preprocesado, procesado y postprocesado, implicando además un gasto computacional considerable. Siendo necesaria una metodología simplificada que reduzca considerablemente el tiempo de diseño. La investigación se desarrolló aplicando una metodología experimental y simulación en el módulo LS-DYNA del software Ansys Research, donde las cargas son aplicadas de acuerdo a la norma ANSI/TIA 222-G utilizada en la industria de las telecomunicaciones. Se aplicó el método matricial, obteniendo los resultados de desplazamientos nodales que fueron comparados con los resultados de la prueba física y los resultados del metamodelo, mostrando un rango de variación de 8.44%, además el metamodelo puede ser utilizado en la etapa de prediseño, reduciendo significativamente el tiempo de análisis.</p>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>monopole structure</kwd>
				<kwd>metamodel</kwd>
				<kwd>flange connection</kwd>
				<kwd>section inertia</kwd>
				<kwd>direct matrix</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras clave<italic>:</italic></title>
				<kwd>estructura de monopolo</kwd>
				<kwd>metamodelo</kwd>
				<kwd>conexión de brida</kwd>
				<kwd>inercia de la sección</kwd>
				<kwd>matriz directa</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="6"/>
				<table-count count="5"/>
				<equation-count count="4"/>
				<ref-count count="30"/>
				<page-count count="7"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>There has been an exponential increase in the use of mobile telephony in recent years, bringing with it large capital investments in the installation of structures to support communications equipment, with optimum characteristics both in terms of design and assembly <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1"><sup>1</sup></xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6"><sup>6</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. The typology of these structures includes self-supporting and guyed towers and tubular monopoles <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7"><sup>7</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Tubular monopoles require less space and are also versatile in their assembly, characteristics that favor the environment and the economy alike <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8"><sup>8</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Tubular monopoles are assembled in sections that are joined using mechanical techniques <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9"><sup>9</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. The discontinuous nature of the sections and the mechanical contact between them introduce structural uncertainties, rendering them vulnerable to high wind loads <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10"><sup>10</sup></xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12"><sup>12</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. </p>
			<p>The steel construction industry uses bolted assemblies, consisting of mechanical connections, steel plates and high-strength bolts, because of their high-performance and reliable clamping properties <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13"><sup>13</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14"><sup>14</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. The best-known connections for tubular sections are the flange-type and friction-type, the latter being less sensitive to the imperfections that may be found in the plates <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15"><sup>15</sup></xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17"><sup>17</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Calculations and assumptions are required for the analysis of these connections because of the uncertainty associated with environmental factors and the limited availability of models. Taken together, these two factors mean that a true representation of structural responses is not available <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18"><sup>18</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19"><sup>19</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Ductile failure mode is determined using analytical design methods. However, experimental results suggest that brittle failure is the most common problem <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20"><sup>20</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Finite element analysis and destructive testing allow the behavior of bolted flange-type connections to be determined <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21"><sup>21</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22"><sup>22</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>.</p>
			<p>Comparisons between experimental results and those derived from finite element analysis have given satisfactory results in determining the demand for safety and economy in flange-type connections that are subject to pure bending. Studies of flange-type joints under axial load have been useful for studies of bending capacity but are limited in number, confining the availability of general information on the design of good connections <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23"><sup>23</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Therefore, research should be conducted using finite element analysis and design methodologies are need to be developed for flange-type connections <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24"><sup>24</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>.</p>
			<p>One of the methodologies used in the literature is the metamodel (or surrogate) approach, which consists in approximating the response of the finite element analysis using analytical functions that associate input variables with results <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25"><sup>25</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26"><sup>26</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. Optimized methodologies that have been developed for designing steel beam-column, semi-rigid connections and bolt-tightening sequences have performed extremely well in operation <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27"><sup>27</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28"><sup>28</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. An advantage of the metamodel approach is that it reduces the computational cost that complexity represents in the process of design steel structures, which involves a lot of input data. Consequently, metamodeling is important in speeding up both analysis and design <sup>[</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29"><sup>29</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30"><sup>30</sup></xref><sup>]</sup>. </p>
			<p>This research seeks to develop an optimized methodology for the design of monopole-type telecommunications towers. It uses a parametric metamodel to estimate displacements and stress in monopole sections and flange-type bolted connections. Experimental tests were carried out and simulations in Ansys LS-DYNA Research software employed.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="methods">
			<title>2. Methodology</title>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Materials</title>
				<p>The bending test executed on the prototype structure used ASTM A36 and ASTM A500 steel for the structural sections and ASTM A325 bolts for the connections. The mechanical properties are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Characteristics of the material models used in Ansys Research.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Material</th>
									<th align="center">Density [kg/m<sup>3</sup>]</th>
									<th align="center">Young's Modulus [MPa]</th>
									<th align="center">Poisson's ratio</th>
									<th align="center">Yield Limit [MPa]</th>
									<th align="center">Maximum Tensile Strength [MPa]</th>
									<th align="center">Failure Plastic Deformation</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">A500</td>
									<td align="center">7890</td>
									<td align="center">200000</td>
									<td align="center">0.3</td>
									<td align="center">320</td>
									<td align="center">430</td>
									<td align="center">0.370</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">A36</td>
									<td align="center">7890</td>
									<td align="center">200000</td>
									<td align="center">0.3</td>
									<td align="center">250</td>
									<td align="center">400</td>
									<td align="center">0.283</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">A325 (Bolts)</td>
									<td align="center">7890</td>
									<td align="center">200000</td>
									<td align="center">0.3</td>
									<td align="center">586</td>
									<td align="center">827</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>Source: the authors</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Equipment</title>
				<p>Thickness gauges, a load cell with a capacity of 500 kg, a comparator clock and a torque meter.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.3. Methods</title>
				<p>For the analysis, the functional characteristics of the flange-type bolted connections were investigated and a 3D model made using Ansys SpaceClaim software. The results obtained using the finite element analysis served to parameterize the metamodel. The experimental results of the physical test supported the results of the finite elements analysis of the simulation carried out using using Ansys Research software.</p>
				<p>The estimation of loads applied to the structure by finite elements was analyzed according to the ANSI/TIA EIA 222 - G standard, and to data on permanent loads such as the weight of the structure itself and of the accessories and communication equipment. To determine loads produced by the wind, the following data were used: wind speed 90 km/h, topographic category 2, exposure category type B. The load was at different points applied at 6 meter intervals along the 36 meter octagonal section tubular monopole. The structure is described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>. For the joints between sections, a &quot;beam&quot; type element was used, which simulates the presence of the bolts used to join the flanges. The contact between each section’s flanges was &quot;frictionless&quot;.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Elements included in the 36-meter monopole construction.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col span="2"/>
								<col/>
								<col span="2"/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="center" rowspan="2">Section</th>
									<th align="center" rowspan="2">Height [m]</th>
									<th align="center" colspan="2">Flanges </th>
									<th align="center" rowspan="2"># Bolts</th>
									<th align="center" colspan="2">Tubular sections </th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th align="center">Flange thickness [mm]</th>
									<th align="center">Diameter [mm]</th>
									<th align="center">Face width [mm]</th>
									<th align="center">Thickness [mm]</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">1</td>
									<td align="center">36</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">230</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">6</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">30</td>
									<td align="center">15</td>
									<td align="center">750</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">16</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">2</td>
									<td align="center">15</td>
									<td align="center">750</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">230</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">8</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">24</td>
									<td align="center">20</td>
									<td align="center">850</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">16</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">3</td>
									<td align="center">20</td>
									<td align="center">850</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">268</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">8</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">18</td>
									<td align="center">20</td>
									<td align="center">950</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">16</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">4</td>
									<td align="center">20</td>
									<td align="center">950</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">306</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">10</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">12</td>
									<td align="center">25</td>
									<td align="center">1050</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">16</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">5</td>
									<td align="center">25</td>
									<td align="center">1050</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">345</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">10</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">6</td>
									<td align="center">25</td>
									<td align="center">1150</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">16</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">6</td>
									<td align="center">25</td>
									<td align="center">1150</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">383</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">12</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">0</td>
									<td align="center">38</td>
									<td align="center">1150</td>
									<td align="center">24</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p>Source: the authors</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>The results obtained for the full-scale structure were used to estimate an equivalent prototype on a reduced scale. This was analyzed using the same software and applying the same conditions as the real structure. It was possible to visualize the deformation trend by measuring deformations at strategic points along the prototype made. To verify the behavior estimated by analysis, a real test was carried out on the prototype. A test bench was assembled, and displacement measurements were made at the top of the prototype, at different levels of force. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1</xref> shows the results of the prototype test.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f1">
						<label>Figure 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Prototype of the monopole structure on the test bench.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-gf1.png"/>
						<attrib>Source: the authors</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>With the results of the analysis and the phase test, a simplified model was proposed (focused on areas where there was a change of section, contact between components or border conditions were present). The metamodel had two principal aims: to reproduce displacements caused by the load, which causes horizontal deformation of the structure and structural rotation with respect to its supporting plane. The simplified structure was of the two-dimensional &quot;frame&quot; type, with material properties, section, and length. Strategic points, where contact occurred, there was a change of section or border conditions were present were also specified.</p>
				<p>The simplified model is shown by the light blue line in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2</xref> and the equivalent strut load allowed the visualization of a reduced scheme that facilitated the analysis of the data obtained using finite element analysis. These were obtained for the points where a section change was present that define the behavior of the structure, because of the important deformations that occur, in particular in the flanged connections.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Figure 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Identification of elements and nodes, from the prototype in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig.1</xref>.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-gf2.jpg"/>
						<attrib>Source: the authors</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>The prototype was assembled using tubular sections of 101 mm (4 in.) diameter with 4 mm (3/16 in.) thickness; the flanges were 175 mm (6 7/8 in.) in diameter and 10 mm (3/8 in.) thick; the gussets were triangular, with a 35 mm (1 3/8 in.) base, 101 mm (4 in.) height and 6 mm (1/4 in.) thickness in the upper section and 8 mm (5/16 in.) in the lower section. The prototype was 2 meters tall. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2</xref> shows the elements and nodes used. Each node had 3 degrees of freedom: displacement in the X axis (δXi), displacement in the Y axis (δYi) and rotation in the Z axis (θi), with force applied at node 12 (F=2533.4 N). Each element had its equivalent stiffness (ki), with the result that the equilibrium could be described using eq. (1):</p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e1">
						<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-e1.png"/>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e2">
						<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-e2.jpg"/>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<p>Where:</p>
				<p>A<sub>i</sub> = Equivalent area of the element.</p>
				<p>I<sub>i</sub> = Inertia of the element</p>
				<p>L<sub>i</sub> = Length of the element</p>
				<p>E<sub>i</sub> = Modulus of elasticity of the element</p>
				<p>S<sub>i</sub> = Sine of the angle of element orientation</p>
				<p>C<sub>i</sub> = Cosine of the angle of element orientation</p>
				<p>Elements 2, 10 and 12 are the joints between sections. These displayed a non-linear behavior. For this reason, the metamodel was required to considers this reinforced section, calculating an equivalent length that represented the physical properties of the reinforced section, using eq. (2):</p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e3">
						<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-e3.jpg"/>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<p>Where:</p>
				<p>L<sub>equ</sub> = Equivalent length</p>
				<p>I<sub>b</sub> = Inertia of the reinforced assembly: flanges, bolts, gussets.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<p>According to the finite element analysis the displacement of the 36000 mm structure was about 400 mm, resulting in a rotation angle of 1/90. The angle of rotation was equal at all heights, allowing an equivalent deformation for the prototype to be calculated:</p>
			<p>
				<disp-formula id="e4">
					<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-e4.jpg"/>
				</disp-formula>
			</p>
			<p>In addition to the figures for displacement, a stress of 300 MPa was obtained, located in section 3 at a height of 18 meters. Data for the prototype was obtained using the description provided in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Fig. 3</xref> shows the stress and displacement results both for the 36-meter structures and the prototype.</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f3">
					<label>Figure 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Finite element analysis results. (a) Displacement of the 36-meter monopole, (b) Maximum stress of the 36-meter monopole located at 50% height, (c) Displacement of the monopole prototype, (d) Maximum stress of the monopole prototype located at 50% height.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-gf3.png"/>
					<attrib>Source: the authors</attrib>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> shows the results obtained by physical testing, finite element analysis and the data estimated using the metamodel. Note that the data for the three types of analysis are very approximate.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Results of physical testing, finite element analysis and metamodel.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="3"/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center" rowspan="2">Force [N]</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="3">Z-axis displacement [mm] </th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Physical Test</th>
								<th align="center">FEM Solid</th>
								<th align="center">Metamodel</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">196.2</td>
								<td align="center">1.6520</td>
								<td align="center">1.7053</td>
								<td align="center">1.7422</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">392.4</td>
								<td align="center">3.2300</td>
								<td align="center">3.4105</td>
								<td align="center">3.4844</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">588.6</td>
								<td align="center">4.9533</td>
								<td align="center">5.1158</td>
								<td align="center">5.2266</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">784.8</td>
								<td align="center">6.5500</td>
								<td align="center">6.8210</td>
								<td align="center">6.9688</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">981.0</td>
								<td align="center">8.3067</td>
								<td align="center">8.5263</td>
								<td align="center">8.7110</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1177.2</td>
								<td align="center">10.0733</td>
								<td align="center">10.2320</td>
								<td align="center">10.4532</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1373.4</td>
								<td align="center">12.1800</td>
								<td align="center">11.9370</td>
								<td align="center">12.1954</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1569.6</td>
								<td align="center">13.6500</td>
								<td align="center">13.6420</td>
								<td align="center">13.9376</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1765.8</td>
								<td align="center">15.5667</td>
								<td align="center">15.3470</td>
								<td align="center">15.6798</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1962.0</td>
								<td align="center">17.1217</td>
								<td align="center">17.0530</td>
								<td align="center">17.4220</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2158.2</td>
								<td align="center">19.1233</td>
								<td align="center">18.7580</td>
								<td align="center">19.1643</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2354.4</td>
								<td align="center">20.9300</td>
								<td align="center">20.0190</td>
								<td align="center">20.9075</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2533.4</td>
								<td align="center">22.5900</td>
								<td align="center">22.0190</td>
								<td align="center">22.4959</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2550.6</td>
								<td align="center">22.7467</td>
								<td align="center">22.1630</td>
								<td align="center">22.6487</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<p>Source: the authors</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 4</xref> shows the comparative graph of the data presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>, showing that the three types of analysis follow the same trend.</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f4">
					<label>Figure 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Comparison of results for the prototype, obtained by the physical test, finite element analysis and metamodel.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-gf4.png"/>
					<attrib>Source: the authors</attrib>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref> shows the results of displacements of the 36-meter monopole at different heights and their respective metamodel. The maximum variation between results were 8.44%.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Results of the displacements of the 36-meter monopole and its respective metamodel.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="3"/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center" rowspan="2">Height [m]</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="3">Z-axis displacement [mm] </th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">FEM Solid</th>
								<th align="center">Metamodel</th>
								<th align="center">Variation [%]</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">36</td>
								<td align="center">398.45</td>
								<td align="center">425.60</td>
								<td align="center">6.38</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">30</td>
								<td align="center">268.63</td>
								<td align="center">290.32</td>
								<td align="center">7.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">24</td>
								<td align="center">159.96</td>
								<td align="center">173.43</td>
								<td align="center">7.77</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">18</td>
								<td align="center">82.65</td>
								<td align="center">90.27</td>
								<td align="center">8.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">12</td>
								<td align="center">34.28</td>
								<td align="center">37.42</td>
								<td align="center">8.39</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">6</td>
								<td align="center">7.89</td>
								<td align="center">8.58</td>
								<td align="center">8.04</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>Source: the authors</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5</xref> shows the comparative graph of the results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>. The results obtained in the prototype test validate the three-dimensional model of the analysis of the 36-meter structure. That is, the results of the analysis are reliable and may be used to compare the data calculated using the metamodel.</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f5">
					<label>Figure 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Comparison of results obtained in the finite element and the metamodel analysis of the 36-meter monopole.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-gf5.png"/>
					<attrib>Source: the authors</attrib>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>The metamodel considered the stiffness effects caused by bolted joints, for which an equivalent length with its respective stiffness was established. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Equivalent lengths for different combinations of flange thickness and numbers of bolts.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
							<col span="2"/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Joint</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">6 m (Connection 1) </th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">12 m -18 m (Connection 2-3)</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">24 m - 30 m (Connection 3-4)</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Number of Bolts</th>
								<th align="center">Thickness</th>
								<th align="center">Equ. length [mm]</th>
								<th align="center">Thickness</th>
								<th align="center">Equ. length [mm]</th>
								<th align="center">Thickness</th>
								<th align="center">Equ. length [mm]</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center" rowspan="5">8</td>
								<td align="center">35</td>
								<td align="center">98</td>
								<td align="center">40</td>
								<td align="center">103</td>
								<td align="center">45</td>
								<td align="center">108</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">30</td>
								<td align="center">161</td>
								<td align="center">35</td>
								<td align="center">166</td>
								<td align="center">40</td>
								<td align="center">171</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">258</td>
								<td align="center">30</td>
								<td align="center">263</td>
								<td align="center">35</td>
								<td align="center">268</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">413</td>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">418</td>
								<td align="center">30</td>
								<td align="center">423</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">679</td>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">684</td>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">689</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center" rowspan="5">16</td>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">26</td>
								<td align="center">30</td>
								<td align="center">31</td>
								<td align="center">35</td>
								<td align="center">36</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">101</td>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">106</td>
								<td align="center">30</td>
								<td align="center">111</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">229</td>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">234</td>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">239</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">477</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">482</td>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">487</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">1114</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">1119</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">1124</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center" rowspan="3">24</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">55</td>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">60</td>
								<td align="center">25</td>
								<td align="center">65</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">191</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">196</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">201</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">461</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">466</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">471</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>Source: the authors</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 6</xref> shows the comparative plots of data from <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>, showing the dependence of thickness on effective length.</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f6">
					<label>Figure 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Comparison of equivalent length results for different combinations of flange thickness and number of bolts: (a) 8 bolts, (b) 16 bolts, (c) 24 bolts.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2346-2183-dyna-90-225-140-gf6.png"/>
					<attrib>Source: the authors</attrib>
				</fig>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>4. Conclusions</title>
			<p>The physical test permitted the accurate determination of the contacts between &quot;frictionless&quot; flanges, and the representation of the bolts with &quot;beam&quot; type element, which were applied using the Ansys Research software and reproduced results in accordance with reality.</p>
			<p>When compared with the results of the physical test, the results for displacement and maximum stresses obtained using the finite element analysis validated the methodology used in the metamodel approach.</p>
			<p>The number of bolts had a direct influence on the thickness of the flanges; it is also evident that the structure’s joint compartments followed a decreasing exponential trend.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<label>[1]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[1] Kumar, P., Raju, M., Navya, M., et al., Effect of wind speed on structural behaviour of Monopole and self-support telecommunication towers, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(6), PP. 911-927, 2017.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raju</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Navya</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Effect of wind speed on structural behaviour of Monopole and self-support telecommunication towers</article-title>
					<source>Asian Journal of Civil Engineering</source>
					<volume>18</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>911</fpage>
					<lpage>927</lpage>
					<year>2017</year>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<label>[2]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[2] Kaveh, A., and Kaveh, A., Optimal design of the monopole structures using the CBO and ECBO algorithms, Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering, Springer International Publishing, USA, 2017, pp. 185-199</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kaveh</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kaveh</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<source>Optimal design of the monopole structures using the CBO and ECBO algorithms, Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering</source>
					<publisher-name>Springer International Publishing</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc>
					<year>2017</year>
					<fpage>185</fpage>
					<lpage>199</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<label>[3]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[3] Suryakumar, V.S., Liu, Z., et al, Aeroelastic preliminary-design optimization of communication tower structures, AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020, pp. 1-15. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1634">https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1634</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Suryakumar</surname>
							<given-names>V.S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<source>Aeroelastic preliminary-design optimization of communication tower structures</source>
					<publisher-name>AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum</publisher-name>
					<year>2020</year>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>15</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1634">https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1634</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<label>[4]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[4] Gao, S. and Wang, S., Progressive collapse analysis of latticed telecommunication towers under wind loads, Advances in Civil Engineering., 2018, art. 3293506, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3293506">https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3293506</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Progressive collapse analysis of latticed telecommunication towers under wind loads</article-title>
					<source>Advances in Civil Engineering</source>
					<year>2018</year>
					<comment>art. 3293506</comment>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3293506">https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3293506</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<label>[5]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[5] Ahmad, S.I., Alam, M.S., and Alam, M.J., Structural and life-cycle economic feasibility of rooftop low-height bamboo telecom tower considering a case study from bangladesh, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25(3), art. 492, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000492">https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000492</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ahmad</surname>
							<given-names>S.I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alam</surname>
							<given-names>M.S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alam</surname>
							<given-names>M.J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Structural and life-cycle economic feasibility of rooftop low-height bamboo telecom tower considering a case study from bangladesh</article-title>
					<source>Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction</source>
					<volume>25</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<comment>art. 492</comment>
					<year>2020</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000492">https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000492</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<label>[6]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[6] Szafran, J., Juszczyk-Andraszyk, K., and Kamiński, M., Reinforcements of tower structures: effective and economic design engineering, in: Proceedings of XXIV LSCE Conference 2018, Łódź University of Technology, 2018, pp.126-133.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Szafran</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Juszczyk-Andraszyk</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kamiński</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<source>Reinforcements of tower structures: effective and economic design engineering</source>
					<conf-name>Proceedings of XXIV LSCE Conference</conf-name>
					<conf-date>2018</conf-date>
					<conf-sponsor>Łódź University of Technology</conf-sponsor>
					<year>2018</year>
					<fpage>126</fpage>
					<lpage>133</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<label>[7]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[7] Travanca, R., Varum, H., and Vila-Real, P., The past 20 years of telecommunication structures in Portugal, Engineering Structures, 48, pp. 472-485, 2013. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.012</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Travanca</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Varum</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vila-Real</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>The past 20 years of telecommunication structures in Portugal</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>48</volume>
					<fpage>472</fpage>
					<lpage>485</lpage>
					<year>2013</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<label>[8]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[8] Al-jassani, A.,and Al-suraifi, I., Telecommunication cell tower most common alternatives, American Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(5), pp. 268-281, 2017. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170505.12">https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170505.12</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Al-jassani</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>and Al-suraifi</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Telecommunication cell tower most common alternatives</article-title>
					<source>American Journal of Civil Engineering</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>268</fpage>
					<lpage>281</lpage>
					<year>2017</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170505.12">https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170505.12</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<label>[9]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[9] Varghese, J. and Joseph, R., Analysis of monopole communication tower, International Journal of Engineering Studies and Technical Approach, 2015, pp. 23-34</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Varghese</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Joseph</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Analysis of monopole communication tower</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Engineering Studies and Technical Approach</source>
					<year>2015</year>
					<fpage>23</fpage>
					<lpage>34</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<label>[10]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[10] Giaccu, G.F., Modeling a gyroscopic stabilizer for the improvement of the dynamic performances of slender monopole towers, Engineering Structures , 215, art. 110607, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110607">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110607</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Giaccu</surname>
							<given-names>G.F</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Modeling a gyroscopic stabilizer for the improvement of the dynamic performances of slender monopole towers</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>215</volume>
					<comment>art. 110607</comment>
					<year>2020</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110607">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110607</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<label>[11]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[11] Luan, Y., Guan, Z., Cheng, G., et al., A simplified nonlinear dynamic model for the analysis of pipe structures with bolted flange joints, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331(2), pp. 325-344, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.09.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.09.002</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Luan</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guan</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cheng</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>A simplified nonlinear dynamic model for the analysis of pipe structures with bolted flange joints</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Sound and Vibration</source>
					<volume>331</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>325</fpage>
					<lpage>344</lpage>
					<year>2020</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.09.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.09.002</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<label>[12]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[12] Giaccu, G.F. and Caracoglia, L., Wind-load fragility analysis of monopole towers by Layered Stochastic-Approximation-Monte-Carlo method, Engineering Structures , 174, pp. 462-477, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.081">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.081</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Giaccu</surname>
							<given-names>G.F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Caracoglia</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Wind-load fragility analysis of monopole towers by Layered Stochastic-Approximation-Monte-Carlo method</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>174</volume>
					<fpage>462</fpage>
					<lpage>477</lpage>
					<year>2018</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.081">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.081</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<label>[13]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[13] Yu, Q., Zhou, H., et al., High-temperature low cycle fatigue life prediction and experimental research of pre-tightened bolts, Metals, 8(10), art. 828, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100828">https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100828</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yu</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>High-temperature low cycle fatigue life prediction and experimental research of pre-tightened bolts</article-title>
					<source>Metals</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<issue>10</issue>
					<comment>art. 828</comment>
					<year>2018</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100828">https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100828</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<label>[14]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[14] Badara-Camara, A., Pennec, F., et al., Fatigue life assessment of bolted connections, MATEC Web of Conferences, 12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018), 165, art. 10009, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816510009">https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816510009</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Badara-Camara</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pennec</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<source>Fatigue life assessment of bolted connections</source>
					<conf-name>MATEC Web of Conferences, 12</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)</conf-loc>
					<volume>165</volume>
					<comment>art. 10009</comment>
					<year>2018</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816510009">https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816510009</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<label>[15]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[15] Pavlović, M., Heistermann, C., Veljković, M., et al., Friction connection vs. Ring flange connection in steel towers for wind converters, Engineering Structures , 98, pp 151-162, 2015. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.026</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pavlović</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Heistermann</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Veljković</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Friction connection vs. Ring flange connection in steel towers for wind converters</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>98</volume>
					<fpage>151</fpage>
					<lpage>162</lpage>
					<year>2015</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.026</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<label>[16]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[16] Huang, F., Zhang, D., Hong, W., and Li, B., Mechanism and calculation theory of prying force for flexible flange connection, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 132, pp. 97-107, 2017. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.014</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hong</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Mechanism and calculation theory of prying force for flexible flange connection</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</source>
					<volume>132</volume>
					<fpage>97</fpage>
					<lpage>107</lpage>
					<year>2017</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.014</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<label>[17]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[17] Deng, H., Song, X., et al., Experiment and design methodology of a double-layered flange connection in axial loads, Engineering Structures , 175, pp. 436-456, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.040">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.040</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Deng</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Experiment and design methodology of a double-layered flange connection in axial loads,</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>175</volume>
					<fpage>436</fpage>
					<lpage>456</lpage>
					<year>2018</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.040">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.040</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<label>[18]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[18] Meisami, F. and Moavenian, M., Nonlinear behavior of single bolted flange joints: a novel analytical model non-linear modeling and dynamic analysis of bolted flange joints view project, Engineering Structures , 173, pp. 908-917, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.035">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.035</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Meisami</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Moavenian</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Nonlinear behavior of single bolted flange joints: a novel analytical model non-linear modeling and dynamic analysis of bolted flange joints view project</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>173</volume>
					<fpage>908</fpage>
					<lpage>917</lpage>
					<year>2018</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.035">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.035</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<label>[19]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[19] Tessari, R.K., Kroetz, H.M., and Beck, A.T., Performance-based design of steel towers subject to wind action, Engineering Structures , 143, pp. 549-557, 2017. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.053">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.053</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tessari</surname>
							<given-names>R.K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kroetz</surname>
							<given-names>H.M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beck</surname>
							<given-names>A.T</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Performance-based design of steel towers subject to wind action</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>143</volume>
					<fpage>549</fpage>
					<lpage>557</lpage>
					<year>2017</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.053">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.053</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<label>[20]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[20] Van-Long, H., Jean-Pierre, J., and Jean-François, D., Behaviour of bolted flange joints in tubular structures under monotonic, repeated and fatigue loadings I: experimental tests, Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 85, pp. 1-11, 2013. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.011</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Van-Long</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jean-Pierre</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jean-François</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Behaviour of bolted flange joints in tubular structures under monotonic, repeated and fatigue loadings I: experimental tests</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>11</lpage>
					<year>2013</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.011</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<label>[21]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[21] Blachowski, B., Gutkowski, W., Effect of damaged circular flange-bolted connections on behaviour of tall towers, modelled by multilevel substructuring, Engineering Structures , 111, pp. 93-103, 2016. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.018</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Blachowski</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gutkowski</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Effect of damaged circular flange-bolted connections on behaviour of tall towers, modelled by multilevel substructuring</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>111</volume>
					<fpage>93</fpage>
					<lpage>103</lpage>
					<year>2016</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.018</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<label>[22]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[22] Szafran, J. and Rykaluk, K., A full-scale experiment of a lattice telecommunication tower under breaking load, Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 120, pp. 160-175, 2016, DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.006</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Szafran</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rykaluk</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>A full-scale experiment of a lattice telecommunication tower under breaking load</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</source>
					<volume>120</volume>
					<fpage>160</fpage>
					<lpage>175</lpage>
					<year>2016</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.006</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<label>[23]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[23] Wang, Y., Zong, L., and Shi, Y.J., Bending behavior and design model of bolted flange-plate connection, Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 84, pp. 1-16, 2013. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zong</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shi</surname>
							<given-names>Y.J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Bending behavior and design model of bolted flange-plate connection</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</source>
					<volume>84</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>16</lpage>
					<year>2013</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<label>[24]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[24] Hawkins, D.W., Discussion of current issues related to steel telecommunications monopole structures, in: Structures Congress 2010, 2010, pp. 2417-2438. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)219">https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)219</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hawkins</surname>
							<given-names>D.W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<chapter-title>Discussion of current issues related to steel telecommunications monopole structures</chapter-title>
					<source>Structures Congress 2010</source>
					<year>2010</year>
					<fpage>2417</fpage>
					<lpage>2438</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)219">https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)219</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<label>[25]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[25] Fernandez-Ceniceros, J., Sanz-Garcia, A., et al., A numerical-informational approach for characterising the ductile behaviour of the T-stub component. Part 2: parsimonious soft-computing-based metamodel, Engineering Structures , 82, pp. 249-260, 2015. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.047">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.047</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandez-Ceniceros</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sanz-Garcia</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>A numerical-informational approach for characterising the ductile behaviour of the T-stub component. Part 2: parsimonious soft-computing-based metamodel</article-title>
					<source>Engineering Structures</source>
					<volume>82</volume>
					<fpage>249</fpage>
					<lpage>260</lpage>
					<year>2015</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.047">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.047</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<label>[26]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[26] Loureiro, A., Lopez, M., et al. Metamodelling of stiffness matrices for 2D welded asymmetric steel joints, Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 162, art. 105703, 2019. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105703">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105703</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Loureiro</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lopez</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Metamodelling of stiffness matrices for 2D welded asymmetric steel joints</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</source>
					<volume>162</volume>
					<comment>art. 105703</comment>
					<year>2019</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105703">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105703</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<label>[27]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[27] Díaz, C., Victoria, M., et al., Optimum design of semi-rigid connections using metamodels, Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 78, pp. 97-106, 2012. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Díaz</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Victoria</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Optimum design of semi-rigid connections using metamodels</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</source>
					<volume>78</volume>
					<fpage>97</fpage>
					<lpage>106</lpage>
					<year>2012</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.013</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<label>[28]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[28] Abasolo, M., Aguirrebeitia, J., et al., Methodology for the optimization of bolting sequences for wind generator flanges, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, ASME, 136(6), art. 061202, 2014. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027597">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027597</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Abasolo</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aguirrebeitia</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Methodology for the optimization of bolting sequences for wind generator flanges</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, ASME</source>
					<volume>136</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<comment>art. 061202</comment>
					<year>2014</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027597">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027597</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<label>[29]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[29] Arroba, C.H., Penã, F.A., et al., Simulating metamodel for urban bus seats design, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 507(1), Incheon, South Korea, 2019, art. 012027. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/507/1/012027">https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/507/1/012027</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Arroba</surname>
							<given-names>C.H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Penã</surname>
							<given-names>F.A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<etal/>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Simulating metamodel for urban bus seats design</article-title>
					<source>IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering</source>
					<volume>507</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<publisher-name>Incheon</publisher-name>
					<publisher-name>South Korea</publisher-name>
					<year>2019</year>
					<comment>art. 012027</comment>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/507/1/012027">https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/507/1/012027</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<label>[30]</label>
				<mixed-citation>[30] Wan, H.P. and Ren, W.X., Parameter selection in finite-element-model updating by global sensitivity analysis using gaussian process metamodel, Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(6), art. 1108, 2015. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001108">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001108</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wan</surname>
							<given-names>H.P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ren</surname>
							<given-names>W.X</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<article-title>Parameter selection in finite-element-model updating by global sensitivity analysis using gaussian process metamodel</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Structural Engineering</source>
					<volume>141</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<comment>art. 1108</comment>
					<year>2015</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001108">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001108</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
		<fn-group>
			<fn fn-type="other" id="fn0">
				<label>How to cite:</label>
				<p> Sánchez-Guerrero, J.H., Lagos-Zamora, C.D., Peña-Jordán, F.A. and Arroba-Arroba, C.H., Metamodel simulation for designing monopole telecommunication antenna support structures. DYNA, 90(225), pp. 140-146, January - March, 2023.</p>
			</fn>
		</fn-group>
		<fn-group>
			<fn fn-type="other" id="fn1">
				<label>J.H. Sanchez-Guerrero</label>
				<p> is BSc. Eng. in Mechanical Engineer in 2019, from the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic>, Ambato, Ecuador. In 2020 he obtained certification as a Mechanical Designer. From 2019 he worked in mechanical engineering programs and projects, with an emphasis on mechanical design and simulation, collaborating with the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic> in the publication of articles in scientific journals. He works in the design, detailing and assembly of metal structures. ORCID: 0000-0002-3119-7139</p>
			</fn>
			<fn fn-type="other" id="fn2">
				<label>C.D. Lagos-Zamora</label>
				<p> is BSc. Eng. in Mechanical Engineer in 2019, from the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic>, Ambato, Ecuador. From 2019 he worked in mechanical engineering programs and projects, with emphasis on mechanical design and simulation, collaborating with the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic> in the publication of articles in scientific journals. He works in the design, detailing and assembly of metal structures. ORCID: 0000-0003-2488-9265</p>
			</fn>
			<fn fn-type="other" id="fn3">
				<label>F.A. Peña-Jordán</label>
				<p> is BSc. Eng. in Mechanical Engineer in 2007, from the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic>, Ambato, Ecuador and obtained an MSc. in Mechanical Design in 2016, from the <italic>Escuela Politécnica Nacional</italic>, Quito, Ecuador and a MSc. in Civil Engineering in 2022, from the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic>, Ambato, Ecuador. He graduated as a Sp. in steel building design from the <italic>Universidad CLEA</italic> in 2023. He has worked in the design, detailing and assembly of metal structures. He is a full-time professor at the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic> in the Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include the simulation of steel structures for the telecommunication industry, welded and bolted connections and foundations. ORCID: 0000-0002-0140-3827</p>
			</fn>
			<fn fn-type="other" id="fn4">
				<label>C.H. Arroba-Arroba</label>
				<p> is BSc. Eng. in Mechanical Engineer in 2003, from the Polytechnic School of Chimborazo. Riobamba, Ecuador. He obtained a MSc. in Mechanical Design in 2013, from the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic>, Ambato, Ecuador. Currently, he is a full-time professor at the <italic>Universidad Técnica de Ambato</italic> in the Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Since 2013, he has researched bus design, steel structures and numerical simulation. ORCID: 0000-0001-5656-7549 </p>
			</fn>
		</fn-group>
	</back>
</article>