Publicado

2017-01-01

Fortalecimiento de la expresión oral y escrita en inglés a través de un andamiaje de escritura creativa colaborativa: un estudio de diseño desde la cognición distribuida

Improving oral and written communication in english through collaborative creative writing scaffolding: a design study from the distributed cognition approach

Fortalecimento da expressão oral e escrita em inglês por meio de um arcabouço de uma escrita criativa colaborativa: um estudo de criação a partir da cognição distribuída

Palabras clave:

andamiaje, cognición distribuida, escritura colaborativa, expresión oral y escrita (es)
scaffolding, distributed cognition, collaborative writing, written and oral expression (en)
arcabouço, cognição distribuída, escrita colaborativa, expressão oral e escrita (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

Este artículo presenta los hallazgos de un estudio que buscó determinar la incidencia de un andamiaje de escritura creativa colaborativa en el desarrollo de la expresión oral y escrita en inglés de un grupo de estudiantes de Filología e Idiomas en la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. En el andamiaje confluyeron los fundamentos conceptuales de la adquisición de lenguas, la escritura creativa y la cognición distribuida. La investigación fue un estudio de diseño de corte cualitativo, a través del cual se pudo determinar que el andamiaje favoreció las habilidades expresivas, al generar un alto nivel de interacción en la lengua extranjera, mayor conciencia metalingüística y autorregulación del aprendizaje. Se considera que este estudio puede contribuir a la generación de estrategias que coadyuven a mejorar la cualificación de los licenciados en inglés en Colombia, ya que, según las estadísticas, un alto porcentaje se gradúa con niveles más bajos de los requeridos.
This article presents findings of a study conducted to determine the incidence of collaborative creative writing scaffolding in the oral and written production of English in students of Philology and Languages at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. The scaffolding brought together the theoretical basis for the acquisition of languages, creative writing and distributed cognition. This was Design Based Research with a qualitative approach. The findings revealed that scaffolding was useful to improve expressive abilities, generating a high level of interaction in English and raising metalinguistic awareness and autonomy in students' regulation of their own learning. This study can contribute to the generation of suitable strategies to improve pre-service English teachers' professional qualifications, given that, according to statistics, a high percentage of English teachers finish the undergraduate program with a language level lower than that required for their profession in Colombia.
Este artigo apresenta as descobertas de um estudo que procurou determinar a incidência de um arcabouço de escritura criativa colaborativa no desenvolvimento da expressão oral e escrita em inglês de um grupo de estudantes de Filologia e Idiomas na Universidad Nacional de Colombia. No arcabouço reuniram-se os fundamentos conceituais da aquisição de línguas, a escrita criativa e a cognição distribuída. A pesquisa foi um estudo de criação de corte qualitativo, por meio do qual pôde ser determinado que o arcabouço favoreceu as habilidades expressivas, ao gerar um alto nível de interação na língua estrangeira, maior consciência metalinguística e autorregulação da aprendizagem. Considera-se que este estudo pode contribuir à: geração de estratégias que ajudem a melhorar a qualificação dos licenciados em inglês na Colômbia, já que, segundo as estatísticas, uma alta porcentagem se gradua com níveis mais baixos do que os requeridos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Akande, A. T., Adedeji, E. O., & Okanlawon, B. O. (2006). Lexical Errors in the English of Technical College Students in Osun State of Nigeria. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(1), 71-89.

Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Amabile, T. (2013). Componential Theory of Creativity. En E. H. Kessler (ed.), Encyclopedia of Management Theory (pp. 134-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ander, S., & Yildirim, Ö. (2010). Lexical Errors in Elementary Level efl Learners’ Compositions. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 5299-5303.

Atkinson, D. (2011). A Sociocognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition: How mind, Body, and World Work Together in Learning Additional Languages. En Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 143-166). London: Routledge

Baker, C. (1988). Key Issues in Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogical Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Barab, S. (2006). Design–Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baumgartner, E., Bell, P., Brophy, J., Hoadley, C., His, S., Joseph, D., Orrill, C., Puntambekar, S., Sandoval, W., & Tabak, I. (2003). Design–Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Journal: Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.

Benavides, M. O., & Gómez-Restrepo, C. (2005). Métodos en investigación cualitativa: triangulación. Revista colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(1), 118-124.

Bialystok, E. (2006). Bilingualism: The Good, the Bad, and the Indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3-11.

Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the Mind: The Benefits of Bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 229 -235.

Boden, M. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. New York: Routledge.

Briceño, M. (2009). El uso del error en los ambientes de aprendizaje. Revista de Teoría y Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales, 14, 9-28.

Bronckart, J. (2007). Desarrollo del lenguaje y didáctica de las lenguas. Madrid: Miño y Dávila Editores.

Bruffee, K. A. (1994). Making the most of Knowledgeable Peers. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 26(3), 39-39.

Bruner, J. (1985). Child’s talk: Learning to use Language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1(1), 111-114.

Bruner, J. (1998). Realidad mental y mundos posibles. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Carter, R. (2004). Language and Creativity. The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.

Cassany, D. (2009). La composición escrita en e/le. MarcoELE, 9, 49-66.

Cassany, D., Luna, M., & Sanz, G. (2001). Enseñar lengua. Barcelona: Graó.

Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Chappell, V., & Rodby, J. (1983). Verb Tense and esl Composition: A Discourse–Level Approach. TESOL, 82, 309-320.

Chomsky, N. (1969). Lingüística cartesiana. Madrid: Gredos.

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford.

Clarke, A. C. (1974). The Nine Billion Names of God: The Best Short Stories of Arthur C. Clarke. New York: New American Library.

Congreso de la República de Colombia. (12 de Julio de 2013). Ley 1651 de 2013.

Consejo de Europa. (2002). Marco Común Europeo de Referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación. Madrid: Anaya.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.

Cunningham, D. J., Duffy, T. M., & Knuth, R. A. (1993). The Textbook of the Future. En C. McKnight, A. Dillon & J. Richardson (eds.), Hypertext: a Psychological Perspective (pp. 19-49). Chichester: Horwood.

De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. (2011). Fluency Training in the esl Classroom: An Experimental Study of Fluency Development and Proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568.

De Zubiría. M. (2006). Psicología del talento y la creatividad: Como explorar, identificar y desarrollar el talento y la creatividad de todos los niños y jovenes. Bogotá: Fundacion Alberto Merani para el Desarrollo de la Inteligencia.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human needs and the Self–Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

Delmastro, A. L. (2008). El andamiaje docente en el desarrollo de la lectura y la escritura en lengua extranjera. Paradigma (Maracay), 29(1), 203-236.

DiCamilla, F. J., & Anton, M. (1997). Repetition in the Collaborative Discourse of l2 Learners: A Vygotskian Perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.

Dominino, M., Castellaro, M., & Roselli, N. (2010). Los sistemas de cognición distribuida en la enseñanza universitaria en función del tipo de ciencia. Revista de Psicología, 6(11), 7-39.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective Scaffolding in Second Language Learning. En J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. (pp. 33-56). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.

Education First. (2015). Índice de dominio del inglés [en línea]. Consultado en: http:// www.ef.com.co/epi/

Egan, K., & Judson, G. (2013). Engaging Students’ Imaginations in Second Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 343-356.

Ellis, R. (2005). La adquisición de segundas lenguas en un contexto de enseñanza: análisis de las investigaciones existentes. Wellington: Ministerio de Educación de Nueva Zelanda.

Ellis, R. (2014). Task–based Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity–theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta–Konsultit.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative Learning in Work Teams: Analyzing Cycles of Knowledge Creation in Practice. En Y. Engeström, et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. (pp. 377- 404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). How we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. En C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S. Wang (eds.) Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior (pp. 85-102). Nueva York: Academic Press.

Finke, R., Ward, T., & Smith, S. (1996). Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process. Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 51-72.

Gardner, H. (2005). Las cinco mentes del futuro. Barcelona: Paidós.

Glăveanu, V. (2014). Distributed Creativity. Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Heidelberg: Springer.

Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from a Learning Design Perspective. En J. van den Akker, N., K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney y N. Nieven (eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 17-51). Londres: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.

Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The Treatment of Error in Written Work. The Modern Language Journal, 64(2), 216-221.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Longman.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Essex: Pearson.

Hinkel, E. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. tesol Quarterly, 40(1), 109-131.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (2005). Investigating Instructed Second Language Acquisition. En A. Housen & M. Pierrard (ed.), Investigating Instructed Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 1-27) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Huertas, A., Vesga, G., Vergara, A. & Romero, M. (2015). Effect of a Computational Scaffolding in the Development of Secondary Students’ Metacognitive Skills. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(4), 143-159.

Humboldt, W. V. (1990). Sobre la diversidad de la estructura del lenguaje humano y su influencia sobre el desarrollo espiritual de la humanidad. España: Anthropos Ed. del Hombre.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Bradford: mit Press.

Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive Ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705-715.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.

icontec. (2007). Norma Técnica Colombiana 5580: programas de formación para el trabajo en el área de idiomas. Consultado en: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-157089_archivo_pdf_NTC_5580.pdf.

Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, B. (2004). El Aprendizaje cooperativo en el aula. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

John-Steiner, J. V. (2006). Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

Juan, E. U., & Flor, A. M. (2006). Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills. Berlin: M. de Gruyter.

Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (2009). Cooperative Learning. San Clemente: Kagan Publishing.

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In Praise of Clark Kent: Creative Metacognition and the Importance of Teaching Kids when (not) to Be Creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155-165.

Kerne, A., & Koh, E. (2007). Representing Collections as Compositions to support Distributed Creative Cognition and Situated Creative Learning. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 13(2), 135-162.

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative Writing among Second Language Learners in Academic Web–based Projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91-109.

Kozulin, A., & Barberán, G. S. (2000). Instrumentos psicológicos: La educación desde una perspectiva sociocultural. Barcelona: Paidós.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven: Yale University.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language Teacher Education for a Global Society. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R.W (2013). Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lier, L. V. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric Competence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268-294.

Llach, M. P. A. (2007b). Lexical Errors as Writing Quality Predictors. Studia Linguistica, 61(1), 1-19.

Lomas, C., & Tusón, A. (2000). Textos de didáctica de la lengua y de la literatura. La narración. Barcelona: Graó.

Long, M. H. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. En W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Luzzatto, E., & DiMarco, G. (2010). Collaborative Learning: Methodology, Types of Interactions and Techniques. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the Benefits of Task Repetition and Recycling in Classroom Language Learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221-250.

Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2001). A Case of Exercising: Effects of Immediate Task Repetition on Learners’ Performance. En M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (pp. 141-162). Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.

Magdy, M., Shaalan, K., & Fahmy, A. (2007). Lexical Error Diagnosis for Second Language Learners of Arabic. En Proceedings of The Seventh Conference on Language Engineering, Egyptian Society of Language Engineering (ELSE) (pp. 5-6). Cairo, Egypt.

Maybin, J., & Swann, J. (2007). Everyday Creativity in Language: Textuality, Contextuality, and Critique. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 497-517.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (men). (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguas Extranjeras. Consultado en: http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/mediateca/1607/articles-115375_archivo.pdf.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (men). (s. f.). Proyecto de fortalecimiento al desarrollo de competencias en lenguas extranjeras. Convocatoria para financiación de proyectos de formación docente en el marco de estrategias regionales de desarrollo de competencias en lenguas extranjeras. Consultado en: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-327001_archivo_pdf_terminos_convocatoria.pdf.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (men). (2014). Programa nacional de inglés 2015-2025. Documento de Socialización. Consultado en: http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles-343287_recurso_1.pdf.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (men). (2015). Decreto 2450. Consultado en: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-357048_recurso_1.pdf.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (men). (2016). Resolución 02041. Consultado en: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-356144_recurso_1.pdf.

Minsky, M. (2010). K–Lines: A Theory of Memory. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 117-133.

Nation, P. (1989). Improving Speaking Fluency. System, 17(3), 377-384.

Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer Response Groups: Do l2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising their Drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135-142.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task–Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Olson, R. D. (1994). The World on Paper. The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Olson, R. D., & Torrance, N. (eds.). (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Omaggio, A. (1986). Teaching Language in Context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Paulus, P., & Nijstad, B. (eds.). (2003). Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.

Pavlenko, A. (2005). Bilingualism and Thought. En J. Kroll. & A. De Groot. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp. 433- 453). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pavlenko, A. (2011). Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages. Bilingual Education & Bilingualism. Ontario: Multilingual Matters.

Pea, R. (2001). Prácticas de inteligencia distribuida y diseños para la educación. En G. Salomon (comp.), Cogniciones distribuidas: Consideraciones psicológicas y educativas. (pp. 75-125). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Perdomo, M., & Vergara, A. (2009). Enhancing Self–Access in English Reading Comprehension Among Visually Impaired Students. Lenguaje, 37(2), 393-414.

Perkins, D. (1995). La escuela inteligente: Del adiestramiento de la memoria a la educación de la mente. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Perkins, D. (2001). La persona–más: una visión distribuida del pensamiento y el aprendizaje. En G. Salomón (comp.), Cogniciones distribuidas: Consideraciones psicológicas y educativas (pp. 126-152). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Pica, T. (1987). Second–language Acquisition, Social Interaction, and the Classroom. Applied linguistics, 8(1), 3-21.

Pierce, G. (2015). Rubric Development for Assessment. Office of the Provost. Consultado en: https://www.bu.edu/provost/files/2015/03/2.26.15-CEITAssessment-Rubric-Development-PowerPoint.pdf

Pozo, J. I. (2001). Humana mente. El mundo, la conciencia y la carne. Madrid: Morata.

Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (eds.). (1991). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. Relc Journal, 44(1), 5-33.

Rinaudo, M., & Donolo, D. (2010). Estudios de diseño. Una perspectiva prometedora en la investigación educativa. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 22, 1-29.

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our Minds: Learning to Be Creative. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing.

Roldán, E. (1989). ¿Qué es la interlengua? Documentos lingüísticos y Literarios, 15, 11-12.

Romero, M., & Vergara, A. (2014). Ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje y metacognición: un estudio bibliométrico en el contexto latinoamericano. Revista Papeles, 6(11), 72-86.

Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development and Practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Salomon, G. (2001). Cogniciones distribuidas consideraciones psicológicas y educativas. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Sánchez, A. (2013). Bilingüismo en Colombia. Cartagena: Banco de la República.

Sawyer, K. (2003). Group Creativity: Musical Performance and Collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34, 148-165.

Sawyer, K. (2007). Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: Perseus/Basic Books.

Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Dos modelos explicativos de los procesos de composición escrita. Infancia y aprendizaje, 15(58), 43-64.

Schumm, J. S. (ed.). (2006). Reading Assessment and Instruction for All Learners. New York: Guilford Press.

Sharpless, M. (1999). How to Write. Writing as a Creative Design. London: Routledge.

Silk, G., & Sunshine, M. (2002). Mental Holography: The Power of Imagery in Communication. The Journal of the Imagination and Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 50-55.

Smith, C. (2013). Creative Writing as an Important Tool in Second Language Acquisition and Practice. The Journal of Literature in Language teaching, 2, 12-18.

Smith, S., Ward, T. & Finke, R. (1997). The Creative Cognition Approach. Cambridge: mit Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An Investment Theory of Creativity and its Development. Human development, 34(1), 1-31.

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of Interaction in esl Pair Work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative Writing: Product, Process, and Students’ Reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on Form through Collaborative Dialogue: Exploring Tasks Effects. En M. Bygate, P. Skeham, & M. Swain (eds), Researching Pedagogic Tasks, Second Language Learning and Testing (pp. 99- 118). Harlow: Longman.

Thagard, P. (2013). Artistic Genius and Creative Cognition. En D. K. Simonton (ed.), Wiley–Blackwell Handbook of Genius (pp. 120-138). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Torre, S. de la (2002). El error como estrategia didáctica. En Torre & Barrios (eds.), Estrategias didácticas innovadoras (pp. 211-228). Barcelona: Octaedro.

Torre, S. de la., & Violant, V. (2006). Comprender y evaluar la creatividad: Un recurso para mejorar la calidad de la enseñanza. Málaga: Aljibe.

unesco (2010). Políticas de la creatividad. Guía para el desarrollo de las industrias culturales y creativas. Consultado en: http://es.unesco.org/creativity/sites/creativity/files/220384s.pdf.

Van Dijk, T. (1980). Texto y contexto. Madrid: Cátedra.

Van Dijk, T. (1997). La ciencia del texto. Barcelona: Paidós.

Vass, E., Littleton, K., Miell, D., & Jones, A. (2008). The Discourse of Collaborative Creative Writing: Peer Collaboration as a Context for Mutual Inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 192-202.

Vergara, A. (2010). Caracterización de procesos cognitivos creativos grupales y su relación con el estilo cognitivo desde la dimensión DIC (Tesis de maestría en Educación, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá). Consultado en: http://repository.javeriana.edu.co/bitstream/10554/801/1/edu69.pdf.

Verity, D. (2005). Lifelong Learning: Proceedings of the 4th Annual JALT Pan–SIG Conference. Consultado en: https://jalt.org/pansig/2005/HTML/Verity.htm

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.

Weisberg, R. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Weisberg, R., & Reeves, L. (2013). Cognition: From Memory to Creativity. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Wells, G. (1987). Aprendices en el dominio de la lengua escrita. En Psicología y Educación. Realizaciones y tendencias en la investigación y en la práctica. Actas de las II Jornadas Internacionales de Psicología y Educación (pp. 57-72). Madrid: Visor-Aprendizaje / mec.

Wells, G. (2004). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G. (2009). The Meaning Makers: Learning to Talk and Talking to Learn (Second edition). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What Role for Collaboration in Writing and Writing Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 364-374.

Williams, J. (2001). Learner–generated Attention to Form. En R. Ellis (ed.), Form–focused Instruction and Second Language Learning (pp. 303-346). Malden: Blackwell.