Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Recibir y donar sangre: ¿entre la solidaridad, la generación de lazos sociales y la cosificación? Las paradojas de la transfusión en un contexto clínico pluricultural
Receiving And Donating Blood: Between Solidarity, the Generation of Social Ties, and Objectification? the Paradoxes of Transfusion in a Pluricultural Clinical Context
Receber e doar sangue: entre a solidariedade, a geração De laços sociais e a coisificação? Os paradoxos da Transfusão em um contexto clínico pluricultural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/mag.v35n1.96662Palabras clave:
antropología médica, biosocialidad, diversidad cultural, donación, sangre, transfusión. (es)antropologia médica, biossocialidade, diversidade cultural, doação, sangue, transfusão. (pt)
biosociality, blood, cultural diversity, donation, medical anthropology, transfusion. (en)
Descargas
En este artículo abordo la transfusión de sangre desde el punto de vista de algunas familias de diferentes orígenes sociales, nacionales y económicos que residen en Montreal (Canadá), cuyos hijos e hijas son transfundidos. Mi objetivo es examinar la experiencia de recibir una transfusión y las opiniones frente al sistema de donación de sangre. Me baso en una metodología cualitativa a partir de la observación participante, entrevistas semidirigidas y el análisis temático. Exploro las perspectivas de las personas desde la antropología médica crítica, y el debate sobre el alcance social y cosificante de los sistemas de tratamiento de los tejidos orgánicos. Con base en este trabajo, concluyo que las familias perciben el sistema de recolección de sangre de manera ambivalente y tienen diferentes reacciones frente al anonimato, la restitución de la sangre y los lazos que se generan entre donantes y receptores.
In this article, I examine blood transfusion from the point of view of families of diverse social, national, and economic backgrounds who live in Montreal (Canada), whose children are being transfused. My objective is to explore the experience of receiving a transfusion and the opinions regarding the blood donation system. Based on a qualitative methodology centered on observations, semi-directed interviews, and thematic analysis, I discuss the participants’ perspectives within the framework of critical medical anthropology, and the social and dehumanizing scope of organic tissue treatment systems. Drawing on my fieldwork, I conclude that these families perceive the blood collection system ambivalently. Families have different reactions regarding anonymity, blood restitution, and donor-recipient connections.
Este artigo expor a transfusão de sangue desde a perspectiva de algumas famílias cujos filhos e filhas são transfundidos, e que são de diferentes origens sociais, nacionais e econômicos, com residência em Montreal (Canadá). Meu objetivo é examinar a experiência de receber uma transfusão e as opiniões sobre o sistema de doação de sangue. Utilizo uma metodologia qualitativa baseada na observação participante, entrevistas semidirigidas e análise temática. Eu exploro as perspectivas de pessoas desde a antropologia médica crítica e o debate sobre o escopo social e coisificante dos sistemas de tratamento de tecidos orgânicos. Com base neste trabalho, concluo que as famílias percebem o sistema de coleta de sangue de forma ambivalente e têm reações diversas frente ao anonimato, à restituição do sangue e aos vínculos que se geram entre doadores e receptores.
Referencias
Al-Drees, Abdul Majeed. 2008. “Attitude, Belief and Knowledge about Blood Donation and Transfusion in Saudi Population”. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 24, 1, 74-79.
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Nueva York/Londres: Verso.
Banning, Maggi et al. 2006. “Current Perceptions of Canadian Autologous Blood Donors”. Vox Sanguinis 91, 2: 157-161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00808.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00808.x
Barrett, Rachel, Ronald G. Moore y Anthony Staines. 2007. “Blood Transfusion in Ireland: Perceptions of Risk, a Question of Trust”. Health, Risk & Society 9, 4: 375-388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570701612600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570701612600
Bataille, Georges. 2011. La part maudite. Précédée de la notion de dépense. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Bibeau, Gilles. 2006. “La question du don dans le don d’organes: une perspective anthropologique”. En La transplantation d’organes. Enjeux et paradoxes, dirigido por Sylvaine De Plaen. Montréal: Éditions du CHU Sainte-Justine.
Canguilhem, Georges. 2009. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Casteret, Anne-Marie. 1992. L’affaire du sang. Paris: La Découverte.
Copeman, Jacob. 2005. “Veinglory: Exploring Processes of Blood Transfer Between Persons”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11, 3: 465-485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00246.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00246.x
Copeman, Jacob. 2008. “Violence, Non-Violence, and Blood Donation in India”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14, 2: 278-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00501.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00501.x
Copeman, Jacob. 2009. Veins of Devotion: Blood Donation and Religious Experience in North India. Nuevo Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Copeman, Jacob. 2011. “Excessifs dons de sang. Dévotion et ascétisme en Inde”. Terrain. Anthropologie & Sciences Humaines 56: 106-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/terrain.14213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/terrain.14213
Das, Veena. 2000. “Traumatisme et témoignage: implications pour la communauté politique”. NAQD 18, 2: 151-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/naqd.018.0151
Douglas, Mary. 1966. De la souillure: essai sur les notions de pollution et de tabou. Paris: Maspero.
Durkheim, Émile. 1897. “De la définition des phénomènes religieux”. L’année Sociologique (1896/1897-1924/1925) 2: 1-28.
Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 2002. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fantauzzi, Annamaria. 2008. “Un inter-esse problématique. Ethnoanthropologie du don du sang chez les immigrés marocains de Turin”.
Revue du MAUSS Permanent. https://www.journaldumauss.net/?Un-interesse-problematique
Felts, John H. 2000. “Richard Lower: Anatomist and Physiologist”. Annals of Internal Medicine 132, 5: 420-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-5-200003070-00023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-5-200003070-00023
Foucault, Michel. 1980. The History of Sexuality. Nueva York: Vintage Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.1980.002
Foucault, Michel. 1994. La naissance de la clinique. Paris: Quadrige.
Fox, Renée y Judith P. Swazey. 1974. The Courage to Fail: A Social View of Organ Transplants and Dialysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fox, Renée y Judith P. Swazey. 1992. Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Frazer, James. 1996 [1890]. The Golden Bough. A Study in Comparative Religion. New York: Penguin.
Given, Lisa. M. 2008. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Godbout, Jacques y Alain Caillé. 1992. L’esprit du don. Montréal/París: Éditions la Découverte.
Godbout, Jacques. 2000. Le don, la dette et l’identité: homo donator versus homo oeconomicus. Montreal: Boréal.
Godelier, Maurice. 1996. L’énigme du don. París: Fayard.
Gordon, Deborah. 1988. “Tenacious Assumptions in Western Medicine”. En Biomedicine Examined, editado por Deborah Gordon y Margaret M. Lock, 19-56. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2725-4_3
Grassineau, Dominique. 2007. Au fil du sang. Usages thérapeutiques et politiques du sang humain à Ngazidja, Union des Comores. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias Sociales. Centre Universitaire de Mayotte.
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
Healy, Kieran. 2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226322384.001.0001
Héma-Québec. 2017. Transformation du don de sang. [en línea]. https://www.hema-quebec.qc.ca/sang/savoir-plus/transformation-don.fr.html
Henrion, Aline. 2007. “Le don de sang. Approche ethnographique du recevoir et du rendre”. Revue du MAUSS permanente. http://www.journaldumauss.net/?Le-don-de-sang
Latreille, Martin. 2009. “Anthropologie du sang et de la transfusion sanguine: une recension des écrits”. Centre de recherche de l’Hôpital Sainte-Justine.
Lederer, Susan. 2008. Flesh and Blood. Organ Transplantation and Blood Transfusion in 20th Century America. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, David H., Manali D. Mehta y Paula. D. James. 2003. “Differences in the Perception of Blood Transfusion Risk between Laypeople and Physicians”. Transfusion 43, 6: 772-778. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00401.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00401.x
Lee, David. 2006. “Perception of Blood Transfusion Risk”. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 20, 2: 141-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2005.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2005.11.006
Lock, Margaret. 2000. “On Dying Twice: Culture, Technology and the Determination of Death”. En Living and Working with the New Medical Technologies, editado por Margaret Lock, Allan Young y Alberto Cambrosio, 233-262. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621765.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621765.011
Lock, Margaret. 2001. “The Alienation of Body Tissue and the Biopolitics of Immortalized Cell Lines”. Body & Society 7, 2-3: 63-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X0100700204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X0100700204
Lock, Margaret. 2002. “Human Body Parts as Therapeutic Tools: Contradictory Discourses and Transformed Subjectivities”. Qualitative Health Research 12, 10: 1406-1418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238751
Lock, Margaret y Vinh-Kim Nguyen. 2010. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Chichester/West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mauss, Marcel. 2002. Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. París: Presses Universitaires de France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1522/cla.mam.ess3
Pires, Alvaro P. 1997. “De quelques enjeux épistémologiques d’une méthodologie générale pour les sciences sociales”. La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques, editado por Deslauriers Poupart, Laperrière Groulx, Pires Mayer, pp. 3-54. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin,Éditeur.
Rabinow, Paul. 2005. “Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality”. En Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics, editado por Jonathan X. Inda, 179-193. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470775875.ch7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470775875.ch7
Robertson Smith, William. 1890. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites: Second and Third Series. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Âge de pierre, âge d’abondance. L’économie des sociétés primitives. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
Sanner, Michel. 2003. “Transplant Recipients’ Conceptions of Three Key Phenomena in Transplantation: The Organ Donation, the Organ Donor, and the Organ Transplant”. Clinical Transplantation 17, 4: 391-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0012.2003.00065.x
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy y Margaret M. Lock. 1987. “The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1, 1: 6-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1987.1.1.02a00020
Sharp, Lesly. 2007. Bodies, Commodities, and Biotechnologies: Death, Mourning, and Scientific Desire in the Realm of Human Organ Transfer. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sharp, Lesley. 2006. Strange Harvest: Organ Transplants, Denatured Bodies, and the Transformed Self. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520939615
Starr, Douglas P. 1998. Blood: An Epic History of Medicine and Commerce. 1st ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Statistiques Canada. 2016. Atlas de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec. Consultado en http://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/atlas/atlas/index.php
Steiner, Philippe. 2003. “Gifts of Blood and Organs: The Market and ‘Fictitious’ Commodities”. Revue Française de Sociologie 44: 147-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3323249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3323249
Taussig, Michael. 1991. Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Testart, Alain. 2007. Critique du don: Études sur la circulation non marchande. París: Syllepse.
Titmuss, Richard. 1997. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. Londres: Allen and Unwin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(97)00096-6
Waldby, Catherine. 2006. “Umbilical Cord Blood: From Social Gift to Venture Capital”. BioSocieties 1, 1: 55-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855205050088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855205050088
Waldby, Catherine y Robert Mitchell. 2006. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham/Londres: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388043
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Dora Soliz Guerrero. (2023). Programa de gestión para incrementar la captación y fidelización de donantes voluntarios, en el Banco de Sangre de Referencia departamental Potosí. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(2) https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i2.803.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Liliana Gómez-Cardona
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Esta licencia permite compartir, modificar y comercializar las obras bajo los siguientes términos:
Reconocimiento: Debe reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciador (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).
Compartir igual: Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.
Copyright
El autor es el titular del copyright de los contenidos publicados y retiene los derechos de publicación.
