The Role of
English Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs About
Teaching in Teacher Education Programs
El papel de las creencias de los profesores de inglés en formación sobre la enseñanza en los programas de formación docente
Judith Castellanos Jaimes
Universidad
Externado de Colombia
jucaja_98@yahoo.com
This article
was received on January 21, 2012, and accepted on October 29, 2012.
This paper presents
a review of studies on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching. The
purpose of the article is to show teacher educators the relevance of exploring
such issue in the classroom. Preservice teachers come
into the teaching profession with beliefs about teaching; sometimes they are
aware of them, other times they are not. The studies reviewed in this paper
demonstrate that when teacher educators ascertain this principle, they clearly
integrate it in their syllabi thus aiding preservice
teachers to acquire awareness of their entering beliefs about teaching and to
experience changes in them so that explicit beliefs guide and inform the act of
teaching. Teacher educators assist this process through reflection, course
content, and learning activities, as well as by engaging in research
activities.
Key words: Beliefs about teaching, pre-service English teachers, teacher education programs.
En
este artículo se presenta una revisión de varios estudios sobre
las creencias de los docentes en formación acerca de la
enseñanza. El propósito es mostrar a los educadores de docentes
en formación la relevancia de explorar este tema en el salón de
clase. Los profesores en formación entran a la profesión docente
con creencias acerca de la enseñanza; algunas veces son conscientes de
estas, otras veces no. Los estudios aquí citados demuestran que cuando
los educadores de docentes en formación asumen este principio, lo
integran claramente en el currículo, y de este modo ayudan a los
docentes en formación a ser conscientes de sus propias creencias
iniciales y a transformarlas, de tal forma que les guíen e informen
acerca de su labor pedagógica. Los educadores apoyan este proceso por
medio de la reflexión, los contenidos, las actividades de aprendizaje y
las actividades investigativas.
Palabras clave: creencias sobre la enseñanza, programas de formación docente, profesores de inglés en formación.
Introduction
Pre-service
teachers come into the teaching profession with beliefs about teaching;
sometimes they are aware of them, other times they are not. These are informed
by their own judgment of how high-quality teaching looks and works. In other
words, they have entering beliefs that enlighten their own system of beliefs
about teaching. Moreover, entering beliefs about teaching come from their own
experiences as pupils, significant interpersonal relations with their
professors, mentors and classmates, and their reflection upon critical
incidents in their first encounters with teaching.
In fact, entering
beliefs appear to be a construction, which implies that they are not static or
do not remain the same over time; they are subject to experience changes or
turning points when they come into contact with different components of teacher
development: course content, reflection, and research, to mention some. For
this reason, teacher educators should embrace a teacher education pedagogy that
considers the central role of pre-service beliefs about teaching by both
explicitly including this topic in the curriculum (for example through
reflection, course content and learning activities) and doing research on it.
The present
article, on the one hand, provides teacher educators interested in conducting
studies about pre-service teaching with a brief literature review of
pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching. On the other hand, this
article may raise awareness in all teacher educators of formal pre-service
English teaching programs in Colombia about the importance of taking into
account prospective teachers’ entering beliefs and explicitly including
this topic in the curriculum.
I expect that the
body of knowledge reviewed in this article allows going further in the
understanding of the philosophical principles that support pre-service English
teaching programs in Colombia. Likewise, it can provide researchers and teacher
educators, who are engaged in developing situated know-ledge through research,
with important findings to further understand pre-service English
teachers’ entering beliefs about teaching. Moreover, this article may
raise awareness about the importance of undertaking intensive, collaborative
studies through which the TEFL education community “can strive to address
the needs of students, teachers, teacher educators, and other stakeholders working
to establish a common vision” (Simmons et al. 1999, Abstract section) of
excellence in pre-service teacher education in a reform context in Colombia.
This article begins
with a literature review targeted to the needs of many South American TESOL
contexts as regards pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching and
includes research studies on the topic. Finally, there is a conclusion that
highlights the importance of undertaking more research on pre-service
education.
Literature Review
Some attention has
been paid to teacher beliefs in recent years. They have been defined with
various terms that include “teaching conceptions” and
“teaching values”; likewise, they are also known as “teaching
styles”, “teaching practices”, “teaching images”
or “teaching approaches.” They all can be understood as “a
teacher’s cognitive and other behaviors [that] are guided by and make
sense in relation to a personally held system of beliefs, values, and
principles that guide the act of teaching” (Clark & Peterson, as
cited in Maxson & Sindelar,
1998, p. 5).
This article uses
the term beliefs about teaching, which refers to all the beliefs (ideas and
preconceptions) that pre-service teachers bring with them when they enter an
education program, about how their teaching looks and works, what kind of
teacher they are and how they conceive teaching. There is a large body of
literature about teachers’ beliefs and the categories that different
scholars have developed are various: from the more general ones, such as
teacher-centered and student-centered practices, to more detailed ones. That is
the case of Pratt (1998), who proposes five teaching approaches: Apprenticeship,
transmission, developmental, nurturing and social
reformist.
First,
apprenticeship teachers consider themselves as skilled practitioners with
knowledge and wisdom to be taught. Second, those who hold transmission beliefs
would place significant stress on the transmission of information,
well-organized treatment of content, more dynamic time management, and/or the
design of teaching material. Third, teachers with developmental beliefs see
themselves as facilitators of learning. Fourth, nurturing teachers stress the
principles of individual worth and self-respect and reciprocal trust, fair
dignity, and respect. Fifth, social reformists hold the beliefs that their own
ideology is appropriate for all people. They place emphasis on locating
improved technologies of instruction, approaches to knowledge, and ways of
assisting cognitive or personal development of moral and political issues
(Pratt, 1998).
Kagan (1992) completed an extensive
review of studies about pre-service and first year teaching. This period
appears to constitute a single developmental stage during which novices acquire
knowledge of pupils then use that knowledge to modify and reconstruct their
beliefs about teaching. Kagan reviewed three studies
(Calderhead & Robson, 1991; McDaniel, 1991; and Weistein, 1990, as cited in Kagan,
1992) and concluded that although the contexts of these studies differ,
findings were cohesive in the sense that there is a central role of preexisting
beliefs and prior experience that filter the content of course work and,
despite course content, these beliefs/ images appear to be stable and
inflexible. Moreover, she reviewed studies conducted by Laboskey,
1991; Bullough, 1991; Hollingsworth, 1989, and Strahan, 1990, which confirm that candidates enter teaching
practicum and student teaching with beliefs about teaching that have been
derived in part from their own experiences as learners; however, when these
images of self as teacher are not strong, the novices may be predestined to
have difficulty.
The findings
reported in the previous studies point out that the initial focus of novice
teachers is inward, that is to say, when novices are in the reality of the
classroom, they first seek to confirm and validate their beliefs about
teaching; gradually, when they find proper conditions, they begin to use their
growing knowledge of pupils and classrooms to modify, adapt, and reconstruct
their beliefs. Also, they explore the role of preexisting beliefs that result
from the interaction of their prior experiences as pupils in classrooms,
theoretical knowledge from course work (knowledge base) and experiences during
their practicum.
It is relevant to
consider that in a 2004 study, Ambrose states that:
Many mathematics educators have found that prospective elementary school teachers’ beliefs interfere with their learning of mathematics. Often teacher educators consider these beliefs to be wrong or naïve and seek to challenge them so prospective teachers will reject them for more generative beliefs. Because of the resilience of prospective teachers’ beliefs in response to these challenges, teacher educators could consider alternative ways of thinking about and addressing beliefs, particularly the potential of building on rather than tearing down pre-existing beliefs. (p. 91)
I therefore take
the position that if pre-service teachers’ beliefs are thought to be
incorrect or immature, then no teacher educator, course content or teaching
experience could ever foster change or turning points in pre-service
teachers’ construction of a self-image as teachers; as a consequence,
professional development would never occur. On the other hand, if these beliefs
are thought of as entering beliefs, product of the teacher-to-be experiences as
a learner, then teacher educators will find a much more constructivist
panorama; that is to say, “building on rather than tearing down
pre-existing beliefs” as Ambrose herself claims.
Fung and
Chow’s (2002) study on preexisting beliefs set out to obtain a profile of
pedagogical images of a group of student teachers, as well as to assess whether
there is a congruence between their pedagogical images
and classroom practices. Findings concerning teaching students’
pedagogical images served as focus for the present study. The researchers start
from the assumption that student teachers enter formal training with
preconceptions of how teaching should take place.
Results indicated
that the student teachers’ most common dominant teaching beliefs were the
nurturing beliefs, followed by the mixed and the developmental ones (Pratt,
1998), which have already been explained.
However, in actual
practices, student teachers’ approach was a mixture of the apprenticeship
and the transmission approaches. In sum, the findings of this study to be
considered in the present article include that whereas in practice students
conceive themselves as having a more child-centered approach to teaching, in
reality, their practices constituted more a teacher-centered approach. Similar
findings were revealed in Simmons et al.’s (1999) study. They conducted a
3-year exploratory study about secondary science teacher education. The authors
investigated what were
[...] the perceptions, beliefs, and classroom performances of beginning secondary teachers as related to their philosophies of teaching and their content pedagogical skills. [...] An analysis of video portfolios of beginning teachers provided classroombased evidence of their performance in both subject matter and pedagogical dimensions of teaching. Among the findings [...] were that teachers graduated from their teacher preparation programs with a range of knowledge and beliefs about how teachers should interact with subject content and processes, about [...] what teachers should be doing in the classroom, [...] philosophies of teaching, and how they perceived themselves as classroom teachers. Beginning teachers described their practices as very student-centered. Observations of these teaching practices contrasted starkly with teacher beliefs: While teachers professed student-centered beliefs, they behaved in teacher-centered ways. (Simmons et al., 1999, Abstract section).
The purpose of Maxson and Sindelar’s
(1998) study was to identify the beliefs, ideas, and knowledge that entry-level
students bring with them as they begin their work in an elementary teacher
education program. Likewise, the study sought to determine how and if those
beliefs changed as a result of coursework designed to challenge and clarify
those beliefs. Data utilized for the study involved two written exercises that
posed open-ended questions designed to encourage self-awareness of
students’ perspectives and their implicit beliefs about teaching.
The data gathered
in Maxon and Sindelar’s
(1998) study seems to suggest that there may be minimally two basic types of
students entering teacher preparation programs. The first one is composed of a
group of pre-service teachers with clearly surfaced beliefs about teaching, and
a second group is comprised of those who come into teaching without focused
beliefs that can be clearly communicated. With respect to the changes initiated
by the coursework designed to challenge or clarify their entering beliefs, the
research suggests that students learn early to mouth program concepts, but do
not always make the connections to their own beliefs and understandings. If
learning is not assimilated into a learner’s existing cognitive structure,
then students may be saying what we want to hear in our courses, but forgetting
or misusing the information by the time they begin teaching in their own
classrooms. These findings seem to resemble those of Hollingsworth’s
(1989) who claims that in the absence of cognitive dissonance, learning among
novices remained shallow and imitative.
An important
implication of this study is the role of learning activities in initiating
changes or turning points in the beliefs about teaching. The learning
activities that a teacher educator explicitly designs to explore pre-service
teachers’ beliefs are central to assist pre-service teachers in making
the connections to their own beliefs and understandings instead of only
repeating program concepts.
These and other
studies have had impact on teacher education programs: When teacher education
programs are designed to promote reflection, pre-service teachers manifest more
self-reflection and acknowledge limitations of their prior beliefs and
knowledge. Moreover, when learning teachers do not possess clear beliefs about
teaching with which to integrate program knowledge, it remains superficial and
easily replaced. That is to say, pre-service students should be aware of what
they are doing in their classes and why they are doing it because they have
reflected upon their classroom practices and actions and not just because they
are blindly following principles and methodologies that form part of the
program knowledge. Therefore, the role of reflection is essential for pre-service
teachers’ growth to occur and programs must include a direct challenge to
personal beliefs; otherwise, learning among teachers remains shallow and
imitative. This challenge is achieved by including reflection and learning
activities that a teacher educator explicitly designs to explore pre-service
teachers’ beliefs.
The previous
research studies support my argument that exploring pre-service teachers’
beliefs about teaching is crucial in teacher education. They also confirm that
pre-service teachers enter a teaching program with beliefs about teaching which
can be altered through various factors, events and people.
Other studies
(Johnson, 1992, 1994, 2007; Wray, 1993; Bailey et al., 1996; Beach, 1994; Borg,
2003; Cabaroglu & Roberts, 2000; McGillivray
& Freppon, 2000; Peacock, 2001) ratify the need
to continue researching how pre-service teachers learn to teach and the key
factors involved in such process; and beliefs about teaching are part of those
key factors.
Nowadays,
pre-service teachers are not always first career graduates. The longitudinal
study by Manuel and Brindley (2003) with pre-service
students of English in Australia and the UK proves that the current tendency is
an increase in the proportion of second and later career candidates in teacher
education programs. This urgently requires a sensitive understanding on the
part of teachers educators that a considerable number of pre-service teachers
bring with them significant experience and expertise about teaching; that is,
they are far from being tabulae rasae or blank slates with little knowledge about
education. Indeed, the pre-service teachers of this century enter teacher
education programs “with deeply-held personal beliefs about the potential
for the teacher to create, affirm, build connections and act to good effect
(Boomer & Torr, 1987), constructing teaching as a
potent force for change in society” (Manuel & Brindley,
2003, The Significance of Previous Experience section, para.
1).
A new profile of
the pre-service teachers affirms the need to continue researching beliefs about
teaching.
Manuel and Brindley (2003) assert that:
There has been considerable research undertaken over the past decade-and-a-half into the beliefs that pre-service teachers bring with them into teacher education courses: the nature of these beliefs, their representation in metaphor and story; the ways in which these beliefs influence not only what is learnt in pre-service education, but how it is learnt and the implications of these things for teacher identity, professional development, and efficacy as classroom practitioners (cf. Stuart & Thurlow 2000; Maxon & Mahlios, 1994). (The Significance of Previous Experience section, para. 3)
These
scholars’ words show the relevance and interest in researching how
pre-service teachers learn to teach and the role of their entering beliefs.
Their research with pre-service teachers in Australia and The UK avow:
[...] the continued significance of personal beliefs and their role in developing teacher identity. It also demonstrates the ways in which the participants imagine the self as teacher-constructing and representing this self in a range of ways that embodies their principles and ‘dreams’ as an educator. (Manuel & Brindley, 2003, The Significance of Previous Experience section, para. 4)
In
the Colombian context, there has been a growing interest in researching pre-service English teaching in
Colombia (González & Quinchía,
2003; Cárdenas & Faustino, 2003; Viáfara,
2005; Cárdenas, Nieto & Martin, 2005; Quintero & Guerrero, 2005;
Castellanos, 2005; Faustino & Cárdenas, 2006; Quintero &
Piñeros, 2006; Ayala, 2006; Latorre, 2007; Sierra, 2007; Pineda & Frodden, 2008; Samacá,
2008; Zambrano & Inuasty, 2008; Viáfara, 2010). Some of these experiences have been documented and published in indexed
Colombian journals like CALJ, PROFILE, IKALA, FOLIOS and LENGUAJE. Likewise,
there are important experiences documented in theses from the Master’s
program in Applied Linguistics to TEFL at Universidad Distrital
Francisco José de Caldas; other experiences have been socialized in
national academic events. This has led to the development of important situated
knowledge about pre-service English teaching in Colombia.
The aforementioned
scholars and their significant research provide an important background of
studies that relates to pre-service English teachers’ development in
Colombia, focusing on various aspects such as pre-service teachers’
development of reflective teaching, research skills, teaching practicum,
development of knowledge, skills and attitudes and autonomy, among other
topics. However, the majority of these studies do not include English
pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching; except for Castellanos (2005) and Samacá
(2008). This leads me to argue that there has been, to some extent, an
abandonment of this essential component of pre-service teaching in the teacher
education programs and even in the postgraduate programs that promote research
on teacher development and education.
The search of
studies on pre-service English teachers’ beliefs about teaching in
Colombia yielded one case study conducted by Castellanos
(2005) and an action research carried out by Samacá
(2008). Castellanos’ study is probably the
first one that addresses pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching.
Her study focuses on pre-service English teachers’ construction of
self-image as teachers and its purpose was to bring to light the elements that
help preservice English teachers construct their self image as teachers. Likewise, it provides findings related
to how the participants perceive themselves as someone who is becoming a
teacher and how their perceptions informed about turning points in the
construction of their self-image as teachers. The findings show that there are
several aspects and factors that play crucial roles in the construction of a
self-image as a teacher.
The findings
suggest that pre-service teachers create their self-images through a
combination of factors that interact among them. From that interplay, their
pedagogical images are in a constant process of construction and change. There
are three main factors that were highlighted as crucial for the construction of
their self image as teachers.
Factor 1. The first one suggests a process of identification
with teachers they have had at various stages in their lives who demonstrated
knowledge, skills and positive attitudes towards the teaching and learning
processes and their students in and outside their classrooms. The
teachers-to-be seem to experience “the looking glass self ” (Cooley,
1902), which implies that the more we see other people as being like ourselves,
or the more significant a part that people play in our lives, the more likely
we are to compare ourselves with them (Suls &
Greenwald 1986; Higgins, Klein, & Strauman, 1985).
The process of imitating role models also supports Calderhead
and Robson’s (1991) findings. They state that novices enter with clear
images of good teaching that were related to their own classroom experiences as
pupils. Such images appeared to be derived from a few role models and were
inflexible across classroom contexts.
Factor 2. The second important factor that contributes to the
construction of self-images as teachers is linked to the interaction and
collaboration with cooperating teachers, supervisors, peers and other teachers.
These agents have some characteristics that identify them as mentors. For
instance, they foster self-reflection, guide classroom processes and management
and hold very up-to-date views of teaching-learning and language. Mutual help
and support with their mentors contributed to enrich their pedagogical images.
The collaboration with their mentors resulted in a process that empowered the
participants to become active practitioners rather than mimickers of the
methods of an experienced teacher. As active practitioners they explored their
own teaching style. Another benefit of a collaborative interaction is the
decrease of a sense of isolation, bringing about emotional support.
Factor 3. A third factor that plays a crucial role in the
construction of the teachers-to-be self-images is their system of beliefs about
teaching and learning. Simmons et al. (1999) state that beginning teachers have
translated their experiential worlds of the classroom into a unique view of
what constitutes good teaching and learning, and they define their philosophy
of teaching based on these beliefs and experiences. Examining the
participants’ philosophy gave the study important insights into the
pre-service teachers’ beliefs. General themes about the teaching styles
emerged from the participants’ system of beliefs. The themes that best
captured the beginning teachers’ beliefs comprise a first moment in their
construction of a self-image as teachers when the transmission perspective
dominated.
A second stance in
their process of construction suggests a mixture of the developmental image and
the nurturing image (Pratt, 1998). The consolidation of a system of beliefs
about teaching and learning helped pre-service teachers get clear images of how
their teaching looks and works and guided their decision-making in terms of
classroom methodology, their role as teachers and the role of their students.
The ideal image of a teacher along with the philosophy of teaching is a crucial
aspect that sustains a student-teacher’s system of beliefs. In their
process of self-image construction, beginning teachers hold strong views and
beliefs of what teachers should be. In other words, they hold views of a
subject of the imaginary and symbolic orders.
The institutional
practices and discourses that were identified as symbolic identifications for
the pre-service teachers comprise the critical pedagogical outlook of a
teacher, teachers as teacher-researchers and innovators, and teachers involved
in reflective teaching. The findings suggest that teachers-to-be perceive
themselves as people who have experienced an ongoing process of becoming. Two
moments that mark before and after in the construction were identified. During
their first stage, preconceptions about teaching guided the pre-service
teachers’ first encounter with it during their first practicum. A second
stage is comprised of course content on critical pedagogy during the senior
year. Getting acquainted with critical pedagogy constitutes an axis for the
participants’ change in their system of beliefs. They also attribute
their new understanding of the teaching and learning process to the fact that
they were able to put into practice critical pedagogical tenets and principles
by articulating and applying a pedagogical project that lasted a full school
year.
The changes and
shifts are evidenced in their teacher actions and the student actions which
grow from a transmission perspective to a mixture of the developmental and the
nurturing perspective. This turning point in the construction of their selfimage as teachers supports the notion of a process of
transformative learning. Likewise, this process is revealed in a new
conceptualization of a teacher-researcher, one who becomes part of the ELT
community through learning about innovations and their own engagement in
research processes.
As a conclusion,
change in pre-service teachers’ perception of themselves as language
teachers was fostered by making connections between their knowledge base
(pedagogy, methodology, classroom activities and the sort) and practice (their
practicum, the implementation of a pedagogical project and the discipline of a
teacher research process), and by being faced with difficult situations that
posed challenges to their belief system (i.e. when engaged in a dialectic or,
in other words, by a process of transformative learning).
Samacá (2008) carried out
an action research study (with thirteen student teachers from a state
university in the city of Tunja) on the perceptions
pre-service teachers hold concerning their image as future teachers, and how
these perceptions might influence their teaching. The questions that this study
investigated were: What do pre-service teachers’ responses to the
literature about the socio-critical component of a pedagogy and communication
course reveal about their image as future teachers? What aspects do pre-service
teachers focus on when discussing issues related to pedagogy and communication?
and How do they connect these aspects to their views
as teachers?
This study helps
teacher educators add to their understanding of pre-service teachers’
construction of their own images as teachers through discussions and
reflections about the socio-critical component of a pedagogy and communication
course. Data were collected during one academic semester by means of field
notes complemented with audio-recordings, students’ reflective journals
and conferences.
The findings of
this study showed that pre-service teachers began developing empathy towards a
social and critical way of teaching. Their responses showed engagement and
commitment in relation to their social and educational realities, reflecting
and assuming critical positions that enhance personal, social and future
professional transformation. Moreover, being a teacher entails various roles in
students’ integral education, such as guides, facilitators, and
listeners. To carry out those roles successfully, pre-service students should
transform themselves first in order to be able to transform their society. In
sum, pre-service teachers’ reflective process showed that to become the
kind of teachers they wanted, they had to think about their learners, their
needs and interests, and their communities.
Other findings
revealed four relevant aspects for the construction of their image as future
teachers: First, a dialogical relationship (Shor
& Freire, 1987) between students and teachers
that help them both learn from each other and construct knowledge and social
relationships and second, the instructional roles they are to develop in
their classroom settings should involve seeing learning as a teaching practice,
being motivators, and making students’ learning significant for their
lives. The third one is models to be or not to be followed (critical people)
which involve identifying teachers who can influence students’ lives to
the point of adopting his/her profession (Danielewics,
2001). Lastly, the fourth one is called integral formation; that is,
pre-service teachers stressed the role of teachers as educators, forming
students for life.
Finally, the data
showed pre-service teachers’ appreciation of what a teacher should become
and his/her commitment towards the creation of more communicative classrooms
where learners’ voices are also heard. This view of a communicative
teacher might be grouped into two moments: The teacher as a communicator and
mediator, considering the interaction between teaching and learning, and the
teacher as a person who has an attitude towards change.
As a conclusion,
pre-service teachers were able to reflect upon their image as future teachers
and those reflections depicted important issues that can be considered and
analyzed in future research in the field of pre-service teacher education. These
pre-service teachers’ perceptions present various factors that may affect
the construction of student teachers’ views of themselves as future
teachers.
Conclusion
The review of
studies presented here demonstrates the importance of undertaking intensive,
collaborative studies through which the TEFL community can strive to address
the needs of pre-service English teachers. I maintain that it is paramount to
continue working towards the establishment of a large body of local knowledge
in the area of pre-service teaching in Colombia.
Likewise, I invite
teacher educators and researchers who are working to establish a common vision
for excellent pre-service education and pertinent reform in Colombia, and to
view this article as a point of departure in their studies on English
pre-service teaching. As the primary focus of this article is pre-service
beliefs about teaching, I also suggest that the following questions for further
research can be addressed:
How do pre-service
teachers’ belief systems match or mismatch their actions in their
classrooms?
What factors
influence the belief systems of pre-service teachers as they gain experience in
the classroom?
How do pre-service
teachers’ belief systems change when they are confronted with the
constraints of school, district or national curriculum mandates (i.e. the
Common European Framework of TEFL)?
The studies
conducted by Castellanos (2005) and Samacá (2008) highlight the importance of mentoring
so I propose the following queries in the area of pre-service teacher
mentoring:
What roles can each
of the stakeholders involved in teacher education play to prepare novice
teachers that adapt to the constant challenges of EFL teaching and learning?
What is the role of
innovation in the research and pedagogical components of the teacher education
program in the pedagogical transformations of professors and pre-service
teachers?
In conclusion,
teacher educators should keep in mind the premise that student teachers enter a
teacher education program with beliefs about teaching, and explicitly integrate
it in their syllabi through reflection, course content, and learning
activities. I would like to argue that in such a way, they can assist student
teachers in becoming aware of their entering beliefs about teaching and experiencing
changes or turning points in them so that explicit and more generative beliefs
guide and inform the act of teaching.
How teachers can
explicitly include student teachers’ beliefs in the curriculum represents
the topic of the author’s upcoming article which proposes some learning
and teaching activities for teacher educators of pre-service English teachers.
The paper asserts that pre-service English education programs should consider
student teachers’ self-images as teachers, beliefs about teaching,
philosophy of teaching, relationship with students and ability to recognize
important aspects and events that motivate decision making (Freeman, 1989) as
significant pillars; attention to pre-service English teachers’
self-images as teachers can be considered as an alternative to foster teacher
development, and that programs that encourage student-teachers’
realization of their self-images as teachers through specific learning
activities build strong and clear beliefs about teaching thus contributing to
lessening students’ struggles when they face their practicum and their
initial experiences as novice teachers.
Finally, we
teachers and teacher educators, as a community of researchers, are to address
the moving and constant changes and challenges of education and reform in
Colombia and to do so, we ought to be able to structure and conduct research
which will inform our decision-making for improved English language teaching
and learning.
References
Ambrose, R. (2004). Initiating change in prospective
elementary school teachers’ orientations to mathematics: Teaching by
building on beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7,
91-119.
Ayala, J. (2006). Beyond
reflections in and out of the classroom (Master’s thesis).
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de
Caldas, Bogotá.
Bailey, K. M., Bergthold,
B., Braunsterin, B., Fleischman, J. N., Holbrook, M.
P., Tuman, J., Waiss-bluth,
X., & Zambo, L. J. (1996). The language learner’s autobiography: Examining
the “apprenticeship of observation.” In D.
Freeman, & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp.
11-29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
Beach, S. A. (1994). Teachers’ theories and
classroom practice: Beliefs, knowledge, or context? Reading
Psychology, 15(3), 189-96.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language
teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe,
and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
Bullough, R. V., Jr. (1991). Exploring
personal teaching metaphors in pre-service teacher education. Journal
of Teacher Education, 42(1), 43-51.
Cabaroglu, N., & Roberts, J. (2000). Development in student teachers’ pre-existing
beliefs during a 1-Year PGCE programme. System, 28(3),
387-402.
Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers’ early
conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7,
1-8.
Cárdenas,
R., & Faustino C. C. (2003). Developing
reflective and investigative skills in teacher preparation programs: The design
and implementation of the classroom research component at the foreign language
program of Universidad del Valle. Colombian Applied
Linguistics Journal, 5, 22-48.
Cárdenas, M. L., Nieto, M. C., & Martin, Y.
M. (2005). Conditions for monograph
projects by pre-service teachers: Lessons from the long and winding route. Colombian
Applied Linguistics Journal, 7, 75-94.
Castellanos, J. (2005). Pre-service
teachers’ construction of self-image as teachers. A qualitative interpretive case study (Master’s
thesis). Universidad Distrital
Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human
nature and the social order. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s
Sons.
Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy and
teacher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Faustino, C. C., & Cárdenas, R. (2006). Impacto del componente de investigación en la
formación de licenciados en lengua extranjera. Lenguaje, 36(2), 407-446.
Freeman, D. (1989). Teacher training
development and decision making. A model of teaching
and related strategies for language teacher education. TESOL
Quarterly, 18(3), 501-514.
Fung, L., & Chow, L. (2002). Congruence of student teachers’ pedagogical
images and actual classroom practices. Educational Research, 44(3),
313-321.
González,
A., & Quinchía, D. I. (2003). Tomorrow’s EFL teacher educators. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 5,
86-184.
Higgins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman,
T. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy
theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of
depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3, 51-76.
Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change
in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2),
160-189.
Johnson, K. E. (1992). The
relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices during literacy
instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal
of Reading Behavior, 24, 45-89.
Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging
beliefs and instructional practices of pre-service ESL teachers. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452.
Johnson, K. E. (2007). Tracing
teacher and student learning in teacher-authored narratives. Teacher
Development, 11(2), 1-14.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among pre-service and beginning
teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.
Laboskey, V. K. (1991, April). Case studies of two teachers in
a reflective teacher education program: “How do you know?” Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Chicago.
Latorre, A. (2007). The teaching practicum: The harvest of
a never ending reflective process, (Unpublished master’s thesis).
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de
Caldas, Bogotá.
Manuel, J., & Brindley,
S. (2003). The call to teach: Identifying
pre-service teachers’ motivations, expectations and key experiences
during initial teacher education in Australia and the United Kingdom. AATE:
Australian Association for the Teaching of English, 139. Retrieved from http://www.aate.org.au/view_journal.php?id=7&page_id=10
McDaniel, J. E. (1991). Close encounters: How do
student teachers make sense of the social foundations? Paper presented at
the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
McGillivray, L., & Freppon,
P. A. (2000). Reflections over time:
Pre-service teachers’ images of their first year of teaching. Action
in Teacher Education, 22(2), 122-132.
Maxson, M., & Sindelar, R.
(1998). Images revisited: Examining pre-service
teachers’ ideas about teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25,
5-26.
Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’
beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29, 177-95.
Pineda, D., & Frodden,
C. (2008). The
development of a novice teacher’s autonomy in the context of EFL in
Colombia. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development,
9, 143-162.
Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five
perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malabor, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Quintero,
A., & Guerrero, C. H. (2005). Characterizing
student-teachers’ conceptions about critical pedagogy. A research document submitted to CIDE. Universidad
Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá.
Quintero,
A., & Piñeros, C. (2006). Conceptualizing
as regards educational change and pedagogical knowledge: How novice teacher
researchers’ proposals illustrate this relationship. PROFILE Issues in
Teachers’ Professional Development, 7, 173-186.
Samacá, Y. (2008). Exploring a
socio-critical perspective to language pedagogy with pre-service teachers:
Constructing their image as future teachers (Master’s thesis).
Universidad
Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá.
Shor, I., & Freire, P.
(1987). A pedagogy of
liberation. Dialogues on transforming education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey
Publishers, Inc.
Sierra, A. M. (2007). Developing knowledge, skills and attitudes through a
study group: A study on teachers’ professional development. IKALA,
12(18), 279-305.
Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T.,
Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., … Labuda, K. (1999). Beginning teachers:
Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 35, 930-954.
Strahan, D. B. (1990). A developmental analysis of pre-service
teachers’ orientations toward themselves, their studies, and their
subject matter. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Suls, J. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1986). Psychological perspectives on
the self. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Viáfara, J. J. (2005). Responding to
observation: How student teachers’ use of their counselor’s notes
support their preparation. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’
Professional Development, 6, 141-156.
Viáfara, J. J. (2010). How do EFL student teachers face the challenge
of using L2 in public school classrooms? PROFILE Issues in Teachers’
Professional Development, 13(1), 55-74.
Wray, D. (1993). Student-teachers’
knowledge and beliefs about language. In N. Bennett & C. Carré (Eds.), Learning to teach (pp. 51-72).
London, UK: Routledge.
Zambrano, L., & Inuasty, E.
(2008). Analysis of the teaching practicum
in the light of the reflective teaching approach. Lenguaje, 36(2), 447-471.
About the Author
Judith Castellanos Jaimes is a full-time professor at Universidad Externado de Colombia. She also works other two Colombian
universities: Pedagógica Nacional
and Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. She
holds an M.A. in Applied Linguistics to TEFL from Universidad Distrital and a B.A. in Languages from Universidad
Industrial de Santander (Colombia).