Published

2026-07-23

A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon

La Mayoría ya Cree en lo Paranormal: Raíces, Dinámica y Ramificaciones de un Fenómeno en Crecimiento

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001

Keywords:

Paranormal belief, personality, schizotypy, cognitive bias, religiosity (en)
Creencia en lo paranormal, personalidad, esquizotipia, sesgo cognitivo, religiosidad (es)

Downloads

Authors

This paper examines the predominant perspectives in the literature on the etiology and sustenance of paranormal belief. A sample of 250 participants was used to analyze a series of variables representing the primary theoretical frameworks and develop an integrative model of paranormal belief. The 62% of the subjects held paranormal beliefs. Through linear regression analysis, it was found that subjective paranormal experiences were the best predictor of paranormal belief, with a standardized coefficient of .26 (p<.001), followed by openness to experience (.18, p=.002), unusual experiences (.18, p=.002), religiosity (.14, p=.016), and probabilistic reasoning (-.13, p=.021). These results suggest that paranormal belief is a multicausal phenomenon influenced by diverse factors. Finally, a model is proposed to explain the development and sustenance of paranormal beliefs, highlighting the importance of considering the context and practical implications of holding such beliefs.

Este artículo examina las perspectivas predominantes en la literatura sobre la etiología y el sustento de las creencias paranormales. Se utilizó una muestra de 250 participantes para analizar una serie de variables que representan los marcos teóricos principales y desarrollar un modelo integrador de las creencias paranormales. El 62 % de los sujetos tenía creencias paranormales. Mediante un análisis de regresión lineal, se descubrió que las experiencias paranormales subjetivas eran el mejor indicador de la creencia en lo paranormal, con un coeficiente estandarizado de 0,26 (p < 0,001), seguidas de la apertura a la experiencia (0,18, p = 0,002), las experiencias inusuales (0,18, p = 0,002), la religiosidad (0,14, p = 0,016) y el razonamiento probabilístico (-0,13, p = 0,021). Estos resultados sugieren que la creencia en lo paranormal es un fenómeno multicausal influenciado por diversos factores. Por último, se propone un modelo para explicar el desarrollo y el mantenimiento de las creencias paranormales, destacando la importancia de considerar el contexto y las implicaciones prácticas de tener tales creencias.

References

Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, cognitive style, and thinking dispositions. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 1227-1236.

Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2007). Religious People and Paranormal Believers. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1

Arnett, J. (1993). Sensation Seeking: A New Conceptualization and a New Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(2), 289-296.

Bader, C. D., Baker, J. O., & Mencken, F. C. (2012). Paranormal America: Ghost encounters, UFO sightings, Bigfoot hunts, and other curiosities in religion and culture. New York University Press.

Bader, C. D., Day, A., & Gordon, H. S. (2017). Paranormal beliefs and experiences: Sociological perspectives. Journal of Paranormal and Occult Studies, 30(4), 357-372.

Bader, C. D., Mencken, F. C., & Baker, J. O. (2018). Paranormal America 2018: A sociological inquiry into the prevalence of paranormal beliefs in the United States. Journal of American Culture, 41(4), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacc.2018.41.issue-4

Bader R., Mecklinger A., Hoppstädter M., Meyer P. (2010). Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroimage 50, 772–781 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.100

Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). The future of religion: Secularization, revival, and cult formation. University of California Press.

Baker, J. O., & Draper, S. (2010). The paranormal and the politics of truth: A sociological account. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01488.x

Blackmore, S. & Troscianko, T. (1985). Belief in the paranormal: Probability judgments, illusory control, and the `chance baseline' shift. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 459-468.

Blanco, F., Barbeira, I., & Matute, H. (2015). Belief in psychic phenomena and the suggestibility of witnesses. Acta Psychologica, 159, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.005

Britton, W. B. & Bootzin, R. R.(2004). Near-death experiences and the temporal lobe. Psychological Science 15, 254–258.

Brugger, P., Gamma, A., Muri, R., Schäfer, M., and Taylor, K. I. (1993). Functional hemispheric asymmetry and belief in ESP: towards a “neuropsychology of belief”. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(823), 1299–1308. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.3f.1299

Buchy, L., Woodward, T. S., & Liotti, M. (2007). A cognitive bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) is associated with schizotypy. Schizophrenia Research, 90(1–3), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.11.012

Caruana, N., & Seymour, K. (2021). The role of pre-existing beliefs and visual cues in the perception of pareidolia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(4), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000885

Collins-Kreiner, N. (2016). Dark tourism as/is not a new field. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(12), 1257-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1078299

Castro, M., Burrows, R., & Wooffitt, R. (2014). The paranormal is (Still) normal: The sociological implications of a survey of paranormal experiences in Great Britain. Sociological Research Online, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3355

Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory NEO-FFI): Professional manual (Rev. Ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Munley, G. (2010). Reality testing, belief in the paranormal, and urban legends. European Journal of Parapsychology 25, 25–55.

Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Rowley, K. (2014). Misperception of chance, conjunction, belief in the paranormal and reality testing: A reappraisal. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3057

Dean, E. J., Schmaltz, R., Sacco, D. F., & Dubois, S. (2022). A systematic review of the relationship between paranormal beliefs and cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320930957

Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., Grogan, S., & Riley, V. (2017). Understanding the Unknown: A Thematic Analysis of Subjective Paranormal Experiences. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 17(1), 1445–2308.

Eder, S., Farkas, A., & Probst, T. (2011). The impact of paranormal belief on fear of criminal victimization: An analysis of different types of paranormal beliefs. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 25(4), 657-673.

Elk, M. (2017). The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs. Consciousness and Cognition. 49. 313-321. 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.001.

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.

Farha, B., & Stewart, G. P. (2006). Paranormal beliefs: An analysis of college students. Skeptical Inquirer, 30(1), 37-40.

French, C. C. (1992). Factors underlying belief in paranormal phenomena. The Psychologist, 5, 204-208.

French, C. C. (2015). The psychology of belief and disbelief in the paranormal. In E. C. May & S. B. Marwaha (Eds.), Extrasensory perception: Support, skepticism, and science (pp. 129–151). Praeger/ABC-CLIO.

Franco, P. & A. Mustaca (2020). Creencias paranormales y mitos sobre psicología. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 12, (1), 113-114.

Friedman, B. A., & Mandel, R. G. (2012). Motivation predictors of college student academic performance and retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 13, 1-15.

Gallagher, C., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1994). The Anomalous Experiences Inventory: reliability and validity. The Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 402-428.

Garrett, B. M., & Cutting, R. L. (2017). Magical beliefs and discriminating science from pseudoscience in undergraduate professional students. Heliyon, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00433

Glicksohn, J. (1990). Belief in the paranormal and subjective paranormal experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 675–683.

Haddad, L., Schäfer, A., Streit, F., Lederbogen, F., Grimm, O., Wüst, S., Deuschle, M., Kirsch, P., Tost, H., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2015). Brain structure correlates of urban upbringing, an environmental risk factor for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41(1), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu072.

Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology. American Psychological Association.

Heckert, M, Cunejo, G. H., A. P Adams, P. J. Droste, H. E Mueller, M. A. Wallis, H. A Griffin, C. M. Roberts, L. L. (2000) Creation of a new Needs Assessment Questionnaire. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 15(1): 121 – 136

Hergovich, A., Schott, R. & Arendasy, M. (2008). On the relationship between paranormal belief and schizotypy among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 119-125.

Hoffmann, R., Musch, J., & Pohl, R. F. (2022). Paranormal beliefs and cognitive processes underlying the formation of false memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3869

Irwin, H. (2009). The psychology of paranormal belief: A research´s handbook. Hartfield: The University of Hertfordshire Press.

Irwin H.J., Young J.M. (2002). Intuitive versus reflective processes in the formation of paranormal beliefs. European Journal of Parapsychology. 17, 45–53.

Jones, S. P. (2021). Religious affiliation, identity, and the framing of religious beliefs: An exploratory analysis. Religions, 12(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020123

Jowett, L., & Abbott, S. (2013). TV Horror: Investigating the Dark Side of the Small Screen. I.B. Tauris.

Kanai, R., Bahrami, B., Duchaine, B., Janik, A., Banissy, M. J., & Rees, G. (2012). Brain structure links loneliness to social perception. Current Biology, 22(20), 1975-1979

Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1993). Sensation seeking, drug use and reported paranormal beliefs and experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(5), 685-691.

Lange, R., Houran, J., Harte, T. M., & Havens, R. A. (2000). Contextual mediation of perceptions during hauntings and poltergeist-like experiences: A replication and extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(2), 659-663. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.90.2.659

Lewis, M. D. (2011). Dopamine and the neural “Now”: Essay and review of addiction: A disorder of choice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400235

Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 731-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009

How to Cite

APA

Pérez Navarro, J. M. (2026). A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 35(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001

ACM

[1]
Pérez Navarro, J.M. 2026. A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 35, 2 (Jul. 2026), 157–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001.

ACS

(1)
Pérez Navarro, J. M. A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2026, 35, 157-173.

ABNT

PÉREZ NAVARRO, J. M. A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 2, p. 157–173, 2026. DOI: 10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/117001. Acesso em: 7 aug. 2026.

Chicago

Pérez Navarro, José Miguel. 2026. “A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon”. Revista Colombiana De Psicología 35 (2):157-73. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001.

Harvard

Pérez Navarro, J. M. (2026) “A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon”, Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 35(2), pp. 157–173. doi: 10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001.

IEEE

[1]
J. M. Pérez Navarro, “A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon”, Rev. colomb. psicol., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 157–173, Jul. 2026.

MLA

Pérez Navarro, J. M. “A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 35, no. 2, July 2026, pp. 157-73, doi:10.15446/rcp.v35n2.117001.

Turabian

Pérez Navarro, José Miguel. “A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 35, no. 2 (July 24, 2026): 157–173. Accessed August 7, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/117001.

Vancouver

1.
Pérez Navarro JM. A Majority Already Believes in the Paranormal: Roots, Dynamics, and Ramifications of a Growing Phenomenon. Rev. colomb. psicol. [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 24 [cited 2026 Aug. 7];35(2):157-73. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/117001

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

43

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.