Published

2026-07-23

Agency, Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions.

Agencia, psicología y bienestar económico: un estudio empírico en regiones de alta marginación

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194

Keywords:

Human agency, capabilities approach, psychological traits, structural equation modelling (SEM), high marginalisation (en)
Agencia humana, enfoque de capacidades, características psicológicas, modelo de ecuaciones estructurales (MEE), alta marginación (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Clara Edith Muñoz-Márquez Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México image/svg+xml
  • Germán Palafox-Palafox Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México image/svg+xml

Human agency, understood as the capacity to act in pursuit of valued goals, depends on the interaction between psychological resources and structural opportunities. Based on the Capability Approach, this study analyses how psychological characteristics (perseverance, resilience, intelligence, and impulsivity) and objective capabilities (education and type of employment) influence income in contexts of high marginalisation. Using a structural equation model applied to data from 1,238 household heads, acceptable fit indices were obtained. The results indicate that psychological resources serve an adaptive function, but do not replace the fundamental role of structural opportunities. Furthermore, the model controlled for the direct effect of sex on income, revealing the persistence of a gender pay gap which reflects systemic gender inequalities. These findings underscore the need for public policies that expand structural opportunities and strengthen individual capacities in an integrated manner amongst vulnerable populations.

La agencia humana, entendida como la capacidad de actuar en favor de metas valiosas, depende de la interacción entre
recursos psicológicos y oportunidades estructurales. Basado en el Enfoque de Capacidades, este estudio analiza cómo características psicológicas (perseverancia, resiliencia, inteligencia e impulsividad) y capacidades objetivas (educación y tipo de empleo) influyen en el ingreso en contextos de alta marginación. Mediante un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales aplicado a datos de 1,238 jefes de familia, se obtuvieron índices de ajuste aceptables. Los resultados indican que los recursos psicológicos cumplen una función adaptativa, pero no sustituyen el papel fundamental de las oportunidades estructurales. Además, el modelo controló por el efecto directo del sexo en el ingreso, lo que revela la persistencia de una brecha salarial que refleja desigualdades sistémicas de género. Estos hallazgos subrayan la necesidad de políticas públicas que amplíen las oportunidades estructurales y fortalezcan las capacidades individuales de forma integrada en poblaciones vulnerables.

References

Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7

Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 1–181). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53444-6.00001-8

Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 321–332). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.321

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1982). The collected philosophical papers of G. E. M. Anscombe: Vol. II. Metaphysics and the philosophy of mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Attanasio, O., & Székely, M. (1999). Ahorro de los hogares y distribución del ingreso en México. Economía Mexicana. Nueva Época, 8(2), 267–338.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Sage Publications, 9(3), 75–78. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20182630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

Barratt, E. S. (1959). Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 9, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1959.9.3.191

Barratt, E. S. (1985). Impulsiveness subtraits: Arousal and information processing. In J. T. Spence & C. E. Izard (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and personality (pp. 137–146). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(6), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271

Crocker, D. A., & Robeyns, I. (2009). Capability and agency. In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Amartya Sen: Contemporary philosophy in focus (pp. 60–90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511.005

Córdoba, R. C. (2006). Desarrollo humano y capacidades. Aplicaciones de la teoría de las capacidades de Amartya Sen a la educación. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 64(234), 365–380. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23766074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.2366

Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. In The Journal of Philosophy (Vol. 60, No. 23, pp. 685–700). American Philosophical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177

Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462

Duckworth, A., & Quinn, P. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (GRIT-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C. H., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

Ebersöhn, L. (2014). Teacher resilience: Theorizing resilience and poverty. Teachers and Teaching, 20(5), 568–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.937960

El Buen Socio (2019). ¿Qué hacemos? Retrieved from https://www.elbuensocio.com.mx

Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1997). Contemporary educational psychology (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8

Heckman, J. J. (2010). La economía y psicología del desarrollo humano en contextos de inequidad (No. 5(35)). Universidad de Chicago. Retrieved from https://politicaspublicas.uc.cl/web/content/uploads/2010/01/la-economia-y-psicologia-del-desarrollo-humano-en-contextos-de-inequidad.pdf

Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014

Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/504455

Hick, R. (2016). Between income and material deprivation in the UK: In search of conversion factors. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2015.1076772

Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres (INMUJERES). (2020, September 21). Four causes that contribute to the gender wage gap. Gobierno de México. Retrieved from https://www.gob.mx/inmujeres/es/articulos/cuatro-causas-que-propician-la-brecha-salarial-de-genero?idiom=es

Kabeer, N. (2002). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273

Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

Krishnakumar, J., & Chávez-Juárez, F. (2016). Estimating capabilities with structural equation models: How well are we doing in a ‘real’ world? Social Indicators Research, 129(2), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1148-6

Lelli, S. (2008). Operationalising Sen’s capability approach: The influence of the selected technique. In F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, & S. Alkire (Eds.), The capability approach: Concepts, measures and application (pp. 310–361). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.011

Luthar, S. S. (2015). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In Developmental psychopathology (pp. 739–795). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939406.ch20

Luthar, S. S., & Cushing, G. (2002). Measurement issues in the empirical study of resilience. In M. Glantz & J. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development (pp. 129–160). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47167-1_7

Lybbert, T. J., & Wydick, B. (2017). Hope as aspirations, agency, and pathways: Poverty dynamics and microfinance in Oaxaca, Mexico. In The economics of poverty traps (pp. 153–177). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22661

Masten, A. S., & Powell, J. L. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. In Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615788.003

Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3

Montenegro, C. E., & Patrinos, H. A. (2014). Comparable estimates of returns to schooling around the world (WPS 7020). Washington, DC: World Bank Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7020

Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2016). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Times Books.

Narayan-Parker, D. (2005). Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e597202012-001

Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women and human development: The capabilities approach (Vol. 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C., & Mosquera, A. S. (2012). Crear capacidades. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.

Observatorio de Desarrollo Regional y Promoción Social, A. (2019). ¿Quiénes somos? Retrieved from https://www.odp.social

OPHI, & CAF. (2016). Las dimensiones faltantes en la medición de la pobreza. Bogotá, Colombia: Centro para el Desarrollo Humano Lyra; Centro para el Desarrollo Humano IERU; CAF; Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). Retrieved from http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/833

Patrinos, H. A. (2016). Why education is important for economic development. World Bank Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/why-education-important-economic-development

Pick, S., Sirkin, J., Ortega, I., Osorio, P., Martínez, R., Xocolotzin, U., & Givaudan, M. (2007). Escala para medir agencia personal y empoderamiento (ESAGE). Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 295–304.

Ponce, P., Robles, S., Alvarado, R., & Ortiz, C. (2019). Efecto del capital humano en la brecha de ingresos: Un enfoque utilizando propensity score matching. Revista Economía y Política, 25(29), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.25097/rep.n29.2019.02

Raven, J. (2000). The Raven's progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0735

Raven, J., & Raven, J. (1993). Test de matrices progresivas: Manual (Manual de software informático No. 159.9.072). Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.

Richardson, G. E., Neiger, B. L., Jensen, S., & Kumpfer, K. L. (1990). The resiliency model. Health Education, 21(6), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00970050.1990.10614589

Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000089

Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266

Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x

Rosander, P., Bäckström, M., & Stenberg, G. (2011). Personality traits and general intelligence as predictors of academic performance: A structural equation modelling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.004

Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 147(6), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.147.6.598

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68

Salvo, L., & Castro, A. (2013). Confiabilidad y validez de la escala de impulsividad de Barratt (BIS-11) en adolescentes. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 51(4), 245–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272013000400003

Samman, E., & Santos, M. E. (2009). Agency and empowerment: A review of concepts, indicators and empirical evidence (Technical Report). Oxford, UK: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5

Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency, and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184

Sen, A. (1990). Welfare, freedom, and social choice: A reply. Recherches Économiques de Louvain, 56(3/4), 451–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0770451800043992

Sen, A. (1994). Well-being, capability, and public policy. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 53(7–9), 333–347.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (2000). El desarrollo como libertad. Barcelona, Spain: Planeta S.A.

Snyder, R. C. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Snyder, R. C. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01

Squillace, M., Picón Janeiro, J., & Schmidt, V. (2011). El concepto de impulsividad y su ubicación en las teorías psicobiológicas de la personalidad. Revista Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 3(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.5579/rnl.2011.0057

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660

van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Stroebe, W., & Aarts, H. (2013). Successful restrained eating and trait impulsiveness. Appetite, 60(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.016

Vigil-Colet, A., & Morales-Vives, F. (2005). How impulsivity is related to intelligence and academic achievement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005072

How to Cite

APA

Muñoz-Márquez, C. E. & Palafox-Palafox, G. (2026). Agency, Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 35(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194

ACM

[1]
Muñoz-Márquez, C.E. and Palafox-Palafox, G. 2026. Agency, Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 35, 2 (Jul. 2026), 77–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194.

ACS

(1)
Muñoz-Márquez, C. E.; Palafox-Palafox, G. Agency, Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2026, 35, 77-95.

ABNT

MUÑOZ-MÁRQUEZ, C. E.; PALAFOX-PALAFOX, G. Agency, Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 2, p. 77–95, 2026. DOI: 10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/118194. Acesso em: 19 aug. 2026.

Chicago

Muñoz-Márquez, Clara Edith, and Germán Palafox-Palafox. 2026. “ Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions”. Revista Colombiana De Psicología 35 (2):77-95. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194.

Harvard

Muñoz-Márquez, C. E. and Palafox-Palafox, G. (2026) “ Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions”., Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 35(2), pp. 77–95. doi: 10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194.

IEEE

[1]
C. E. Muñoz-Márquez and G. Palafox-Palafox, “ Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions”., Rev. colomb. psicol., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 77–95, Jul. 2026.

MLA

Muñoz-Márquez, C. E., and G. Palafox-Palafox. “ Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 35, no. 2, July 2026, pp. 77-95, doi:10.15446/rcp.v35n2.118194.

Turabian

Muñoz-Márquez, Clara Edith, and Germán Palafox-Palafox. “ Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 35, no. 2 (July 24, 2026): 77–95. Accessed August 19, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/118194.

Vancouver

1.
Muñoz-Márquez CE, Palafox-Palafox G. Agency, Psychology and Economic Well-being: An Empirical Study in Highly Marginalized Regions. Rev. colomb. psicol. [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 24 [cited 2026 Aug. 19];35(2):77-95. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/118194

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

200

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.