<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model type="application/xml-dtd" href="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d3/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d3 20150301//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d3/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.1d3" specific-use="Marcalyc 1.2" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="redalyc">3090</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title specific-use="original">Revista Colombiana de Química</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Rev. Colomb. Quim</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0120-2804</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2357-3791</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Universidad Nacional de Colombia</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>
<country>Colombia</country>
<email>rcolquim_fcbog@unal.edu.co</email>
</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="art-access-id" specific-use="redalyc">309068794002</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Aplicada y Analítica</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">A dual perspective (conventional and solar-enhanced) on advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasses</article-title>
<trans-title-group>
<trans-title xml:lang="en">A dual perspective (conventional and solar-enhanced) on advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasses</trans-title>
</trans-title-group>
<trans-title-group>
<trans-title xml:lang="pt">Uma perspectiva dupla (convencional e aprimorada com energia solar) nos processos de oxidação avançados para tratar vinassas de <italic>Agave cocui</italic>
</trans-title>
</trans-title-group>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Ferrer-Gutiérrez</surname>
<given-names>Juan Pedro</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="corresp1"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<email>jferrer@utmachala.edu.ec</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Santos-Luna</surname>
<given-names>Jovanny Angelina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Pérez-Rodríguez</surname>
<given-names>Jhonny Édgar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Marcheno-Revilla</surname>
<given-names>Jefferson Michael</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Cuenca-Mayorga</surname>
<given-names>Fabián Patricio</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMach), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Av. Panamericana km 5 1/2 Vía a Pasaje, Machala, Ecuador.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Machala</institution>
<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMach), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Av. Panamericana km 5 1/2 Vía a Pasaje, Machala, Ecuador.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Machala</institution>
<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMach), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Av. Panamericana km 5 1/2 Vía a Pasaje, Machala, Ecuador.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Machala</institution>
<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMach), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Av. Panamericana km 5 1/2 Vía a Pasaje, Machala, Ecuador.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Machala</institution>
<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMach), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Av. Panamericana km 5 1/2 Vía a Pasaje, Machala, Ecuador.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Machala</institution>
<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="corresp1">
<email>jferrer@utmachala.edu.ec</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
<season>Mayo-Agosto</season>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>50</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>15</fpage>
<lpage>23</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>26</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-request" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>20</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>21</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<ali:free_to_read/>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>Se caracterizó fisicoquímicamente la vinaza de <italic>Agave cocui</italic> con base en regulaciones ambientales de referencia. Se obtuvieron los siguientes resultados: DQO: 71 000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, sólidos totales: 21 000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, sólidos disueltos: 17 000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>; pH: 4,06, conductividad: 9,45 mhos.cm<sup>-1</sup>, hierro total: 48,83 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, fenoles totales: 8,66 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>; DBO: 30 000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>. Se aplicaron las reacciones Fenton y foto Fenton para tratar las aguas residuales producidas. Para el proceso Fenton, las condiciones de oxidación óptimas encontradas fueron pH = 3,48, relación de masa [DQO]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:5 y relación de masa [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:6. Para el proceso foto Fenton, los parámetros óptimos encontraron fueron: pH = 3,98, [DQO]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:7,86 y [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:5. Los datos experimentales fueron ajustados a modelos de segundo orden polinomial con R<sup>2</sup> = 0,88 para el proceso Fenton y R<sup>2</sup> = 0,91 para el proceso foto Fenton, respectivamente. El lodo producido presentó las siguientes características: DQO promedio: 41 000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, hierro total: 296 000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, pH: 7,7. Las variables con mayor influencia en ambos procesos fueron [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] and [DQO]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>].</p>
</abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>
<italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse was physicochemically characterized with reference to the relevant environmental regulations. The following results were obtained: COD: 71,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, total solids: 21,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, dissolved solids: 17,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>; pH: 4.06, conductivity: 9.45 mhoscm<sup>-1</sup>, total Fe: 48.83 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, total phenols: 8.66 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>; BOD: 30,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>. Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions were applied to treat the wastewater produced. For the Fenton process, the optimal oxidation conditions found were pH = 3.48, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio = 1:5, and [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]: [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio = 1:6. For the photo-Fenton process, the optimal parameters found were: pH = 3.98, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:7.86, and [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]: [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:5. The experimental data were adjusted to fit second order polynomial models with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88 for the Fenton process and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91 for the photo-Fenton process, respectively. The sludge produced featured the following characteristics: average COD: 41,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, total Fe: 296,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, pH: 7.7. The variables with the greatest influence in both processes were [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] and [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>].</p>
</trans-abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="pt">
<title>Resumo</title>
<p>A vinhaça de <italic>Agave cocui</italic> foi caracterizada físico-quimicamente de acordo com as normas ambientais de referência. Os seguintes resultados foram obtidos: DQO: 71.000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, sólidos totais: 21.000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, sólidos dissolvidos: 17.000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>; pH: 4,06, condutividade: 9,45 mhos.cm<sup>-1</sup>, Fe total: 48,83 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, fenóis totais: 8,66 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>; DBO: 30,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>. As reações de Fenton e foto Fenton foram aplicadas para tratar a água residual produzida. Para o processo Fenton, as condições de oxidação ideais encontradas foram pH = 3,48, razão de massa [DQO]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:5 e razão de massa [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:6. Para o processo de foto Fenton, os parâmetros ideais encontrados foram: pH = 3,98, [DQO]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:7,86 e [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:5. Os dados experimentais foram ajustados para se adequar modelos polinomiais de segunda ordem com R<sup>2</sup> = 0,88 para o processo Fenton e R<sup>2</sup> = 0,91 para o processo foto Fenton, respectivamente. O lodo produzido apresentou as seguintes características: DQO média: 41.000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, Fe total: 296.000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, pH: 7,7. As variáveis ​​com maior influência em ambos os processos foram [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] e [DQO]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>].</p>
</trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
<title>Palabras clave</title>
<kwd>agua residual</kwd>
<kwd>reacción Fenton</kwd>
<kwd>procesos sostenibles</kwd>
<kwd>energía alternativa</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>wastewater</kwd>
<kwd>Fenton reaction</kwd>
<kwd>sustainable processes</kwd>
<kwd>alternative energy</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
<title>Palavras-chave</title>
<kwd>água residual</kwd>
<kwd>reação Fenton</kwd>
<kwd>processos sustentáveis</kwd>
<kwd>energia alternativa</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="39"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title/>
<p>
<bold>Introduction</bold>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Cocuy pecayero</italic> is a spiritous beverage that has been produced since pre-Hispanic times in the Pecaya parish, Sucre district, Falcón state, Venezuela. It is obtained by the fermentation and distillation of juices extracted from <italic>Agave cocui </italic>Trelease, of the <italic>Agavaceae</italic> family. The distilled product features organoleptic properties similar to those found in tequila, the world-renowned alcoholic beverage originating in Jalisco, Mexico [1]. The production of <italic>Cocuy pecayero</italic> generates high levels of wastewater. Wastewaters produced by the alcoholic beverages industry are known as vinasses. The vinasses generated by the manufacture of <italic>Cocuypecayero</italic> have high organic loads and acidic pH values [2], analogous to the complex wastewaters generated by conventional distilleries [3]. The production of <italic>Cocuy pecayero</italic> is reported to be approximately 200,000 L per annum, with the result that a significant volume of effluents is also generated; the average production ratio of vinasses is 12 L per L of <italic>Cocuy pecayero</italic> [4].</p>
<p>Effluents from the production of Cocuy pecayero are refractory to biological treatments, meaning that a wastewater treatment technique must be applied to achieve a higher degree of efficiency in related biochemical processes, e.g., degradation of stable substances of low degradability such as unfiltered Agave fibers, yeast biomass, residual sugars, acids, esters, higher alcohols, phenols, and pigments [5]. Wastewater treatments must also be appropriate to issues including economic factors (especially in relation to circular economies), operation in an industrial environment, low influence over efficiency, and safe discharging. A viable alternative to biological treatments involves chemical methods based on the application of reagents that turn organic pollutants into relatively harmless compounds such as carbon dioxide and water, through advanced oxidization processes (AOP), based on the production of reactive species e.g., the hydroxyl radical (OH●), which oxidize a wide range of organic pollutants regardless of their nature [6]. Thus, the application of chemical treatments to wastewaters generated by distillation processes is a viable method for countering pollution issues, taking into account technological, economic, and environmental factors. Among advanced oxidation processes, the Fenton reaction (Fe(II)/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and, particularly, the photo-Fenton reaction (Fe(II)/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/UV), have garnered interest in the last few years for its efficiency in degrading a wide range of organic pollutants [7]. The oxidizing power of the Fenton reaction is attributed to the formation of hydroxyl radicals during the catalytic decomposition of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> under acidic conditions, as described in Eq. (1) [8].</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi2.png"/>    (1)</p>
<p>Once formed, Fe (III) reacts with the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to regenerate Fe(II) in a so-called Fenton type reaction; the sequence describing this process is depicted by Eq. (2), Eq. (3), and Eq. (4) [9].</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi3.png"/>       (2)</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi4.png"/>        (3)</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi5.png"/>(4)</p>
<p>Efficiency in degrading organic compounds is remarkably improved provided the Fenton reaction is aided by the incidence of visible and ultraviolet radiation, due to the regeneration of Fe(II) via Fe(III) photoreduction and the production of new hydroxyl radicals, as described by Eq. (5) and Eq. (6) [10].</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi30.png"/>      (5)</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi22.png"/>     (6)</p>
<p>In order to reach an efficient application of the photo-Fenton reaction, the concentration of each reagent involved in the degradation of organic pollutants must be optimized. To achieve this, previous studies reported the application of the multivariate response surface methodology, using a composite central factorial design and a quadratic polynomial model to adjust results [11, 12]. In this sense, systems dedicated to the treatment of wastewaters produced by the fermentation and distillation of the <italic>Agave cocui</italic> juice must be developed before it is discharged into the environment. Such treatments prepare the discharged wastewater to ensure it complies with the relevant environmental and legal standards, preserving sources of water suitable for human consumption and soil characteristics, as well as securing sustainable economic development, assuring the quality of the final product and strengthening the ecological image of this incipient artisanal industry and contributing in this way to the principles embodied in the concept of the circular economy. Thus, this study evaluates the degradation of vinasses produced by the distillation of <italic>Agave cocui </italic>juices, via Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions and using the response surface methodology. Moreover, this research explored the following specific objectives: (i) to characterize <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasses according to the parameters contained in standards of reference related to the classification and quality control of water bodies, liquid discharges, and effluents [13], in order to increase understanding of the waste to be treated and to recommend prior and posterior steps regarding advanced oxidation processes, (ii) to determine optimal pH, [COD]:[H.O.], and [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] conditions both in terms of mass and mass ratio, to achieve advanced oxidation conditions for the degradation of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasses via Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions, (iii) to compare Fenton and photo-Fenton processes in terms of organic load removal and kinetic parameters, (iv) to characterize the sludge produced in advanced oxidation processes, and (v) to compare the physicochemical parameters of the treated waste according to the optimal reaction conditions declared in the standards of reference.</p>
<p>
<bold>Material and methods</bold>
</p>
<p>
<bold>
<italic>Sample preparation</italic>
</bold>
</p>
<p>25 artisanal stills, registered with FUNDACITE Falcón (the Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology, Falcón state), were established as the study population. The stills were located in Pecaya, Sucre district, Falcón state, Venezuela. A purposive sampling was carried out in 4 stills producing “A type” <italic>Cocuy pecayero</italic> (i.e., liquor made without the addition of sugar during the fermentation stage). A composed sample consisting of a mixture of 3 L of vinasse taken from the 4 different sampling spots was prepared; producing a total volume of 12 L, which was stored in a 20 L high-density polyethylene container. The sampling procedure was carried out at the bottom of the still.</p>
<p>
<bold>
<italic>Experimental procedure</italic>
</bold>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Fenton reaction</italic>
</p>
<p>The composed sample was stored at 4 °C. The physicochemical properties in the sample were measured according to the criteria described in the standards of reference [13]. The average Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) value was measured as the starting point to perform calculations pertaining to each experiment according to the [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio, the [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio, and pH. In order to evaluate the removal of soluble COD, the crude vinasse was filtered and centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 min and then diluted using a dilution factor of 10. Next, 50 mL of the diluted vinasse was transferred to a 250 mL beaker, at room temperature. The sample was stirred for 5 min until homogenization occurred. Subsequently, in order to regulate the pH value according to the experimental conditions, either H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> or NaOH were added, followed by the required amount of FeSO<sub>4</sub>.7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.5 M. Next, to ensure the dissolution of Fe<sup>+2</sup> ions, the solution was stirred for 5 min before further agitation was carried out until the end of the reaction. Next, and sequentially, the required amounts of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> 30% <italic>w/v</italic> were added in 3 equal parts and at 20 min intervals up to completion of 1.5 h of reaction, to avoid the solution overheating (as the resulting reaction was exothermic) and the potential decomposition of free hydroxyl radicals (OH.) provoked by high temperatures. When the reaction time was over, a precipitation of Fe<sup>+3</sup> (such as Fe(OH)<sub>3</sub> and other complex ferric compounds) was observed, adjusting the final pH value to between 8 and 9; at these values, the lowest solubility for this chemical species was noted. After circa 15 h rest, and in the absence of light, the clarification stage was observed. The volume of sludge produced was measured in each experiment.</p>
<p>
<italic>Photo-Fenton reaction</italic>
</p>
<p>The experimental set-up was carried out under direct solar radiation between 12:00 and 14:00. The irradiance data yielded on the day of the experiment were measured using a UV radiometer. Total sun exposure time was 1.5 h [14,15]. The UV radiation value obtained was circa 25.15 Wm<sup>-2</sup>, a value near to that reported as “optimal [7].” The reactor used for the process had the following characteristics: 13 cm diameter and 500 mL (although the reacting mixture occupied only 50 mL of the available space). A specific energy value of 61.02 kJ·L<sup>-1</sup> was determined for the cited reaction time. COD, residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, total residual iron, total phenols, and pH were determined for the resulting supernatant. To compare the effectiveness of each process separately, these parameters were determined once the Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions had ended and when the flocculation-coagulation stage was over. To avoid including the added H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in the Fenton reagent, the obtained COD values were corrected using Eq. (7) [16].</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi32.png"/>     (7)</p>
<p>Where:</p>
<p>COD: Chemical oxygen demand (corrected)</p>
<p>COD<sub>M</sub>: Measured chemical oxygen demand</p>
<p>Rp: Concentration of residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.</p>
<p>This equation was based on a study of the interference of H2O<sub>2</sub> in the determination of COD, in order to avoid this intervention, which would have occurred using standard methods [16]. Finally, COD removal, in terms of efficiency ., was determined by Eq. (8):</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi33.png"/>     (8)</p>
<p>Where:</p>
<p>η: efficiency</p>
<p>COD<sub>O</sub>: Sample chemical oxygen demand before the treatment</p>
<p>COD<sub>F</sub>: Sample chemical oxygen demand after the treatment</p>
<p>
<bold>
<italic>Statistical analysis and experimental design</italic>
</bold>
</p>
<p>A statistical analysis was performed using the StatGraphics Plus 5.1 package, based on the data obtained on COD removal at the following points: the experimental point, the (stationary) optimal point, and the analysis of variance, to set the corresponding mathematical model (9). The independent variables selected were pH, (COD):(H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) ratio, and (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>):(Fe) ratio; the response variable determined was the COD removal percentage. In order to determine whether the data obtained in both processes (Fenton and photo-Fenton) could be adequately modeled by a normal distribution, the Goodness-of-Fit Test (the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), was applied to the result data yielded. The optimal points were chosen using the values for the physicochemical composition of the treated effluent and the amount of sludge produced in the overall process.</p>
<p>
<disp-formula id="e1">
<label/>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_ee2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The residual sludge in each advanced oxidation process was analyzed to determine the volume, pH, COD, and total Fe. Once determined in the effluent treated under optimal conditions, these parameters were compared with the standards of reference [13]. A rotatable central composite design, widely used in this type of process [11, 12], was applied. Following the literature, the levels and variables under study (pH, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio, [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio) were selected to optimize the experimental procedure regarding time, an early approach to the optimal region, cost issues associated with the use of chemical reagents and a significant reduction in the number of experimental runs [17-19]. Table 1 depicts the experimental design, which consisted of a simple factorial design (experimental runs: 1 to 8), making it possible to identify the optimal region and discard the applicability of a lineal model. In addition, the experimental design array was prepared using 6 central points (experimental runs: 9 to 14) to minimize experimental errors, i.e., with a greater number of degrees of freedom, and subsequently 6 axial points (experimental runs: 15 to 20) providing rotatability properties to the experimental design (the variance of the predicted response by the constructed model depended on the distance to center of the experimental design). The experimental design featured 10 degrees of freedom.</p>
<p>
<bold>Table 1.</bold> Central rotatable experimental design, with codified and natural variables</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Table 1.</title>
<p>Central rotatable experimental design, with codified and natural variables.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 1 Table 1.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gt2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="width:94.64%;border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt2-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:13.5pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt"/>
<td style="width:42.04%;   border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-right:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt" colspan="3">Codified variables</td>
<td style="width:42.24%;   border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-right:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt" colspan="3">Natural variables</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.5pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">Experimental run  </td>
<td style="width:16.04%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio (A)</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">pH (B)</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">[COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio (C)</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:13.5pt">[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio (A)</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:13.5pt">  pH (B)</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:13.5pt">[COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio (C)</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;border:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">1</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;border:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">4:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">3</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;border:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">1:2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">2</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4.1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">5</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">8:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">8:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">7</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">8.1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">8</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">+</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">8:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">4</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">9</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">10</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">11</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">12</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">13</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">14</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">15</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">-1.68</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">2.64:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">16</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">1.68</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">9.36:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">17</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">-1.68</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">2.66</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">18</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">1.68</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">4.34</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">1:4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.75pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">19</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">-1.68</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:12.75pt">1:1.14</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.5pt">
<td style="width:15.72%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">20</td>
<td style="width:16.04%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">0</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">0</td>
<td style="width:17.9%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">1.68</td>
<td style="width:16.26%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">6:1</td>
<td style="width:8.12%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">3.5</td>
<td style="width:17.88%;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:13.5pt">1:7.86</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>
<bold>Results</bold>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Physicochemical characterization of Agave cocui vinasse</italic>
</p>
<p>Due to its vegetal nature, vinasse has a high organic load. The suspended material is composed of fibers and residues of <italic>Agave cocui</italic>.  However, after 24 h of resting time without the action of any coagulant-flocculant, the suspended material settled to the bottom and the solution was clarified. According to the standards of reference on the classification of the composition of liquid discharges, the physicochemical parameters of this effluent corresponded to the Group II, i.e., substances with unknown effects which may feature acute or chronic toxic effects on individuals, may affect the biota and is not suitable for further uses, given its high concentrations of carbonaceous organic matter (expressed in terms of COD or Biological Oxygen Demand - BOD) and suspended solids, in addition to atypical properties regarding color, temperature, pH, and other biological parameters [13]. Physicochemical characteristics analyzed in the composed sample of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse are presented in Table 2. All values are the average of 3 repetitions. Regarding data normality, since the smallest p-value amongst the tests performed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) over the data obtained in both processes was greater than or equal to 0.05 (0.55 for Fenton processes and 0.28 for photo-Fenton processes), the idea that the data obtained came from a normal distribution with 95% confidence was accepted, i.e., the data obtained can be adequately modeled by a normal distribution.</p>
<p>
<bold>Table 2</bold>. Principal physicochemical characteristics in <italic>Agave cocui </italic>vinasses</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>Table 2.</title>
<p>Principal physicochemical characteristics in Agave cocui vinasses.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 2 Table 2.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gt3.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="width:78.86%;border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt3-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">
<bold>Parameters</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">
<bold>X</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">
<bold>± SD</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">
<bold>% CV</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">
<bold>Threshold</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">pH</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">4.06</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.01</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.37</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">6 – 9</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">COD (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">71,000</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">2.24</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">350</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Total solids (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">21,560</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">78</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.36</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Diluted solids (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">17,000</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">87</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.50</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Suspended solids (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">4,410</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">9</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.19</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">80</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Turbidity (NTU)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">13,000</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">350</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.93</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Chlorides (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">385.56</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">12</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">2.66</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">1,000</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Total Fe (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">48.83</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.3</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.59</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">10</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">Nitrates (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">4.82</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.02</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">0.29</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">40</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">Sulfides (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1,430</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">14</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1.00</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1,000</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">BOD (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">30,000</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">0.74</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">60</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">Conductivity (mhos·cm<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">9,000</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">0.86</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">Biodegradability (BOD<sub>5</sub>/COD)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">0.440</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">0.001</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">0.98</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">Total Cu (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">6.33</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1.53</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">0.24</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:41.88%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">Total phenols (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:15.2%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">8.66</td>
<td style="width:15.6%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">1.15</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">0.13</td>
<td style="width:13.66%;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Optimization of operational conditions in the Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions</italic>
</p>
<p>Table 3 shows the results for the treatment of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse via the Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. The removal percentages for the Fenton reaction and the photo-Fenton reaction were 72.39% and 82,75% respectively. During the Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation processes, principally during the pH adjustment between 8 and 9, a large number of flocs of various sizes were observed. These flocs were identified as ferric complexes formed by chain reactions of ferrous and hydroxyl ions [20]. All the flocs and the residual sludge settled by gravity. In addition, the experimental data were fitted to second order models in terms of the coded variables. The Fenton process model (10) yielded R. = 0.88, meaning it can explain 88% of the cases studied. Similarly, in the case of the photo-Fenton process (11), the yield was R. = 0.91 after adjustments. The adjustments decreased the magnitude of the regression coefficient with the removal of terms with no statistical significance to reach the simplification of the model [12,21].</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi35.png"/>     (10)</p>
<p>
<inline-graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gi36.png"/>     (11)</p>
<p>Figure 1 shows the estimated response surfaces for the proposed empirical mathematical models. A quadratic behavior of the variables involved was observed, and the optimal region was clearly denoted in every case. A lack-of-fit test was performed for the proposed equations, the p-values found for Fenton and photo-Fenton being 0.6 and 0.45, respectively. The test applied was carried out comparing the variability of the actual residues model with the variability between the observations in the replication of factors. Provided that the p-values for the lack-of-fit were greater than or equal to 0.05, they were considered appropriate to explain the observed data at a 95% confidence level.</p>
<p>
<bold>Table 3.</bold> Experimental results for the treatment of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse via the Fenton and photo-Fenton processes</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<title>Table 3.</title>
<p>Experimental results for the treatment of Agave cocui vinasse via the Fenton and photo-Fenton processes.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 3 Table 3.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gt4.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="width:758.4pt;margin-left:-15.9pt;border-collapse:collapse;border:none;  " id="gt4-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:21.6pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:none;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:21.6pt"/>
<td style="width:382.7pt;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:none;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:21.6pt" colspan="8">
<bold>End of the Fenton reaction stage</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:12.0cm;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:none;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:21.6pt" colspan="7">
<bold>End of the photo-Fenton reaction stage </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:33.25pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Run No.</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Effluent pH</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Sludge pH</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Sludge volume (mL)</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Effluent volume (mL)</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Total Fe (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">COD (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Remo-val (%)</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Effluent pH</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Sludge pH</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Sludge volume (mL)</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Total Fe (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">COD (mg·L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:33.25pt">Remo-val (%)</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">1</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">680</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">9.46</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">9.06</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">36</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">62.3</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">170</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">6.45</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">9.06</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">14</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">1.5</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">936.68</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:15.0pt">86.77</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10.38</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10.21</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">43</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">79.64</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.4</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10.21</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">15</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3.8</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">78.98</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10.56</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10.3</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">41</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">30</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">63.64</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.5</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10.3</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.1</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">71.15</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">272</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.59</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.9</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">54</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">68.64</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">68</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.95</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.9</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">16</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.2</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">982.7</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">86.12</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">5</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">272</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.17</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">5.16</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">51</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">30</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">75.3</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">68</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.47</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">5.16</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">13</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3.6</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">921.8</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">86.98</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">408</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.49</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.39</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">56</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">61.93</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">102</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.89</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.39</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">16</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2.6</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">71.61</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">680</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.96</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.94</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">53</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">61.68</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">170</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.96</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.94</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">4.3</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">76.33</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.83</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">5.79</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">49</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">66.64</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.38</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">5.79</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">11</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2.5</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">79.63</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">272</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.62</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3.91</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">47</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">83.9</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">68</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.66</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3.91</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1.8</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">774.6</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">89.06</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.04</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.17</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">50</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">84.21</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.04</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.17</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">800.0</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">88.7</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">11</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">272</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.09</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.2</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">54</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">83.89</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">68</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.1</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.2</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">13</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3.1</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">713.7</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">89.92</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">272</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9.3</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9.54</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">53</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">83.85</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">68</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.4</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9.54</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">13</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2.35</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">713.7</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">89.92</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">13</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.85</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.21</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">11</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">48</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">83.96</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.34</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.21</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">11</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1.01</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">848.9</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">88.01</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">14</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.82</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.09</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">42</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">84.25</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.82</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.09</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2.21</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">796.5</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">88.75</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">15</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.1</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.83</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">13</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">41</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">69</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.1</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.83</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1.95</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">74.42</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">16</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">544</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.9</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.81</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">48</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">75.29</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.9</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.81</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">13</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2.55</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">81.77</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">17</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.51</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.45</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">9</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">57</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">30</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">56.78</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">34</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">6.01</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.45</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">75.54</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">18</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">544</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.76</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.75</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">14</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">60</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">61.94</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">136</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.76</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.75</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">11</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">1</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">69.34</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.0pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">19</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">408</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.83</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.79</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">11</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">59</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">30</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">3,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">63.25</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">102</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">7.23</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">8.79</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">2.94</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">919.7</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:15.0pt">87.01</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.55pt">
<td style="width:35.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">20</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">272</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">8.77</td>
<td style="width:42.55pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">6.15</td>
<td style="width:44.2pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">10</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">52</td>
<td style="width:47.95pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">30</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">77.64</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">68</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">6.95</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">6.15</td>
<td style="width:49.65pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">12</td>
<td style="width:49.6pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">4.4</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;   height:14.55pt">355.4</td>
<td style="width:42.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:   solid windowtext 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;height:14.55pt">94.98</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>
<bold>a)</bold>
</p>
<p>
<bold>b)</bold>
</p>
<p>
<bold>Figure 1.</bold> Response surface graphs for the COD removal processes (a) Fenton and (b) photo-Fenton</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt4">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Figure 1.</title>
<p>Response surface graphs for the COD removal processes (a) Fenton and (b) photo-Fenton</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 1 Figure 1.</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gt5.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<object-id/>
</graphic>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>On the other hand, the effect of the [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio was found to be significant for the Fenton process. This variable, in addition to establishing the technical costs, is related to removal efficiency, as demonstrated experimentally. For the photo-Fenton processes, the variables found to be most influential were, in relative order of importance, pH and [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio. No statistically significant influences were found for the [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio, whereas the BC/(pH-[COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]) interaction presented statistical significance. Concerning pH, the consensus found in the literature was that the optimal region was located around pH 4. Remarkably, coloration removal was observed in all treatments using both advanced oxidization techniques. The photo-Fenton process removed around 10% more organic matter than the Fenton process at the same length of total reaction time and under the same operational conditions. This evidenced the influence of solar light on the regeneration of Fe<sup>+2</sup> radicals. In addition, the effluent parameters, Fe and residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, were improved due to the total consumption of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, either because of the process reactions, photocatalytic decomposition, or by temperature influence. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> decomposed into oxygen and water in the precipitation stage provoking bubbling, and resuspension of the iron particles occurred in the catalyst deposited in the treated effluent. Figure 2 depicts the precision of the constructed models for the prediction of the COD removal percentage against the actual measured values, both expressed in dimensionless variables. Little dispersion was observed for the points on the line of fit, which shows that the equations may, to a large extent, be used to estimate the percentage values of COD removal in the region not subject of experimental study.</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt5">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<title>Figure 2.</title>
<p>Measured data fit versus predicted values for the proposed model (a) Fenton and (b) photo-Fenton processes.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 2  Figure 2.</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gt6.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>Figure 3 depicts the Pareto diagrams featuring factors with a direct or inversely proportional effect over the analyzed response variable. The interactions extending to the right of the vertical blue line were those presenting a significant effect above the process efficiency. For Fenton and photo-Fenton processes alike, pH featured a sign (-), meaning that the lower pH values produce higher efficiencies in the evaluated interval [10].</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf2">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<title>Figure 3.</title>
<p>Pareto diagrams for removal percentage of COD for (a) Fenton and (b) photo-Fenton.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 3 Figure 3.</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gf2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<bold>Figure 3.</bold> Pareto diagrams for removal percentage of COD for (a) Fenton and (b) photo-Fenton</p>
<p>The contours derived from the response surface graphs for the evaluated regions are shown grouped in Figure 4.  In both cases, the optimal region for removal was located near to the center of the experimental design. An increase in the COD removal percentage was observed as the [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio and the pH increased up to a point where a decrease in response occurred. Similarly, an increase in both the [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] and [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratios near the optimal region produced a decrease in the response variable, as both species, when in excess, act as trappers of OH. radicals, which are precursors of oxidation reactions. Efficiency percentages increased with pH values of 3.5 to 4, alongside proportional increments for the [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] and [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratios. The optimal values for the Fenton process, yielding a percentage of organic matter removal of 85.84%, were: pH, 3.48, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio, 1:5, and  [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio, 1:6. The optimal values for the photo-Fenton process, yielding a percentage of organic matter removal of 96.45% were: pH=3.98, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio, 1:7,8, and [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio, 1:5. These values were located in the experimental region. An average percentage of removal of 87.37% for the Fenton process was found; according to the value predicted by the model and a residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration of 286 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> in the effluent and 9 mL of sludge. In the case of the photo-Fenton process, an average percentage of removal of 96.52% was found, according to the value predicted by the model and a residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration of 56 mg.L<sup>-1 </sup>in the effluent and 11 mL of sludge. An increase of 10% was yielded for organic matter removal in vinasse when natural solar radiation was applied during the same timeframe as for the reaction without radiation exposure. However, sludge production was around 3% and 5% higher than in the Fenton process. This was the case in the experimental region, including within the optimal region.</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf1">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<title>Figure 4.</title>
<p>Contour graphs for the removal of COD in Fenton (a, b, c) and photo-Fenton (d, e, f) processes.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 4 Figure 4.</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gf3.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Characterization of sludges</italic>
</p>
<p>The average composition of the sludges produced was: 41,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>of COD, 296,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>of total Fe, pH of 7.7 and 0.96 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>of total phenols. As expected, this sludge featured high Fe content from the spent catalyst, and high content of organic matter deposited in the precipitation stage. According to the featured physicochemical composition, the effluent was slow-reactive, flammable and might be considered toxic. Comparatively, a higher amount of sludge was produced in the photo-Fenton process (around 12.35 mL per 50 mL of crude vinasse) than in conventional Fenton (around 9.25 mL per 50 mL of crude vinasse). This difference of circa 25% is related to the fact that the photo-Fenton yields a higher oxidation rate for Fe<sup>+2</sup> to Fe<sup>+3</sup> due to the influence of ultraviolet light; the latter is presented in the residual sludge at the end of the process [22]. As the sludge produced by both advanced oxidation processes had the same characteristics, namely flammability, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity, it is classified, according to the standard of reference, as waste “Type 2,” i.e., water-soluble, non-flammable, non-reactive, non-corrosive, non-irritating, non-toxic by inhalation, pH between 6 and 8 semi-solid or liquid materials, and wastes containing toxic elements in low concentrations. This type of waste is considered neither massively poisonous nor environmentally resilient; its hazard is related to its fluid condition, which makes it difficult to recover should a spilling event occur [13]. In the case of the Fenton process, the amount of total residual Fe in the whole experimental region featured values equal to or higher than the levels established by the environmental standards. Though the values for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in the effluent were not regulated by the standard of reference, significant quantities occurred in the effluent treated by the aforementioned technique. However, the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> decomposed fairly easily. On the other hand, the concentration of total residual Fe remained below the allowable limit in the entire experimental region studied for the photo-Fenton process. Table 4 shows that, for the optimal reaction conditions, the concentration value was 2.8 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>. The difference between both processes may be explained by the residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> decomposed during the course of the reaction in two ways: catalytic system and photocatalysis.</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt6">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<title>Table 4.</title>
<p>Physicochemical characteristics of the effluent treated with the photo-Fenton in optimal reaction conditions.</p>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 4 Table 4.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="309068794002_gt7.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt7-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">
<bold>Parameters</bold>
</td>
<td style="border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">
<bold>Before </bold>
<bold>treatment</bold>
</td>
<td style="border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">
<bold>After</bold>
<bold>Treatment</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">
<bold>Maximum admissible value by the standards</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">pH</td>
<td style="border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">4.06</td>
<td style="border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">7.36</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">6 – 9</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">COD (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">71,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">4,000</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">350</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Total solids (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">21,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">580</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Diluted solids (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">17,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">390</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Suspended solid (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">4,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">77</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">80</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Turbidity (NTU)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">12,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">1,000</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Chloride (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">372</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">25</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">1,000</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Total Fe (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">48.83</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">2.8</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">10</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.65pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">Nitrates (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">4.5</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:14.65pt">0.2</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:14.65pt">40</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">Sulfides (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">1,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">12</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1,000</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">BOD (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">30,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">2,000</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">60</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">Conductivity (mhos.cm<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">9,000</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">600</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">Biodegradability (BOD<sub>5</sub>/COD)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">0.44</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">0.70</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">-</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">Total Cu (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">6.33</td>
<td style="padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">0.54</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;   height:15.5pt">1</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">Total phenols (mg.L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">8.66</td>
<td style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;   padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">0.96</td>
<td style="width:118.2pt;border:none;   border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 3.5pt 0cm 3.5pt;height:15.5pt">2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>
<bold>Discussion</bold>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse features suspended solids in different concentrations that provide fluidity properties; it is a reddish-brown liquid of alcohol-caramel odor, with plentiful foam. Concomitantly, it is partially composed of natural pigments, acids, esters, furans, pyrans, aldehydes, long and short chain fatty acids, 2-methyl furoate, 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, higher alcohols, nitrogenous and sulfur compounds, inorganic salts, proteins, and amino acids, alongside suspended cells, and biomass [23]. The total solids in <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse were slightly lower than those reported for tequila vinasses, probably due to different operational practices [24]. Suspended solids in the vinasse studied were above the allowable limit established in the standard of reference, representing 20.45% of total solids. This justifies pretreatment steps (filtration, equalizing, sedimentation, flocculation), where a significative amount of the organic load was removed. Conversely, COD and BOD are relevant parameters in a liquid effluent, both provide significant information, e.g., the organic matter content and waste biodegradability. COD and BOD are indicators of secondary treatment processes that should be applied. The average value for COD in <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse was 71,000 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>, higher than the values for tequila [25, 26]. The results obtained exceeds the maximum allowable by the standard of reference of 350 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> [13]. Although the effluent was rich in organic matter potentially subject to consumption by microorganisms, the biodegradability index (BOD/COD ratio), was 0.44,  expressing its low microbial capacity for degradation and showing how viable the application of chemical oxidation processes can be as a means of pretreatment, especially when compared to biological alternatives, as the toxicity and resilience of the compounds presented in the vinasse would hamper the initiation of the operation and the capacity to buffer high organic loads in a bioreactor. The average experimental pH value in the sample confirmed the values reported, explaining the corrosive capacity of the vinasse [3,27]. Moreover, this property is common in vinasses generated from different raw materials, e.g., sugar cane (pH = 4.08) and sugar beet (pH = 4.8) [28,29]. Results obtained for chlorides and nitrates were 385 mg·L<sup>-1 </sup>and 4.82 mg·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, values higher that the admissible limits. However, there were significant average concentrations of sulfates of around 1,000 mg·L<sup>-1</sup>, above the admissible value. Sulfate is a non-toxic permanent ion, which at higher concentrations might unbalance the natural sulfur cycle [30]. The high values yielded of total Fe may be associated with precarious manufacturing practices used in the production of <italic>Agave cocui</italic> (rusted tanks and metallic drums). It is important to monitor initial concentrations, since the Fenton reagent may add additional amounts of Fe to the waste, which may be a critical issue in the application of the treatments studied. When admissible limits are not reached, additional removal stages, i.e., ion exchange, stone-sand filters or polyelectrolyte addition should be added at the end of the process, which may increase costs. Values four times higher than those established in the standards of reference were found for total phenols, toxic compounds that limit further biological treatments. In the Fenton process the variables with the highest degree of influence in the removal percentage of COD were, according to their relative importance and quadratic values, as follows: pH, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratio and [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>] ratio. This explains the importance of ensuring the proper ratio between the catalyzer (Fe<sup>+2</sup>) and the OH. producer (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>).  Unsuitable ratios of these components may cause issues involving the generation and spontaneous consumption of hydroxyl radicals [31,32]. Considering the basic reactions involved in the Fenton process, undue amounts of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> enhance Fe<sup>+3</sup> to react with it to produce ferric complexes. Hydroxyl radicals, required for oxidation purposes, are not generated, whereas non-optimal amounts of Fe<sup>+2</sup> directly limit the production of the hydroxyl radicals, negatively impacting the overall process yield.</p>
<p>According to the results found, pH was one of the factors with higher influence in the efficiency in Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions. The optimal range to remove chemical compounds is between 3 and 4. However, optimal pH values of around 7 have also been reported [17,33]. The inhibition of the Fenton process due to the influence of the pH might be explained by the following : (i) under an extremely low pH value (pH&lt;2), the [Fe(H<sub>2</sub>O)]<sup>+2 </sup>formed reacts with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, decreasing the production of OH. [34], (ii) the inhibition effect of the H. ions on OH. radicals assume higher importance under low pH values, (iii) Fe<sup>+3</sup> and the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> reaction is inhibited under low pH conditions [35], (iv) at pH values higher than 4.5, the absence of H. inhibits the decomposition of the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> resulting in lower production of hydroxyl ions, (v) at pH values higher than 5, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> decomposes into water and oxygen; in addition, the formation of Fe complexes begins, deactivating the catalyzer [36], (vi) the oxidation potential of OH. decreases as the pH value increases. The H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> amounts are a critical variable of the process, the OH. amount produced being directly dependent on it. Nevertheless, an excess of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> provokes Fe flocculation due to the oxygen produced during self-decomposition and contributes to higher concentrations of Fe in the effluent and higher amounts of residual H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, which could cause issues in further biological treatments [37]. The only statistical significances found in the interaction between parameters was the AC ([H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]:[Fe<sup>+2</sup>]-[COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]) interaction, reflecting the importance of setting the optimal catalyst doses for the removal percentage of COD. The optimal [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] ratios found in this  study were higher than the recommended 1:14 ratio for the removal of COD [10]. However, it was similar to an optimal ratio reported of 1:4 for COD removal [12]. This shows that high doses of Fe<sup>+2</sup> are required to reach higher removal degrees of organic matter; excesses may, though, block the OH. radicals. A treatment for vinasses requires proper concentrations of OH., i.e., proportional to the initial amount of organic matter. Reported removal percentages in biological treatments applied to tequila vinasses were on average around 70% [38,39], evidencing the versatility of the treatment applied in this study to counter the complexity in vinasse biodegradability. COD and BOD parameters were above those quoted in the environmental norms. Therefore, further treatments are required to adjust these constraints. According to the increase of around 57% for the biodegradability index, and since the effluent resilience decreased, a subsequent biological treatment might be applied. In addition, total phenol concentration decreased; these compounds are responsible for starting issues in such reactions. In spite of the lack of mineralization of the compounds and remnants present in the final effluent, these are expected to be those with higher chemical stability/resilience; the biodegradability index increased given that the concentration of such compounds was much lower at the end of the treatment than in the crude residual wastewater, allowing microbiota to degrade the effluent more efficiently. Total Fe concentrations in the treated effluent using the photo-Fenton technique were around 50% lower than that allowable according to the standard of reference of 10 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> in each case [13]. Solar radiation optimized the conversion from Fe<sup>+3</sup> to Fe<sup>+2</sup>, explaining the higher recovery of residual sludge at the end of the process. The amount of residual H.O. showed a similar pattern of behavior; there was a lack of oxygen bubbling produced by decomposition, hence Fe particles contained in the deposited sludge may return to the treated vinasse.</p>
<p>
<bold>Conclusions </bold>
</p>
<p>
<italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasses feature high concentrations of organic matter, low pH, and high temperature of discharge. <italic>Agave cocui</italic> vinasse composition is comparable to other vinasses, e.g., of tequila and wine. Primary treatment processes may be hindered by phenols, natural pigments, and other substances. Hence, chemical treatments may be a viable alternative. The significant amounts of precipitable solids in vinasses requires coagulation/flocculation steps as a pretreatment stage, where about 30% of the initial COD was removed in this study. The application of Fenton and photo-Fenton processes, favored under acidic conditions, may be enhanced by the pH value in discharged vinasses. Given the complex nature of the vinasse composition, the use of COD as a sign of the organic matter concentration is of relevance for evaluating wastes and carrying out kinetics studies. The evaluated variables showed optimal values, providing a maximum removal percentage over the experimentally studied ranges. The results demonstrated that, in optimal conditions, the amount of residual sludge is similar to the lower amount produced in the experimental region.</p>
<p>The response surface methodology, especially the rotatable central design, optimizes the operational conditions in the treatment of vinasses. The optimal conditions for the oxidation in the Fenton process were pH=3.48, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass proportion = 1:5, and [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] mass ratio = 1:6. In the photo-Fenton process, the optimal conditions were:  pH = 3.98, [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] = 1:7.86, and [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>]=1:5. The application of the photo-Fenton process resulted in around 10% more organic matter removed compared to the conventional Fenton process. However, around 3% - 5% more residual sludge was produced. Environmental factors should be pondered when selecting chemical treatments. The convenience of the photo-Fenton process is boosted by the use of solar light irradiance as the energy source, complying with the principles of the circular economy, i.e., it might be a sustainable alternative for treating wastewater. The variables with higher influence in the process were [Fe<sup>+2</sup>]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>], [COD]:[H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>], and pH. The experimental data were adjusted precisely to the second order polynomial models. The amount of residual sludge produced constituted around 20% of the treated effluent volume.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>
<bold>References</bold>
</title>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref1">
<label>[1]</label>
<mixed-citation>[1]       I. Leal, J. Medina, H. Morán, y L. Jaimes, “Evaluación de la diferencia en la composición de volátiles mayoritarios entre cocuy de agave y licor fraudulento comercializado como cocuy”. <italic>Multiciencias</italic>, vol. 11, n° 4, pp. 339–344. 2011.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Evaluación de la diferencia en la composición de volátiles mayoritarios entre cocuy de agave y licor fraudulento comercializado como cocuy</article-title>
<source>Multiciencias</source>
<year>2011</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref2">
<label>[2]</label>
<mixed-citation>[2]       R. Colina, J. Ferrer, e I. Leal, “Impactos ambientales de la producción de Cocuy en el municipio Sucre, estado Falcón, Venezuela”. <italic>Multiciencias</italic>, vol. 13, n° 3, pp. 229–237, 2013.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Impactos ambientales de la producción de Cocuy en el municipio Sucre, estado Falcón, Venezuela</article-title>
<source>Multiciencias</source>
<year>2013</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref3">
<label>[3]</label>
<mixed-citation>[3]       Y. Pérez, O. Pérez, y L. Zumalacárregui, “Caracterización química, física y microbiológica de dos vinazas cubanas”. <italic>Revista EIA</italic>, vol. 14, n° 28, pp. 29–43, 2017. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v14i28.695">https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v14i28.695</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Caracterización química, física y microbiológica de dos vinazas cubanas</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v14i28.695</source>
<year>2017</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v14i28.695">https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v14i28.695</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref4">
<label>[4]</label>
<mixed-citation>[4]       M. Leal, E. Pérez, H. Morán, W. Barrera, O. Pérez, y A. García, “Modelado matemático del equilibrio líquido vapor de mostos de Agave cocui”. <italic>ACI Avances En Ciencias e Ingenierías</italic>, vol. 7 n° 2, pp. C53 – C60, 2015. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i2.266">https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i2.266</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Modelado matemático del equilibrio líquido vapor de mostos de Agave cocui</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i2.266</source>
<year>2015</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i2.266">https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i2.266</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref5">
<label>[5]</label>
<mixed-citation>[5]       W. Mikucka, y M. Zielińska, “Distillery stillage: characteristics, treatment, and valorization”. <italic>Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology</italic>, n°. 192, pp. 770–793, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03343-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03343-5</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Distillery stillage: characteristics, treatment, and valorization</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03343-5</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03343-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03343-5</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref6">
<label>[6]</label>
<mixed-citation>[6]       D. Miklos, C. Remy, M. Jekel, K. Linden, J. Drewes, y U. Hübner, “Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review”. <italic>Water Research</italic>, n° 139, pp. 118–131, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042</source>
<year>2018</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref7">
<label>[7]</label>
<mixed-citation>[7]       C. Medina, y E. Segovia, “Aplicación del método Foto-Fenton para el tratamiento de aguas residuales en la industria láctea”. <italic>Dominio Ciencia</italic>, vol. 6, pp. 785–801, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1316">http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1316</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Aplicación del método Foto-Fenton para el tratamiento de aguas residuales en la industria láctea</article-title>
<source>http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1316</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1316">http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1316</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref8">
<label>[8]</label>
<mixed-citation>[8]       A. Rubio, E. Chica, y G. Peñuela, “Aplicación del proceso Fenton en el tratamiento de aguas residuales de origen petroquímico”. <italic>Ingeniería y Competividad</italic>, vol. 16, n° 2, pp. 211–223, 2014.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Aplicación del proceso Fenton en el tratamiento de aguas residuales de origen petroquímico</article-title>
<source>Ingeniería y Competividad</source>
<year>2014</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref9">
<label>[9]</label>
<mixed-citation>[9]       J. De Laat, y H. Gallard, “Catalytic decomposition of H2O2  by Fe(III) in homogeneous aqueous solution: mechanism and kinetic modeling”. <italic>Environmental Science and Technology</italic>, vol. 33, n° 16, pp. 2726–2732, 1999. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es981171v">https://doi.org/10.1021/es981171v</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Catalytic decomposition of H2O2  by Fe(III) in homogeneous aqueous solution: mechanism and kinetic modeling</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1021/es981171v</source>
<year>1999</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es981171v">https://doi.org/10.1021/es981171v</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref10">
<label>[10]</label>
<mixed-citation>[10]     E. Gilpavas, E. Arbelárez, J. Medina, y C. Gómez, “Tratamiento de aguas residuales de la industria textil mediante coagulación química acoplada a procesos Fenton intensificados con ultrasonido de baja frecuencia”. <italic>Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental,</italic> vol. 34, n° 1, pp. 157–167, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2018.34.01.14">https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2018.34.01.14</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Tratamiento de aguas residuales de la industria textil mediante coagulación química acoplada a procesos Fenton intensificados con ultrasonido de baja frecuencia</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2018.34.01.14</source>
<year>2018</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2018.34.01.14">https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2018.34.01.14</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref11">
<label>[11]</label>
<mixed-citation>[11]     G. Castillo y J. Blaz, “Reducción de la carga orgánica de aguas residuales tóxicas de los laboratorios de la unas mediante oxidación avanzada foto–Fenton”. <italic>Revista ECIPrerú</italic>, vol. 15, pp. 31–41, 2018.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castillo y J. Blaz</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Reducción de la carga orgánica de aguas residuales tóxicas de los laboratorios de la unas mediante oxidación avanzada foto–Fenton</article-title>
<source>Revista ECIPrerú</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref12">
<label>[12]</label>
<mixed-citation>[12]     K. Ramos y Y. Jiménez, “Degradación de desechos tóxicos provenientes de laboratorios universitarios con foto-Fenton solar usando diseño de experimentos”, <italic>Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental</italic>, Vol. 32, n° 1, pp. 119–131, 2016.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramos y Y. Jiménez</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Degradación de desechos tóxicos provenientes de laboratorios universitarios con foto-Fenton solar usando diseño de experimentos</article-title>
<source>Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental</source>
<year>2016</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref13">
<label>[13]</label>
<mixed-citation>[13]     Decreto 883, “Normas para la clasificación y control de la calidad de los cuerpos de agua”. <italic>Gaceta Oficial de República de Venezuela</italic>, 1995.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Decreto 883</collab>
</person-group>
<article-title>Normas para la clasificación y control de la calidad de los cuerpos de agua</article-title>
<source>Gaceta Oficial de República de Venezuela</source>
<year>1995</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref14">
<label>[14]</label>
<mixed-citation>[14]     S. Malato, “Descontaminación de aguas mediante oxidación avanzada bajo radiación solar: un proceso doblemente sostenible”. En: Universidad Nacional de San Martín y Fundación Innovación Tecnológica. Programa Futuros: Escuela de Posgrado: Agua + Humedales. (Serie Futuros). <italic>UNSAM Edita</italic>, pp. 226 – 240, 2018.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="other">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malato</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>UNSAM Edita</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref15">
<label>[15]</label>
<mixed-citation>[15]     L. Prieto-Rodríguez, D. Spasiano, I. Oller, I. Fernández-Calderero, A. Agüera y S. Malato, “Solar photo-Fenton optimization for the treatment of MWTP effluents containing emerging contaminants”. <italic>Catalysis Today</italic>, n° 209, pp. 188–194, 2013. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.002</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prieto-Rodríguez</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spasiano</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oller</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernández-Calderero</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agüera y S. Malato</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Solar photo-Fenton optimization for the treatment of MWTP effluents containing emerging contaminants</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.002</source>
<year>2013</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.002</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref16">
<label>[16]</label>
<mixed-citation>[16]     I. Talinli y G.K. Anderson, G. K., “Interference of H2O2  on the standard COD test”. Water Research, vol. 26, n° 1, pp. 107-110, 1992.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Talinli y G.K. Anderson</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Interference of H2O2  on the standard COD test</article-title>
<source>Water Research</source>
<year>1992</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref17">
<label>[17]</label>
<mixed-citation>[17]     B. Caram y F. García, “Efecto del pH en la degradación de derivados salicílico en sistemas tipo-Fenton y Foto-Fenton. <italic>Investigación Joven</italic>, vol. 3, n° 1, pp. 70–71, 2016.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Caram y F. García</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Efecto del pH en la degradación de derivados salicílico en sistemas tipo-Fenton y Foto-Fenton</article-title>
<source>Investigación Joven</source>
<year>2016</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref18">
<label>[18]</label>
<mixed-citation>[18]     C. Gutiérrez, y A. Pilco, A, “Optimización de la remoción de compuestos orgánicos persistentes mediante el proceso foto-Fenton. <italic>Revista de la Sociedad Química del Perú</italic>, vol. 86, n° 1, pp. 58–69, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37761/rsqp.v86i1.273">https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37761/rsqp.v86i1.273</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Optimización de la remoción de compuestos orgánicos persistentes mediante el proceso foto-Fenton</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37761/rsqp.v86i1.273</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37761/rsqp.v86i1.273">https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37761/rsqp.v86i1.273</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref19">
<label>[19]</label>
<mixed-citation>[19]     V. Leifeld, M. Tâmisa, D. Wisniewski y L Igarashi-Mafra, “Ferrous ions reused as catalysts in Fenton-like reactions for remediation of agro-food industrial wastewater”. <italic>Journal of Environmental Management</italic>, vol. 222, pp. 284–292, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.087">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.087</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leifeld</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tâmisa</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wisniewski y L Igarashi-Mafra</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Ferrous ions reused as catalysts in Fenton-like reactions for remediation of agro-food industrial wastewater</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.087</source>
<year>2018</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.087">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.087</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref20">
<label>[20]</label>
<mixed-citation>[20]     C. Walling, y S. Kato, “The Oxidation of Alcohols by Fenton’s Reagent. The Effect of Copper Ion”. Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 93, n° 17, pp. 4275–4281, 1971. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618262.ch16b">https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618262.ch16b</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>The Oxidation of Alcohols by Fenton’s Reagent. The Effect of Copper Ion</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618262.ch16b</source>
<year>1971</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618262.ch16b">https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618262.ch16b</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref21">
<label>[21]</label>
<mixed-citation>[21]     E. Marín y F. Gonzales, “Influencia de la concentración de H.O. y densidad de corriente en la remoción de color y DQO de la vinaza mediante electro-Fenton”. Tesis de grado. Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, 2018.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marín y F. Gonzales</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Universidad Nacional de Trujillo</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref22">
<label>[22]</label>
<mixed-citation>[22]     C. Benatti, A. Saraiva y C. Tavares, “Characterization of solids originating from the Fenton’s process”. <italic>Journal of Hazardous Materials</italic>, vol. 163, pp. 1246–1253, 2009. DOI:  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.094">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.094</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benatti</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saraiva y C. Tavares</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Characterization of solids originating from the Fenton’s process</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.094</source>
<year>2008</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.094">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.094</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref23">
<label>[23]</label>
<mixed-citation>[23]     I. Bravo, y E. Giraldo, “Vinazas: transformación de un residuo contaminante en un recurso útil”. <italic>UnicaucaCiencia</italic>, vol. 1, pp. 55–65, 1996.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Vinazas: transformación de un residuo contaminante en un recurso útil</article-title>
<source>UnicaucaCiencia</source>
<year>1996</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref24">
<label>[24]</label>
<mixed-citation>[24]     R. Ibarra, L. León y A, Osoria, “Caracterización fisicoquímica de vinazas de destilerías”. <italic>Revista Cubana de Química</italic>, vol. 31, n° 2, pp. 246–257, 2019.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ibarra</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>León y</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Caracterización fisicoquímica de vinazas de destilerías</article-title>
<source>Revista Cubana de Química</source>
<year>2019</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref25">
<label>[25]</label>
<mixed-citation>[25]     G. Íñiguez y R. Hernández, “Estudio para la rehabilitación de una planta de tratamiento de vinazas tequileras mediante un floculante polimérico de poliacrilamida (PAM)”. <italic>Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental</italic>, vol. 26, n° 1, pp 209–311, 2010.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Íñiguez y R. Hernández</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Estudio para la rehabilitación de una planta de tratamiento de vinazas tequileras mediante un floculante polimérico de poliacrilamida (PAM)</article-title>
<source>Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental</source>
<year>2010</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref26">
<label>[26]</label>
<mixed-citation>[26]     M, Garzón, E. Estrada, G. Mantilla, M. Salazar y E. Bahena, “Desarrollo de una tecnología de tratamiento para aguas residuales de la industria tequilera”. Informe final, Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua, 2013.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="other">
<source>Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua</source>
<year>2013</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref27">
<label>[27]</label>
<mixed-citation>[27]     C. Aristizábal, “Caracterización fisicoquímica de una vinaza resultante de la producción de alcohol de una industria licorera a partir del aprovechamiento de la caña de azúcar”. <italic>Ingenierías USBMed</italic>, vol. 6, n° 2, pp. 36–41, 2015. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.1729">https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.1729</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aristizábal</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Caracterización fisicoquímica de una vinaza resultante de la producción de alcohol de una industria licorera a partir del aprovechamiento de la caña de azúcar</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.1729</source>
<year>2015</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.1729">https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.1729</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref28">
<label>[28]</label>
<mixed-citation>[28]     J. González, S. Buedo, F. Prado y S. Álvarez, “Efecto de la vinaza sobre el crecimiento y productividad de la Soja (Glycine max) en condiciones semicontroladas”. <italic>Boletín de La Sociedad Argentina de Botánica</italic>, vol. 53, n° 4, pp. 597–608, 2018. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v53.n4.21982">https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v53.n4.21982</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>González</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buedo</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prado y S. Álvarez</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Efecto de la vinaza sobre el crecimiento y productividad de la Soja (Glycine max) en condiciones semicontroladas</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v53.n4.21982</source>
<year>2018</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v53.n4.21982">https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v53.n4.21982</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref29">
<label>[29]</label>
<mixed-citation>[29]     I. Scull, L. Savón, O. Gutiérrez, E. Valiño, I. Orta, P. Mora, H. Orta, Y. Ramos, A. Molineda, G. Coto y A, Nodo. “Composición físico química de mostos concentrados para su evaluación en dietas destinadas a animales”. <italic>Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola</italic>, 46, 385–389, 2012.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scull</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savón</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gutiérrez</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valiño</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orta</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mora</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orta</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molineda</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coto y</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Composición físico química de mostos concentrados para su evaluación en dietas destinadas a animales</article-title>
<source>Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola</source>
<year>2012</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref30">
<label>[30]</label>
<mixed-citation>[30]     E. Hinckley, J. Crawford, H. Fakhraei y C. Driscoll, “A shift in sulfur-cycle manipulation from atmospheric emissions to agricultural additions”. <italic>Nature Geoscience</italic>, vol. 13, n° 9, pp. 597–604, 2020. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0620-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0620-3</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hinckley</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crawford</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fakhraei y C. Driscoll</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A shift in sulfur-cycle manipulation from atmospheric emissions to agricultural additions</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0620-3</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0620-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0620-3</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref31">
<label>[31]</label>
<mixed-citation>[31]     W.Z. Tang y S. Tassos. Oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of trihalomethanes by Fenton’s reagent. <italic>Water Research</italic>, vol. 31, n° 5, pp. 1117–1125, 1997. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00348-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00348-X</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang y S. Tassos. Oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of trihalomethanes by Fenton’s reagent. Water</surname>
<given-names>W.Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of trihalomethanes by Fenton’s reagent</article-title>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref32">
<label>[32]</label>
<mixed-citation>[32]     M. Costante y F, García, “Superficies de respuesta de la degradación de foto Fenton de la mezcla de colorantes”, <italic>Investigación Joven</italic>, vol. 3, n°1, pp. 62–63, 2016.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Costante y</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Superficies de respuesta de la degradación de foto Fenton de la mezcla de colorantes</article-title>
<source>Investigación Joven</source>
<year>2016</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref33">
<label>[33]</label>
<mixed-citation>[33]     J. Buitrago, J. Sanabria, H. Gutiérrez, L. Pizzio, F. Urbano, J. Rengifo y P. Osorio, (2018). Degradación de contaminantes emergentes (amoxicilina y diurón) mediante Fenton y foto-Fenton a pH circunneutro y bajas concentraciones de hierro. Evaluación del efecto de matriz. <italic>4to Encuentro de Investigadores en Formación en Recursos Hídricos</italic>, 1–13, 2018.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="other">
<source>Investigadores en Formación en Recursos Hídricos</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref34">
<label>[34]</label>
<mixed-citation>[34]     S. Bossmann, E. Oliveros, S. Göb, S. Siegwart, E. Dahlen, L. Payawan, M. Straub, M, Wörner y A. Braun, “New evidence against hydroxyl radicals as reactive intermediates in the thermal and photochemically enhanced Fenton reactions”. <italic>Journal of Physical Chemistry A</italic>, vol. 102, n° 28, pp. 5542–5550, 1998. DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980129j">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980129j</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>New evidence against hydroxyl radicals as reactive intermediates in the thermal and photochemically enhanced Fenton reactions</article-title>
<source>https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980129j</source>
<year>1998</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980129j">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980129j</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref35">
<label>[35]</label>
<mixed-citation>[35]     Y. Sun, y J. Pignatello. “Organic Intermediates in the Degradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Fe<sup>3+</sup>/H.O. and Fe<sup>3+</sup>/H.O./UV”. J. Agric. Food Chem, vol. 41, pp. 1139–1142, 1993.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Organic Intermediates in the Degradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Fe<sup>3+</sup>/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Fe<sup>3+</sup>/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/UV</article-title>
<source>J. Agric. Food Chem</source>
<year>1993</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref36">
<label>[36]</label>
<mixed-citation>[36]     C. Zanta y C. Martínez-Huitle, “Degradation of 2-hydroxybenzoic acid by advanced oxidation processes”. <italic>Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering</italic>, vol. 26, n° 03, pp. 503 - 513, 2009.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanta y C. Martínez-Huitle</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Degradation of 2-hydroxybenzoic acid by advanced oxidation processes</article-title>
<source>Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering</source>
<year>2009</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref37">
<label>[37]</label>
<mixed-citation>[37]     C. Medina, W. Uriarte, S. Orrego, E. Montero, “Aplicación del proceso Fenton para degradar aguas residuales del camal de Chota”. <italic>Informe Final de Investigación</italic>. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Chota, 2018.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="other">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Medina</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uriarte</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orrego</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montero</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Chota</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref38">
<label>[38]</label>
<mixed-citation>[38]     K. Salazar, “Tratamiento por biofiltración aerobia sobre cama orgánica del efluente de la digestión anaerobia de vinazas de tequila”. <italic>Tesis de maestría</italic>. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 2017.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Salazar</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Instituto Politécnico Nacional</source>
<year>2017</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_309068794002_ref39">
<label>[39]</label>
<mixed-citation>[39]     A. Serrano, M. Garzón, B. Barragán, E. Estrada y J, Vigueras. “Estrategias para mejorar la calidad del efluente de un sistema de tratamiento por digestión anaerobia de vinazas de tequila”. <italic>Tercer congreso nacional-Asociación Mexicana de Ingeniería, Ciencia y Gestión Ambiental, A.C</italic>., 2017.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Serrano</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garzón</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barragán</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Estrada y</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Tercer congreso nacional-Asociación Mexicana de Ingeniería, Ciencia y Gestión Ambiental</source>
<year>2017</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>