Published

12-08-2026

Injuries, Behaviors, and Needs of Veterinary Clinicians Following Occupational Accidents: Analysis of Associated Factors

Lesiones, comportamientos y necesidades de los médicos veterinarios clínicos tras accidentes laborales: un análisis de los factores asociados

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v73n2.126242

Keywords:

work absence, veterinarians, occupational risks, epidemiology (en)
ausencia laboral, veterinarios, riesgos profesionales, epidemiología (es)
ausecia del traba, ausencia del trabalho, veterinários, riscos professionais (pt)

Downloads

Authors

Veterinarians are at high risk of sustaining occupational injuries, and their responses and needs following occupational accidents are often difficult to predict. This study aimed to examine the associations between injury location, continuation of work despite injury, self-treatment, seeking medical assistance, work absence, and selected risk factors among veterinary clinicians in the Province of Tucumán, Argentina. The findings are intended to inform strategies to improve occupational health and well-being among veterinary professionals. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 203 veterinary practitioners who reported at least one occupational accident (OA) after graduation. The risk factors evaluated were gender, time since graduation (≤12 or >12 years), and type of practice (large-animal, small-animal, or mixed-animal practice). Statistical analyses included the χ² test, Student's t-test, ANOVA, and logistic regression. Wounds and contusions were the most common injuries. The upper limbs (96.1%) and lower limbs (43.8%) were the most frequently affected body regions. Following an OA, 84.2% of participants reported self-treatment, 79.8% continued working despite their injuries, 47.8% sought medical assistance, and 50.7% reported one or more days of absence from work. Upper- and lower-limb injuries were associated with small-animal (P = 0.006) and large-animal practice (P < 0.001), respectively. Time since graduation was associated with seeking medical assistance (P = 0.008) and work absence (P = 0.002). A higher frequency of self-treatment was associated with a greater likelihood of continuing to work despite injury (P < 0.001). Injured veterinarians lost a mean of 8.2 ± 17.1 workdays. 

Los veterinarios corren un alto riesgo de sufrir lesiones laborales, y sus necesidades y comportamientos tras un accidente de trabajo suelen ser difíciles de predecir. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las asociaciones entre la localización de la lesión, la continuación del trabajo a pesar de la lesión, el autotratamiento, la búsqueda de asistencia médica y el absentismo laboral, y determinados factores de riesgo entre los veterinarios clínicos de la provincia de Tucumán, Argentina. Los resultados buscan servir de base para estrategias destinadas a mejorar la salud y el bienestar laboral de los profesionales veterinarios. Se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal en el que participaron 203 veterinarios en ejercicio que declararon haber sufrido al menos un accidente laboral (AL) desde su graduación. Los factores de riesgo evaluados fueron el sexo, el tiempo transcurrido desde la graduación (≤12 o >12 años) y el tipo de consulta (animales grandes, animales pequeños o consulta mixta). Los análisis estadísticos incluyeron la prueba de χ², la prueba t de Student, el ANOVA y la regresión logística. Las heridas y contusiones fueron las lesiones más frecuentes. Las extremidades superiores (96,1%) y las extremidades inferiores (43,8%) fueron las regiones del cuerpo más afectadas. Tras sufrir un AA, el 84,2% de los participantes declaró haberse automedicado, el 79,8% continuó trabajando a pesar de la lesión, el 47,8% solicitó asistencia médica y el 50,7% declaró haber estado de baja laboral uno o más días. 

Os veterinários enfrentam um alto risco de lesões relacionadas ao trabalho. O objetivo deste estudo foi buscar associações entre local da lesão, continuar trabalhando mesmo lesionado, autotratamento, assistência médica e afastamento do trabalho com potenciais fatores de risco em clínicos veterinários na província de Tucumán, Argentina. Foi realizado um estudo transversal em 203 profissionais. Os fatores de risco selecionados foram Sexo, tempo transcorrido desde a graduação e tipo de prática (grande/ pequena/ ambas as práticas com animais). A análise estatística incluiu X2, teste T de Student, ANOVA e regressão logística. Feridas e contusões foram as lesões mais frequentes. As localizações mais frequentes foram os Membros Superiores (96,1%) e inferiores (43,8%). Após um AT, 84,2% se trataram, 79,8% continuaram trabalhando mesmo feridos, 47,8% procuraram atendimento médico e 50,7% relataram um ou mais dias de folga. Lesões em membros superiores e inferiores foram associadas ao trabalho com animais pequenos (P= 0,006) e grandes (P< 0,001), respectivamente. Os anos de graduação foram relacionados à assistência médica (P= 0,008) e ausência ao trabalho (P= 0,002). Quanto maior a frequência de praticantes que se tratam, maior a proporção daqueles que continuam trabalhando com condições físicas prejudicadas (P< 0,001). Veterinários lesionados perderam 8,2❷17,1 dias úteis. Os acidentes relacionados a animais apresentaram a maior frequência de veterinários que necessitaram de atendimento médico e ausência ao trabalho. Os programas de educação continuada devem se concentrar em estudantes de graduação e populações-alvo específicas dentro de veterinários graduados.

References

Abbott, F. V., & Fraser, M. I. (1998). Use and abuse of over-the-counter analgesic agents. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 23(1), 13–34.

Álvarez, E. T., Peratta, D. L., García Cachau, M. A., Cavagión, L. J., Larrieu, E. J., & Ferrán, A. M. (2007). Enfermedades y lesiones laborales en médicos veterinarios de Argentina. Ciencias Veterinarias, 9(1), 49–67. https://cerac.unlpam.edu.ar/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1890

Baracaldo-Santamaría, D., Trujillo-Moreno, M. J., Pérez-Acosta, A. M., Feliciano-Alfonso, J. E., Calderon-Ospina, C. A., & Soler, F. (2022). Definition of self-medication: A scoping review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 13, 20420986221127501. https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986221127501

Benson, L. S., Edwards, S. L., Schiff, A. P., Williams, C. S., & Visotsky, J. L. (2006). Dog and cat bites to the hand: Treatment and cost assessment. Journal of Hand Surgery, 31(3), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.12.011

Berry, S. L., Susitaival, P., Ahmadi, A., & Schenker, M. B. (2012). Cumulative trauma disorders among California veterinarians. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(9), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22076

Blanco, V. J. (2016). Automedicación en estudiantes de veterinaria de la UNNE. Año 2015. XXII Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Ciencias de la Salud, UNNE, Corrientes, Argentina. https://sistema.cyt.unne.edu.ar/sap/1.0/aplicacion.php?ah=st696d5233a5c1a6.19159588&ai=sap%7C%7C3528&ts=imprimir&tcm=popup&id=398&evt=imprimir&fila=10

Breña, J., Falcón, N., Fernández, C., & Zuazo, J. (2014). Accidentes ocupacionales en personal que labora en clínicas y consultorios de animales de compañía, Lima, 2010. Salud y Tecnología Veterinaria, 2(1), 24–31. https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/STV/article/view/2063/2055

Epp, T., & Waldner, C. (2012). Occupational health hazards in veterinary medicine: Physical, psychological, and chemical hazards. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 53(2), 151–157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3258828/

Fritschi, L., Day, L., Shirangi, A., Robertson, I., Lucas, M., & Vizard, A. (2006). Injury in Australian veterinarians. Occupational Medicine, 56(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqj037

Gómez de la Torre, N., & Tarabla, H. D. (2015). Accidentes laborales, enfermedades profesionales y uso de elementos de protección personal en veterinarios de pequeños animales. InVet, 17(2), 23–27. https://www.fvet.uba.ar/fcvanterior/publicaciones/archivos/vol-17-n2-2015/articulo-VI-Vol-17-n2-2015.pdf

Huertas, P. A., Molineri, A. I., León, E. A., Signorini, M. L., & Tarabla, H. D. (2019). Factores asociados a accidentes in itinere en veterinarios de grandes animales. Revista Ab Intus, 3(2), 71–76. https://www.ayv.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/Ab_Intus/article/view/110/134

Imoberdorf, C. G., Signorini, M. L., & Tarabla, H. D. (2023). Estudio exploratorio comparativo sobre seguridad ocupacional en diferentes tipos de prácticas veterinarias. Revista FAVE Ciencias Veterinarias, 22, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14409/favecv.2023.22.e0025 .

Jeyaretnam, J., Jones, H., & Phillips, M. (2000). Disease and injury among veterinarians. Australian Veterinary Journal, 78(9), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2000.tb11939.x

Kregar, G., & Filinger, E. (2005). ¿Qué se entiende por automedicación? Acta Farmacéutica Bonaerense, 24(1), 130–133. http://www.latamjpharm.org/trabajos/24/1/LAJOP_24_1_6_2_5ROG2AU4L2.pdf

Lecaros, A. C., Falcón, N. P., & Elías, R. P. (2010). Accidentes ocupacionales y zoonosis en profesionales que laboran en zoológicos y zoocriaderos de Lima, Perú. Una Salud. Revista Sapuvet de Salud Pública, 1(2), 27–42. https://revistas.lasalle.edu.co/index.php/us/article/view/5097

Leggat, P. A., Smith, D. R., & Speare, R. (2009). Exposure rate of needlestick and sharps injuries among Australian veterinarians. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-4-25

Lucas, M., Day, L., Shirangi, A., & Fritschi, L. (2009). Significant injuries in Australian veterinarians and use of safety precautions. Occupational Medicine, 59(5), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqp070

Lucas, M., Day, L., & Fritschi, L. (2013). Serious injuries to Australian veterinarians working with cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal, 91(1–2), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.01014.x

Molineri, A. I., Signorini, M. L., Pérez, L., & Tarabla, H. D. (2013). Zoonoses in rural veterinarians in the central area of Argentina. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 21(5), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12054

Molineri, A. I., Signorini, M. L., & Tarabla, H. D. (2016). Distribución espacial de accidentes de tránsito, percepción de riesgos y uso de elementos de protección personal in itinere en veterinarios de grandes animales en la Provincia de Santa Fe. Analecta Veterinaria, 36(2), 23–27. https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/analecta/article/view/3550/3361

Navarrete, M. B., & Tarabla, H. D. (2018). Factores asociados a los riesgos ocupacionales y el uso de elementos de protección personal en la práctica veterinaria con bovinos y equinos. InVet, 20(1–2), 255–266. https://www.fvet.uba.ar/archivos/publicaciones/invet/vol20-2-2018/ART-3-VOL-20-N-2.pdf

Nienhaus, A., Skudlik, C., & Seidler, A. (2005). Work-related accidents and occupational disease in veterinarians and their staff. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 78(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0583-5

Nordgren, L. D., Gerberich, S. G., Alexander, B. H., Church, T. R., Bender, J. B., & Ryan, A. D. (2014). Evaluation of factors associated with work-related injuries to veterinary technicians certified in Minnesota. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 245(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.245.4.425

Rood, K. A., & Pate, M. L. (2019). Assessment of musculoskeletal injuries associated with palpation, infection control practices, and zoonotic disease risks among Utah clinical veterinarians. Journal of Agromedicine, 24(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2018.1536574

Signorini, M. L., Pérez, L., Tarabla, H. D., & Molineri, A. I. (2014). Accidentes laborales en veterinarios rurales. Avances en Ciencias Veterinarias, 29(1), 36–34. https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/12848

Tarabla, H. D. (2009). Riesgos de trabajo en veterinarios del centrooeste de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. InVet, 11(1), 39–47. https://www.fvet.uba.ar/fcvanterior/publicaciones/archivos/vol_11N1/T08.pdf

Tarabla, H. D., Hernández Villamizar, A. C., Molineri, A. I., & Signorini, M. L. (2017). Percepción y prevención de riesgos ocupacionales en veterinarios rurales. Revista Veterinaria, 28(2), 152–156. https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/vet/article/view/2543/2249

Tarabla, H. D., Molineri, A. I., Robin, H., & Signorini, M. L. (2019). Riesgos ocupacionales en estudiantes de veterinaria en Argentina. Revista Veterinaria, 30(1), 63–67. https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/vet/article/view/3914/3540

Ugnia, L. I., Troillet, J. C., & Tarabla, H. D. (2021). Riesgos ocupacionales en veterinarios dedicados a la producción porcina. Revista Ab Intus, 8(4), 14–22. https://www.ayv.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/Ab_Intus/article/view/20/19

Villarreal, R. T., Kim, S. Y., & Yu, D. (2024). Worker and work-related factors influence on musculoskeletal symptoms among veterinary surgeons. Ergonomics, 67(8), 1064–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2280830

Voss, D. S., Boyd, M. V., Evanson, J. F., & Bender, J. B. (2024). An increase in animal-related occupational injuries at a veterinary medical center (2008–2022). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 262(3), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.23.08.0477

White, S. C. (2013). Prevalence and risk factors associated with musculoskeletal discomfort in spay and neuter veterinarians. Animals, 3(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3010085

Wilkins, M. J., Bartlett, P. C., Judge, L. J., Erskine, R. J., Boulton, M. L., & Kaneene, J. B. (2009). Veterinarian injuries associated with bovine TB testing livestock in Michigan, 2001. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 89(3–4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.014

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

32

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Injuries, Behaviors, and Needs of Veterinary Clinicians Following Occupational Accidents: Analysis of Associated Factors. (2026). Revista De La Facultad De Medicina Veterinaria Y De Zootecnia, 73(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v73n2.126242