Health-Related Quality of Life of an adult population sample in Barranquilla, Colombia

Objective The aim of this study was to estimate values of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by focusing on the physical and mental health of an adult population sample in the city of Barranquilla, Colombia. Materials and Methods Cross-sectional study with 368 adults representing an adult population. The questionnaires included the health-related quality of life “CDC-Healthy Days”, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, and the Overall Disability Sum Score. The prevalence of fair or poor health status (FPH), frequent physical distress (FPD), frequent mental distress (FMD), and frequent activity limitation (FAL) was estimated according to socio-demographic characteristics, presence of depression, and physical disability. Results The mean age of 368 adults was 45.6 ± 18.3 years; 55.7% were males. Only 21% of this population considered their general health to be fair or poor. The prevalence of FPH, FPD, FMD and FAL was higher in women than in men, and increased with greater severity of depression and higher physical disability. Moreover, 12% of the population presented with mild depression, 3.8% with moderate depression, and less than 1% with severe depression. 94% of this population did not have an arms or legs disability. Discussion This study provides HRQOL values for an adult sample of the population of Barranquilla, Colombia. Overall, the HRQOL of this population, with subtle differences, is similar to other reports from Colombia. In general, women and people with depression and physical disabilities had a worse quality of life.


H
ealth-related quality of life (Hrqol) is a multidimensional concept (1).It refers to the perception that a person has of his or her own physical and mental health under the influences of life experience, beliefs, expectations, and the ability to react to factors in physical and social environments (2,3).It is an important aspect of general health and has become a predictor indicator in public health research of morbidity and mortality (4), mainly by capturing aspects related to health status and well-being from the individual's perspective.
Monitoring Hrqol may be useful when discussing policies for improving health and reducing inequalities among the population (5).In addition, it is relevant in medical practice, not only to obtain more general information of the patient's clinical status, but also to provide feedback on perceived health after treatment or interventions (6,7).However, measuring Hrqol is a challenge due to a lack of consensus on the most reliable and valid tools (6).Nonetheless, despite the complexity of its measurement, several instruments with good psychometric properties have been created to estimate generic-and disease-specific aspects of Hrqol (8).
Several authors have reported population estimates of Hrqol in Colombia, but for patient populations affected by or being treated for chronic diseases (9)(10)(11)(12).Few of these studies have reported Hrqol normative data for the general population (13)(14)(15).
This study sought to estimate the Hrqol values in an adult population sample of the city of Barranquilla, Colombia.

Study design and population
This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted in the city of Barranquilla, Colombia, which is located on the northern Caribbean coast of the country, with a population of 1 228 271 as of 2017.The city is organized in five local administrative units: Riomar, Metropolitana, Norte Centro Historico, Sur Oriente and Sur Occidente (16).
A sample size of 360 individuals was required assuming that depression in the general population was 19.8% (17), with accuracy of 5%, and an estimated population of 1 228 271 inhabitants.The participants were selec-ted according to the administrative units of the reported cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome during the Zika virus outbreak in Barranquilla in 2015-2016.In each administrative unit, the sample was calculated proportionally to the population size.This was done because the variance between administrative units and socioeconomic status is expected to be higher than the variance among socio-economic levels or strata.Blocks of 10 residential houses were randomly selected and consecutively visited until the subjects were identified according to age range (only people over 18 years of age were included).This method was repeated until the estimated number of participants was completed.The socio-economic distribution, age ranges (18 to 24, 25 to 54, 55 to 69, and >70 years), and sex of the final sample selected was similar to the population over 18 years old from Barranquilla, Colombia (18).

Variables
The sociodemographic characteristics were assessed with a questionnaire designed by the authors.On the one hand, socioeconomic level was classified according to the national guidelines (levels 1, 2 and 3 are people with fewer resources, level 4 people with an intermediate level, 5 and 6 people with greater economic resources) (19).On the other hand medical health insurance system in Colombia is divided into a) subsidized healthcare: only for poor or homeless Colombians; b) contributory healthcare: mandatory for all residents (the monthly premium is 12.5% of the monthly gross income); and c) private healthcare: available through different private companies (20).
The Hrqol was assessed through the Hrqol-4 Questionnaire developed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc) (21,22).This instrument assesses the health status of an individual based on their answer to the following question: 1) Would you say that in general your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?It also estimates the Hrqol based on physical and mental health days by asking the following questions: 2) "Now thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?"; 3) "Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?"; and 4) "During the past 30 days, on about how many days did poor physical or mental health keep you from doing your usual activities, such as self-care, work, or recreation?" The questions were a Spanish-language version of the original in English used in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (22,23).The self-rated health question responses were dichotomized into fair or poor health (FPH) vs. good, very good, or excellent health, and measures of unhealthy days or activity limitation days into ≥14 days (frequent physical distress -FPd, frequent mental distress -FMd, and frequent activity limitation -FAl) and <14 days (infrequent physical distress, infrequent mental distress, and infrequent activity limitation, according to clinical impact) (24).
Depression was assessed using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SdS) (25).This instrument is a short, 20-item, self-rating questionnaire designed to measure the presence and/or strength of major depressive symptoms and yield a quantitative description of the severity of a depressive disorder.The score ranges between 20 and 80 points.The percentage index (SdS index = score x 100/80) was calculated, and the depression status was classified as "no depression (<50)", "mild depression (50-59)", "moderate depression (60-69)", and "severe depression (>70)".
Physical disability was measured through the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INcAT) Overall Disability Sum Score (odSS) (26), which is a checklist that assesses functional impairments of the arms and the legs.The odSS ranges between 0 = no signs of disability, and 12 = maximum disability (arm disability scale: range 0-5; leg disability scale: range 0-7) (26).
The questionnaires were back-translated to warrant the effectiveness of the translation, and the application process was tested to establish the amount of time needed for each instrument.

Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics for demographics and characteristics of the population were generated as frequencies and percentages.Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages.Quantitative variables were measured as means and 95% confidence intervals (95%cI).The prevalence estimates and 95%cI for each Hrqol measure were calculated through exact method.Categorical variables were assessed with z-test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as indicated.A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 24 for Windows (Armonk, New York, USA), and Epidat version 3.1 (Galicia, Spain).

Ethics Statement
This study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.

RESULTS
The sampled population included 368 adults, with a mean age of 44.6 ± 18.3, and age range 18-88 years.In this population, 78.2% (95%cI = 73.9%-82.6%)reported their health status as excellent, very good or good, while 21.5% (95%cI = 17.3%-25.8%)considered their general health to be fair or poor.The result for each health status is presented in Table 1.56% of this sample was male, and 32.6% had college education.85% of these participants were of low socio-economic level (levels 1, 2 or 3), and 35.9% had health insurance subsidized by the state.Their personal health history is shown in Table 2.
Regarding medical insurance, people with subsidized insurance reported fair or poor health more (27.27%)than those with the contributory insurance (16.8%, p=0.038).The prevalence of fair or poor health decreased as the socio-economic level increased.The prevalence of fair or poor health reported by people suffering from chronic headaches, depression, high blood pressure or insomnia was 35.1%, 36.0,47.2%, and 38.3%, respectively (Table 2).
FPH=fair or poor health; FPd= frequent physical distress; FMd=frequent mental distress; FAl=frequent activity limitation by age group, medical insurance, socio-economic level and health risk factors; *Classified according to the national guidelines (levels 1, 2 and 3 are people with fewer resources, level 4 people with an intermediate level, 5 and 6 people with greater economic resources (19) The mean value for unhealthy days in the last 30 days due to poor physical health, for all participants, was 4.6 (95%cI = 3.6-5.5),and the figure in relation to poor mental health was 2.7 (95%cI = 1.9-3.5).The value for usual daily activities restricted by poor physical and mental health was 2.3 (95%cI = 1.6-3.0).
The prevalence of FPd was higher in women (18.2%) than in men (12.8%), p=0.216; it also increased with age, and decreased with higher socio-economic levels.The prevalence of FPd reported by people suffering from chronic headache, depression, high blood pressure, or insomnia, was 30.6%, 21.7%, 30.6% and 26.8%, respectively (Table 2).
The results of self-rated depression symptoms, based on the Zung Scale, of this population showed that 83.2% (175 men and 131 women) did not report any depression symptoms, 12.2% presented with mild depression, 3.8% had moderate depression, and less than 1% were categorized as severe depression.The prevalence of fair or poor health status, FMd, FPd and FAL increased with a greater severity of depression on this population (Table 3).
odSS= Overall Disability Sum Score, FPH = fair or poor health, FPd = frequent physical distress, FMd = frequent mental distress, FAl = frequent physical distress by depression symptoms according to the Zung Scale and disability according to the odSS in the general population of Barranquilla, Colombia, 2017 The results of physical disability level in this population, measured by the odSS, showed that 94% (193 men and 153 women) had no disability in arms or legs.3.5% (8 men and 5 women) of the sample presented a score of 1-2 points, and 2.5% (4 men and 5 women) of the participants presented a score ≥3 points.The prevalence of fair or poor health, FMd, FPd and FAl increased with higher scores of odSS, e.g., the prevalence of fair or poor health was 19.4% for people with 0 points, 38.5% for people with 1-2 point, and 77.8% for people with ≥3 points (Table 3).

DISCUSSION
This study attempted to estimate self-reported health-related quality of life based on "unhealthy days" of physical and mental health, self-reported depression symptoms, and overall disability score in a population sample of the city of Barranquilla, Colombia.
Regarding self-reported health status in this study, 78.3% of the population reported that they were in good, very good, or excellent health.In general, these results corroborate the findings from a previous study that also estimated perceived Hrqol in the Colombian adult population (15).However, the authors used the Eq-5d 3 level version by the EuroQol group and found that around 70% of the population reported being "completely healthy" (15).Furthermore, they reported that men tend to perceive their health status better compared to women of the same age range (15).Therefore, based on these surveys, in spite of using different instruments to measure Hrqol, there is evidence that the Colombian populations represented in these studies are generally in good health.
In this study, the majority of participants (48%) self-reported a "good health" status; these results show some similarities with other reports from Latin America.A decade ago, a study showed that self-reported "good health" was around 50% in Bridgetown (Barbados) and in Sao Paulo (Brazil), being a little lower than the 60% reported in Buenos Aires (Argentina) and Montevideo (Uruguay), yet higher than the 30% reported in Havana (Cuba), Santiago (Chile), and Mexico City (Mexico) (27).However, the percentage of our study population (21.5%) that reported fair-to-poor health status is higher than previously reported by that study (27).The percentage of the population reporting "poor" heath status in Buenos Aires, Montevideo and Bridgetown ranged between 5-7%, followed by Havana (13%), Santiago (18%), and Mexico City (19%) (27).In addition, in the United States, between 1993 and 2002, the percentage of people reporting regular-to-poor health status ranged between 14.4% and 15.4% (28).Other studies in Colombia (29), using the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) survey, have found that the general health status is lower in Colombia than in the United States, Canada, or Mexico.Although the rea-sons for these findings are not clear, varying expectations or beliefs that the population uses to define their health status may play a key role in these differences.It is important to note that these studies, as in our research, used a general population, not specific groups of patients.
The results of self-reported "unhealthy days" of this study due to physical symptoms, mental symptoms and limitation to perform usual daily activities also show some similarities with previously published international results.Jia et al. (30) applied a multilevel model to examine the association of selected county-level indicators and self-reported number of physically and mentally unhealthy days and activity limitation days (Hrqol measures) reported by respondents through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System of the United States.Their results were 3.34 and 3.17, respectively, for physically and mentally unhealthy days, and 1.91 for limited activity days (30), being quite similar to our results.
Although we found similar results with other studies, they should be interpreted with caution because socioeconomic indicators, environmental determinants, and other variables, which may cause large variations between populations, may heavily influence Hrqol estimates, thereby limiting comparisons of general populations between countries.Also, it is worth mentioning that the prevalence of FPd increases with age on the people that reported fair or poor health status.This fact has already been exposed in previous studies that found an association between self-reported physical unhealthy days and worse health status (28).The FMd and FAl do not seem to show a clear association with those that rated their health status as fair or poor.
The results of self-rated depression symptoms showed that most of our study sample (83.2%) did not report any depression symptoms.This finding is similar to a study conducted on the Colombian general population (84.2%), two decades ago, using the same questionnaire (31).Considering the Zung Depression Scale scores, it seems that self-reported depression symptoms were sta- This study provides, for the first time, odSS data for a population sample of Barranquilla.The data revealed that 94% of the Barranquilla population does not present any disability due to arm/leg weakness.This result coincides with the national prevalence of disability rate (6.4%) reported by the Colombian population census performed in 2005 by the National Department of Statistics (dANE) (35).
In addition, the results of this study corroborate other studies that examined population Hrqol data showing that the prevalence of reporting fair or poor health status is higher in women than in men (36), and that it increases with greater severity of depression and higher disability scores.This fact is supported by studies that prove that physical and mental health are key determinants of perceived health, and people with depression or disability often perceive their Hrqol worse than the healthy population (37).
This study provided Hrqol values for a sample of the population from Barranquilla, Colombia.Overall, the Hrqol of this population, with subtle differences, is similar to other reports from Colombia.In general, women, people with depression and physical disabilities had a worse quality of life.However, these data should be interpreted with caution when comparing other populations.We estimated the Hrqol cross-sectionally based on self-reported questionnaires, which is a limiting factor of the study.On the other hand, this study used validated questionnaires with good psychometric properties, which is one of its greatest strengths.Future studies should strive to use high quality Hrqol when comparing normal and disease specific populations ♣

Table 1 .
HRQOL according to the CDC HRQOL-4 questionnaire in the population sample of Barranquilla, Colombia, 2017

Table 2 .
Prevalence of FPH, FPD, FMD and FAL in the population sample ofBarranquilla, Colombia, 2017

Table 3 .
(34)alence of FPH, FPD, FMD and FAL by depression and disability in the population sample of Barranquilla, Colombia, 2017 On the other hand, our study provides data to corroborate previous findings, demonstrating that people with more self-reported symptoms of depression have a tendency to report a worse health status(34).