Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
Uso de prototipos para producir mapas futuros sistémicos de alta resolución. Una propuesta de modelo para la investigación y el conocimiento en diseño
Utiliser des prototypes pour produire des cartes systémiques à haute résolution du futur: étudier la nature des connaissances générées par le design
Uso de protótipos para produzir mapas futuros sistêmicos de alta resolução. Um modelo proposto para pesquisa e conhecimento em design
Palabras clave:
design research, systems design, value systems, future studies, methodology (en)investigación de diseño, diseño de sistemas, sistemas de valores, estudios futuros, metodología (es)
recherche en design, design de systèmes, systèmes de valeur, études futures, méthodologie (fr)
pesquisa em design, design de sistemas, sistemas de valor, estudos futuros, metodologia (pt)
Descargas
Design’s arguments of innovative transformation and its constant search for a preferred future have become a contemporary principle of the discipline, and yet most design models limit their process to the production of the next stage of incremental innovation. This approach to the future carries significant systemic problems that can go from unexpected behavioral changes to unintended discrimination against certain groups, especially when addressing complex social problems and transformations. Avoiding these systemic problems might require the use of Design Research to study the conditions that produced them. However, design researchers seem to still disagree on the nature of Design Research, and the specific knowledge that can be produced through it. This paper seeks to introduce a possible model for design research that integrates various design theories to help obtain a more sophisticated view of the systemic situation of possible preferred futures. The goal of these process is to seek to produce a better understanding of how stakeholders envision their future, their intentions, values and needs as a systemic view within any given socio-technical system.
Los argumentos del diseño de transformación innovadora y búsqueda constante del futuro preferido se han convertido en un principio contemporáneo de la disciplina, sin embargo, la mayoría de los modelos de diseño limitan su proceso a la producción de la siguiente etapa de innovación incremental. Este enfoque hacia el futuro conlleva importantes problemas sistémicos que pueden ir desde cambios de comportamiento inesperados hasta la discriminación involuntaria contra ciertos grupos, especialmente al abordar problemas y transformaciones sociales complejos. Evitar estos problemas sistémicos puede requerir el uso de la investigación en diseño para estudiar las condiciones que los produjeron. Sin embargo, los investigadores de diseño parecen estar aún en desacuerdo sobre la naturaleza de la investigación de diseño y el conocimiento específico que produce. Este artículo intenta presentar un modelo posible para la investigación de diseño que integre sus distintas teorías y ayude a obtener una visión más sofisticada del estado sistémico de futuros posibles preferidos. El objetivo de dicho proceso es producir una mejor comprensión de cómo las partes interesadas visualizan su futuro, intenciones, valores y necesidades como una mirada sistémica dentro de cualquier sistema sociotécnico dado.
Os argumentos do design de transformação inovadora e sua constante busca por um futuro preferido tornaram-se um princípio contemporâneo da disciplina, e, no entanto, a maioria dos modelos de design limita seu processo à produção do próximo estágio da inovação incremental. Essa abordagem para o futuro carrega problemas sistêmicos significativos que podem passar de mudanças comportamentais inesperadas a discriminação não intencional contra certos grupos, especialmente quando se trata de problemas e transformações sociais complexas. Evitar esses problemas sistêmicos pode exigir o uso da Pesquisa de Projeto para estudar as condições que os produziram. No entanto, os pesquisadores de design ainda parecem discordar da natureza da Pesquisa de Design e do conhecimento específico que pode ser produzido através dela. Este artigo procura introduzir um possível modelo de pesquisa em design que integre várias teorias de design para ajudar a obter uma visão mais sofisticada da situação sistêmica de possíveis futuros preferidos. O objetivo desse processo é buscar uma melhor compreensão de como as partes interessadas visualizam seu futuro, suas intenções, valores e necessidades como uma visão sistêmica em qualquer sistema sócio-técnico.
Descargas
Citas
ALEXANDER, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
ARCHER, L. B. (1981). “A view of the nature of the design research”. In: R. Jacques & J. A. Powell (eds.), Design: science: method. Guildford: IPC Business Press, pp, 30-47.
BANATHY, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Springer.
BAYAZIT, N. (2004). “Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research”. Design Issues, 20 (1): 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793604772933739
BERTALANFFY, L. von, (1968). General system theory. Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
BIJL-BROUWER, M. van der. (2019). “Problem framing expertise in public and social innovation”. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5 (1): 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.003
BØDKER, S. (1987). “Prototyping revisited - design with users in a cooperative setting”. DAIMI PB, 233: 1-26.
BØDKER, S. (1998). “Understanding representation in design”. Human-Computer Interaction, 13 (2): 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1302_1
BROWN, T. & WYATT, J. (2010). “Design thinking for social innovation”. Development Outreach, 12 (1): 29-43. Retrieved from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/213798-1278955272198/Design_Thinking_for_SocialInnovation2.pdf
BUCHANAN, R. (2001). “Design research and the new learning”. Design Issues, 17 (4): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056
CROSS, N. (2001). “Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science”. Design Issues, 17 (3): 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196
DE LA ROSA, J. (2017). “Prototyping the non-existent as a way to research and innovate: a proposal for a possible framework for design research and innovation”. The Design Journal, 20 (sup 1): S4468-S4476. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352943
DE LA ROSA, J., KOHLER, K. & RUECKER, S. (2016). “Prototyping as a resource to investigate future states of the system”. Oslo, proceedings of the RSD6, Emerging contexts for Systems Perspectives in Design. Retrieved from: https://systemic-design.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/RSD6-dlaRosaKohlerRuecker-1.pdf
EDELENBOS, J. (1999). “Design and management of participatory public policy making”. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 1 (4): 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719039900000027
EDMONDS, B. M. (1999). Syntactic measures of complexity. Manchester: University of Manchester.
ESCOBAR, A. (1992). “Reflections on ‘development’: grassroots approaches and alternative politics in the Third World”. Futures, 24 (5): 411-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(92)90014-7
FASTE, T. & FASTE, H. (2012). “Demystifying'design research': design is not research, research is design”. Boston, paper presented at the IDSA Education Symposium. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6961/5f9130a93c129fa2f3acbb8ff2f145b49660.pdf
FINDELI, A. (2004). “La recherche-projet : une méthode pour la recherche en design”. Bâle, paper presented at the Symposium de Recherche sur le Design.
FORLANO, L. & MATHEW, A. (2014). “From design fiction to design friction: speculative and participatory design of values-embedded urban technology”. Journal of Urban Technology, 21 (4): 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.971525
FRAYLING, C. (1993). Research in art and design. London: Royal College of Art.
GALEY, A. & RUECKER, S. (2010). “How a prototype argues”. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25 (4): 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq021
GALLAGHER, S. (2010). “Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of perception”. Topoi, 29 (2): 183-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-010-9079-y
HALLAM, J. C., et al. (1994). “Behaviour: perception, action and intelligence-the view from situated robotics [and discussion]”. Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering, 349 (1689): 29-42.
HANCOCK, T. & BEZOLD, C. (1994). “Possible futures, preferable futures. Healthcare Forum Journal, 37 (2): 23-9.
IRANI, M. & PELEG, S. (1990). “Super resolution from image sequences”. Atlantic City, proceedings or the 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, pp. 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.1990.119340
IRWIN, T., KOSSOFF, G. & TONKINWISE, C. (2015). “Transition design provocation”. Design Philosophy Papers, 13 (1): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688
ISKANDER, N. (2018, September 5). “Design thinking is fundamentally conservative and preserves the Status Quo”. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2018/09/design-thinking-is-fundamentally-conservative-and-preserves-the-status-quo
JONES, P. H. (2014). “Systemic design principles for complex social systems”. In: G. S. Metcalf (ed.), Social systems and design. Tokyo: Springer, pp. 91-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4
KIMBELL, L. (2015). Applying design approaches to policy making: discovering policy lab. Brighton: University of Brighton. Retrieved from: https://researchingdesignforpolicy.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/kimbell_policylab_report.pdf
LATOUR, B. (1990). “Technology is society made durable”. The Sociological Review, 38 (sup 1): 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1996). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
MURATOVSKI, G. (2015). Research for designers: a guide to methods and practice. London: Sage.
NELSON, H. G. & STOLTERMAN, E. (2003). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
POLANYI, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.
SEVALDSON, B. (2011). “GIGA-Mapping: visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design”. Nordes, 4. Retrieved from: https://archive.nordes.org/index.php/n13/article/view/104/88
SEVALDSON, B. (2017). “Redesigning systems thinking”. FormAkademisk - Research Journal of Design and Design Education, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1755
SIMON, H. (1969). The science of the artificial. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
VERGANTI, R. (2009). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
VOROS, J. (2003). “A generic foresight process framework”. Foresight, 5 (3): 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379
ZAMENOPOULOS, T. & ALEXIOU, K. (2007). “Towards an anticipatory view of design”. Design Studies, 28 (4): 411-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.001
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Bitácora Urbano Territorial
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El contenido y las opiniones incluidas en los trabajos publicados por Bitácora Urbano\Territorialson de responsabilidad exclusiva de sus autores para todos los efectos, y no comprometen necesariamente el punto de vista de la Revista. Cualquier restricción legal que afecte los trabajos y su contenido (escrito y/o gráfico) es responsabilidad exclusiva de quienes los firman.Bitácora Urbano\Territorial se reserva el derecho de realizar modificaciones al contenido escrito y/o gráfico de los trabajos que se van a publicar, a fin de adaptarlos específicamente a requerimientos de edición.
Bitácora Urbano\Territorial está publicada bajo Licencia de Atribución de Bienes Comunes Creativos (CC) 4.0 de Creative Commons. El envío de colaboraciones a Bitácora Urbano\Territorial implica que los autores conocen y adhieren a las condiciones establecidas en esa licencia.
