Published

2022-01-01

Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá

Governance and Structuring of Informal Agreements and Common Use Resources in the Case of Small Rural Producers from Bogotá Sabana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760

Keywords:

acuerdos informales, producción agrícola comunal, recursos de uso común, sistemas socioecológicos (es)
communal agricultural production, informal agreements, resources of common use, socio-ecological systems (en)

Downloads

Additional Files

Authors

Este artículo se fundamenta en el marco teórico de la tesis doctoral “Modelo de autogestión colectiva y productividad en el sector agrícola de pequeña escala de la Sabana de Bogotá”. Se construye un cuerpo de hipótesis que involucra: a) la sostenibilidad de los recursos de uso común; b) el impacto de estos sobre la productividad; c) los alcances de los acuerdos informales; y d) las relaciones entre estos y el capital social. Esta implementación es probada mediante un mecanismo diseñado con información de encuesta obtenida con los productores de las asociaciones en la zona. El mecanismo se valida a partir de incorporar los costos ocultos derivados del acuerdo de protección a las fuentes hídricas, en este caso cuatro ríos, y los costos factoriales correspondientes. El resultado se prueba mediante componentes principales y se obtiene que los datos usados en el modelo tienen una confiabilidad del 82 %. Esto muestra los alcances y validez de las cuatro hipótesis propuestas y el marco teórico.

This article is based on the theoretical framework of the doctoral thesis “Model of collective self-management and productivity in the small-scale agricultural sector of the Sabana de Bogotá”. A body of hypotheses is constructed that involves: a) the sustainability of common use resources; b) the impact of these on productivity; c) the scope of informal agreements; and d) the relationships between these and social capital. This implementation is tested by means of a mechanism designed with survey information obtained from the producers of the associations in the area. The mechanism is validated by incorporating the hidden costs derived from the agreement to protect water sources, in this case four rivers, and the corresponding factor costs. The result is tested by means of principal components and it is obtained that the data used in the model have a reliability of 82%. This shows the scope and validity of the four hypotheses proposed and the theoretical framework.

References

Acosta, C., Ortega, M., Bunsen, H., Koirala, B. y Ghorbani, A. (2018). Facilitating energy transition through energy commons: an application of socio ecological systems framework for integrated community energy systems. Sustainability, 10(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020366

Afacan, M. O., Bó, I. y Turhan, B. (2020). Assignment maximization. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.01011.pdf

Afroz, S., Cramb, R. y Grunbuhel, C. (2016). Collective management of water resources in Coastal Bangladesh: formal and substantive approaches. Human Ecology, 44, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9809-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9809-x

Agrawal, A. (2014). Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: Some concluding thoughts. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.012

Andersson, K., Benavides, J. y León, R. (2014). Institutional diversity and local forest governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.009

Añaños, M. C. (2014). La idea de los bienes comunes en el sistema internacional: ¿renacimiento o extinción? Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 14, 153-195. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/amdi/v14/v14a5.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-4654(14)70005-4

Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: a critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.011

Arrow, K. (1994). Elección social y los valores individuales. Madrid: Planeta-Agostini.

Axelrod, R. (1986). La evolución de la cooperación – el dilema del prisionero y la teoría de juegos. Madrid: Alianza.

Baldassarri, D. (2015). Cooperative networks: altruism, group solidarity, reciprocity, and sanctioning in Ugandan producer organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 355-395. https://doi.org/10.1086/682418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/682418

Baldwin, K. y Mvukiyehe, E. (2015). Elections and collective action: evidence from changes in traditional institutions in Liberia. World Politics, 67(4), 690-725. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000210

Bareille, F. y Zavalloni, M. (2020). Decentralisation of agro-environmental policy design. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz049

Bashar, T. y Bramley, G. (2018). Social capital and neighbourhood cooperation: implications for development of the urban poor in LDCs. Urban Studies, 56(13), 2757-2745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018797945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018797945

Beitl, C. M. (2012). Shifting policies, access, and the tragedy of enclosures in Ecuadorian mangrove fisheries: towards a political ecology of the commons. Journal of Political Ecology, 19(1). 94-113. https://doi.org/10.2458/v19i1.21719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v19i1.21719

Benavides, Ó. A. y Salamanca, A. E. (2019). Bienes de uso común e interacción estratégica: el legado de Elinor Ostrom. En A. Lara Rivero, M. Amaya Y B. Grandlgruber. Complejidad y gobierno de los bienes comunes (pp. 115-157). Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Berchoux, T. y Hutton, C. W. (2019). Spatial associations between household and community livelihood capitals in rural territories: an example from the Mahanadi Delta, India. Applied Geography, 103, 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.002

Biró, P. y Gudmundsson, J. (2021) Complexity of finding Pareto-efficient allocations of highest welfare. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(291), 614-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.018

Blok, S. N., van Buuren, M. W. y Fenger, H. J. (2020) Exclusivity of citizens’ initiatives: Fuel for collective action? Journal of Civil Society, 16(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794168

Bluffstone, R., Dannenberg, A., Martinsson, P., Prakash, J. y Bista, R. (2020). Cooperative behavior and common pool resources: Experimental evidence from community forest user groups in Nepal. World Development, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104889

Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114

Böhling, K. y Arzberger, M. B. (2014). New modes of governance in Bavaria’s alpine forests: the ‘Mountain Forest Initiative’ at work. Forest Policy and Economics, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.004

Brando, N., Boonen, C., Cogolati, S., Hagen, R., Vanstappen, N., y Wouters, J. (2019). Governing as commons or as global public goods: Two tales of power. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 553-577. http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.907

Bullini, L., De Martino, E., Rossignoli, C. y Bonomi, S. (2019). Strategic value of agricultural business networks in sustaining common goods. Sustainability, 11(21), 5986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215986

Camus, P. e Hidalgo, R. (2017). “Y serán desplayados”. Recorrido histórico sobre los bienes comunes, pescadores artesanales y control legal del litoral en Chile. Historia Crítica, 63(63), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit63.2017.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit63.2017.05

Camus, P., Hidalgo, R., Pérez, L. y Muñoz, E. (2017). ¡Defendamos Díchato! Bienes comunes y conflicto territorial en los espacios litorales chileno. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 68, 105-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022017000300105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022017000300105

Carballo, D. M. y Feinman, G. M. (2016) Cooperation, collective action, and the archeology of large-scale societies. Evolutionary Anthropology, 25(6), 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21506

Cenker-Özek, C. I. (2017). Civic space in Turkey: a social capital approach to civil society. Turkish Studies, 18(4), 688-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2017.1351303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2017.1351303

Cervellini, M., Fiorini, S., Cavicchi, A., Campetella, G., Simonetti, E., Chelli, S., Canullo, R. y Gimona, A. (2017). Relationships between understory specialist species and local management practices in coppiced forests - Evidence from the Italian Apennines. Forest Ecology and Management, 385, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.027

Charnley, S., Kelly, E. y Fischer, P. (2020). Fostering collective action to reduce wildfire risk across property boundaries in the American West. Environmental Research Letters 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab639a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab639a

Chaudhuri, A. (2016). Recent advances in experimental studies of social dilemma games. Games, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/g7010007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g7010007

Chen, H. (2020). Institutional credibility and informal institutions: the case of extralegal land development in China. Cities, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102519

Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/724810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466560

Cody, K., Smith, S., Cox, M. y Andersson, K. (2015). Emergence of collective action in a groundwater commons: irrigators in the San Luis Valley of Colorado. Society and Natural Resources, 28, 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.970736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.970736

Colombatto, E. y Tavormina, V. (2016). On the role of government in promoting altruism. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(11), 1156-1170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2015-0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2015-0041

Cowen, N. y Delmotte, C. (2020). Ostrom, floods and mismatched property rights. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 583-596. http://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.983

Dannenberg, A., Löschel, A., Paolacci, G., Reif, C. y Tavoni, A. (2015). On the provision of public goods with probabilistic and ambiguous thresholds. Environmental and Resource Economics, 61(3), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9796-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9796-6

Delgado-Serrano, M. del M. y Ramos, P. (2015). Making Ostrom’s framework applicable to characterize social ecological systems at the local level. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 808-830. http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.567

Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J. y Bavel, R. van. (2019). Behavioral factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policyoriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019

Duru, M., M’hand, F. y Therond, O. (2014). A conceptual framework for thinking now (and organising tomorrow) the agroecological transition at the level of the territory. Cahiers Agriculture, 23(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2014.0691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2014.0691

Esteves, A. M. (2017). “Commoning” at the borderland: ecovillage development, socioeconomic segregation, and institutional mediation in southwestern Alentejo, Portugal. Journal of Political Ecology, 24, 968-991. https://doi.org/10.2458/v24i1.20978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v24i1.20978

Euler, J. (2018). Conceptualizing the commons: moving beyond the goods-based definition by introducing the social practices of commoning as vital determinant. Ecological Economics, 143, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.020

Fan, K. y Hui, E. C. M. (2020). Evolutionary game theory analysis for understanding the decision-making mechanisms of governments and developers on green building incentives. Building and Environment, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106972

Faysse, N., Errahj, M., Imache, A., Kemmoun, H. y Labbaci, T. (2014). Paving the way for social learning when governance is weak: supporting dialogue between stakeholders to face a groundwater crisis in Morocco. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 27(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.847998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.847998

Flor, R., Maat, H., Hadi, B., Then, R., Kraus, E. y Chhay, K. (2020). How do stakeholder interactions in Cambodian rice farming villages contribute to a pesticide lockin? Crop Protection, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.04.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.04.023

Galafassi, G. (2018). Entre las clases y los movimientos sociales. Conflictos, acumulación y bienes comunes. Athenea Digital, 18(2), https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1757

Gavrilets, S. (2014). Collective action and the collaborative brain. J. R. Soc. Interface, 12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.1067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/009746

Giest, S. y Howlett, M. (2014). Understanding the pre-conditions of commons governance: The role of network management. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.010

Gold, S., Muthuri, J. y Reiner, G. (2017). Collective action for tackling “wicked” social problems: a system dynamics model for corporate community involvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 662-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.197

González, S. y Pérez, M. (2018). Planeación de escenarios participativos en procesos degobernanza para la compensación ambiental: el caso de la central hidroeléctrica El Quimbo. Gestión y Ambiente, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v21n2.73698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v21n2.73698

González-Mulet, Y., Moreno-Lemus, N. y Moreno-Lemus, E. (2016). Metodología para el análisis de estabilidad de sistemas de ecuaciones diferenciales N-Dimensionales. Revista Cubana de Informática Médica, 8(3), 515-525. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rcim/v8s1/rcim04316.pdf

Graham, S. (2014). A new perspective on the trust power nexus from rural Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.010

Griebler, C. y Avramov, M. (2014). Groundwater ecosystem services: a review. Freshwater Science, 34(1), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1086/679903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/679903

Gross, J. y De Dreu, C. (2019). Individual solutions to shared problems create a modern tragedy of the commons. Social Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7296

Guo, P. y Han, C. (2021). Nash equilibrium and group strategy consensus of networked evolutionary game with coupled social groups. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126380

Gurney, G., Cinner, J., Sartin, J., Pressey, R., Ban, N., Marshall, N. y Prabuning, D. (2016). Participation in devolved commons management: Multiscale socioeconomic factors related to individuals’ participation in community-based management of marine protected areas in Indonesia. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.015

Hamann, M., Biggsa, R. y Reyersa, B. (2015). Mapping social-ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red- loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use. Global Environmental Change, 34, 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1724745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. New York: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hinkel, J., Cox, M. E., Schlüter, M., Binder, C., y Falk, T. (2015). A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases. Ecology and Society, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07023-200132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07023-200132

Hribar, M. Š., Bole, D. y Urbanc, M. (2015). Public and common goods in the cultural landscape. Geografski vestnik, 87(2). https://doi.org/10.3986/GV87203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/GV87203

Jackson, J. E. (1991). A user’s guide to principal components. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471725331

Jackson, O. y Srivastava, S. (1996). A characterization of game theoretic solutions which lead to impossibility theorems. Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2298113

Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macaulay, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., y Pluye, P. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-015-1949-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1

Jakob, M. y Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026

Jakoby, O., Quaas, M., Müller, B., Baumgärtner, S. y Frank, K. (2014). How do individual farmers’ objectives influence the evaluation of rangeland management strategies under a variable climate? Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(2), 483-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12216

Jucevicius, G. y Juceviciene, R. (2017). Cultural dilemmas and paradoxes in dynamic organizational environments. En M. Rozkwitalska, L. Sułkowski y S. Magala (Eds.), Intercultural interactions in the multicultural workplace (pp. 53-70). Gdansk: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9_4

Jung, H. (2020). Estimating the social value of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) with choice experiment. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 66(3), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.17221/147/2019-agricecon DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/147/2019-AGRICECON

Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L. y Aurenhammer, H. (2014). Actor-centred power: the driving force in decentralized communitybased forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012

Leenhardt, P., Teneva, L., Kininmonth, S., Darling, E., Cooley, S. y Claudet, J. (2017). Challenges, insights, and perspectives associated with using social-ecological science for marine conservation. Ocean @Coastal Management, 115, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018

Lejano, R. P. y Fernández de Castro, F. (2014). Norm, network, and commons: the invisible hand of community. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.012

Levidow, L. y Papaioannou, T. (2017). Which inclusive innovation? Competing normative assumptions around social justice. Innovation and Development, 8(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1351605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1351605

Li, W. y Tan, X. (2020). Locally Bayesian learning in networks. Theoretical Economics, 15(1), 239-278. https://doi.org/10.3982/TE3273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/TE3273

Lienert, J. y Burger, P. (2015). Merging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being. Ecology and Society, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07405-200220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07405-200220

Lowitt, K., Levkoe, C. Z., Spring, A., Turlo, C., Williams, P. L., Bird, S., Sayers, C. y Simba, M. (2020). Empowering small-scale, community-based fisheries through a food systems framework. Marine Policy, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104150

Maat, H. (2018). Group compositions: the politics of technology implemented in smallholder farming. Journal of Political Ecology, 25, 703-715. https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22389

Mailath, G. J. (1998). Do people play Nash equilibrium? Lessons from evolutionary game theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1347-1374. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564802

Marshall, A. (1982). Principles of economics (8.a. ed.). Philadelphia: Porcupine Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15213-1

Martínez, C. I. (2021). Modelo de autogestión colectiva y productividad en el sector agrícola de pequeña escala de la Sabana de Bogotá [Inédito]. Buenos Aires: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Argentina.

Martínez, C.I. (2020). Acuerdos informales y estrategias inclusivas para la sostenibilidad. En A. Beltrán-Duque, O. J. Montilla-Gálviz, C. A. Restrepo Rivillas y A. Rodríguez-Orejuela (Comps.), Encuentro Internacional de Investigadores en Administración 2020 (pp. 2136-2152). Bogotá; Cali: Universidad Externado de Colombia; Universidad del Valle. Recuperado de https://administracion.uexternado.edu.co/encuentroInvestigacion/archivos/memorias/Memorias%20Encuentro%202020.pdf

Martínez, C.I. y Sanabria-Landazábal, N.J. (2017). Cooperación y elección electiva: estrategia para la sostenibilidad de los recursos. En N. J. Sanabria-Landazábal G. J. Rodríguez y J. E. Cervera-Cárdenas (Comps.), Competitividad, innovación y empresa (pp. 20-21). Barranquilla: Sello Editorial Uniautónoma. http://repositorio.uac.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11619/3719/Competitividad,%20Innovaci%C3%B3n%20y%20Empresa.pdf?sequence=3

Maskin, E. (2009). Diseño de mecanismos: cómo implementar objetivos sociales. Revista Asturiana de Economía, 44(21-36). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4008580

Mazabel, D. (2014). Acción colectiva y sustentabilidad en el manejo del agua. Revista Luna Azul, 39, 1-5. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2014.39.1

Meilasari-Sugiana, A. (2012). Collective action and ecological sensibility for sustainable mangrove governance in Indonesia: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Political Ecology, 19(1), 184-201. https://doi.org/10.2458/v19i1.21726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v19i1.21726

Meilasari-Sugiana, A. (2018). Oil palm companies, privatization, and social dissonance: towards a socially viable and ecologically sustainable land reform in Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Political Ecology, 25(1), 548-568. https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22045

Mischen, P., Lipo, C. y Hunt, T. (2019). Good governance of the commons of Rapa Nui: present and past. Anthropology Datasets (74), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022019000300061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022019000300061

Morillas del Moral, J. (2020). Nuevos comunes para la transformación ecosocial: el ecomercado de Granada como estudio de caso. Revesco-Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 135, e69179. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.69179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.69179

Morin, M. (2018). Indigenous peoples, political economists, and the tragedy of the commons. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 19(2), 559-585. https://www7.tau.ac.il/ojs/index.php/til/article/view/1582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2018-0028

Mourato, J. M. y Bussler, A. (2019). Community-based initiatives and the politicization gap in socio-ecological transitions: lessons from Portugal. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.08.001

Musavengane, R., Tantoh, H. y Simatele, D. (2019). A comparative analysis of collaborative environmental management of natural resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: a study of Cameroon and South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies 54(4), 512-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618825276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618825276

Nash, J. F. (1951) Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529

Newton, J. (2018) Evolutionary game theory: a renaissance. Games, 9(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020031

Nockur, L., Arndt, L., Keller, J. y Pfattheicher, S. (2020). Collective choice fosters sustainable resource management in the presence of asymmetric opportunities. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 10724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67757-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67757-1

Nunn, P. D., Aalbersberg, W., Lata, S. y Gwilliam, M. (2014). Beyond the core: community governance for climate-change adaptation in peripheral parts of Pacific Island Countries. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0486-7

Ohseto, S. (2021). Strategy-proof and Pareto efficient allocation of indivisible goods: general impossibility domains. Int. J. Game Theory, 50, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-021-00754-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-021-00754-4

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, E. (2000). El gobierno de los bienes comunes. La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Ostrom, E. (2013). Comprender la diversidad institucional. Barcelona: KRK Ediciones Pensamiento.

Pachoud, C., Delay, E., Da Re, R., Ramanzin, M. y Sturaro, E. (2020). A relational approach to studying collective action in dairy cooperatives producing mountain cheeses in the Alps: the case of the Primiero Cooperative in the Eastern Italians Alps. Sustainability, 12(11), 4596. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114596

Park, S., Shamma, J. S. y Martins, N. C. (2018). Passivity and evolutionary game dynamics. Recuperado de https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.07744.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2018.8619450

Partelow, S. (2016). Coevolving Ostrom’s social-ecological systems (SES) framework and sustainability science: four key co-benefits. Sustain Sci., 11, 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0351-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0351-3

Peña, J., Nöldeke, G. y Lehmann, L. (2015). Evolutionary dynamics of collective action in spatially structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 382, 122-136.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.039

Perera, V. (2014). Engaged universals and community economies: the (human) right to water in Colombia. Antipode, 47(1), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12097

Peres-Neto, P. R., Jackson, D. A. y Somers, K. M. (2005). How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49(4), 974-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015

Petriello, M. A. y Stronza, A. L. (2019) Campesino hunting and conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology, 34(2), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13396

Petruzzi, P. E., Pitt, J. y Busquets, D. (2016) Inter-institutional social capital for selforganising ‘nested enterprises’. IEEE 10th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/SASO.2016.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SASO.2016.15

Pino-Romero, N., Salazar-Fernández, C. U. y López-Cruz, R. (2019). Solución uniformemente acotada y estabilidad asintótica del punto libre de infección de un modelo matemático SI con dinámica vital (crecimiento logístico) mediante las ecuaciones diferenciales con retardo. Selecciones Matemáticas, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17268/sel.mat.2019.01.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17268/sel.mat.2019.01.09

Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente – PNUMA. (s. f.). Sobre el programa de la ONU para el medio ambiente. https://www.unep.org/es/sobre-onu medio-ambiente

Putnam, R. (2002). Solo en la bolera. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.

Qiu, J., Carpenter, S. R., Booth, E. G., Motew, M., Zipper, S. C., Kucharik, C. J., Loheide, S. P. y Turner, M. G. (2018). Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb87

Rademacher-Estay, L. A. (2002). Cálculo y estabilidad de equilibrios de Nash y aplicaciones al modelamiento del mercado de energía eléctrica [Tesis de grado]. Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile. https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~lrademac/memoria.pdf

Ribeiro, A. Coimbra, Andion, C. y Burigo, F. (2015). Ação coletiva e coprodução para o desenvolvimento rural: um estudo de caso do Colegiado de Desenvolvimento Territorial da Serra Catarinense. Rev. Adm. Pública, 49(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-76121685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-76121685

Rigon, A. (2016). Collective or individual titles? Conflict over tenure regularisation in a Kenyan informal settlement. Urban Studies, 53(13), 2758-2778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015602658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015602658

Rinaudo, J.-D., Moreau, C. y Garin, P. (2016). Social justice and groundwater allocation in agriculture: a French case study. En A. Jakeman, O. Barreteau, R. Hunt, J. Rinaudo y A. Ross. (Eds.), Integrated groundwater management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_11

Romano, J. y Coral, B. V. (2020). Public management, private management and collective action in the Portoviejo river basin. Visions and conflicts. Sustainability, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135467

Rouillard, J. y Rinaudo, J.-D. (2020). From State to user-based water allocations: an empirical analysis of institutions developed by agricultural user associations in France. Agricultural Water Management, 239(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106269

Saha, D. (2020). Producer collectives through self-help: sustainability of small tea growers in India. International Review of Applied Economics, 32(4), 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2020.1773646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2020.1773646

Šálka, J., Dobšinská, Z. y Hricová, Z. (2016). Factors of political power: The example of forest owners’ associations in Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.003

Salvioli, M., Dubbeldam, J., Staňková, K. y Brown, J. S. (2021). Fisheries management as a stackelberg evolutionary game: finding an evolutionarily enlightened strategy. PLoS ONE 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245255

Sánchez-Zapata, M. A. (2021). Estabilidad de los puntos de equilibrio de un modelo matemático para el tratamiento de tumores con la técnica de viroterapia [Tesis de grado]. Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. Recuperado de https://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12672/17409/Sanchez_zm.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Sandler, T. (2015). Collective action: fifty years later. Public Choice, 164, 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0

Sanz-Hernández, A., Sanagustín-Fons, M. V. y López-Rodríguez, M. E. (2019). A transition to an innovative and inclusive bioeconomy in Aragon, Spain. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 33, 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.08.003

Sardi, A. y Sorano, E. (2019). Dynamic performance management: an approach for managing the common goods. Sustainability, 11(22), 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226435

Scyphers, S., Picou, S. y Powers, S. (2015). Participatory conservation of coastal habitats: the importance of understanding homeowner decision making to mitigate cascading shoreline degradation. Conservation Letters, 8(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12114

Sen, A. (1976). Elección colectiva y bienestar social. Madrid: Alianza.

Seward, P. y Xu, Y. (2019). The case for making more use of the Ostrom design principles in groundwater governance research: a South African perspective. Hydrogeoly Journal, 27, 1017-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1899-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1899-7

Shalsi, S., Ordens, C. M., Curtis, A. y Simmons, C. T. (2019). Can collective action address the “tragedy of the commons” in groundwater management? Insights from an Australian case study. Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 1017-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01986-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01986-1

Smith, H., Marrocoli, S., García, A. y Basurto, X. (2018). Hunting for common ground between wildlife governance and commons scholarship. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13200

Soma, K. y Vatn, A. (2014). Representing the common goods: Stakeholders vs. citizens. Land Use Policy, 41, 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015

Soma, K., Tatenhove, J. van y van Leeuwen, J. (2015). Marine governance in a European context: regionalization, integration, and cooperation for ecosystem-based management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.03.010

Sułkowski, Ł. (2017). Social capital, trust, and intercultural interactions. En M. Rozkwitalska, Ł. Sułkowski, S. Magala (Eds.), Intercultural Interactions in the Multicultural Workplace (pp. 155-172). Gdansk: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9_11

Szolnoki, A. y Chen, X. (2017). Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemas. A Letters Journal Exploring the Frontiers of Physics, 120(5). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/120/58001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/120/58001

Szolnoki, A. y Perc, M. (2016). Leaders should not be conformists in evolutionary social dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23633

Tadesse, G. y Kassie, G. T. (2017). Measuring trust and commitment in collective actions: evidence from farmers marketing organizations in rural Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(7), 980-996. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2015-0253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2015-0253

Tosun, J., Koos, S. y Shore, J. (2016). Co-governing common goods: Interaction patterns of private and public actors. Policy and Society, 35, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.01.002

Trujillo-Cabrera, M. (2016). Recursos naturales de uso común: aproximaciones teóricas para su análisis. Mundo Amazónico, 7(1/2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.15446/ma.v7.57253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ma.v7.57253

Tsuyuguchi, B. B., Morgan, E. A., Rego, J. C. de Oliveira Galvão, C. (2020). Governance of alluvial aquifers and community participation: a social-ecological systems analysis of the Brazilian semi-arid region. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(34), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02160-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02160-8

Urquiza, A. y Cadenas, H. (2015). Sistemas socio-ecológicos: elementos teóricos y conceptuales para la discusión en torno a vulnerabilidad hídrica. L’Ordinaire des Amériques, 218. https://doi.org/10.4000/orda.1774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/orda.1774

Uusivuori, J. (2016). Access rights to forests and private conservation: an economic analysis. Forest Science, 62(4), 355-363. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.15-081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.15-081

Van der Waal, K. (2017). Multiple livelihoods and social relations in the South African Lowveld, 1986–2013. Review of African Political Economy, 44(152), 220-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2017.1313727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2017.1313727

Vasconcelos, V., Santos, F. y Pacheco, J. (2013). A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons. Nature Climate Change, 3, 797-801.https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1927

Villa, E. (2003). Teoría de las implementaciones y diseño de mecanismos. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

Villanueva, A., Gómez-Limón, J. A., Arriaza, M. y Rodríguez-Entrena, M. (2015). The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers’ preferences insouthern Spain. ScienceDirect Land Use Policy, 46, 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.009

Wilshusen, P. R. (2019). Environmental governance in motion: practices of assemblage and the political performativity of economistic conservation. World Development, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104626

Wolkmer, M. de F. Schumacher y Ferrazzo, D. (2018). O paradoxo do desenvolvimento: direito ambiental e bens comuns no capitalismo. Veredas do Direito, Belo Horizonte, 15(33), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v15i33.1269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v15i33.1269

Xu, Y. y Yao, Y. (2015). Informal institutions, collective action, and public investment in rural China. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000155

Yi, H., Suo, L., Shen, R., Zhang, J., Ramaswami, A. y Feiock, R. C. (2017). Regional governance and institutional collective action for environmental sustainability. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 556-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12799

Zachary, S.-T. (2017). Spontaneous collective action: peripheral mobilization during the Arab Spring. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 379-403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000769

Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L, y Capaldi, C. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005

How to Cite

APA

Sanabria, N., Cárdenas, J. and Martínez, C. (2022). Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá. Ciencia Política, 17(33), 255–294. https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760

ACM

[1]
Sanabria, N., Cárdenas, J. and Martínez, C. 2022. Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá. Ciencia Política. 17, 33 (Jan. 2022), 255–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760.

ACS

(1)
Sanabria, N.; Cárdenas, J.; Martínez, C. Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá. Cienc. politi. 2022, 17, 255-294.

ABNT

SANABRIA, N.; CÁRDENAS, J.; MARTÍNEZ, C. Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá. Ciencia Política, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 33, p. 255–294, 2022. DOI: 10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cienciapol/article/view/93760. Acesso em: 12 aug. 2024.

Chicago

Sanabria, Néstor, Jesús Cárdenas, and Clemencia Martínez. 2022. “Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá”. Ciencia Política 17 (33):255-94. https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760.

Harvard

Sanabria, N., Cárdenas, J. and Martínez, C. (2022) “Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá”, Ciencia Política, 17(33), pp. 255–294. doi: 10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760.

IEEE

[1]
N. Sanabria, J. Cárdenas, and C. Martínez, “Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá”, Cienc. politi., vol. 17, no. 33, pp. 255–294, Jan. 2022.

MLA

Sanabria, N., J. Cárdenas, and C. Martínez. “Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá”. Ciencia Política, vol. 17, no. 33, Jan. 2022, pp. 255-94, doi:10.15446/cp.v17n33.93760.

Turabian

Sanabria, Néstor, Jesús Cárdenas, and Clemencia Martínez. “Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá”. Ciencia Política 17, no. 33 (January 1, 2022): 255–294. Accessed August 12, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cienciapol/article/view/93760.

Vancouver

1.
Sanabria N, Cárdenas J, Martínez C. Gobernanza y estructuración de acuerdos informales y recursos de uso común en el caso de pequeños productores rurales de la Sabana de Bogotá. Cienc. politi. [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Aug. 12];17(33):255-94. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cienciapol/article/view/93760

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

396

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Ciencia Política

Todos los documentos alojados en esta web están protegidos por la licencia CC Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia

ISSN En línea: 2389-7481

ISSN Impreso: 1909-230X 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/cp

Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas y Sociales - Departamento de Ciencias Políticas