Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Assessment of LES Dynamic Smagorinsky-Lilly model resolution for combustion engineering applications
Evaluación de la resolución del modelo LES Dynamic Smagorinsky-Lilly para aplicaciones de combustión en la ingeniería
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n225.103219Palabras clave:
LES; instantaneous velocity field resolution; combustion (en)LES; resolución del campo de velocidad instantánea; combustión (es)
Descargas
Large Eddy Simulation (LES) has become a powerful tool for dealing with turbulence. Nevertheless, mesh resolution of the simulated domain under the LES approach was shown to be a key matter. Critical regions should maintain an adequate mesh resolution and also the highest possible quality. LES with the Dynamic Smagorisky-Lilly sub-grid model was used for the simulation of SMA1-flame, to assess the influence of the mesh resolution on the instantaneous velocity fields, species profiles, and temperatures profiles. The results of the simulation suggest a comprehensible agreement with experimental data. Nevertheless, some areas in the highly rotational velocity field are not properly solved, mainly due to a poor mesh resolution of such areas. As a result, the central jet’s decay rate was not accurately predicted. On the other hand, the temperature and species profiles were reasonably computed, considering the simple chemistry provided by the Eddy Dissipation Model (EDM).
La simulación de grandes remolinos (LES) se ha convertido en una poderosa herramienta para tratar la turbulencia. Sin embargo, la resolución de la malla es una cuestión clave. Las regiones de interés deben tener una malla adecuada. Para la simulación de la llama SMA1 se utilizó el enfoque LES con el submodelo Dynamic Smagorinsky-Lilly, con el fin de evaluar la influencia de la resolución de la malla en los campos de velocidad, los perfiles de especies y temperatura. Los resultados de la simulación sugieren una coincidencia razonable con los datos experimentales. No obstante, algunas zonas del campo de velocidad de alta rotación no se resuelven adecuadamente, debido a la escasa resolución de malla de dichas zonas. Como resultado, la tasa de decaimiento del chorro central no se predijo con suficiente exactitud. Sin embargo, el campo de temperatura se calculó de forma razonable, considerando la simplicidad del Eddy Dissipation Model (EDM).
Referencias
Davidson, P., Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2015, pp. 9-125.
Andersson, B. et al., Turbulent-flow modelling, in Andersson, B., et al., Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England, 2012, pp. 62-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139093590.005
Roos, L.D., Large Eddy simulation, in: Unsteady turbulent flow modelling and applications, Launchbury, D.R., Ed., Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany, 2016, pp. 3-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11912-6_2
De, S. et al., Modeling and simulation of turbulent combustion, 1st ed., Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2018, 662 P.
Kuo, K.K. and Acharya, R., Fundamentals of turbulent and multiphase combustion, 1st ed., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA, 2012, 897 P. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118107683
Versteeg, H.K. and Malalasekera, W., An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method, 2nd ed., Pearson Education, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2007.
Ge, W., Sankaran, R. and Chen, J.H., Development of a CPU/GPU portable software library for Lagrangian–Eulerian simulations of liquid sprays. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 128, pp. 103-293, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103293
Pope, S.B., Turbulent flows, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000, pp. 65-638.
Baudoin, E. et al., Comparison of LES models applied to a bluff body stabilized flame. In: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Meeting paper, 2009, pp. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1178.
Menter, F.R., Matyushenko, A. and Lechner, R., Development of a Generalized K-ω Two-Equation Turbulence Model. In: Dillmann, A., et al Eds., New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XII, Contributions to the 21st STAB/DGLR Symposium, Springer International Publishing, Darmstadt, Germany, 2018, pp. 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25253-3_10
Safavi, M. and Amani. E., A comparative study of turbulence models for non-premixed swirl-stabilized flames. Journal of Turbulence, 19(11-12), pp. 1017-1050, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2018.1527033.
De Santis, A., et al. Assessment of the impact of subgrid-scale stress models and mesh resolution on the LES of a partially-premixed swirling flame. Fuel, 281, pp. 118-620, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118620.
Cheng, P., Two-dimensional radiating gas flow by a moment method. AIAA Journal, 2(9), pp. 1662-1664, 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2645.
Siegel, R. and Howell, J.R., Thermal radiation heat transfer, 1st ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington D.C., USA, 1992, pp. 710-760.
Davidson, P., Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2015, pp. 9-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722588.001.0001
Smagorinsky, J., General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review, 91(3), pp. 99-164, 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2
Lilly, D.K., The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. IBM Form, 1967, pp. 195-210.
Deardorff, J.W., Three-dimensional numerical study of the height and mean structure of a heated planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 7(1), pp. 81-106, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224974.
Nicoud, F. and Ducros, F., Subgrid-Scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 62(3), pp. 183-200, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995426001.
Shur, M.L., et al., A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 29(6), pp. 1638-1649, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001.
Kim, W.-W. and Menon, S., Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall-bounded flows, in: 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics - AIAA, Reno, NV, U.S.A. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-210
Germano, M., et al., A dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy viscosity model. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3(7), pp. 1760-1765, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857955.
Lilly, D.K., A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid‐scale closure method. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4(3), pp. 633-635, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858280.
ANSYS, I. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Southpointe, ANSYS, Inc., 2020, pp. 39-132.
Rodriguez, S., Applied computational fluid dynamics and turbulence modeling practical tools, tips and techniques 1st ed., Sandia National Laboratories, Cham, Springer Nature, Albuquerque, USA, 2019, pp. 197-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28691-0
International Workshop on Measurement and Computation of Turbulent Flames (TNF Workshop). [online]. 2020. [cited: 2020 10/25/2020]; Available at: https://tnfworkshop.org/data-archives/simplejet/dlrflames/.
Nooren, P.A., et al., Raman-Rayleigh-LIF measurements of temperature and species concentrations in the Delft piloted turbulent jet diffusion flame. Applied Physics B, 71(1), pp. 95-111, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400000278.
Barlow, R.S., et al., Scalar profiles and NO formation in laminar opposed-flow partially premixed methane/air flames. Combustion and Flame, 127(3), pp. 2102-2118, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00313-3.
Dibble, R.W., et al., An improved method of data aquisition and reduction for laser raman-rayleigh and fluorescence scattering from Multispecies. Applied Physics B, 51(1), pp. 39-43, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332322.
Thakker, A. and Hourigan. F., A comparison of two meshing schemes for CFD analysis of the impulse turbine for wave energy applications. Renewable Energy, 30(9), pp. 1401-1410, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.10.006.
Santana, H.S., et al., Computational methodology for the development of microdevices and microreactors with ANSYS CFX. MethodsX, 7, pp. 100765, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.12.006.
Sergent, E., Vers une méthodologie de couplage entre la simulation des grandes échelles et les modèles statistiques. Thèse de doctorat en Mécanique, Ecully, Ecole centrale de Lyon, France, 2002, 198 P.
Mathey, F., et al., Specification of LES inlet boundary condition using vortex method. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, an International Journal, [online]. 6(1-3), pp. 58-67, 2006. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00274860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/PCFD.2006.009483
Pope, S.B., Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New Journal of Physics, 6, pp. 35-35, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/035.
Celik, I.B., Cehreli, Z.N. and Yavuz, I., Index of resolution quality for large Eddy simulations. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 127(5), pp. 949-958, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1990201.
Lacaze, G. and Oefelein, J., Development of quality assessment techniques for large eddy simulation of propulsion and power systems in complex geometries. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA, United States, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1177603
El-Asrag, H. and Menon, S., Large eddy simulation of bluff-body stabilized swirling non-premixed flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31(2), pp. 1747-1754, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.251.
Kalt, P.A.M., et al., Swirling turbulent non-premixed flames of methane: flow field and compositional structure. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 29(2), pp. 1913-1919, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80232-2.
Masri, A.R., Kalt, P.A.M. and Barlow, R.S., The compositional structure of swirl-stabilised turbulent nonpremixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 137(1), pp. 1-37, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.12.004.
El-Mahallawy, F. and El-Din, H.S., Fundamentals and technology of combustion, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, England. 2002, pp. 367-490.
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Gergely Ámon, Katalin Bene, Richard Ray. (2025). Comparing Depth-Integrated Models to Compute Overland Flow in Steep-Sloped Watersheds. Hydrology, 12(4), p.67. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12040067.
2. Changqing Yang, Xinyu Xu, Jing Xiong, Lu Chen, Jiangyan Ma, Angui Li. (2025). Flow and evolution characteristics of the thermal plumes above an inclined area heat source. Energy and Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2025.05.010.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 DYNA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.
