Publicado

2018-12-15

Así no se explica la atención conjunta

Joint Attention Cannot Be Explained That Way

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084

Palabras clave:

apertura cognitiva, atención conjunta, cognición social, co-perceptor, espacio perceptual compartido. (es)
cognitive opening, joint attention, social cognition, co-perceiver, shared perceptual space. (en)

Descargas

Autores/as

  • Anderson Pinzón Universidad Nacional de Colombia
La atención conjunta se da cuando dos sujetos atienden al mismo objeto a la vez, y el hecho es cognitivamente abierto. Existen dos enfoques al respecto: el primero reconoce que cada sujeto sabe que el otro está percibiendo lo mismo, es decir, es un co-perceptor; se trata, entonces, de explicar en qué consiste ser un co-perceptor. El segundo enfoque resalta que los sujetos saben que el objeto está siendo percibido por ambos; en dicho caso, se trata de explicar en qué consiste que un objeto sea percibido como perceptualmente compartido. En este texto se analizan las razones del primer enfoque para mostrar por qué es desorientador; y se dan razones para validar el segundo enfoque. La respuesta a la apertura cognitiva abre el camino a la futura investigación en atención conjunta.
Joint attention occurs when two subjects focus on the same object at once and the event is cognitively open. There are two approaches to this matter: according to the first one, each subject knows that the other is perceiving the same thing and is, therefore, a co-perceiver. The second approach highlights the fact that the subjects know that the object is being perceived by both of them, and explains what it means for an object to be perceived as perceptually shared. The article analyzes the reasons supporting the first approach in order to show that it is misleading, and it provides grounds to validate the second approach. The answer to cognitive openness paves the way for future research on joint attention.

Referencias

Baron-Cohen, S. “The Eye Direction Detector (edd) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (sam): Two Cases for Evolutionary Psychology.” Joint Attention: Its origins and Role in Development. Eds. Chris Moore and Philip J. Dunham. NewYork/Sussex: Psychology Press, 1995. 41-60. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806617

Bruner, J. S., and Scaife, M. “The Capacity for Joint Visual Attention in the Infant.” Nature 253 (1974-1975): 265-266.

Campbell, J. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Campbell, J. “Joint Attention and Common Knowledge.” Joint Attention Communication and Other Minds, Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Eds. Naomi Eilan, Christoph Horel, Teresa McCormack, and Johannes Roessler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245635.003.0013

Campbell, J. “An Object-Dependent View of Joint Attention.” Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of mind and Social Neuroscience. Ed. Seemann Axel. Cambridge, ma: mit Press, 2011. 415-430.

Davies, M. “The Mental Simulation Debate.” Philosophical Issues 5 (1994): 189-218.

De Jaegher, H. Social Interaction Rhythm and Participatory Sense-Making: An Embodied, Interactional Approach to Social Understanding, with Some Implications for Autism. Diss. Sussex: University of Sussex, 2006.

Dunham, P. J., and Moore, C. “Current Themes in Research on Joint Attention.” Joint Attention: Its origins and Role in Development. NewYork; Sussex: Psychology Press, 1995. 29-40.

Eilan, N. “Joint Attention, Communication and Mind.” Joint Attention, Communication and Other Minds, Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Ed. Naomi Eilan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245635.003.0001

Eilan, N. “Consciousness, Self-Consciousness and Communication.” Reading Merleau- Ponty on Phenomenology of Perception. Ed. Thomas Baldwin. London: Routledge, 2007. 118-138.

Eilan, N. Joint Attention and the Second Person. 2015. Mind and Action Research Center. Warwick: Warwick University.

Evans, G. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.

Gallagher, S. “Body Image and Body Schema: A Conceptual Clarification.” Journal of Mind and Behaviour 7.4 (1986): 541-554.

Gallagher, S. “The Practice of Mind: Theory, Simulation or Interaction?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8.5-7 (2001): 83-108.

Gallagher, S. “Logical and Phenomenological Arguments against Simulation Theory.” Folk Psychology Re-Assesed. Eds. Daniel D. Hutto and Matthew Ratcliffe. Dordrecth: Springer, 2007. 63-78.

Gallagher, S. “Strong Interaction and Self-Agency.” Humana Mente 15 (2011a): 55-76.

Gallagher, S. “Interactive Coordination in Joint Attention.” Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. Ed. Axel Seemann. Cambridge, ma: mit Press, 2011b. 293-306.

Haugueland, J. “Objective Perception.” Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1998. 241-266.

Hommel, B. “Inverting the Simon Effect by Intention: Determinants of Direction and Extent of Effects of Irrelevant Spatial Information.” Psychological Research 55 (1993): 270–279.

Hutto, D. “Elementary Mind Minding, Enactivist-Style.” Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. Ed. Axel Seemann. Cambridge, ma: mit, 2011. 307-342.

Nadel, J., Charcon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D., and Réserbat-Plantey, D. “Expectancies for Social Contingency in 2-Months-Old.” Developmental Science 2.2 (1999): 164-173.

Peacocke, C. “Joint Attention: Its Nature, Reflexivity, and Relation to Common Knowledge.” Joint Attention Communication and Other Minds, Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Eds. Naomi Eilan, Christoph Horel, Teresa McCormack, and Johannes Roessler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 298-324.

Reddy, V. “Before the ‘Third Element’: Understanding Attention to Self.” Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Eds. Naomi Eilan, Christoph Horel, Teresa McCormack, and Johannes Roessler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 85-109.

Reddy, V. “A Gaze at Grips with Me.” Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. Ed. Axel Seemann. Cambridge, ma: mit Press, 2011.

Seemann, A. “Joint Attention: Toward a Relational Account.” Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. Cambridge, ma: mit Press, 2012. 183-202.

Tomasello, M. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2005): 675-735.

Trevarthen, C. and Aitken, K. J. “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications.” J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42.1 (2001): 3-48.

Cómo citar

MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION

Pinzón, A. «Así no se explica la atención conjunta». Ideas y Valores, vol. 67, diciembre de 2018, pp. 15-39, doi:10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084.

ACM

[1]
Pinzón, A. 2018. Así no se explica la atención conjunta. Ideas y Valores. 67, (dic. 2018), 15–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084.

ACS

(1)
Pinzón, A. Así no se explica la atención conjunta. Ideas Valores 2018, 67, 15-39.

APA

Pinzón, A. (2018). Así no se explica la atención conjunta. Ideas y Valores, 67, 15–39. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084

ABNT

PINZÓN, A. Así no se explica la atención conjunta. Ideas y Valores, [S. l.], v. 67, p. 15–39, 2018. DOI: 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/73084. Acesso em: 22 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Pinzón, Anderson. 2018. «Así no se explica la atención conjunta». Ideas Y Valores 67 (diciembre):15-39. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084.

Harvard

Pinzón, A. (2018) «Así no se explica la atención conjunta», Ideas y Valores, 67, pp. 15–39. doi: 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73084.

IEEE

[1]
A. Pinzón, «Así no se explica la atención conjunta», Ideas Valores, vol. 67, pp. 15–39, dic. 2018.

Turabian

Pinzón, Anderson. «Así no se explica la atención conjunta». Ideas y Valores 67 (diciembre 15, 2018): 15–39. Accedido marzo 22, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/73084.

Vancouver

1.
Pinzón A. Así no se explica la atención conjunta. Ideas Valores [Internet]. 15 de diciembre de 2018 [citado 22 de marzo de 2026];67:15-39. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/73084

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

579

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.