Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
¿Moralidad sin competencia? Dos interpretaciones de la objeción de inmoralidad al pirronismo
Morality without Competence? Two Interpretations of the Immorality Objection to Pyrrhonism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v72n10Supl.106329Keywords:
moral, escepticismo antiguo, inmoralidad, acción (es)moral competence, pyrrhonic skepticism, immorality objection, action (en)
Downloads
Argumentamos en contra de dos intentos contemporáneos por rehabilitar el pirronismo debido a su incapacidad para resolver la clásica objeción de inmoralidad. Proponemos dos diferentes lecturas de la objeción: una débil, según la cual los pirrónicos son inmorales dado que sus actos mismos lo son —lo que constituye un cargo empírico—, y otra fuerte, donde la inmoralidad del pirrónico proviene del hecho de que, por diseño, no puede exhibir ningún tipo de competencia moral, lo que constituye un cargo conceptual. Concluyo que ambos intentos fracasan debido a que se atienen el sentido débil de la objeción, pero no el fuerte.
We argue against two contemporary attempts to rehabilitate Pyrrhonism due to its inability to resolve the classic objection of immorality. We propose two different readings of the objection: a weak one according to which the Pyrrhonics are immoral since their very acts are immoral —which constitutes an empirical charge—, and a
strong one, where the immorality of the Pyrrhonic comes from the fact that, by design, they cannot exhibit any kind of moral competence –constituting a conceptual charge. We conclude that both attempts fail because they only hold the weak sense of objection, but not the strong one.
References
Annas, Julia. “Doing Without Objective Values: Ancient and Modern Strategies.” The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic ethics. Edited by M. Schofield and G. Striker. Cambridge University Press, 1986. 3-30.
Anscombe, Gertrude. Intention. Oxford University Press, 1963.
Attie-Picker. Mario. “Does Scepticism Lead to Tranquility? Exploring a Pyrrhonian theme.” Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy. Vol. 3. Edited by Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols. Oxford University Press, 2020. 97-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852407.003.0005
Barnes, Jonathan. “La possibilità di una vita scettica.” Atti e relazioni dell´Accademmia Pugliese delle Scienze 45 (1988): 1-28.
Beebe, James, Qiaoan, Runya, Wysocki, Tomasz, and Endara, Miguel. “Moral objectivism in cross-cultural perspective.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 15.3-4 (2015): 386-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342157
Blackburn, Simon. Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195080414.001.0001
Burnyeat, Myles. “Can the Sceptic Live His Scepticism?” Doubt and Dogmatism. Edited by Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat, and Jonathan Barnes. Clarendon Press, 1980. 20-53.
Bett, Richard. How to be a Pyrrhonist. The Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557603
Bett, Richard. “The Cyrenaics and Skepticism.” Skepticism. From Antiquity to the Present. Edited by Diego Machuca and Baron Reed. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. 14-23.
Bett, Richard. “Pyrrhonism in Diogenes Laertius.” Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius. Edited by Katja Maria Vogt. Mohr Siebeck, 2015. 75-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-156430-7
Corti, Lorenzo. Scepticisme et Langage. Vrin, 2009.
Correa, Alfonso. “La inmoralidad de los pirrónicos.” Estudios Filosóficos 60 (2019): 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/10.17533/udea.ef.n60a04
Davidson, Donald. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press, 1980.
Doris, Jhon. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878364
Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda. Pirrone. Testimonianze. Bibliopolis, 1981.
Ferrari, Gian Arturo. “L’immagine dell’ equilibrio.” Lo scetticismo antico. Vol. 1. Edited by Gabriele Giannantoni. Bibliopolis, 1981. 337-370.
Everson, Stephen. “The Objective Appearance of Pyrrhonism.” Companion to Ancient Thought 2: Psychology. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge University Press, 1991. 121-147.
Gottschalk, Hendrik. “Aristotelian Philosophy in the Roman World from the Time to Cicero to the End of the Second Century ad.” Aufstieg und Nierdergang der Römischen Welt, ii, 36.2. Edited by Wolfgang Haase and Hildegard Temporini. De Gruyter, 1987. 1019-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851519-010
Goodwin, Geoffrey., and Darley, John. “The Psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism.” Cognition 106.3 (2008): 1339-1366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007
Hartman, Gilbert. “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1998-1999): 315-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.00062
Inwood, Brad. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. oup, 1985.
Jost, John and Hunyady, Orsolya. “The Psychology of System Justification and the Palliative Function of Ideology.” European Review of Social Psychology 13.1 (2003): 111-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000046
Kaukua, Jari, and Lähteenmäki, Vili. “Subjectivity as a Non-Textual Standard of Interpretation in the History of Philosophical Psychology.” History and Theory 49 (2010): 21-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00526.x
Kamtekar, Rachana. “Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character.”Ethics 114 (2004): 458-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/381696
Kay, Aaron, Whitson, Jennifer, Gaucher, Danielle, and Galinsky, Adam. “Compensatory Control: Achieving Order Through the Mind, our Institutions, and the Heavens.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 18.5 (2009): 264-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
Laursen, John C. “Ancient Skepticism and Modern Fiction: Some Political Implications.” Elenchos 40.1 (2019): 199-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2019-0008
Lorenz, Hendrik, and Morrison, Benjamin. “Aristotle Empiricist Theory of Doxastic Knowledge.” Phronesis 64.4 (2019): 431-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341975
Lozano-Vásquez, Andrea. “Pyrrhonian Language.” Rónai. Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios 8.2 (2020): 309-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32363
Machuca, Diego. “Does Pyrrhonism Have Practical or Epistemic Value?” Sceptical Paths. Edited by Giuseppe Veltri, Racheli Haliva, Stephan Schmid and Emidio Spinelli. De Gruyter, 2019a. 43-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110591040-004
Machuca, Diego. “Pyrrhonism, Inquiry, and Rationality.” Elenchos 34 (2013): 201-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2013-340109
Machuca, Diego. “Scepticisme, apraxia et rationalité.” Les raisons du doute: études sur le scepticisme antique. Edited by Diego Machuca and Stéphane Marchand. Classiques Garnier, 2019b. 53-87.
Mackie, John Leslie. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin, 1977.
Mahfouz, Naguib. Sugar Street. Anchor Books, 1993.
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54.2 (2010): 440-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
Nussbaum, Martha. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press, 1990.
Nussbaum, Martha. The Therapy of Desire. Princeton University Press, 1994.
Nussbaum, Martha. “Equilibrium: Scepticism and Immersion in Political Deliberation.”Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition. Edited by Juha Sihvola. Hakapaino Oy, 2000. 171-196.
Obdrzalek, Suzanne. “From Skepticism to Paralysis: The Apraxia Argument in Cicero’s Academica.” Ancient Philosophy 32 (2012): 369‒392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil201232231
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996.
Rokeach, Milton. The Open and Closed Mind. Basic Books, 1960.
Salmieri, Gregory. “Aristotle on Selfishness? Understanding the Iconoclasm of Nicomachean Ethics ix 8.” Ancient Philosophy 34 (2014): 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20143417
Sarkissian, Hagop, Park, John, Tien, David, Wright, Jennifer, and Knobe, Joshua. “Folk Moral Relativism.” Mind & Language 26.4 (2011): 482-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01428.x
Sosa, Ernst. Epistemology. Princeton University Press, 2017.
Turing, Alan. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59 (1950): 433-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Valentino, Nicholas, Hutchings, Vincent, Banks, Antoine, and Davis, Anne. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good itizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning Via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29.2 (2008): 247-273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
How to Cite
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonComnercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Internacional License authorizes copying and redistributing the material in any means or format, provided that credit is granted to the authors and to Ideas y Valores as the source of the original publication. Copying or distributing the contents of the journal for commercial purposes is not allowed; neither is the adaptation, derivation, or transformation of the contents, without previous authorization by the authors and the editors of Ideas y Valores. For further information regarding the terms of this license, please consult http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.
1.jpg)
.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
