Observaciones antropológicas (I) Lecturas antropológicas y etnológicas al pensamiento de Wittgenstein: entre la descripción y la teoría
Anthropological remarks (I). Anthropological and ethnological readings of Wittgenstein’s thought: between description and theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v74n187.96812Keywords:
antropología, etnología, enfoque, Hacker, Wittgenstein (es)anthropology, ethnology, approach, Hacker, Wittgenstein (en)
Downloads
A partir de la pregunta por lo antropológico en el pensamiento de Ludwig Wittgenstein, este trabajo ordena las formas de lectura antropológica —y etnológica— que se le han hecho a la filosofía que desarrolló después de su regreso a Cambridge en 1929; trazando los límites y las posibilidades de las mismas desde la forma propia de los escritos wittgensteineanos. Dado que se han incrementado los estudios al respecto, dilucidaremos las diferencias que estas lecturas poseen a la hora de presentar una “antropología wittgensteineana”; sobre todo desde las diferencias epistémicas entre una lectura descriptiva y una lectura teórica.
Based on the question about the anthropological in the thought of Ludwig Wittgenstein, this paper orders the forms of anthropological and ethnological readings that have been done to the philosophy that he developed after his return to Cambridge in 1929; drawing their limits and possibilities from the form of wittgensteinian writings.
Given that, since the end of the 20th century until today the studies on the matter have increased, we will elucidate the differences that these readings have when presenting
a “wittgensteinian anthropology”; especially, from the epistemic differences between a descriptive reading and a theoretical reading.
References
Aarhus, Lars Albinus. “Culture as a Monastic Rule. Sloterdijk’s Erratic Casting of Wittgenstein as a Cultural Elitist”. Wittgenstein-Studien 9.1 (2018): 85-99. [https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2018-0007]
Alonso, Juan David. “Investigaciones antropológicas. Observaciones en torno a Wittgenstein y la antropología de la religión”. Debate sobre la antropología, Thémata. 35 (2005): 685-694. [https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1987005]
Anderson, R. J., John. A. Hughes y W. W. Sharrock. “Wittgenstein and Comparative Sociology”. Inquiry 27.1-4 (1984): 268-276.[https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748408602035]
Ann Ness, Sally y Erich Reck. Reseña al texto: “Philosophical Anthropology: Wittgenstein’s Perspective”. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. An electronic Journal, Universidad de Notre Dame. Web. 2011. [https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/philosophical-anthropology-wittgenstein-s-perspective-2/]
Ayer, Alfred Jules. “Sobre magia y religión”. Wittgenstein. Barcelona: Crítica, 1986: 112-118.
Balza García, Rafael. “Certeza y cultura. Alcances antropológicos de Sobre la Certeza”. Lógoi, Revista de Filosofía 18 (2010): 77-92. [https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.v0i18.2713]
Balza García, Rafael. “De los sistemas orgánicos a los sistemas simbólicos: la cultura y la articulación de lo real. Apuntes para una etnoepistemología desde Wittgenstein”. Revista de Filosofía 74 (2013): 43-70. [https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/filosofia/article/view/18263]
Balza García, Rafael. “Observaciones antropológicas (II). Las antropologías de Wittgenstein: una filosofía etnográficamente orientada”. Revista de Filosofía 95 (2020): 7-55. [https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/filosofia/article/view/35163]
Balza García, Rafael. “Pensando el contexto. La cultura como realización epistémica”. Intersticios 19.41 (2014): 37-56 [https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/intersticios/articulo/pensando-el-contexto-la-cultura-como-realizacion-epistemica]
Baran, Marcin. “Lebensform and ‘Socio-Cultural Background’. The Wittgensteinian Inspirations in the Philosophical Anthropology of Charles Taylor”. Wittgenstein-Studien 9.1 (2018): 75-84. [https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2018-0006]
Barrett, Louise. “Picturing Primates and Looking at Monkeys: Why 21st Century Primatology Needs Wittgenstein”. Philosophical Investigations 41.2 (2018): 161-184. [https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12189]
Bell, Richard. “Wittgenstein’s Anthropology. Self-Understanding and Understanding Other Cultures”. Philosophical Investigations 7.4 (1984): 295-312. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.1984.tb00052.x]
Bloor, David. Wittgenstein. A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Wittgenstein, la Sociologie et le Sociologisme”. Wittgenstein, Dernières Pensées. Marseille: Agone, 2002: 345-353.
Bouveresse, Jacques. “L’animal Cérémoniel: Wittgenstein et l’anthropologie”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 16 (1977): 43 54. [https://www.persee.fr/doc/arss_0335-5322_1977_num_16_1_2567]
Bremer, Jozef. “Wittgenstein’s Remarks Concerning the Accessibility of Foreign Cultures”. Wittgenstein-Studien 1.8 (2017): 159-184 [https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2017-007]
Brusotti, Marco. “An ‘Anthropological’ Way of Looking at Philosophical Problems. Wittgenstein, Frazer and the Art of Comparison”. Realismus - Relativismus - Konstruktivismus / Realism - Relativism - Constructivism. Contributions. August 9-15 XXIII (2015).
Brusotti, Marco. “‘What Belongs to a Language Game is a Whole Culture’. On Two Related Concepts in Wittgenstein’s Philosophy”. Wittgenstein-Studien 9.1 (2018): 51-73. [https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2018-0005]
Burley, Mikel. Contemplating Religious Forms of Life: Wittgenstein and D. Z. Phillips. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2012.
Carmona, Carla. Wittgenstein. La conciencia del límite. Madrid: Bonalletra Alcompas, 2015.
Carmona, Carla, David Pérez-Chico y Chon, Tejedor (Eds.). Intercultural Understanding after Wittgenstein. UK: Anthem Pres, 2023.
Cavell, Stanley. “Declining Decline: Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Culture”. This New Yet Unapproachable America: Lectures After Emerson After Wittgenstein. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1989: 29-77.
Cavell, Stanley. ¿Must We Mean What We Say? UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Chauviré, Christiane. Le Moment Anthropologique de Wittgenstein. Paris: Kimé, 2005.
Clack, Brian R. “Wittgenstein and Anthropology”. Companion to Wittgenstein. UK: Wiley Blackwell, 2017: 627-638.
Clack, Brian R. “Wittgenstein and Expressive Theories of Religion”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40.1 (1996): 47-61. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/40036719]
Clack, Brian R. “Wittgenstein and Magic”. Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge, 2001: 12-28.
Clammer, John. “Wittgensteinianism and the Social Sciences”. Sociological Review 24 (1976): 775-791. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1976.tb00584.x]
Col, Giovanni y Stephan Palmié. (Eds.). The Mythology in our Language. Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Boug. Chicago: HAU Books, 2018.
Curry, Michael R. “Forms of Life and Geographical Method”. Geographical Review 79.3 (1989): 280-296. [https://doi.org/10.2307/215573]
Das, Veena. Textures of the Ordinary: Doing Anthropology after Wittgenstein. New York: Fordham University Press, 2020.
Das, Veena. “Wittgenstein and Anthropology”. Annual Review of Anthropology 27 (1998): 171-195. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/223368]
D. Z. Phillips. Belief, Change and Forms of Life. New York: Library of Philosophy and Religion, Humanities Press, 1986.
D. Z. Phillips. Wittgenstein and Religion. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1993.
D. Z. Phillips. “Wittgenstein, Religion and ‘First Philosophy’”. Religion and the End of Metaphysics. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008: 7-43.
DeAngelis, William J. Ludwig Wittgenstein. A Cultural Point of View. Philosophy in the Darkness of this Time. New York: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2007.
DeSmith, Felicia. “Frazer, Wittgenstein and the Interpretation of Ritual Practice”. Macalester Journal of Philosophy 14.1 (2005): 59-72. [https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo/vol14/iss1/6]
Díaz Aurelio, Jorge. “Wittgenstein y la religión”. El pensamiento de L. Wittgenstein. Bogotá: Editorial Unibiblos, 2001: 241-263.
Edimar, Brígido. “Wittgenstein: la consciencia del límite. Una conversación con Carla Carmona”. Praxis Filosófica 50 (2020): 227-238. [https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i50.8856]
Fann, Kuang Tih. Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971.
Flathman, Richard E. (2000). “Wittgenstein and the Social Sciences: Critical Reflections Concerning Peter Winch’s Interpretations and Appropriations of Wittgenstein’s Thought”. History of the Human Sciences 13.2 (2000):1-15. [https://doi.org/10.1177/09526950022120647]
Gaffal, Margit. “Actions Embedded in Forms of Life”. Action, Decision-Making and Forms of Life. Berlin-Boston: Aporía, de Gruyter, 2016: 45-59.
Gebauer, Gunter. Wittgenstein‘s Anthropological Philosophy. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Geertz, Clifford. La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa, 2003.
Gellner, Ernest. Language and Solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsbud Dilemma. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
González-Castán, Óscar. L. “Structures, Dynamisms and Contents of our Belief System: Husserl and Wittgenstein”. Action, Decision-Making and Forms of Life. Berlin-Boston: Aporía, de Gruyter, 2016: 121-135. [https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/92734]
Guetti, Edward. “Wittgenstein’s Natural-Historical Investigations”. Wittgenstein-Studien 8.1 (2017): 81-102. [https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2017-004]
Gustafsson, Ylva, Camilla Kronqvist y Hannes Nykänen (Eds.). Ethics and the Philosophy of Culture: Wittgensteinian Approaches. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.
Hacker, Peter M. S. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations. 4 vols. UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.
Hacker, Peter M. S. “El enfoque antropológico y etnológico de Wittgenstein”. Antropología de Wittgenstein. Reflexionando con P. M. S. Hacker. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2011: 17-40.
Hacker, Peter M. S. Wittgenstein. Comparisons and Context. UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Heckel, Emily. “A Wittgensteinian Defense of Cultural Relativism”. Macalester Journal of Philosophy 19.1 (2010): 5-26. [https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo/vol19/iss1/3]
Holguín, Magdalena. “Antropología o historia natural”. Antropología de Wittgenstein. Reflexionando con P. M. S. Hacker. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2011: 117-126.
Humphries, Carl y Walter Schweidler. (Eds.). Wittgenstein, Philosopher of Cultures. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2017.
Innsbruck, Ilse Somavilla. “Wittgenstein’s Ambivalent Attitude toward Science and Culture”. Wittgenstein-Studien 9.1 (2018): 13-29.
Jacorzynski, Witold. En la cueva de la locura. La aportación de Ludwig Wittgenstein a la antropología social. México D. F.: Ediciones de la Casa Chata-Porrúa, 2008.
Jacorzynski, Witold. “El enfoque etnológico de Wittgenstein reconsiderado”. Antropología de Wittgenstein. Reflexionando con P. M. S. Hacker. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2011a: 127-157.
Jacorzynski, Witold. “La filosofía de Ludwig Wittgenstein como una nueva propuesta para la antropología y las ciencias sociales”. Sociológica 26.74 (2011b): 177-204. [https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305026732006]
Jolley, Kelly Dean. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Remarks”. Wittgenstein. Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, 2010, [https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654420.002]
Knabenschuh, Sabine. “Del espacio lógico al ver aspectos. Hacia una epistemología cultural a lo Wittgenstein”. Revista de Filosofía 70.2012-1 (2012): 123-150. [https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/filosofia/article/view/18240]
Knabenschuh, Sabine. “Epistemología resucitada. Proyecciones a partir de Wittgenstein”. Revista de Filosofía 63.2009-3 (2009): 89-103.
Knabenschuh, Sabine. “Compatibilidad vs. conmensurabilidad. La ‘gramática’ wittgensteineana ante un reto (inter) cultural”. Wittgenstein en español II. Buenos Aires: Colección Humanidades y Arte, serie Filosofía Ediciones de la UNLa, (2010a): 175-199.
Knabenschuh, Sabine. “La indecidibilidad epistémica como marco de acción. Wittgenstein ante una paradoja cultural”. Revista Lógoi 18 (2010b): 19-44.
Knabenschuh, Sabine. “Lenguaje, comprensión y cultura: la epistemología paraláctica de Wittgenstein”. Actas del III Congreso Iberoamericano de Filosofía “Pluralismo”. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, 2008. [Mesa Redonda “Pluralismo Epistémico. Reflexiones del Círculo Wittgensteineano - Maracaibo/Venezuela”, sesión 1, ponencia 3].
Knabenschuh, Sabine. “Sobre la cultura. Wittgenstein y el sueño de Cassirer”. Revista de Filosofía 79.2015-1 (2015): 87-104. [https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/filosofia/article/view/19895]
Lara, Philippe. Le Rite et la Raison: Wittgenstein Anthropologue. Ellipses, 2005.
Lara, Philippe. “Wittgenstein and Evans-Pritchard on Ritual: Twenty-Two Reasons to Think that Wittgenstein Was an Anthropologist”. Jaso 31.2 (2000): 119-132.
Lara, Philippe. “Wittgenstein as Anthropologist: the Concept of Ritual Instinct”. Philosophical Investigations 26.2 (2003): 109-124. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9205.00190]
Laugier, Sandra. “Interculturality, Ordinary Language and Translation from Wittgenstein to Cavell”. Intercultural Understanding after Wittgenstein. UK: Anthem Pres, 2023.
Laugier, Sandra. “On an Anthropological Tone in Philosophy”. The Mythology in our Language. Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Boug. Chicago: HAU Books, 2018a: 207-225.
Laugier, Sandra. “This is us: Wittgenstein and the Social”. Philosophical Investigations 41.2 (2018b): 204-222. [https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12197]
Le Du, Michel. “Tacit Knowledge and Action”. Wittgenstein: Issues and Debates, Aporía. 3. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010: 11-30. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110321845]
Li, Yabo. “Cross-Cultural Communication Based on Wittgenstein’s Life Form”. 7th International Conference on Education and Management. Heilongjiang: Atlantis Press, 2017.
Marques, António. “Anthropological Representations and Forms of Life in Wittgenstein”. Philosophical Anthropology. Wittgenstein’s Perspective. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110321821.61]
McGuinness, Brian. (Ed.). Wittgenstein in his Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd., 1990.
Moore, George Edward. “Conferencias de Wittgenstein de 1930-33”. Defensa del sentido común y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Ediciones Orbis, 1983.
Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle. “Coming to Language: Wittgenstein’s Social ‘Theory’ of Language Acquisition”. Language and World. Part One: Essays on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010: 291-313. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110330595.291]
Munz, Volker. A. “Philosophy from an ‘Anthropological’ Point of View. Wittgenstein and Sraffa”. Conceptus 42.101-102 (2016): [https://doi.org/10.1515/cpt-2016-0005]
Muñoz Sánchez, María Teresa. Wittgenstein y la articulación lingüística de lo público. México D. F.: Universidad Intercontinental, 2009.
Needham, Rodney. Belief, Language and Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972.
Needham, Rodney. “Remarks on Wittgenstein and Ritual”. Exemplars. London, 1985.
Norman, Rudich y Manfred Stassen. “Wittgenstein’s Implied Anthropology: Remarks on Wittgenstein’s Notes on Frazer”. History and Theory 10.1 (1971): 84-89. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2504399]
Padilla Gálvez, Jesús. “Action, Decision-Making and Forms of Life”. Action, Decision-Making and Forms of Life, Aporía. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 2016: 1-8.
Padilla Gálvez, Jesús. (Ed.). Antropología de Wittgenstein. Reflexionando con P. M. S. Hacker. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2011.
Padilla Gálvez, Jesús. (Ed.). Philosophical Anthropology. Wittgenstein’s Perspective. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010.
Rivera, Silvia. “Ludwig Wittgenstein y las ciencias sociales”. Hermenéutica Intercultural, Revista de Filosofía 16 (2007): 153-170.
Salgues, Camille. “Un Nouveau Wittgenstein Encore Inapprochable. Le Eôle et la Place du Philosophe Dans l’Anthropologie”. L’Homme 3-4, 187-188 (2008): 201-222. [https://doi.org/10.4000/lhomme.29259]
Sanfélix Vidarte, Vicente. “Contraste y trasfondo. Wittgenstein y la filosofía”. Antropología de Wittgenstein. Reflexionando con P. M. S. Hacker. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2011.
Schatzki, Theodore. R. Social Practices: a Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. London: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Scotto, Carolina. “Formas de vida extrañas”. Wittgenstein en español. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Lanús, 2009: 205-236.
Sloterdijk, Peter. Du Musst dein Leben ändern: über Anthropotechnik. Frankfurt, 2012.
Solís, Yors. “Algunas interpretaciones de la filosofía de Wittgenstein”. Praxis. Revista de Filosofía 71(2013): 141-161. [http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/praxis.71.6]
Tomasini Bassols, Alejandro. “Meaning and Action”. Philosophical Anthropology. Wittgenstein’s Perspective. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010.
Tomasini Bassols, Alejandro. “Wittgenstein: filosofía de la antropología y antropología filosófica”. Antropología de Wittgenstein. Reflexionando con P. M. S. Hacker. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2011: 83-103.
Tomasini Bassols, Alejandro. “Wittgenstein y Frazer: el caso de la magia”. Investigación Humanística II.2 (1986): 127-142.
Trigg, Roger. “Wittgenstein and Social Science”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 28 (1990): 209-222. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100005324]
Whitaker, Mark. P. “Ethnography as Learning: a Wittgensteinian Approach to Writing Ethnographic Accounts”. Anthropological Quarterly 69.1 (1996): 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3317135]
Winch, Peter. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
Winch, Peter. “Understanding a Primitive Society”. American Philosophical Quarterly 1.4 (1964): 307-324.[https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009143]
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Aforismos. Cultura y valor. Madrid: Editorial Austral, 2007.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Investigaciones filosóficas. México D. F: Instituto de Investigación Filosóficas-UNAM, 2003.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Los cuadernos azul y marrón. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1968.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Observaciones a la Rama Dorada de Frazer. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1992.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Observaciones sobre la filosofía de la psicología. II tomos. México D. F.: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas-UNAM, 1997a.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Sobre la certeza. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa, 1997b.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Observaciones sobre los fundamentos de la matemática. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1978.
How to Cite
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonComnercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Internacional License authorizes copying and redistributing the material in any means or format, provided that credit is granted to the authors and to Ideas y Valores as the source of the original publication. Copying or distributing the contents of the journal for commercial purposes is not allowed; neither is the adaptation, derivation, or transformation of the contents, without previous authorization by the authors and the editors of Ideas y Valores. For further information regarding the terms of this license, please consult http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.