Publicado

2025-01-01

COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times

La era del COVID-19: más permisividad materna en comparación con los tiempos prepandemia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363

Palabras clave:

Pandemic, mother, parental attitudes, preschool children (en)
Pandemia, madre, actitudes de los padres, niños en edad preescolar (es)

Autores/as

Objective This study aimed to assess mothers' attitudes toward their preschool children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods In this observational study, mothers of children aged 2 to 6 years completed a family information form and the Parent Attitude Scale (PAS) during two periods: the Before Pandemic (BPanP) group (n=303) and the During Pandemic (DPanP) group (n=344). Generalized lineer models evaluated differences in PAS subdimension scores according to pandemic period and mother-child characteristics.

Results Compared to the BPanP group, the median scores for democratic and overprotective attitudes were quite similar in the two phases, while the median scores for authoritarian and permissive attitudes were notably higher in the DPanP group (p=0.014, p<0.001, respectively). When we accounted for mother-child factors, multivariate analysis revealed a positive link between the pandemic period and permissive parenting scores. Prior to the pandemic, there was a negative correlation between democratic parental attitudes and both authoritarian and permissive attitudes. However, during the pandemic, this negative correlation only persisted between democratic and authoritarian attitudes. The positive correlation between authoritarian and permissive attitudes, observed before the pandemic, remained unchanged during the pandemic period. A new positive correlation emerged between democratic and overprotective attitudes.

Conclusion The findings indicate changes in maternal attitudes, with higher scores in permissive parenting amidst the COVID-19 outbreak in contrast to the time before the pandemic.

Objetivo Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar las actitudes de las madres hacia sus hijos en edad preescolar antes y durante la pandemia de COVID-19.

Materiales y Métodos En este estudio observacional, madres de niños de 2 a 6 años completaron un formulario de información familiar y la Escala de Actitud de los Padres (PAS) durante dos periodos: el grupo Antes de la Pandemia (BPanP) (n=303) y el grupo Durante la Pandemia (DPanP) (n=344). Los modelos lineales generalizados evaluaron las diferencias en las puntuaciones de las subdimensiones PAS, según el periodo de la pandemia y las características madre-hijo.

Resultados En comparación con el grupo BPanP, las puntuaciones medianas para actitudes democráticas y sobreprotectoras fueron bastante similares en las dos fases, mientras que las puntuaciones medianas para actitudes autoritarias y permisivas fueron notablemente más altas en el grupo DPanP (p=0,014, p<0,001, respectivamente). Cuando tomamos en cuenta los factores madre-hijo, el análisis multivariado reveló un vínculo positivo entre el periodo de la pandemia y las puntuaciones de paternidad permisiva. Antes de la pandemia, existía una correlación negativa entre las actitudes democráticas de los padres y las actitudes autoritarias y permisivas. Sin embargo, durante la pandemia, esta correlación negativa solo persistió entre actitudes democráticas y autoritarias. La correlación positiva entre actitudes autoritarias y permisivas, observada antes de la pandemia, se mantuvo sin cambios durante el periodo pandémico. Surgió una nueva correlación positiva entre actitudes democráticas y sobreprotectoras.

Conclusión Los hallazgos indican cambios en las actitudes maternas, con puntuaciones más altas en crianza permisiva durante el brote de COVID-19 en contraste con la época anterior a la pandemia.

Recibido: 11 de mayo de 2024; Revisión recibida: 27 de diciembre de 2024; Aceptado: 30 de diciembre de 2024

Resumen

Objective This study aimed to assess mothers' attitudes toward their preschool children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods In this observational study, mothers of children aged 2 to 6 years completed a family information form and the Parent Attitude Scale (PAS) during two periods: the Before Pandemic (BPanP) group (n=303) and the During Pandemic (DPanP) group (n=344). Generalized lineer models evaluated differences in PAS subdimension scores according to pandemic period and mother-child characteristics.

Results Compared to the BPanP group, the median scores for democratic and overprotective attitudes were quite similar in the two phases, while the median scores for authoritarian and permissive attitudes were notably higher in the DPanP group (p=0.014, p<0.001, respectively). When we accounted for mother-child factors, multivariate analysis revealed a positive link between the pandemic period and permissive parenting scores. Prior to the pandemic, there was a negative correlation between democratic parental attitudes and both authoritarian and permissive attitudes. However, during the pandemic, this negative correlation only persisted between democratic and authoritarian attitudes. The positive correlation between authoritarian and permissive attitudes, observed before the pandemic, remained unchanged during the pandemic period. A new positive correlation emerged between democratic and overprotective attitudes.

Conclusion The findings indicate changes in maternal attitudes, with higher scores in permissive parenting amidst the COVID-19 outbreak in contrast to the time before the pandemic.

Keywords

Pandemic, mother, parental attitudes, preschool children, (source: MeSH, NLM)..
Resumen, traducido

Objetivo Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar las actitudes de las madres hacia sus hijos en edad preescolar antes y durante la pandemia de COVID-19.

Materiales y Métodos En este estudio observacional, madres de niños de 2 a 6 años completaron un formulario de información familiar y la Escala de Actitud de los Padres (PAS) durante dos periodos: el grupo Antes de la Pandemia (BPanP) (n=303) y el grupo Durante la Pandemia (DPanP) (n=344). Los modelos lineales generalizados evaluaron las diferencias en las puntuaciones de las subdimensiones PAS, según el periodo de la pandemia y las características madre-hijo.

Resultados En comparación con el grupo BPanP, las puntuaciones medianas para actitudes democráticas y sobreprotectoras fueron bastante similares en las dos fases, mientras que las puntuaciones medianas para actitudes autoritarias y permisivas fueron notablemente más altas en el grupo DPanP (p=0,014, p<0,001, respectivamente). Cuando tomamos en cuenta los factores madre-hijo, el análisis multivariado reveló un vínculo positivo entre el periodo de la pandemia y las puntuaciones de paternidad permisiva. Antes de la pandemia, existía una correlación negativa entre las actitudes democráticas de los padres y las actitudes autoritarias y permisivas. Sin embargo, durante la pandemia, esta correlación negativa solo persistió entre actitudes democráticas y autoritarias. La correlación positiva entre actitudes autoritarias y permisivas, observada antes de la pandemia, se mantuvo sin cambios durante el periodo pandémico. Surgió una nueva correlación positiva entre actitudes democráticas y sobreprotectoras.

Conclusión Los hallazgos indican cambios en las actitudes maternas, con puntuaciones más altas en crianza permisiva durante el brote de COVID-19 en contraste con la época anterior a la pandemia.

Palabras Clave

Pandemia, madre, actitudes de los padres, niños en edad preescolar, (fuente: DeCS, BIREME)..

With the begining of lockdown procces after the first COVID-19 case in Turkey (1,2), a new period has begun for children and adults; their contact with their peers is reduced, and all their connections with the outside are minimized (3,4). The lockdown period, in which children and their parents in the COVID-19 pandemic are at home for a long and indefinite duration and their daily and domestic routines change, affects people individually while also possibly affecting family life and parent-child relationships within the family (5,6). Parental attitudes are known to be associated with factors such as the education level of the parents, age, socio-economic and socio-cultural conditions, whether the parents are ready for parenthood, and the state of the relations between the spouses in the period before becoming parents (7). Research conducted prior to the pandemic indicated a strong correlation between the positive mood of family members and warm family interactions. Conversely, negative moods were linked with withdrawal from family interactions (8,9). A study during the pandemic period showed that parents, especially mothers, represented the most anxious group, and being a parent was a risk factor for fear and anxiety, especially for the safety of children, compared to non-parents (10). While a multitude of studies have delved into the ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical and mental well-being, as well as the lifestyle, of individuals (11,12), there is a conspicuous gap in the literature concerning the impact of adult parental roles during the pandemic (13,14).

Furthermore, there is a lack of published research examining the differences in parenting attitudes among mothers of preschool-aged children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, We hypothesize that there will be alterations in mothers' parental attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic as opposed to the pre-pandemic period. This study aims to compare parental attitudes—specifically, democratic, authoritarian, overprotective, and permissive attitudes—among mothers of preschool children in the periods before and during the pandemic (BPanP and DPanP). Identifying variations in parenting attitudes during the pandemic can inform the development of support programs for mothers in future outbreak periods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study consists of two parts, BPanP and DPanP. In the BPanP section, mothers of preschool children who applied to the Hacettepe University Ihsan Doğramacı Children’s Hospital between January and May 2019 were included in the study by face-to-face interview, while in the DPanP section in January 2021, 10 months after the onset of the pandemic, mothers who had preschool children were included in the study with an online survey including a family information form and a questionnaire by the snowball sampling method. Volunteer mothers with at least one child between the ages of 2-6 and who had a nuclear family (consisting of a mother, father, and children) were included in the study. Single-parent or extended-family children and their mothers were not included in the study. The survey was requested to be filled out for the younger child by those who had more than one child in the 2–6 age range. The online survey was preferred during the pandemic period by volunteers to minimize the risk of virus transmission.

In BPanP period, mothers completed informed consent form prior to their enrollment in the study. During the pandemic period, participants completed an online informed consent form. The research followed the guidelines set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, and it received approval from the ethics committee at Hacettepe University (2021/10-29).

Sample size for two phase study, effect size (d): 0.3, alpha error: 0.05, power: 0.95, and allocation ratio: 1/1, and two tail comparison; 304 participants for each period was calculated (G*Power 3.1.9.4).

Both the written and online surveys comprised three identical parts. The first part consisted of an informed consent section obtained from parents who agreed to participate in the study. The second part was a self-completion family information form, while the third part consisted of the parents' attitudes scale. The family information form comprised 15 questions, covering various aspects including parental age and education, family type, total number of children, and the age and gender of the youngest child in the family, who was between 2 and 6 years old, as well as details regarding their childcare arrangements during the pandemic. The questionnaire was completed voluntarily by participating parents. Parental age was categorized into two groups: <35 years and ≥35 years, while parents' education levels were divided into <12 years and ≥12 years. Mothers completed the Parent Attitude Scale (PAS) as part of the third segment of the online survey.

The PAS questionnaire comprises a 46-item Likert-style scale. Each item assesses parental behavior and is rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one (never) to five (always). The questionnaire is structured into four subdimensions, encompassing 17 items for democratic parenting, 11 for authoritarian parenting, 9 for overprotective parenting, and 9 for permissive parenting. (15) Among the 4 subdimensions we questioned in the PAS, the democratic parent subdimension aims to encourage the child to develop an independent personality and express his ideas clearly while accepting the child as a separate individual; the authoritarian parenting attitude, thinking that the parent is the owner of the child and that the child is not a separate individual, accordingly, one-way communication from the parent to the child and the child's unconditional compliance with the rules set by the parent; overprotective parental attitude, believing that the parent should constantly protect the child because the child can not be self-sufficient by avoiding giving responsibility to the child; on the other hand, the permissive parent subdimension includes allowing more freedom than normal to the child's behavior by tolerating everything the child does (15). Achieving high scores indicates a tendency towards the behavior represented by the corresponding subdimension.

The validity and reliability analyses of PAS revealed Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.83 for the democratic subdimension, 0.76 for the authoritarian subdimension, 0.75 for the overprotective subdimension, and 0.74 for the permissive subdimension (15), in another study the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients were reported as 0.84, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.73, respectively (16). In the present study, Cronbach's alpha values were calculated as 0.90 for the democratic subdimension, 0.78 for the authoritarian dimension, 0.81 for the overprotective dimension, and 0.75 for the permissive dimension for the face-to-face PAS in BPanP group and 0.94 for democratic subdimension, 0.85 for authoritarian subdimension, 0.81 for overprotective subdimension, and 0.74 for permissive dimension for online PAS in DPanP group. These values were similar in BPanP and DPanP groups and consistent with the literatüre (15,16).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS 23.0 software package. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, kurtosis, skewness, and data histogram were utilized to examine the distribution characteristics. The results indicated that the democratic and overprotective subscales exhibited a left-skewed distribution, while the authoritarian and permissive subscales showed a right-skewed distribution.

The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to assess differences between groups for variables that did not exhibit a normal distribution, with quarterly values provided. For variables with a normal distribution, Student's t-test was utilized, and mean and standard deviation values were calculated.

The distribution disparities of categorical variables between groups were evaluated using a chi-square test.

Differences in PAS subscales, having p value<0.2 in univarate comparison, according to study period (DPanP vs. the BPanP) and parent-child characteristics [child's gender (male vs. female), child's age, mother's age, mother's working status (housewife, those with job), maternal education status (<12, ≥12 years) and the number of children (single, ≥2), child care (grandparent vs. mother, nursery vs. mother, kindergarten vs. mother),] were analyzed with generalized linear models. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The BPanP survey was confirmed by 344, and 403 mothers confirmed the DPanP survey with children between 2 and 6 years old. The questionnaires which were fully completed and met the inclusion criteria in 303 questionnaires for BPanP and 344 questionnaires for DPanP were included in the study.

General characteristics of mother-child dyads of BPanP and DPanP

The parent-child characteristics of the BPanP and DPanP groups are shown in Table 1. While 64.7% of the mothers in the BPanP group had 12 years or more of education and 55.1% were working, these values were 76.7% and 64.0%, respectively, in the DPanP group (respectively; p=0.001, 0.022). Mothers with children in the BPanP group were 30.4%, while 40.4% in the DPanP group had a single child, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.029). Other parent-child factors (mother's age, child's age, father's age, child's gender) of the BPanP and DPanP groups were similar. Giving care to the child during the day has differed in groups (p<0.001). Among PAS subdimensions, the median scores of democratic and overprotective attitudes were similar in groups from two phases, while the median scores of authoritarian and permissive attitude were higher in the DPanP group (p=0.014, p<0.001, respectively, Table 1).

Table 1.: General characteristics of mother-child dyads of BPanP and DPanP

Values were given as mean ± SD or n (%) or mean [95%CI]; BPanP: Before Pandemic; DPaP: During Pandemic.

Parental attitude subscale scores according to pandemic period and mother-child characteristics

PAS scores in BPanP group and DPanP group according to pandemic period and parent-child characteristics are shown in Table 2. When mother-child characteristics included in generalized lineer models (GLM), a statistically significant change was seen in the median scores of permissive PAS with the pandemic period variable; the median scores of permissive attitude was higher in the DPanP compared to BPanP group (p=0.001).

Among mother-child characteristics, GLM revealed higher authoritarian scores with having children more than one, and mother and nursery care than counterparts (p<0.001, p=0.012, respectively). Higher permissive scores were detected during pandemic period, in low maternal education and permissive scores decreased with child age (p=0.001, p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively).

Table 2.: Parent Attitude Scale scores according to variables; pandemic period and mother-child characteristics, Generalized linear models

*mean [%95 Wald CI]; BPanP: Before Pandemic; DPaP: During Pandemic; abThe values in the same column are different, p<0.05.

Correlations between PAS scores and mother-child age and child number

The correlation between parental attitude subscale scores and mother-child age and number of children was analyzed in BPanP and DPanP groups, seperately (Table 3). The negative correlation between democratic parental attitudes and authoritarian and permissive attitudes before the pandemic period continued only between democratic and authoritarian attitudes during the pandemic period, while there was a new positive correlation between democratic and overprotective attitudes. The positive correlation between authoritarian and permissive attitudes before the pandemic continued unchanged during the pandemic period. The negative relationship between the child's age before the pandemic and the mother's permissive attitude did not change during the pandemic period. The negative relationship between maternal age and overprotective attitude before the pandemic disappeared during the pandemic period. The relationships between the number of children and democratic and authoritarian attitudes were not detected during the pandemic period. During the pandemic, the previously observed negative correlation between the number of children and democratic attitude, as well as the positive correlation between the number of children and authoritarian attitude, disappeared.

Table 3.: Correlations between Parent Attitude Scale scores and mother-child age and child number, r (p)

BPanP: Before Pandemic; DPaP: During Pandemic.

DISCUSSION

In our study; when the parental attitudes of mothers of children aged 2–6 years before and during the pandemic were examined, it was found that democratic and overprotective attitude scores were similar. In contrast, the authoritarian and permissive parental attitude sub-dimensions were higher during the pandemic period. It was noted that this variation depended on the specific characteristics of both the mother and the child. Other studies investigating the relationship between parental attitudes and the pandemic period have demonstrated that parents face challenges in managing their children, particularly while navigating the social isolation imposed by the pandemic (17). Similar to the higher scores of authoritarian attituide of DPanP group mothers in our study, The social isolation and pressures of quarantine experienced during this period led to parents adopting a more authoritarian stance in their attitudes towards their children (18). The further analysis of the study evaluated differences in PAS scores according to pandemic period and mother-child characteristics; when family-child characteristics are adjusted, the permissive parental attitude score was found to be higher during the pandemic period. It is known that in permissive parental attitude, the parent has an overly accepting approach toward the child, and the parent's control over the child is low (19). Some studies have shown that parents who spent more time with their kids during the pandemic than usual are more likely to have parenting problems, such as picky eaters, fights between siblings, etc. (20,21). This might be a possible explanation for the higher scores of permissive parenting attitude in the DPanP group and in the futher analyses results in our study. Also, it is konwn that the closure of schools and kindergartens during the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with the necessity to balance work and home life from within the household, significantly burden working mothers in meeting the caregiving needs of their children (22). It can be thought that the result that the percentage of mothers with job in the DPanP group in our study and the permissive scores of the mothers in this group were higher compared to the BPanP group, are parallel to these studies.

In our study, mothers with 2 or more children had higher authoritarian parenting scores comparered to having single child. A study on parenting attitudes revealed a noteworthy distinction, indicating that the presence of siblings has a significant positive association with mothers' the authoritarian child-rearing attitudes (23). Based on these findings, it can be inferred that mothers of children with siblings tend to adopt more authoritarian child-rearing attitudes. Consequently, it follows that the more children a mother has, the more authoritarian her child-rearing attitudes may become.

We discovered that when the mother is the day caregiver, the mothers' authoritarian attitude toward their child is higher compared to having child in grandparent and kindergarten care. Another study reported that grandparent involvement in child care reduced the risk of harsh parenting attitudes exhibited by mothers towards their children (24).

In the analyses, when the child is in nursery care during the day, the mothers' democratic attitude toward their child is lower than the grandparent and kindergarten care. In a study done between 100 kindergarten children and their parents, democratic parenting was the most common parenting style (25). In another study analysed the grandparent- grandchild relations, grandparents primarily employ a democratic style for their grandchildren from the child’s perspective (26). In our study, the fact that the mother exhibited a more democratic parenting when the child was under the care of the grandparent during the day than when the child was under nursery care may be due to the democratic attitude of the grandparent being an example for the mother, as this previous study suggests.

In the correlation analyses; mothers were more permissive to their younger children than the older ones in BPanP and DPanp groups. There are studies in the literature reporting that mothers with younger children are at higher risk of parenting-related exhaustion compared to those having an older child (27), and another study showed the quality of parent-child interactions with younger children might potentially be decreased during the pandemic (28). However, in our study, we found that the permissive parenting of mothers was in negative correlation with child’s age. In a study investigating the behavior problems of preschool children, it was reported that age creates a significant difference in attention deficit and mobility problems, and inattention and mobility problems are observed more in younger children. It has been stated that the reason for this may be the expectation of parents to exhibit less problematic behavior from older children (29). In our study, the negative corelation of permissive parenting attitude scores of mothers with children age might be similar to this study.

Strengths and limitations

One limitation is that it is a cross-sectional study based on maternal declarations both before and during the pandemic period. Even though it's possible that mothers try to see themselves differently than they really are or that they don't have a good enough understanding of how they act, especially during the pandemic, this is less likely now that surveys have been done online using snowball sampling. The same volunteers could not be reached during the pandemic period as a limitation, and other mother-child dyads with similar characteristics were included in the study. However, the Cronbach alpha values of the parent attitude scales made face-to-face and online during the pandemic period were similar. This showed that future researchers could study the parent attitude scale online and face-to-face.

As a limitation, the mothers included in the DPanP group during the pandemic period were more likely to be working and have an education of 12 years or more than the mothers in the BPanP group. Given that maternal education and employment status can influence parental attitudes, these variables were controlled for in subsequent analyses to assess the impact of the pandemic on parental attitudes. This suggests that when comparing studies conducted during the pandemic with those conducted before, there may be differences in participant characteristics that are accessible, thus necessitating adjustments in the analyses accordingly.

Although there are studies on the results of the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and the mental health and lifestyle of individuals (11,12), there are not enough studies examining the relationship between parental roles with the pandemic period and the interaction between them and their children, so the results of our study are important.

The present study showed that the permissive parenting attitude was higher during the pandemic period than before. The result obtained from the study showed that the pandemic period was added to the known influencers of parental attitudes. Even a healthy parent-child relationship that has developed under routine conditions, it will be primarily affected by parental attitudes in special situations such as pandemics, which will develop suddenly, and we will not know how long they will last or whether they will recur in the future. We enrolled the nuclear family type, and further studies are needed for single-parent and extended families ♣

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine.
Written informed consents were taken online from one parent before filling online questionnaire.

Conflicts of interest: None.

REFERENCES

Aysan A, Balcı E, Karagöl E, Kılıç E, Gültekin F, Şahin F, et al. COVID-19 pandemi değerlendirme raporu [Internet]. Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları, TÜBA Raporları; 2020. Available at: https://bit.ly/41ENLij.[Link]

Gazete R. Covid-19 kapsamında kamu çalışanlarına yönelik ilave tedbirler. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Genelgesi; 2020.

Cava MA, Fay KE, Beanlands HJ, McCay EA, Wignall R. The experience of quarantine for individuals affected by SARS in Toronto. Public Health Nurs. 2005; 22(5):398-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220504.x.[CrossRef]

Jeong H, Yim HW, Song Y-J, Ki M, Min J-A, Cho J, et al. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol Health. 2016; 38:e2016048. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2016048.[CrossRef]

Maccoby EE. Parenting effects: Issues and controversies. Parenting and the child's world: Psychology Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603616-3.[CrossRef]

Wissmath B, Mast FW, Kraus F, Weibel D. Understanding the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures: An empirical model of stress. PloS One. 2021; 16(7):e0254883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254883.[CrossRef]

Lauri Korajlija A, Jokic-Begic N. COVID-19: Concerns and behaviours in Croatia. Br J Health Psychol. 2020; 25(4):849-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12425.[CrossRef]

Bai S, Reynolds BM, Robles TF, Repetti RL. Daily links between school problems and youth perceptions of interactions with parents: A diary study of school-to-home spillover. Social Development. 2017; 26(4):813-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12229.[CrossRef]

Repetti R, Wang SW, Saxbe D. Bringing it all back home: How outside stressors shape families' everyday lives. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009; 18(2):106-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01618.x.[CrossRef]

Lateef R, Alaggia R, Collin-Vézina D. A scoping review on psychosocial consequences of pandemics on parents and children: Planning for today and the future. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 125:106002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106002.[CrossRef]

Creese B, Khan Z, Henley W, O'Dwyer S, Corbett A, Da Silva MV, et al. Loneliness, physical activity, and mental health during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of depression and anxiety in adults over the age of 50 between 2015 and 2020. Int Psychogeriatr. 2021; 33(5):505-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220004135.[CrossRef]

Caroppo E, Mazza M, Sannella A, Marano G, Avallone C, Claro AE, et al. Will nothing be the same again?: changes in lifestyle during COVID-19 pandemic and consequences on mental health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16):8433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168433.[CrossRef]

Zhang L, Cao H, Lin C, Ye P. Family socio-economic status and Chinese Preschoolers' anxious symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of parental investment, parenting style, home quarantine length, and regional pandemic risk. Early Child Res Q. 2022; 60:137-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.01.007.[CrossRef]

Cuong VM, Assanangkornchai S, Wichaidit W, Minh Hanh VT, My Hanh HT. Associations between gaming disorder, parent-child relationship, parental supervision, and discipline styles: Findings from a school-based survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam. J Behav Addict. 2021; 10(3):722-30. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00064.[CrossRef]

Demir KE, Şendil G. Ebeveyn Tutum Ölçeği (ETÖ). Türk Psikoloji Yazıları; 2008.

Çaylan N, Yalçın SS, Nergiz ME, Yıldız D, Oflu A, Tezol Ö, et al. Associations between parenting styles and excessive screen usage in preschool children. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021; 56(3):261-6. https://doi.org/10.14744/TurkPediatriArs.2020.43765.[CrossRef]

Ares G, Bove I, Vidal L, Brunet G, Fuletti D, Arroyo Á, et al. The experience of social distancing for families with children and adolescents during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Uruguay: Difficulties and opportunities. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 121:105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105906.[CrossRef]

Lee SJ, Ward KP, Chang OD, Downing KM. Parenting activities and the transition to home-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 122:105585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105585.[CrossRef]

Aksoy AB, Kahraman ÖG. Asya kültürlerinde ebeveynlik stilleri ve uygulamalari. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2009; 18(2):14-25.

Petrocchi S, Levante A, Bianco F, Castelli I, Lecciso F. Maternal distress/ coping and children's adaptive behaviors during the COVID-19 lockdown: mediation through children's emotional experience. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:587833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.587833.[CrossRef]

Güler P, Bozkır Ç, Uluata S. Covıd-19 pandemi kısıtlamalarının beslenme alışkanlıklarına etkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023; 32(2):237-43. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.1042777.[CrossRef]

Chung G, Lanier P, Wong PYJ. Mediating effects of parental stress on harsh parenting and parent-child relationship during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore. J Fam Violence. 2022; 37(5):801-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00200-1.[CrossRef]

Toran M, Özden B. Are there any changes in mothers' attitudes? Analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 quarantine on child-rearing attitudes. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022; 134:106372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106372.[CrossRef]

Riem MM, Lodder P, Guo J, Vrielink-Verpaalen M, Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, et al. Predictive models of maternal harsh parenting during COVID-19 in China, Italy, and Netherlands. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:722453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722453.[CrossRef]

Al-Elaimat A, Adheisat M, Alomyan H. The relationship between parenting styles and emotional intelligence of kindergarten children. Early Child Dev. Care. 2020; 190(4):478-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1479403.[CrossRef]

Viguer P, Meléndez JC, Valencia S, Cantero MJ, Navarro E. Grandparent-grandchild relationships from the children's perspective: shared activities and socialization styles. Span J Psychol. 2010; 13(2):708-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002377.[CrossRef]

Marchetti D, Fontanesi L, Mazza C, Di Giandomenico S, Roma P, Verrocchio MC. Parenting-related exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 lockdown. J Pediatr Psychol. 2020; 45(10):1114-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa093.[CrossRef]

Vaterlaus JM, Shaffer T, Patten EV, Spruance LA. Parent-child relationships and the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory qualitative study with parents in early, middle, and late adulthood. J Adult Dev. 2021; 28(3):251-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09381-5.[CrossRef]

Alisinanoğlu F, Kesicioğlu OS. Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının davranış sorunlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Giresun ili örneği). Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi; 2010.

Referencias

1. Aysan A, Balcı E, Karagöl E, Kılıç E, Gültekin F, Şahin F, et al. COVID-19 pandemi değerlendirme raporu [Internet]. Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları, TÜBA Raporları; 2020. Available at: https://bit.ly/41ENLij.

2. Gazete R. Covid-19 kapsamında kamu çalışanlarına yönelik ilave tedbirler. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Genelgesi; 2020.

3. Cava MA, Fay KE, Beanlands HJ, McCay EA, Wignall R. The experience of quarantine for individuals affected by SARS in Toronto. Public Health Nurs. 2005; 22(5):398-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.07371209.2005.220504.x.

4. Jeong H, Yim HW, Song Y-J, Ki M, Min J-A, Cho J, et al. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol Health. 2016; 38:e2016048. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2016048.

5. Maccoby EE. Parenting effects: Issues and controversies. Parenting and the child's world: Psychology Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603616-3.

6. Wissmath B, Mast FW, Kraus F, Weibel D. Understanding the psycho- logical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures: An empirical model of stress. PloS One. 2021; 16(7):e0254883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254883.

7. Lauri Korajlija A, Jokic-Begic N. COVID-19: Concerns and behaviours in Croatia. Br J Health Psychol. 2020; 25(4):849-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12425.

8. Bai S, Reynolds BM, Robles TF, Repetti RL. Daily links between school problems and youth perceptions of interactions with parents: A diary study of school-to-home spillover. Social Development. 2017; 26(4):813-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12229.

9. Repetti R, Wang SW, Saxbe D. Bringing it all back home: How outside stressors shape families' everyday lives. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009; 18(2):106-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01618.x.

10. Lateef R, Alaggia R, Collin-Vézina D. A scoping review on psychosocial consequences of pandemics on parents and children: Planning for today and the future. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 125:106002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106002.

11. Creese B, Khan Z, Henley W, O'Dwyer S, Corbett A, Da Silva MV, et al. Loneliness, physical activity, and mental health during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of depression and anxiety in adults over the age of 50 between 2015 and 2020. Int Psychogeriatr. 2021; 33(5):505-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220004135.

12. Caroppo E, Mazza M, Sannella A, Marano G, Avallone C, Claro AE, et al. Will nothing be the same again?: changes in lifestyle during COVID-19 pandemic and consequences on mental health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16):8433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168433.

13. Zhang L, Cao H, Lin C, Ye P. Family socio-economic status and Chinese Preschoolers' anxious symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of parental investment, parenting style, home quarantine length, and regional pandemic risk. Early Child Res Q. 2022; 60:137-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.01.007.

14. Cuong VM, Assanangkornchai S, Wichaidit W, Minh Hanh VT, My Hanh HT. Associations between gaming disorder, parent-child relationship, parental supervision, and discipline styles: Findings from a school-based survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam. J Behav Addict. 2021; 10(3):722-30. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00064.

15. Demir KE, Şendil G. Ebeveyn Tutum Ölçeği (ETÖ). Türk Psikoloji Yazıları; 2008.

16. Çaylan N, Yalçın SS, Nergiz ME, Yıldız D, Oflu A, Tezol Ö, et al. Associations between parenting styles and excessive screen usage in preschool children. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021; 56(3):261-6. https://doi.org/10.14744/TurkPediatriArs.2020.43765.

17. Ares G, Bove I, Vidal L, Brunet G, Fuletti D, Arroyo Á, et al. The experience of social distancing for families with children and adolescents during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Uruguay: Difficulties and opportunities. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 121:105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105906.

18. Lee SJ, Ward KP, Chang OD, Downing KM. Parenting activities and the transition to home-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 122:105585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105585.

19. Aksoy AB, Kahraman ÖG. Asya kültürlerinde ebeveynlik stilleri ve uygulamalari. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2009; 18(2):14-25.

20. Petrocchi S, Levante A, Bianco F, Castelli I, Lecciso F. Maternal distress/coping and children's adaptive behaviors during the COVID-19 lockdown: mediation through children's emotional experience. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:587833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.587833.

21. Güler P, Bozkır Ç, Uluata S. Covıd-19 pandemi kısıtlamalarının beslenme alışkanlıklarına etkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023; 32(2):237-43. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.1042777.

22. Chung G, Lanier P, Wong PYJ. Mediating effects of parental stress on harsh parenting and parent-child relationship during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore. J Fam Violence. 2022; 37(5):801-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00200-1.

23. Toran M, Özden B. Are there any changes in mothers' attitudes? Analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 quarantine on child-rearing attitudes. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022; 134:106372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106372.

24. Riem MM, Lodder P, Guo J, Vrielink-Verpaalen M, Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, et al. Predictive models of maternal harsh parenting during COVID-19 in China, Italy, and Netherlands. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:722453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722453.

25. Al-Elaimat A, Adheisat M, Alomyan H. The relationship between parenting styles and emotional intelligence of kindergarten children. Early Child Dev. Care. 2020; 190(4):478-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1479403.

26. Viguer P, Meléndez JC, Valencia S, Cantero MJ, Navarro E. Grandparent-grandchild relationships from the children's perspective: shared activities and socialization styles. Span J Psychol. 2010; 13(2):708-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002377.

27. Marchetti D, Fontanesi L, Mazza C, Di Giandomenico S, Roma P, Verrocchio MC. Parenting-related exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 lockdown. J Pediatr Psychol. 2020; 45(10):1114-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa093.

28. Vaterlaus JM, Shaffer T, Patten EV, Spruance LA. Parent-child relationships and the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory qualitative study with parents in early, middle, and late adulthood. J Adult Dev. 2021; 28(3):251-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09381-5.

29. Alisinanoğlu F, Kesicioğlu OS. Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının davranış sorunlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Giresun ili örneği). Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi; 2010.

Cómo citar

APA

Yıldız, D. & Yalçın, S. S. (2025). COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times. Revista de Salud Pública, 27(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363

ACM

[1]
Yıldız, D. y Yalçın, S.S. 2025. COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times. Revista de Salud Pública. 27, 1 (ene. 2025), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363.

ACS

(1)
Yıldız, D.; Yalçın, S. S. COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times. Rev. salud pública 2025, 27, 1-7.

ABNT

YILDIZ, D.; YALÇIN, S. S. COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times. Revista de Salud Pública, [S. l.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 1–7, 2025. DOI: 10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revsaludpublica/article/view/114363. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2026.

Chicago

Yıldız, Deniz, y Sıddıka Songül Yalçın. 2025. «COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times». Revista De Salud Pública 27 (1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363.

Harvard

Yıldız, D. y Yalçın, S. S. (2025) «COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times», Revista de Salud Pública, 27(1), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363.

IEEE

[1]
D. Yıldız y S. S. Yalçın, «COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times», Rev. salud pública, vol. 27, n.º 1, pp. 1–7, ene. 2025.

MLA

Yıldız, D., y S. S. Yalçın. «COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times». Revista de Salud Pública, vol. 27, n.º 1, enero de 2025, pp. 1-7, doi:10.15446/rsap.v27n1.114363.

Turabian

Yıldız, Deniz, y Sıddıka Songül Yalçın. «COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times». Revista de Salud Pública 27, no. 1 (enero 1, 2025): 1–7. Accedido agosto 8, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revsaludpublica/article/view/114363.

Vancouver

1.
Yıldız D, Yalçın SS. COVID-19 era: more maternal permissiveness compared to pre-pandemic times. Rev. salud pública [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2025 [citado 8 de agosto de 2026];27(1):1-7. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revsaludpublica/article/view/114363

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

339

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.