Environmental Impact on Human Health: Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease in Bogotá D.C.
Impacto ambiental en salud humana: Análisis de la carga global de enfermedad en Bogotá, D. C.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v27n2.116666Palabras clave:
Burden of disease, public health, Bogotá D.C.;, environmental impact, environmental epidemiology, respiratory and cardiovascular pathologies (en)Carga de enfermedad, salud pública, Bogotá D.C., impacto ambiental, epidemiología ambiental, patologías respiratorias y cardiovasculares (es)
Descargas
Objective The interplay between the environment and human health is an escalating global concern, particularly in densely populated urban centers like Bogota. This article delves into the global burden of diseases, focusing on how environmental factors shape the health landscape of its populace. Emphasis is placed on comprehending and addressing health hazards linked with the urban landscape and depletion of natural resources within the city.
Methods A quantitative ecological approach was employed, utilizing secondary data from sources such as SALUDATA and the National Data Archive (Archivo Nacional de Datos-ANDA) of the National Administrative Department of Statistics (Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística-DANE). An etiological approach to epidemiological transition was adopted, and theoretical frameworks established by Murray and López were employed to gauge the burden. Analysis was conducted at the level of the city's 20 localities, considering the number of individuals attended to in healthcare institutions per locality.
Results A total of 11,220,420 individuals were identified as receiving care in the year 2022, exhibiting unequal distribution across localities. Diseases influenced by environmental factors were incorporated into the study. Metrics such as years of life lost (YLL), years of life lost due to disability (YLD), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were computed. Findings underscored a substantial burden affirming the influence of environmental impact.
Conclusion The study underscores the imperative of addressing environmental factors to alleviate the burden and enhance the quality of life for the population. Urgency is stressed in implementing efficacious policies and measures to mitigate adverse effects on public health. These insights bear direct implications for shaping public health policies and provide a robust foundation for future investigations into the interplay between burden and environmental determinants within the city.
Objetivo La interacción entre el medio ambiente y la salud humana es una preocupación mundial creciente, particularmente en centros urbanos densamente poblados como Bogotá. Este artículo profundiza en la carga mundial de enfermedades, centrándose en cómo los factores ambientales dan forma al panorama sanitario de su población. Se hace hincapié en la comprensión y el tratamiento de los peligros para la salud relacionados con el paisaje urbano y el agotamiento de los recursos naturales dentro de la ciudad.
Métodos Se empleó un enfoque ecológico cuantitativo, utilizando datos secundarios de fuentes como SALUDATA y el Archivo Nacional de Datos (ANDA) del Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). Se adoptó un enfoque etiológico de la transición epidemiológica y se emplearon los marcos teóricos establecidos por Murray y López para medir la carga. El análisis se realizó a nivel de las 20 localidades de la ciudad, considerando el número de personas atendidas en instituciones de salud por localidad.
Resultados Se identificó que un total de 11,220,420 personas recibieron atención en el año 2022, mostrando una distribución desigual entre localidades. Se incorporaron al estudio las enfermedades influenciadas por factores ambientales. Se calcularon métricas como los años de vida perdidos (AVP), los años de vida perdidos debido a una discapacidad (AVP) y los años de vida ajustados por discapacidad (AVAD). Los hallazgos subrayaron una carga sustancial que afirma la influencia del impacto ambiental.
Conclusión El estudio subraya la necesidad imperiosa de abordar los factores ambientales para aliviar la carga y mejorar la calidad de vida de la población. Se hace hincapié en la urgencia de aplicar políticas y medidas eficaces para mitigar los efectos adversos sobre la salud pública. Estos conocimientos tienen implicaciones directas para la configuración de las políticas de salud pública y proporcionan una base sólida para futuras investigaciones sobre la interacción entre la carga y los determinantes ambientales dentro de la ciudad.
Referencias
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health [Internet]. WHO; 2016. Cited on May 2025. Available at: https://bit.ly/3YWUCSI.
2. Shetty SS, Sonkusare S, Naik PB, Kumari NS, Madhyastha H. Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health. Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e19496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496.
3. Burroughs Peña MS, Rollins A. Environmental exposures and cardiovascular disease: a challenge for health and development in low- and middle-income countries. Cardiol Clin. 2017; 35(1):71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2016.09.001.
4. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu N, et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet. 2018; 391(10119):462-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0.
5. Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet. 2017; 389(10082):1907-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(17)30505-6.
6. Guarnieri M, Balmes JR. Outdoor air pollution and asthma. Lancet. 2014; 383(9928):1581-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60617-6.
7. Prüss-Ustün A, Wolf J, Bartram J, Clasen T, Cumming O, Freeman MC, et al. Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes: an updated analysis with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019; 222(5):765-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.05.004.
8. Vardoulakis S, Dear K, Wilkinson P. Desafíos y oportunidades para la sostenibilidad y la salud ambiental urbana: la iniciativa HEALTHY-POLIS. Environ Health. 2016; 15(Suppl 1):S30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0096-1.
9. Wicki B. The main task of urban public health: narrowing the health gap between the poor and the rich. Int J Public Health. 2022; 67:1605084. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1605084.
10. McKeown RE. The epidemiologic transition: changing patterns of mortality and population dynamics. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009;3(1 Suppl):19S-26S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827609335350.
11. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Vol. 1 [Internet]. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1996. Available at: https://bit.ly/4mu4mOl.
12. Grisales-Romero H, Marín D, González-Gómez D, Grajales IC, Porras-Cataño SM, Colorado-Betancur LJ, et al. Pérdida de años de vida saludable por la población de Medellín, Colombia 2006-2012. Pap Poblac [Internet]. 2018; 24(95). Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3v75pf2u. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2018.95.04
13. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Estimates 2015: Deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000-2015 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available at: https://bit.ly/4mAbBV9.
14. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)/World Health Organization (WHO). Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/29jxfp77.
15. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014.
16. Pardo C, Cendales R. Cancer incidence estimates and mortality for the top five cancers in Colombia, 2007-2011. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018; 49(1):16-22. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v49i1.3596.
17. Sharp L, Deady S, Gallagher P, Hall P, Kelleher T, O'Leary E, et al. Risk of several cancers is higher in urban areas after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Results from a two-country population-based study of 18 common cancers. J Urban Health. 2014; 91(3):510-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9846-3.
18. Goodman M, Naiman JS, Goodman D, LaKind JS. Cancer cluster investigations: review of the past and proposals for the future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(2):1479-99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110201479.
19. Zhou Y, Li C, Huijbregts MAJ, Mumtaz MM. Carcinogenic air toxics exposure and their cancer-related health impacts in the United States. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140013.
20. Mantilla MJ, Patiño LF, Guevara C, Suárez A, Peña CA, Forero-Buitrago EM. Clinical characteristics of early-onset gastric cancer. A study in a Colombian population. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2023; 43(3):236-41. https://doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2023.433.1485.
21. Baumgartner J, Brauer M, Ezzati M. El papel de las ciudades en la reducción de los impactos cardiovasculares de la contaminación ambiental en países de ingresos bajos y medios. BMC Med. 2020; 18:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-1499-y.
22. Münzel T, Sørensen M, Daiber A, Rajagopalan S, Brook FR, Brook RD. Environmental stressors and cardio-metabolic disease: part I-epidemiologic evidence supporting a role for noise and air pollution and effects of mitigation strategies. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(8):550-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw269.
23. Orru H, Ebi KL, Forsberg B. The interplay of climate change and air pollution on health. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017; 4(4):504-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0168-6.
24. Brauer M, Hoek G, Smit HA, de Jongste JC, Gerritsen J, Postma DS, et al. Air pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J. 2007; 29(5):879-88. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00083406.
25. Mohammadi MJ, Baratifar M, Asban P, Kiani F, Hormati M, Kazemi Bareh Bichast R. The effect of air pollutants on chronic gastrointestinal diseases: a comprehensive review. J Hum Environ Health Promot. 2024; 10(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.61186/jhehp.10.1.1.
26. Dujardin CH, Mars R, Manemann S, Kashyap P, Clements N, Hassett L, et al. Impact of air quality on the gastrointestinal microbiome: a review. Environ Res. 2020; 186:109485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109485.
27. Newgard CD, Schmicker RH, Hedges JR, Trickett JP, Davis DP, Bulger EM, et al. Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the “golden hour” in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55(3):235-46.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.024.
28. Tassinari S, Martínez-Vernaza S, Erazo-Morera N, Pinzón-Arciniegas M, Gracia G, Zarante I. Epidemiología de las cardiopatías congénitas en Bogotá, Colombia en el período comprendido entre 2001 y 2014: ¿Mejoría en la vigilancia o aumento en la prevalencia? Biomédica. 2018; 38(Supl 1):141-8. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v38i0.3381.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Esta revista provee acceso libre inmediato a su contenido bajo el principio de que hacer disponible gratuitamente investigación al publico apoya a un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global.
Todos los contenidos de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, están publicados bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.








