Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Validation of the ways of coping checklist after a disaster
Validación de la lista de verificación de formas de afrontamiento después de un desastre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v25n6.99706Palabras clave:
stress coping styles, disasters, post-traumatic stress, parallel factor analysis, ESEM (en)estilos de afrontamiento del estrés, desastres, estrés postraumático, análisis factorial paralelo, ESEM (es)
Descargas
Objective Although widely used, the validity of the Coping Ways Checklist (WCC) is a persistent problem.
Methods By studying a sample (n=285) obtained from a population that had experienced the same traumatic event (an earthquake), using with parallel factor analysis and exploratory structure model (ESEM), a scale of 46 items was obtained: Ways of the Coping Checklist after a disaster (WCC-D).
Results The results indicate a valid model of six dimensions and two dimensions correlated with the post-traumatic stress scale used as criterion.
Discussion The good properties of the WCC-D and its relationship to posttraumatic stress were discussed. The WCC-D is made available in a format ready to be applied and reviewed by health personnel.
Objetivo Aunque se utiliza ampliamente, la validez de la Lista de Verificación de Estilos de Afrontamiento (WCC) es un problema persistente.
Métodos Mediante el estudio de una muestra (n=285) obtenida de una población que había experimentado el mismo evento traumático (un terremoto), utilizando un análisis factorial paralelo y un modelo exploratorio de ecuaciones estructurales (ESEM), se obtuvo una escala de 46 ítems: Ways of the Coping Checklist after a Disaster (WCC-D).
Resultados Los resultados indican un modelo válido de seis dimensiones y dimensiones correlacionadas con la escala de estrés postraumático utilizada como criterio.
Discusión Se discutieron las buenas propiedades de la WCC-D y su relación con el estrés postraumático. Se deja la WCC-D disponible en un formato listo para ser aplicada y revisada por personal de salud.
Referencias
1. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav. 1980; 21(3):219-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136617.
2. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 50(5):992-1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992.
3. Cousson-Gélie F, Cosnefroy O, Christophe V, Sefrestan-Crouzet C, Merckaert I, Fournier E, et al. The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCC): validation in French-speaking cancer patients. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15(8):1246-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310364438.
4. Litman JA. The COPE inventory: Dimensionality and relationships with approach- and avoidance motives and positive and negative traits. Pers Individ Dif. 2006; 41(2):273-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.032.
5. Kieffer KM, MacDonald G. Exploring factors that affect score reliability and variability in the Ways of Coping Questionnaire reliability coefficients: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. J Individ Differ. 2011; 32(1):26-38. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000031.
6. Senol-Durak E, Durak M, Elagöz FÖ. Testing the psychometric properties of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) in Turkish university students and community samples. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011; 18(2):172-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.677.
7. Aldwin C, Folkman S, Shaefer C, Coyne J, Lazarus R. Ways of Coping Checklist: Process measure. In: Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association; 1980; Montreal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07639-000.
8. Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Carr JE, Maiuro RD, Becker J. The Ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and psychometric properties. Multivariate Behav Res. 1985; 20(1):3-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2001_1.
9. Aldwin CM, Revenson TA. Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987; 53(2):337-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.337.
10. Smyth KA, Williams PD. Patterns of coping in Black working women. Behav Med. 1991; 17(1):40-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.1991.9937551.
11. Atkinson M, Violato C. A factor analysis of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire based on data from saddening experiences. Psychol Rep. 1993; 72(3):1159-64. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1159.
12. Parker JD, Endler NS, Bagby RM. If it changes, it might be unstable: Examining the factor structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 1993; 5(3):361-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.361.
13. Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Cousson F, Quintard B, Nuissier J, Rascle N. French adaptation of the Ways of Coping Checklist. Percept Mot Skills. 1996;83(1):104-6. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.104.
14. Munet-Vilaroa F, Gregorich SE, Folkman S. Factor structure of the Spanish version of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002; 32(9):1938-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00265.x.
15. Lundqvist LO, Ahlström G. Psychometric evaluation of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as applied to clinical and nonclinical groups. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 60(5):485-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.08.019.
16. Padyab M, Ghazinour M, Richter J. Factor structure of the Farsi version of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2012; 42(8):2006-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00928.x.
17. Riquelme A, Buendia J, Rodríguez MC. Estrategias de afrontamiento y apoyo social en personas con estrés económico. Psicothema [Internet]. 1993; 5(1):83-9. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/kc6vawyw.
18. Cortina LM, Wasti AS. Profiles in coping: Responses to sexual harassment across persons, organizations, and cultures. J Appl Psychol. 2005; 90(1):182-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.182.
19. Sawang S, Oei TPS, Goh YW, Mansoer W, Markhum E, Ranawake D. Confirmatory factor analysis of the way of coping checklist-revised (WCCL-R) in the Asian context. Appl Psychol. 2010; 59(2):202-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00378.x.
20. Pan American Health Organization. El terremoto y el tsunami del 27 de febrero en Chile: Crónicas y lecciones aprendidas en el sector salud [The earthquake and tsunami in Chile February 27: Chronicles and lessons learned in the health sector] [Internet]. Santiago de Chile: PAHO; 2010. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/48bbekb2.
21. Cova F, Rincón P. El terremoto y tsunami del 27-F y sus efectos en la salud mental. Ter Psicol. 2010; 28(2):179-85. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082010000200006.
22. Leiva-Bianchi M. Relevancia y prevalencia del estrés post-traumático post-terremoto como problema de salud pública en Constitución, Chile. Rev. salud pública (Bogotá). 2011; 13(4):551-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642011000400001.
23. World Medical Association (WMA). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM: Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos [Internet]. WMA; 2013. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/mwm9jr6x.
24. Nava-Quiroz C, Vega-Valero C, Soria R. Escala de modos de afrontamiento: Consideraciones teóricas y metodológicas. Univ Psychol [Internet]. 2010; 9(1):139-47. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/45G59FT. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-1.emac
25. Davidson JRT, Book SW, Colket JT, Tupler LA, Roth S, David D, et al. Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychol Med. 1997; 27(1):153-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291796004229.
26. Garrido LE, Abad FJ, Ponsoda V. A new look at Horn's parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychol Methods. 2013; 18(4):454-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030005.
27. Howard MC. A review of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2015; 32(1):51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664.
28. Lai K, Green SB. The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 51:220-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306.
29. Cho E, Kim S. Cronbach's coefficient alpha: Well-known but poorly understood. Organ Res Methods. 2015; 18:207-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994.
30. Leiva-Bianchi M, Baher G, Poblete C. Efecto de las estrategias de afrontamiento al estrés en los síntomas de estrés postraumático en sobrevivientes de un terremoto. Ter Psicol. 2012; 30(2):51-9. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082012000200005.
31. Tipsword J, Brown-Iannuzzi J, Jones A, Flores J, Badour C. Avoidance coping partially accounts for the relationship between trauma-related shame and PTSD symptoms following interpersonal trauma. Violence Against Women. 2021; 28(1):107-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220988350.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Esta revista provee acceso libre inmediato a su contenido bajo el principio de que hacer disponible gratuitamente investigación al publico apoya a un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global.
Todos los contenidos de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, están publicados bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
