Published

2026-04-30

Field detection of soil properties through sensors: A review

Detección en campo de las propiedades de suelos a través de sensores: una revisión

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v44n1.125222

Keywords:

electrochemical sensing, electromagnetic induction, environmental monitoring, measurement principles, soil moisture (en)
sensado electroquímico, inducción electromagnética, monitoreo ambiental, principios de medición, humedad del suelo (es)

Downloads

Authors

Soil condition is considered critical for crop development. As such, there has been an interest in more detailed, site-specific management techniques that adapt to different resolution scales based on the production area. However, farmers sometimes ack access to conventional sampling systems due to insufficient knowledge or technical support. In addition, laboratory processing times and costs may not align with the needs of agronomic activities of land preparation, fertilization, and weed control. Obtaining results from a single spatial point through laboratory processing can also be highly uncertain, as it may not constitute a representative spatial sample. The aim of this article was to review various strategies for detecting soil properties, focusing on field methods and sensors, and to present comprehensive information on the operating principles, while considering factors affecting the calibration and operation of different devices. This will aid in precision agriculture applications, depending on the limitations of the analyzed devices. The article presents an analysis of different soil characteristics and the related sensors to measure them. A relationship exists between the operating principles, technological development through invention patents, and the availability of commercial-scale equipment for selecting a field sensor. The results suggest a commercial predominance of sensors primarily focused on optical and electromagnetic principles. However, a significant opportunity exists to explore electrochemical principles, particularly for complex soil variables, such as soil organic carbon.

Las condiciones del suelo se consideran críticas para el desarrollo de los cultivos. Por ello, se ha impulsado la adopción de técnicas de gestión de manejo más específicas para cada lugar, que se adapten a diferentes escalas de resolución según el área de producción. El acceso a sistemas de muestreo convencionales en ocasiones es para los agricultores por falta de conocimiento al respecto o por apoyo técnico insuficiente. Además, los costos y tiempos de procesamiento de la información a escala de laboratorio pueden estar en desfase con las proyecciones para el desarrollo de actividades agronómicas como, por ejemplo, preparación de terrenos, siembras, fertilización, riego y control de arvenses. Estos resultados, al ser obtenidos sobre un punto espacial con procesamiento en un laboratorio, pueden tener alta incertidumbre, por no tratarse de una muestra espacial representativa. El objetivo de este artículo fue revisar diferentes estrategias para la detección de características de los suelos, con énfasis en los métodos y sensores de campo, presentando información detallada a partir de principios de operación identificados, entendiendo los factores que afectan la calibración y operación de diferentes dispositivos para considerar aplicaciones alineadas con la agricultura de precisión, en función de las limitaciones de uso para los dispositivos analizados. Se presenta un análisis para diferentes características de los suelos y los sensores relacionados para su medición. Existe una relación entre los principios operativos, el desarrollo tecnológico a través de patentes de invención y la disponibilidad de equipos a escala comercial para seleccionar un sensor de campo. Los resultados sugieren una predominancia comercial de los sensores enfocada principalmente en aquellos relacionados con principios ópticos y electromagnéticos. Sin embargo, se identifica una gran oportunidad de exploración de los principios electroquímicos sobre todo para variables complejas, tales como el carbono orgánico del suelo.

References

Abdu, A., Laekemariam, F., Gidago, G., Kebede, A., & Getaneh, L. (2023). Variability analysis of soil properties, mapping, and crop test responses in Southern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(3), Article e14013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14013

Adamchuk, V. I., Hummel, J. W., Morgan, M. T., & Upadhyaya, S. K. (2004). On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 44(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.03.002

Alesso, C. A., Cipriotti, P. A., Masola, M. J., Carrizo, M. E., Imhoff, S. C., Rocha-Meneses, L., & Antille, D. L. (2020). Spatial distribution of soil mechanical strength in a controlled traffic farming system as determined by cone index and geostatistical techniques. Agronomy Research, 18(S2), 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.133

Anacan, R., Cagayat, S. C., Borja, E., Elesterio, S., Ermita, C., Pepino, H., Quicho, J., & Gabriel, M. K. (2019). Device determining soil npk content level and ph level using image processing with fertilizer recommendation (Philippines Patent No. PH12019000459A1). Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/076599590/publication/PH12019000459A1?q=PH12019000459A1

Anderson Jr., J. R., Bowers, G. H., Lasky, J. S., & Nobblitt, C. C. (2020). Systems and methods for tillage optimization using noninvasive multimodal sensors (U.S. Patent No. US2021105931A1). United States Patent and Trademark Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/075382029/publication/US2021105931A1?q=US2021105931A1

Ardila-García, V., Plazas-Navarro, L. P., & Vallejo, V. E. (2022). Conservation agriculture as a potential strategy to increase soil quality in Colombian agroecosystems. Ciencia y Tecnologia Agropecuaria, 23(3), Article e2674. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2674

Arrubla-Hoyos, W., Ojeda-Beltrán, A., Solano-Barliza, A., Rambauth-Ibarra, G., Barrios-Ulloa, A., Cama Pinto, D., Arrabal-Campos, F. M., Martínez-Lao, J. A., Cama-Pinto, A., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2022). Precision agriculture and sensor systems applications in Colombia through 5G networks. Sensors, 22(19), Article 7295. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197295

Batjes, N. H. (2014). Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 65(1), 10−21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12114_2

Birrell, S. J., & Hummel, J. W. (1997). Multi-sensor ISFET system for soil analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Precision Agriculture (pp. 459–468). BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237429550_Multi-sensor_ISFET_system_for_soil_analysis

Borges, A. R., François, L. L., Becker, E. M., Vale, M. G. R., & Welz, B. (2015). Method development for the determination of chromium and thallium in fertilizer samples using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and direct solid sample analysis. Microchemical Journal, 119, 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2014.11.007

Cabrera Sixto, J. M., Serwatowski Hlawinska, R. J., Saldaña Robles, N., & Porras Chávez, E. E. (2013). Device for measuring and mapping soil compaction, engageable to an agricultural tractor (Mexico Patent No. MXGT06000012A). Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/040273304/publication/MXGT06000012A?q=MXGT06000012A

Cai, G., Liu, S., Zhang, T., Zou, H., Tong, L., & Du, G. (2015). Device based on resistivity piezocone penetration test and saturated sandy soil dilatancy evaluation method (China Patent No. CN102943458A). China National Intellectual Property Administration. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/047726438/publication/CN102943458A?q=CN102943458A

Castro Franco, H. E., & Gómez Sánchez, M. I. (2010). Fertilidad de suelos y fertilizantes. In J. D. Etchevers, F. A. Gutiérrez, & H. E. Castro Franco (Eds.), Principios básicos de la ciencia del suelo (Cap. IV, pp. 213–241). Sociedad Colombiana de la Ciencia del Suelo. https://scholar.google.com/scholarcluster=15194044974232247494&hl=en&oi=scholarr

Cernicchiaro, G., Barmak, R., & Teixeira, W. G. (2019). Digital interface device for field soil hydraulic conductivity measurement. Journal of Hydrology, 576, 58−64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169419305815?via%3Dihub

Chaolong, L. (2020). Agricultural intelligence cultivation system (China Patent No. CN111448974A). China National Intellectual Administration. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/071670747/publication/CN111448974A?q=CN111448974A

Chen, Z., Zeng, J., He, M., Zhu, X., & Shi, Y. (2022). Portable ppblevel carbon dioxide sensor based on flexible hollow waveguide cell and mid-infrared spectroscopy. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 359, Article 131553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.131553

Chyba, J., Kroulík, M., Krištof, K., & Misiewicz, P. A. (2017). The influence of agricultural traffic on soil infiltration rates. Agronomy Research, 15(3), 664−673. https://agronomy.emu.ee/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/Vol15Nr3_Chyba.pdf#abstract-5453

Clement, B., & Stombaugh, T. (2000). Continuously-measuring soil compaction sensor development. Proceedings of the ASAE Annual International Meeting (Paper No. 00-1041). American Society of Agricultural Engineers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289796790_Continuously-measuring_soil_compaction_sensor_development

Cortés, D. L., Camacho-Tamayo, J., & Giraldo, R. (2016). Spatial prediction of soil penetration resistance using functional geostatistics. Scientia Agricola, 73(5), 455−461. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0113

Cortés, D. L., Camacho-Tamayo, J. H., & Giraldo, R. (2018). Spatial prediction of soil infiltration using functional geostatistics. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica, 53(2), 149−155. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2018.15

Cortez, J. W., Matos, W. P., Arcoverde, S. N. S., Cavassini, V. H., & Valente, I. Q. M. (2018). Spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration in no tillage system. Engenharia Agrícola, 38(5), 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v38n5p697-704/2018

Cruz, J. S., Assis Júnior, R., Matias, S. S. R., Camacho-Tamayo, J. T., & Tavares, R. C. (2010). Análise espacial de atributos físicos e carbono orgânico em argissolo vermelho-amarelo cultivado com cana-de-açúcar. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 34(2), 271−278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542010000200001

Dasgupta, I., Saha, J., Venkatasubbu, P., & Ramasubramanian, P. (2020). AI crop predictor and weed detector using wireless technologies: a smart application for farmers. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45, 11115−11127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04928-2

De Jong, E., Ballantyne, A. K., Cameron, D. R., & Read, D. W. L. (1979). Measurement of apparent electrical conductivity of soils by an electromagnetic induction probe to aid salinity surveys. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(4), 810−812. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300040040x

European Patent Office. (2024). Espacenet: Patent search. https://worldwide.espacenet.com

Fasinmirin, J. T., Olorufemi, I. E., Oguntunde, P. G., & Reichert, J. M. (2018). Hydraulic conductivity and penetration resistance of a tropical rainforest alfisol under different land uses in Akure, southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 27(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/JEAI/2018/12690

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – FAO. (1998). Evapotranspiración del cultivo: Guías para la determinación de los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). FAO. https://www.fao.org/4/x0490s/x0490s.pdf

Gan, H., Roper, W. R., Groffman, P. M., Morris, T. F., & Guillard, K. (2023). Automated sensor-based quantification of soil water retention and microbial respiration across drying conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 180, Article 108987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.108987

Garbanzo-León, G., Alemán-Montes, B., Alvarado-Hernández, A., & Henríquez-Henríquez, C. (2017). Validación de modelos geoestadísticos y convencionales en la determinación de la variación espacial de la fertilidad de suelos del Pacífico Sur de Costa Rica. Revista de Investigaciones Geográficas, (93), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.54706

Gómez, M. I., Barragán, A., Magnitskiy, S., & Rodríguez, L. E. (2019). Normalized difference vegetation index, and K+ in stem sap of potato plants (Group Andigenum) as affected by fertilization. Experimental Agriculture, 55(6), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971900005X

González, P. M., Hidalgo, M. C. A., López, B. C. E., Montoya, R. R. D., & Sepúlveda, C. L. M. (2022). Dispositivo y método para la medición, extrapolación, almacenamiento y transmisión de humedad del suelo a diferentes profundidades y diferentes tipos de terrenos basado en internet de las cosas e inteligencia artificial (Colombia Patent No. NC2022/0004926). Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio. https://sipi.sic.gov.co/sipi/Extra/IP/Mutual/Browse.aspx?sid=639063067157773126

Grasmick, J. G., Mooney, M. A., Surdahl, R. W., Voth, M., & Senseney, C. (2014). Capturing a layer response during the curing of stabilized earthwork using a multiple sensor lightweight deflectometer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(6), Article 04014085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001137

Guo, S., Zhang, M., Li, F., Wu, B., Li, G., & Wang, J. (2019). On-line water supplementary device and method for maintaining polluted soil electrical restoration efficiency (China Patent No. CN105945063A). China National Intellectual Property Administration. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/056900453/publication/CN105945063A?q=CN105945063A

Havlin, J. L., Beaton, J. D., Tisdale, S. L., & Nelson, W. L. (1999). Soil fertility and fertilizers. An introduction to nutrient management (6th ed.). Prentice Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366175716_Soil_Fertility_and_Fertilizers_by_John_L_Havlin_z-liborg

Hendrickx, J. M. H., & Kachanoski, R. G. (2002). Nonintrusive electromagnetic induction. In J. H. Dane, & G. C. Topp (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 4. Physical methods (pp. 1297–1306). Soil Science Society of America. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318458140_Nonintrusive_electromagnetic_induction

Hummel, J. W., Ahmad, I. S., Newman, S. C., Sudduth, K. A., & Drummond, S. T. (2004). Simultaneous soil moisture and cone index measurement. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 47(3), 607–618. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/50701000/cswq-0008-143155.pdf

IDEAM – Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. (2022). Estudio nacional del agua. IDEAM. https://www.ideam.gov.co/sala-de-prensa/informes/publicacion-jue-23032023-1200

Iwate, Y., Miyamoto, T., & Seki, K. (2018). Electric conductivity estimation device for solution in porous body, electric conductivity estimation model construction device, and electric conductivity estimation model construction method (Japan Patent No. JP2019190855A). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/068389830/publication/JP2019190855A?q=JP2019190855A

Jaramillo J., D. F. (2002). Introducción a la ciencia del suelo (Vol. 1). https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/70085

Jianguang, H., Bingluo, G., Guanghui, Z., & Zhiwei, L. (2022). High-precision depth domain migration method in imaging of 3D seismic data in coalfield. Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 14(12), Article 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122850

Johnston, A., Adamchuk, V., Cambouris, A., Lafond, J., Perron, I., Lajeunesse, J., & Biswas, A. (2022). Proximal and remote sensing data integration to assess spatial soil heterogeneity in wild blueberry fields. Soil Systems, 6, Article 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6040089

Jordan, D., Kremer, R. J., Bergfield, W. A., Kim, K. Y., & Cacnio, V. N. (1995). Evaluation of microbial methods as potential indicators of soil quality in historical agricultural fields. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 19, 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336098

Kalambate, P. K., Mane, S., Upadhya, S. S., Kalambate, R. P., Gadhari, N. S., Shinde, E. S., & Manoj, D. (2026). Advances in electrochemical sensors for monitoring of emerging soil contaminants: Innovations, challenges, and environmental impact. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 194, Article 118503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2025.118503

Kuang, B., Mahmood, H. S., Quraishi, M. Z., Hoogmoed, W. B., Mouazen, A. M., & Van Henten, E. J. (2012). Sensing soil properties in the laboratory, in situ, and on-line: A review. Advances in Agronomy, 114, 155–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394275-3.00003-1

Lesch, S. M., Corwin, D. L., & Robinson, D. A. (2005). Apparent soil electrical conductivity mapping as an agricultural management tool in arid zone soils. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.007

Li, M., Quan, H., Yang, K., Xu, Z., Liu, L., & Wang, K. (2019). Method for degrading organophosphorus by immobilized microorganisms, miniaturization device of method and application of device (China Patent No. CN109745652A). China National Intellectual Property Administration. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/066405883/publication/CN109745652A?q=CN109745652A

Liu, D., Wang, Y., Ji, Y., Tsuchiya, H., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2021). CycleGAN-based realistic image dataset generation for forward-looking sonar. Advanced Robotics, 35(3-4), 242−254. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2021.1873845

Martínez-Toledo, Á., González-Mille, D. J., García-Arreola, M. E., Cruz-Santiago, O., Trejo-Acevedo, A., & Ilizaliturri-Hernández, C. A. (2021). Patterns in utilization of carbon sources in soil microbial communities contaminated with mine solid wastes from San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208, Article 111493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111493

Mazur, P., Gozdowski, D., Stępień, W., & Wójcik-Gront, E. (2023). Does drone data allow the assessment of phosphorus and potassium in soil based on field experiments with winter rye? Agronomy, 13(2), Article 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020446

McNeill, J. D. (1980). Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers (Technical Note TN-6). Geonics Limited. https://www.geonics.com/pdfs/technicalnotes/tn6.pdf

Näsi, R., Mikkola, H., Honkavaara, E., Koivumäki, N., Oliveira, R. A., Peltonen-Sainio, P., Keijälä, N.-S., Änäkkälä, M., Arkkola, L., & Alakukku, L. (2023). Can basic soil quality indicators and topography explain the spatial variability in agricultural fields observed from drone orthomosaics? Agronomy, 13(3), Article 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030669

NOAA. (2025). Multivariate ENSO index version 2 (MEI.v2). Physical Sciences Laboratory. https://psl.noaa.gov/enso/mei/

Novais, W., Rodríguez-Mejías, J. C., Perret, J., Soto, C., Villalobos, J. E., Fuentes, C. L., & Abdalla, K. (2019). Calibration and validation of Veris MSP3 on two soils in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 30(2), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v30i2.33579

Orjuela-Matta, H. M. (2020). Manual de ingeniería de riego y drenaje (Vol. 1, 1st ed.). Oficina de Publicaciones y Patrimonio Intelectual UDCA. https://www.udca.edu.co/libros/manual-de-ingenieria-de-riego-y-drenaje-casos-practicos/

Orjuela-Matta, H. M., Monsalve-Camacho, O. I., Sanjuanelo--Corredor, D. W., Velandia-Mora, J. A., Cano-Torres, M. A., Quintero, O. C., Marentes-Barrantes, D. L., & Duarte-Gómez, H. W. (2022). Metodología de análisis espacial de resistencia a penetración e infiltración en un suelo cultivado con un frutal arbustivo (Acca sellowiana). Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, 25(2), Article e2331. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v25.n2.2022.2331

Orjuela-Matta, H. M., Rubiano-Sanabria, Y., & Camacho-Tamayo, J. H. (2011). Spatial variability of hydrodynamic parameters in the native savanna of the Colombian Eastern plains. Agronomía Colombiana, 29(1), 83−90. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/15864

Orjuela-Matta, H. M., Rubiano Sanabria, Y., & Camacho-Tamayo, J. H. (2012). Spatial analysis of infiltration in an Oxisol of the eastern plains of Colombia. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 72(3), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392012000300015

Orjuela-Matta, H., Sanjuanelo-Corredor, D., Vásquez-Lizcano, J., Cubides-Posada, K., Rodríguez-Tibaquirá, J., Torres-Rodríguez, J., & Ramírez-Poveda, H. (2023). Integrated processing methodology to identify the spatial variability of accumulated infiltration for agricultural soil. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, 26(1), Article e2365. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v26.n1.2023.2365

Panotra, N., Deepika, R. B., Roy, P., Singh, Y., Sinha, S., Choudhary, N., Choudhary, B., Gangwar, A., Mohanty, L. K., & Gopal, R. (2025). Advances in precision agriculture: a review of technologies, applications and future prospects. Archives of Current Research International, 25(8), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2025/v25i81454

PPSystems. (2017). Analizador portátil de gas CO₂ EGM-5. https://ppsystems.com/products/egm-5/

PPSystems. (2018). CFLUX-1 Automatic soil CO₂ flux system. https://ppsystems.com/wp-content/uploads/EDSCFLUX1.pdf

Qu, R., Liu, G., Yue, M., Wang, G., Peng, C., Wang, K., & Gao, X. (2023). Soil temperature, microbial biomass and enzyme activity are the critical factors affecting soil respiration in different soil layers in Ziwuling Mountains, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, Article 1105723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1105723

Rahman, M., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., Ahmad, B., Ahmad, A., Zhang, Z., Khan, D., Muhammad, D., & Ali, A. (2024). Variations in soil physico-chemical properties, soil stocks, and soil stoichiometry under different soil layers in the major forest region of the Liupan Mountains of Northwest China. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 84, Article e256565. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.256565

Rebollar-Pérez, G., Campos-Terán, J., Ornelas-Soto, N., Méndez- Albores, A., & Torres, E. (2015). Biosensors based on oxidative enzymes for detection of environmental pollutants. Biocatalysis, 1(1), 118–129. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/boca-2015-0010/html

Rodríguez-Vásquez, A. F., Aristizábal-Castillo, A. M., & Camacho- Tamayo, J. H. (2008). Variabilidad espacial de los modelos de infiltración de Philip y Kostiakov en un suelo Ândico. Engenharia Agrícola, 28(1), 64−75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162008000100007

Sabatini, A., Leoni, A., Goncalves, G., Zompanti, A., Marchetta, M. V., Cardoso, P., Grasso, S., Di Loreto, M. V., Lodato, F., Cenerini, C., Figuera, E., Pennazza, G., Ferri, G., Stornelli, V., & Santonico, M. (2022). Microsystem nodes for soil monitoring via an energy mapping network: a proof-of-concept preliminary study. Micromachines, 13(9), Article 1440. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091440

Saucedo-Uriarte, J. A., Diaz-Quevedo, C., Milla Pino, M. E., Durand Chávez, L. M., Linares Rivera, J. L., Vásquez Pérez, H. V., & Quispe-Ccasa, H. A. (2023). Sustentabilidad productiva de la instalación de sistemas silvopastoriles: una revisión sistemática basada en la realidad de Perú y Colombia. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 24(2), Article e3048. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol24_num2_art:3048

Schmittmann, O., & Schulze Lammers, P. (2023). Assessing subsoil conditions with an ASABE conform vertical penetrometer – development and evaluation. Sensors, 23(3), Article 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031306

Schulze Lammers, P., Sun, Y., Kromer, K.-H., & Damerow, L. (2009). Soil sensor has measurement with sensor for detecting moisture content of investigated ground region, device for detecting penetration resistance with force sensor coupled to measurement tip (Germany Patent No. DE10261138A1). German Patent and Trade Mark Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/032308568/publication/DE10261138A1?q=DE10261138A1

Silwana, B., Van Der Horst, C., Iwuoha, E., & Somerset, V. (2014). Amperometric determination of cadmium, lead, and mercury metal ions using a novel polymer immobilised horseradish peroxidase biosensor system. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 49(13), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2014.937169

SIPI – Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio. (2025). SIPI: Base de datos de patentes. https://sipi.sic.gov.co/sipi/Extra/IP/PT/Qbe.aspx

Stege, P. W., Messina, G. A., Bianchi, G., Olsina, R. A., & Raba, J. (2010). Determination of β-glucosidase activity in soils with a bioanalytical sensor modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 397(3), 1347–1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3634-7

Tang, H., Xie, J., Dou, X., Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2023). On-orbit vicarious radiometric calibration and validation of ZY1-02E thermal infrared sensor. Remote Sensing, 15(4), Article 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15040994

Tekeste, M., Grift, T., & Raper, R. (2002). Acoustic compaction layer detection. ASAE Paper No. 02-1089. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20006

Wilson, T. B., Kochendorfer, J., Diamond, H. J., Meyers, T. P., Hall, M., French, B., Myles, L., & Sailor, R. D. (2023). A field evaluation of the SoilVUE10 soil moisture sensor. Vadose Zone Journal, 22(2), Article e20241. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20241

Wolleben, M., & Wolleben, H. (2021). System and method to detect ground moisture. Canadá, Estados Unidos Patente nº US11692950B2. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/077462813/publication/US11692950B2?q=US11692950B2

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). PATENTSCOPE: Patent database. https://www.wipo.int/es/web/patentscope

Xu, Y., Li, Y., Duan, J., Song, S., Jiang, R., & Yang, Z. (2020). Soil water content detection based on acoustic method and improved Brutsaert’s model. Geoderma, 359, Article 114003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114003

Yang, Q., Jia, W., Li, Y., Xu, M., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2014). Adjustable soil infiltration performance detection and loss amount sampling device (China Patent No. CN204374041U). China National Intellectual Property Administration. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/053330251/publication/CN204374041U?q=CN204374041U

Yu, P. (2017). Non-invasive soil moisture measurement method and device (China Patent No. CN106596644A). China National Intellectual Property Administration. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/058598537/publication/CN106596644A?q=CN106596644A

Zhao, M., Yu, F., Sun, G., Wang, L., Tang, Z., Wang, M. H., Gao, Y., Qu, C., Zhao, E., Xu, G., Wang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). A sensing and monitoring device based on crop water demand (China Patent No. CN218831541U). China National Intellectual Property Administration (World Intellectual Property Organization). https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/es/detail.jsf?docId=CN396236652&_cid=P22-MLGLYW-40637-1

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

129

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Field detection of soil properties through sensors: A review. (2026). Agronomía Colombiana, 44(1), e125222. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v44n1.125222