Published

2016-05-01

Digital elevation models (DEM) used to assess soil erosion risks: a case study in Boyaca, Colombia

Modelos de elevación digital (DEM) para evaluar los riesgos de erosión del suelo: un estudio de caso en Boyacá, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56145

Keywords:

DEM, erosion, geomorphometric, fuzzy logic (en)
DEM, erosión, geomorfometría, lógica difusa (es)

Authors

  • Jeiner Yobany Buitrago E. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Agricultural Sciences - Department of Agronomy
  • Luis Joel Martínez M. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Agricultural Sciences - Department of Agronomy
The objective of this research was to develop a model for assessing the risk of erosion, exploring the potential of DEMs from SRTM, ASTER, ALOS PALSAR and one made with interpolation of a 1:25,000 contour map to calculate the variables of the relief that have greater impact on erosion. Several geomorphometric parameters, such as slope, aspect, profile and plan curvature, topographic wetness index, stream power index, and sediment transport capacity were computed from the DEM's elevation, some fuzzy logic functions proposed to evaluate the incidence of each parameter on erosion risk in a mountainous area of Colombia. The results showed that the use of DEM data is a relatively easy, uncostly method to identify, in a qualitative way, the risk of erosion and contribute to the enhancement of erosion information that is obtained with conventional general soil surveys.

El objetivo de esta investigación fue desarrollar un modelo para evaluar el riesgo de erosión, explorando el potencial de los DEM de los sistemas SRTM, ASTER, ALOS PALSAR y uno realizado por interpolación de curvas de nivel a partir de un mapa topográfico escala 1: 25.000. De la elevación de los DEM se calcularon algunos parámetros geomorfométricos como la pendiente, el aspecto, la curvatura horizontal, la curvatura vertical, índice topográfica de humedad, capacidad de transporte de sedimentos, índice de poder de los arroyos que se consideran son tiene el mayor impacto en el riesgo la erosión. Se definieron algunas funciones de lógica difusa para evaluar la incidencia de cada parámetro de riesgos de erosión en una zona montañosa de Colombia. Los resultados mostraron que el uso de datos DEM es un método relativamente fácil y de bajo costo para identificar, de una manera cualitativa, el riesgo a la erosión y contribuir a mejorar la información erosión que se consigue mediante los levantamientos generales de suelos.

References

Aksoy, H. and M.L. Kavvas. 2005. A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models. Catena 64, 247-271. Doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2005.08.008

Canuto, A., M. Fairhurst, and G. Howells. 2003. Fuzzy connectives as a combination tool in a hybrid multi-neural system. Int. J. Neural Syst. 13, 67-76. Doi: 10.1142/S0129065703001455

Chang, K.T. and B.W. Tsai. 1991. The effect of MDE resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 18, 69-77.

Chaplot, V. 2013. Impact of terrain attributes, parent material and soil types on gully erosion. Geomorphology 186, 1-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.10.031

Evans, I.S. 2012. Geomorphometry and landform mapping: what is a landform? Geomorphology 137, 94-106. Doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.029

Gruijter, J.J. De, D.J.J. Walvoort, and G. Bragato. 2011. Geoderma application of fuzzy logic to boolean models for digital soil assessment. Geoderma 166, 15-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.06.003

Hoyos, N. 2005. Spatial modeling of soil erosion potential in a tropical watershed of the Colombian Andes. Catena 63, 85-108. Doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2005.05.012

IGAC, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. 2010. Protocolo para la identificación y evaluación de los procesos de degradación de suelos y tierras por desertificación. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM); Ministerio de Ambiente Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial (MAVDT), Bogota DC.

Jacobsen, K. 2010. Comparison of ASTER GDEMs with SRTM height models. pp. 521-526. In: Remote Sensing for Science, Education, and Natural and Cultural Heritage - 30th EARSeL Symposium, Unesco, Paris.

Kennelly, P.J. 2008. Terrain maps displaying hill-shading with curvature. Geomorphology 102, 567-577. Doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.046

King, C., N. Baghdadi, V. Lecomte, and O. Cerdan. 2005. The application of remote-sensing data to monitoring and modelling of soil erosion. Catena 62, 79-93. Doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2005.05.007

Kirby, M.J. 1980. El problema: erosión en el contexto. pp. 15-34. In: Kirby, M.J. and R.P. Morgan (eds.). Erosión de suelos. Noriega Editores, México DF.

Lal, R. 1988. Erodibility and erosivity. pp. 141-160. In: Lal, R. (ed.). Erosion and research methods. Soil and Water Conservation Society. Ankeny, IA.

Martínez, L.J. and N.A. Correa. 2016. Digital elevation models to improve soil mapping in mountainous areas: case study in Colombia. pp. 377-388. In: Zinck, J.A., G. Metternicht, G. Bocco, and H.F. Del Valle (eds.). Geopedology an integration of geomorphology and pedology for soil and landscape studies. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.

Martinez-Casasnovasa, J.A., M.C. Ramosa, and J. Poesen. 2004. Assessment of sidewall erosion in large gullies using multi-temporal DEMs and logistic regression analysis. Geomorphology 58, 305-321. Doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.08.005

McBratney, A. and I. Odeh. 1997. Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma 77, 85-113. Doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00017-7

Merritt, W.S., R.A. Letcher, and A.J Jakeman. 2003. A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 18, 761-799. Doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1

Mitasova, H., J. Hofierka, M. Zlocha, and L. Iverson. 1996. Modeling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 10, 629-641. Doi: 10.1080/02693799608902101

Mitra, B., H.D. Scott, J.C. Dixon, and J.M. McKimmey. 1998. Applications of fuzzy logic to the prediction of soil erosion in a large watershed. Geoderma 86, 183-209. Doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00050-0

Moore, I.D. and G.J. Burch. 1986. Modeling erosion and deposition. Topographic effects. T. Assoc. Am. Physician. 29, 1624-1630. Doi: 10.13031/2013.30363

Moore, I.D., G.J. Burch, and D.H. Mackenzie. 1988. Topographic effects on the distribution of surface soilwater and the location of ephemeral gullies. T. Assoc. Am. Physician. 31, 1098-1107. Doi: 10.13031/2013.30829

Moore, I.D., P.E. Gessler, G.A Nielsen, and G.A. Peterson 1993. Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 443-452. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020026x

Moore, I.D., R.B. Grayson, and A.R. Ladson. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol. Process. 5, 3-30. Doi: 10.1002/hyp.3360050103

Morgan, P.C. 2005. Soil erosion and conservation. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.

Munar, O.J. and L.J. Martínez. 2014. Relief parameters and fuzzy logic for land evaluations of mango crops (Mangifera indica L.) Agron. Colomb. 32, 246-254. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43988

Neteler, M. and H. Mitasova. 2008. Open source GIS: a GRASS GIS approach. 3rd ed. Springer, New York, NY.

Olaya, V. 2008. Basic land-surface parameters. pp. 141-169. In: Hengl, T. and H.I. Reuter. 2009. Geomorphometry: concepts, software, applications. developments in soil science. Vol. 33. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Pike, R.J. 2000. Geomorphometry - diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Prog. Phys. Geog. 24, 1-20. Doi: 10.1191/030913300674449511; 10.1177/030913330002400101

Planeación Municipal de Samacá. 2012. Plan de desarrollo municipal 2012 - 2015 "Comprometidos con Samacá". Samanca, Colombia.

Quinn, P., K. Beven, P. Chevallier, and O. Planchon. 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distriubted hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process. 5, 59-79. Doi: 10.1002/hyp.3360050106

Reynolds, K. 2001. NetWeaver: a knowledge-base development system. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Forest Service, Washington DC.

Toy, T.J., G.R. Foster, and K.G. Renard. 2002. Soil erosion: processes, prediction, measurement, and control. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

Van Der Knijff, J., R. Jones, and L. Montanarella. 2000. Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. EUR 19044 EN. European Soil Bureau, Joint Resarch Center; Space Applications Institute, Geneva, Switzerland.

Wilson, J.P. and J.C. Gallant. 2000. Terrain analysis: principles and application. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

1907

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Digital elevation models (DEM) used to assess soil erosion risks: a case study in Boyaca, Colombia. (2016). Agronomía Colombiana, 34(2), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56145