Published

2016-05-01

Emitter clogging when using water from a tributary of the Bogotá River in Colombia

Taponamiento de goteros utilizando agua de un afluente del río Bogotá en Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56890

Keywords:

micro irrigation, emitter, water quality (en)
Micro-irrigación, emisor, calidad (es)

Authors

  • Johana Almario-Narváez Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Engineering - Department of Civil Engineering and Agricultural Engineering
  • Javier Enrique Vélez-Sánchez Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Engineering - Department of Civil Engineering and Agricultural Engineering
  • María Jaqueline Molina-Ochoa Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Engineering - Department of Civil Engineering and Agricultural Engineering
An experiment was conducted to study the behavior of three types of emitters used in Colombia under real-work conditions using water from the Neusa River, a tributary of the Bogotá River. The emitters included: an in-line turbulent-flow emitter (E1), an integrated turbulent-flow emitter (E2), and an integrated self-regulated turbulent-flow emitter (E3). The operation and quality of the emitters were evaluated taking into account the flow decrease trend over time (RF), the flow reduction percentage of the emitters (qr), the coefficient of variation (Cv), the Christiansen uniformity coefficient (CU), and the emission uniformity (EU). The results indicated that the water quality in general affected the performance of the emitters over time, depending on the characteristics and properties of the emitters. The EU and CU decreased in the three emitter types as the experiment progressed and the Cv and qr increased. The E2 emitter showed a lower Cv and qr and a higher CU and EU than the E1 and E3 emitters.
Se realizó un experimento para estudiar el comportamiento de tres tipos de emisores utilizados en Colombia en condiciones de operación real, tomando como fuente de agua el río Neusa afluente del río Bogotá. Los emisores utilizados fueron: gotero en línea de flujo turbulento (E1), gotero integrado de flujo turbulento (E2) y gotero integrado de flujo turbulento autor-regulado (E3). El funcionamiento y calidad de los emisores fue evaluado teniendo en cuenta: la tendencia de diminución del caudal en el tiempo (RF), la reducción de caudal del emisor en porcentaje (qr), el coeficiente de variación (Cv), el coeficiente de uniformidad de Christiansen (CU) y la uniformidad de emisión (EU). Los resultados muestran como la calidad del agua afectó el desempeño del gotero a través del tiempo, dependiendo de las características y propiedades del emisor. La EU y el CU en los tres tipos de emisores disminuyó a medida que avanzó la experimentación y el Cv y qr, aumentaron. El emisor tipo E2, mostró menores Cv y qr y un mayor CU, EU que los emisores tipo E1 y E3, respectivamente.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R., L. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotrans-piration, guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome.

Arenas, M.C., J. Vélez, and J. Camacho. 2012. Crecimiento del fruto de peral bajo el sistema de riego por goteo con una y dos líneas. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 6, 140-151. Doi: 10.17584/ rcch.2012v6i2.1972.

Boswell, M.J. 1990. Micro Irrigation-design manual. 4th ed. Hardie Irrigation, El Cajon, CA.

Capra, A. and B. Scicolone. 2007. Recycling of poor quality urban wastewater by drip irrigation systems. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 1529-1534. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.032.

De Kreij, C., A.M. Van Der Burg, and W.T. Runia. 2003. Drip irrigation emitter clogging in Dutch greenhouses as affected by methane and organic acids. Agric. Water Manage. 60, 73-85. Doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00159-2.

FAO. 2013. CropWat 8 Betá. Natural Resources and Environ Department-FAO, Rome.

IGAC, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. 2000. Estudio general de suelos y zonificación de tierras del Departamento de Cundinamarca. Tomos I, II y III. Bogotá.

ISO, International Organization for Standardization. 1991. Agricultural irrigation equipment-emitting specification and test methods. ISO 9260. Switzerland.

Li, Y.K., Z. Bo, L. Yaoze, J. Yinguang, P. Yiting, and S. Ze. 2013. Preliminary surface topographical characteristics of biofilms attached on drip irrigation emitters using reclaimed water. Irrig. Sci. 31, 557-574. Doi: 10.1007/s00271-012-0329-1.

Li, Y.K., S. Peng, P. Yiting, and F. Ji. 2015. Effects of lateral flushing on emitter clogging and biofilm components in drip irrigation systems with reclaimed water. Irrig. Sci. 33, 235-245. Doi: 10.1007/s00271-015-0462-8.

Li, Y.K., Z.L. Yao, B.L. Gui, W.X. Ting, S.L. Hai, M.R. Shu, Y. Da-Zhuang, and L.Y. Pei. 2010. Surface topographic characteristics suspended particulates in reclaimed wastewater and effects on clogging in labyrinth drip irrigation emitters. Irrig. Sci. 30, 43-56. Doi: 10.1007/s00271-010-0257-x.

Liu, H. and G. Huang. 2009. Laboratory experiment on drip emitter clogging with fresh water and treated sewage effluent. Agric. Water Manage. 96, 745-756. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.10.014.

Meriam, J.L. and J. Keller. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide to management. Utah State University, Logan, UT.

Nakayama, F.S. and D.A. Bucks. 1991. Water quality in drip/ trickle irrigation: a review. Irrig. Sci. 12, 187-192. Doi: 10.1007/BF00190522.

Netafim. 2012. Guia para el mantenimiento de sistemas de riego. Beersheva, Israel.

Penadille, Y., G. Deffontaines, Ch. Rosa, and A. Farget. 2006. Prestazioni dei gocciolatori a bassa portata e delle manichette a goccia. Risultati di prove del Cemagref. Irrígazette Latino 30, 5-20.

Pizarro, F. 1996. Riegos localizados de alta frecuencia (RLAF). Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid.

Puig-Bargues, J., G. Arbat, M. Elbana, M. Duran-Ross, J. Barragán, F. Ramírez De Cartagena, and F. Lamm. 2010. Effect of flushing frequency on emitter clogging in microirrigation with effluents. Agric. Water Manage. 97, 883-891. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.019.

Ravina, I., E. Paz, Z. Sofer, A. Marcu, A. Schischa, G. Sagi, Z. Yechialy, and Y. Lev. 1997. Control of clogging in drip irrigation with stored treated municipal sewage effluent. Agric. Water Manage. 33, 127-137. Doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(96)01286-3.

SAS, Statistical Analysis System Institute. 2008. SAS statistic guide for personal computers. Cary, NC.

Vélez, J.E. and J.G. Alvarez. 2012. Riego en frutales. pp. 186-204. In: Fischer, G. (ed.). Manual para el cultivo de frutales en el trópico. Produmedios, Bogotá.

Vélez, J.E., J. Camacho, and J.G. Alvarez. 2013. Evaluación de goteros utilizados en microirrigación en Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 7, 184-198. Doi: 10.17584/rcch.2013v7i2.2234.

Vélez, J.E., D.S. Intrigliolo, and J.R. Castel. 2007. Scheduling deficit irrigation of citrus trees with maximum daily trunk shrinkage. Agr. Water Manage. 90, 197-204. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.03.007.

Vélez, J.E., D.S. Intrigliolo, and J.R. Castel. 2011. Programación de riego en base a sensores de medida del estado hídrico del suelo y de la planta. Rev. U.D.C.A Act. & Div. Cient. 14, 65-73.

Yiting, P., L. Yunkai, L. Yaoze, Z. Bo, S. Ze, and J. Yinguang. 2014. Eight emitters clogging characteristics and its suitability under on-site reclaimed water drip irrigation. Irrig. Sci. 32, 141-157. Doi: 10.1007/s00271-013-0420-2.

Zhang, J., W. Zhao, Z. Wei, Y. Tang, and B. Lu. 2007. Numerical and experimental study on hydraulic performance of emitters with arc labyrinth channels. Comput. Electron. Agric. 56, 120-129. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2007.01.007.