Published

2017-09-01

Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development

Contribución de las innovaciones locales del campesinado en la reconfiguración del desarrollo rural endógeno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551

Keywords:

productive innovation, re-peasantization, Cachaco plantain, peasant agriculture, indigenous agriculture (en)
innovación productiva, re-campesinización, plátano Cachaco, agricultura campesina, agricultura indígena (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Álvaro Acevedo-Osorio Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Agricultural Sciences - Department of Rural Development https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2132-4891
  • Álvaro Rivas G. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Agricultural Sciences - Department of Rural Development

In Colombia, Rural Development Institutional programs have made of local agents imperceptible since their trajectories have not been considered in the search for solutions to the problems in their territories. The present work introduces an innovative system to the production of the leaves of the plantain variety ‘Cachaco’ (Musa ABB S). This improvement, which was developed independently by indigenous communities of southern Tolima (Colombia), has been studied in detail throughout the technical, economic and social aspects of the productive and commercial processes of some plantain leaves producing farms. Based on their relation with their natural and socio-cultural environments, these communities have prompted their own process of re-peasantization. This productive innovation improves the life quality of the families involved, ensures their permanence in the territory and favors its cultural appropriation.

Los programas institucionales de Desarrollo Rural en Colombia invisibilizaron a los actores locales, pues no han sido consideradas sus trayectorias para la búsqueda de soluciones a los problemas en sus territorios. Se analiza la innovación productiva de la hoja de plátano ‘Cachaco’ (Musa ABB S) desarrollada autónomamente por comunidades indígenas del sur del Tolima. Fincas productoras de hoja fueron estudiadas profundizando aspectos técnicos, económicos y sociales del proceso productivo y comercial. Las comunidades generaron una experiencia propia de re-campesinización a partir de la relación con su entorno natural y social. La innovación productiva mejora la calidad de vida de las familias, asegura la permanencia y favorece la apropiación cultural del territorio.

References

Bendini, M.I. and N.G. Steimbreger. 2010. Dinámicas territoriales y persistencia campesina: redefinición de unidades y espacios de trabajo de los crianceros en el norte de la Patagonia. Rev. Transp. Territorio 3, 59-76.

Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet 6 for windows, Software for social network analysis. Harvard, Analytic technologies. New York, USA.

Chhetri, N., P. Chaudhary, P.R. Tiwari, and R.B. Yadaw. 2012. Institutional and technological innovation: Understanding agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nepal. Applied Geography 33, 142-150. Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.006.

Chowdhury, A. and Y. Khairun. 2014. Farmers' local knowledge in extensive shrimp farming systems in coastal Bangladesh. Procedia 8, 125-130. Doi: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.03.013.

Dolinska, A. and P. Aquino. 2016. Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice. Agric. Syst. 142, 122-130. Doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.009.

Eyssartier, C., A.H. Ladio, and M. Lozada. 2013. Traditional horticultural and gathering practices in two semi-rural populations of Northwestern Patagonia. J. Arid Environ. 97, 18-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.05.008.

Fajardo, D. 2012. Propuesta para la modernización del mundo rural colombiano. Ponencia en el Foro Política de Desarrollo Agrario Integral (Enfoque Territorial). Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo y Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.

Garay, L.J. 2013. Globalización, glocalización y territorio. A propósito del desarrollo rural en el caso colombiano. pp 13-20. In: Alonso, R. (ed). Reflexiones sobre la ruralidad y el territorio en Colombia. Problemáticas y retos actuales. Oxfam, Bogota, Colombia.

Gerritsen, P., C. Ortiz-Arrona, and R. González-Figueroa. 2009. Usos populares, tradición y aprovechamiento del carrizo: estudio de caso en la costa sur de Jalisco, México. Econ. Soc. Territ. 9(29), 185-207.

Hocsman, L.D. 2015. Agricultura Familiar y descampesinización. Nuevos sujetos para el desarrollo rural modernizante. Perspectivas rurales. Nueva Época 25, 11-27.

Jenkins, T.N. 2000. Putting postmodernity into practice: endogenous development and the role of traditional cultures in the rural development of marginal regions. Ecol. Econ. 34(3), 301-313. Doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00191-9.

Knapp, C.N. and M.E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2009. Knowledge in practice: Documenting rancher local knowledge in Northwest Colorado. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 62(6), 500-509. Doi: 10.2111/08-175.1.

Läpple, D., A. Renwick, and F. Thorne. 2015. Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland. Food Policy 51, 1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.11.003.

Long, N. 2007. Sociología del desarrollo: una perspectiva centrada en el actor. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social. CIESAS, Mexico D.F.

Lugo-Morin, D.R. 2011. Análisis de redes sociales en el mundo rural: guía inicial. Rev. Estud. Soc. 38, 129-142.

Mileone, P. 2009. Agriculture in transition. A neo institutional analysis. Van Gorcum, The Netheerlands.

Morgan, A., T. Marsden, M. Miele, and A. Morley. 2010. Agricultural multifunctionality and farmer's entrepreneurial skills: a study of Tuscan and Wels farmers. J. Rural Stud. 26(2), 116-129. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.002.

Portafolio. 2012. Tamales generan $26 mil millones solo en el Éxito. In: Redacción portafolio. Retrieved from: Retrieved from: http://www.porta-folio.co/negocios/empresas/tamales-generan-26-mil-millones-exito-105560 ; consulted: December, 2014.

Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, PNUD. 2011. Colombia rural. Razones para la esperanza. Informe Nacional de Desarrollo Humano. INDH, PNUD, Bogota, Colombia.

Ramirez-Miranda, C. 2014. Critical reflection on the new Rurality and the rural territorial development approaches in Latin America. Agron. Colomb. 32(1), 122-129. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n1.41218.

Ray, C. 1999. Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. J. Rural Stud. 15(3), 257-267. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2.

Renting, H., W.A.H. Rossing, J.C.J. Groot, J.D. Ploeg Vander, C. Laurent, D. Perraud, and M.K. Van Ittersum. 2009. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J. Environ. Manag. 90(2), 112-123. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014.

Rijn van, F., E. Bulke, and A. Adekunle. 2012. Social capital and agricultural innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agric. Syst. 108, 112-122. Doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.003.

Rivas, A. and H. Quintero. 2014. Reappraising the multiple functions of traditional agriculture within the context of building rural development investigative skills. Agron. Colomb. 32(1), 130-137. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n1.40185.

Rodima-Taylor, D. 2012. Social innovation and climate adaptation: local collective action in diversifying Tanzania. Appl. Geogr. 33, 128-134. Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.005.

Rodima-Taylor, D., M.F. Olwing, and N. Chhetri. 2012. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: An institutional approach to climate change. Appl. Geogr. 33, 107-111. Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.011.

Schejtman, A. and J.A. Berdegué. 2003. Desarrollo Rural Territorial. Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural (RIMISP). Santiago de Chile.

Schneider, S. 2006. A abordagem territorial do desenvolvimento rural e suas articulações externas. Sociologías Porto Alegre 11, 88-125.

Van-der Ploeg, J.D. 1992. The reconstitution oflocality: technology and labour in modern agriculture. pp. 19-43. In: Marsden, T., R. Lowe, and S. Whatmore (eds.). Labour and locality: uneven development and the rural labour process. David Fulton Publisher, London, UK.

Van-der Ploeg, J.D., H. Renting, G. Brunori, K. Knickel, J. Mannion, K. Marsden, and F. Ventura. 2000. Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Rurais 40(4), 391-408. Doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00156.

Van-der Ploeg, J.D. 2008. Camponeses e impérios alimentares. Lutas por autonomía e sustentabilidades na era da globalização. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Van-der Ploeg, J.D., Y. Jingzhong, and S. Schneider, S. 2012. Rural development through the construction of new, nested, markets: comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union. J. Peasant Stud. 39, 133-173. Doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652619.

Toledo, V.M. and N. Barrera-Bassols. 2008. La memoria bio-cultural. La importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Icaria. Barcelona, Spain.

Vélez, L.D. 2015. Adaptabilidad y persistencia de las formas de producción campesinas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin, Colombia.

Wilson, G. 2009. The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: a human geography perspective. Geoforum 40, 269-280. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.007.

Wilson, G. 2009. The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: a human geography perspective. Geoforum 40, 269-280. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.007.

How to Cite

APA

Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro and Rivas G., Álvaro. (2017). Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development. Agronomía Colombiana, 35(3), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551

ACM

[1]
Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro and Rivas G., Álvaro 2017. Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development. Agronomía Colombiana. 35, 3 (Sep. 2017), 365–373. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551.

ACS

(1)
Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro; Rivas G., Álvaro. Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development. Agron. Colomb. 2017, 35, 365-373.

ABNT

ACEVEDO-OSORIO, Álvaro; RIVAS G., Álvaro. Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development. Agronomía Colombiana, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 3, p. 365–373, 2017. DOI: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/63551. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2024.

Chicago

Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro, and Álvaro Rivas G. 2017. “Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development”. Agronomía Colombiana 35 (3):365-73. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551.

Harvard

Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro and Rivas G., Álvaro (2017) “Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development”, Agronomía Colombiana, 35(3), pp. 365–373. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551.

IEEE

[1]
Álvaro Acevedo-Osorio and Álvaro Rivas G., “Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development”, Agron. Colomb., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 365–373, Sep. 2017.

MLA

Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro, and Álvaro Rivas G. “Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development”. Agronomía Colombiana, vol. 35, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 365-73, doi:10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n3.63551.

Turabian

Acevedo-Osorio, Álvaro, and Álvaro Rivas G. “Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development”. Agronomía Colombiana 35, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 365–373. Accessed July 26, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/63551.

Vancouver

1.
Acevedo-Osorio Álvaro, Rivas G. Álvaro. Contribution of local peasant innovations to the re-configuration of endogenous rural development. Agron. Colomb. [Internet]. 2017 Sep. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 26];35(3):365-73. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/63551

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations2

1. Federica Romagnoli, Juan Molina, Álvaro Parrado. (2018). How to improve smallholder market access: Evaluation of Mercados Campesinos in Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana, 36(1), p.79. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v36n1.67970.

2. Jeimmy Cáceres-Zambrano, Joaquin Guillermo Ramírez-Gil, Dursun Barrios. (2022). Validating Technologies and Evaluating the Technological Level in Avocado Production Systems: A Value Chain Approach. Agronomy, 12(12), p.3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123130.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

479

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.