Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Published
Heritage and Patrimony of the Peasantry: an analytical framework to address rural development
Herencia y Patrimonios de Campesinado: un marco analítico para abordar el desarrollo rural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v37n3.76757Keywords:
peasant, interdisciplinary research, quality of life, rural communities, rural develpment strategies (en)campesinos, investigación interdisciplinaria, calidad de vida, comunidades rurales, estrategias de desarrollo rural (es)
Downloads
The term “rural development” is exceptionally multifaceted, which makes it difficult to define. This and other features make it a ‘wicked problem’, which means the consequences of rural
developmental problems can create other complications. To date, the important discussion of rural development has dealt with productivity and economic concerns. This discussion has many crucial aspects such as the environment, infrastructure, and respect for fundamental rights. This paper describes the ‘Heritage and Patrimony of the Peasantry’ as an alternative analytical framework for addressing rural development. This analytical framework takes important topics from other rural development perspectives (primarily focused on food sovereignty principles). The heritage and patrimony of the peasantry framework moves away from the market point of view, which converts everything into an asset that can be marketed, and utilizes other sources of heritage. The peasantry has seven kinds of ‘heritages’ or ‘patrimonies’: natural, cultural, economic, physical, social, institutional, and human. These heritages or patrimonies are the bases of construction for a decent standard of living which will accomplish full rights for all rural inhabitants, i.e. rural development.
El término desarrollo rural es excepcionalmente multifacético, lo que dificulta su definición. Esta y otras características lo convierten en un “problema complejo”, lo que significa que las consecuencias de los problemas de desarrollo rural pueden crear otros problemas. Hasta la fecha, la importante discusión sobre el desarrollo rural ha sido sobre productividad y asuntos económicos. Sin embargo, esta discusión tiene muchos aspectos cruciales como el medio ambiente, la infraestructura y el respeto de los derechos fundamentales. Este estudio describe los Patrimonios del Campesinado, un marco analítico alternativo para abordar el desarrollo rural. Este marco analítico toma temas importantes de otras perspectivas de desarrollo rural, pero está enfocado principalmente en los principios de la soberanía alimentaria. Patrimonios del campesinado se aleja del punto de vista del mercado, que convierte todo en un activo que se puede comercializar, y se enfoca en otras facetas del patrimonio. El campesinado tiene siete tipos de patrimonios: naturales, culturales, económicos, físicos, sociales, institucionales y humanos. Estos patrimonios son la base de la construcción de un nivel de vida que, a su vez, permitirá alcanzar plenos derechos para todos los habitantes rurales, es decir, el desarrollo rural.
References
Anderson, J. 2003. Risk in rural development: challenges for managers and policy makers. Agricult. Syst. 75(2-3), 161-197. Doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00064-1
Andersson, C. and P. Törnberg. 2018. Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity. Futures 95, 118-138. Doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.001
Barker, D. 2007. The rise and predictable fall of globalized industrial agriculture. A report from the International Forum on Globalization. San Francisco, USA.
Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev. 27(12), 2021-2044. Doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7
Biggart, N.W. and T.D. Beamish. 2003. The economic sociology of conventions: habit, custom, practice, and routine in market order. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100051
Bitsch, V. 2009. Grounded Theory: a research approach to wicked problems in agricultural economics. Mini-symposium qualitative Agricultural Economics at the International Conference of Agricultural Economists. 2009, August 16-22, Beijing, China.
Borras Jr., S.M. 2009. Agrarian change and peasant studies: changes, continuities and challenges-an introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 36(1), 5-31. Doi: 10.1080/03066150902820297
Brass, T. 2002. Latin American peasants - new paradigms for old? J. Peasant Stud. 29(3, 4), 1-40. Doi: 10.1080/03066150412331311019c
Brown, P.H. and A. Park. 2002. Education and poverty in rural China. Econ. Edu. Rev. 21(6), 523-541. Doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00040-1
Brugue, Q., R. Canal, and P. Paya. 2015. Managerial intelligence to address “wicked problems”: the case of interdepartmental committees. Gestion y Política Pública 24(1), 85-130.
Calvo, I., O. Petit, and F. Vivien. 2017. Common patrimony: a concept to analyze collective natural resource management. The case of water management in France. Ecol. Econ. 137, 126-132. Doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.028
Came, H. and D. Griffith. 2018. Tackling racism as a “wicked” public health problem: enabling allies in anti-racism praxis. Soc. Sci. Med. 199, 181-188. Doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.028
Castro-Arce, K. and F. Vanclay. 2019. Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: an analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. J. Rural Stud. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010
Chambers, R. 1983. Rural development: putting the last first. Routledge, London. Doi: 10.4324/9781315835815
Chambers, R. and G. Conway. 1992. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Discussion paper no. 296. Institute of Development Studies, UK.
Cominelli, F. and X. Greffe. 2012. Intangible cultural heritage: safeguarding for creativity. Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural Heritage City Cult. Soc. 3(4), 245-250. Doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2012.10.003
Corrigan, G., R. Crotti, M. Hanouz, and C. Serin. 2014. Assessing Progress toward Sustainable Competitiveness. pp. 53-84. In: Schwab, K. (ed.). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014- 2015. World Economic Forum, Geneva.
Crawshaw, L., S. Fèvre, L. Kaesombath, B. Sivilai, S. Boulom, and F. Southammavong. 2014. Lessons from an integrated community health education initiative in rural Laos. World Dev. 64, 487-502. Doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.024
Criado-Boado, F. and D. Barreiro. 2013. El patrimonio era otra cosa. Estudios atacameños - Arqueología y antropología surandinas (45), 5-18. Doi: 10.4067/S0718-10432013000100002
Declaration of Nyeleni. 2007. Chain Reaction 100, 16.
Delgado, F. and S. Rist. 2011. La transdisciplinariedad y la investigación participativa en una perspectiva de diálogo intercultural e intercientífico. Working document, AGRUCO/CAPTURED, La Paz.
Dentoni, D. and V. Bitzer. 2015. The role(s) of universities in dealing with global wicked problems through multi-stakeholder initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 68-78. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.050
Desmarais, A. 2002. The vía campesina: consolidating an international peasant and farm movement. J. Peasant Stud. 29(2), 91-124. Doi: 10.1080/714003943
de Sousa Santos, B. 1993. Modernidade, Identidade a Cultura de Fronteira. Tempo Soc. USP 5(1-2),31-52. Doi: 10.1590/ts.v5i1/2.84940
Dewey, J. 1938. Unity of science as a social problem. pp. 29-38. In: International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 1 (1). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
Dirven, M., R. Echeverri-Perico, C. Sabalain, A. Rodríguez, D. Candia-Baeza, C. Peña, and S. Faiguenbaum. 2011. Hacia una nueva definición de “rural” con fines estadísticos en América
Latina. Comisión Económica para América Latina CEPAL, Santiago de Chile.
Dormaels, M. 2012. Identidad, comunidades y patrimonio local: una nueva legitimidad social. Alteridades 22(43), 9-19.
Dutta, K. 2018. Solving wicked problems: searching for the critical cognitive trait. Int. J. Manage. Educ. 16(3), 493-503. Doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2018.09.002
Echeverri, R. 2011. Reflexiones sobre lo rural: economía rural, economía de territorios. Hacia una nueva definición de “rural” con fines estadísticos en América Latina. Comisión Económica para América Latina CEPAL, Santiago de Chile.
Elia, G. and A. Margherita. 2018. Can we solve wicked problems? a conceptual framework and a collective intelligence system to support problem analysis and solution design for complex social issues. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 133, 279-286. Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.010
Ellis, F. and S. Biggs. 2001. Evolving themes in rural development 1950s-2000s. Dev. Policy Rev. 19(4), 448. Doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00143
Espina, M.P. 2007. Complejidad, transdisciplina y metodología de la investigación social. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12(38), 29-43.
Farrell, R. and C. Hooker. 2013. Design, science and wicked problems. Des. Stud. 34(6), 681-705. Doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.05.001
Flora, C.B., J. Flora, and S. Gasteyer. 2015. Rural communities: legacy and change. Westview Press, Boulder, United States.
Florian, V. 2012. Territorial Innovation Strategies. Agricultural Economics and Rural Development 9(1), 47-60.
Gutierrez-Montes, I., M. Emery, and E. Fernández-Baca. 2009. The sustainable livelihoods approach and the community capitals framework: the importance of system-level approaches to community change efforts. Community Dev. J. 40(2), 106-113. Doi: 10.1080/15575330903011785
Holt-Giménez, E. and M. Altieri. 2013. Agroecology, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution. Agroecol. Sust. Food 37(1), 90-102.
Kay, C. 2009. Development strategies and rural development: exploring synergies, eradicating poverty. J. Peasant Stud. 36(1), 103-137. Doi: 10.1080/03066150902820339
Kolko, J. 2011. Wicked problems. pp. 96-111. In: Kolko, J. (ed.). Thoughts on interaction design. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380930-8.50007-3
Kolstad, A. 2012. Inter-functionality between mind, biology and culture: some epistemological issues concerning human psychological development. pp. 19-41. In: Seidl-De-Moura M.L. (ed.). Human development - Different perspectives. IntechOpen, London. Doi: 10.5772/2272
Gold, S., J. Muthuri, and G. Reiner. 2018. Collective action for tackling “wicked” social problems: a system dynamics model for corporate community involvement. J. Clean. Prod. 179, 662-673. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.197
Gharehgozli, A.H., J. Mileski, A. Adams, and W. von Zharen. 2017. Evaluating a “wicked problem”: a conceptual framework on seaport resiliency in the event of weather disruptions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 121, 65-75. Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.006
Gustafsson, B. and S. Li. 2004. Expenditures on education and health care and poverty in rural China. China Econ. Rev. 15(3), 292-301. Doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2003.07.004
Head, B.W. and J. Alford. 2015. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Adm. Soc. 47(6), 711-739. Doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
Henriksen, D. 2016. The seven transdisciplinary habits of mind of creative teachers: an exploratory study of award-winning teachers. Think. Skills Creativity 22, 212-232. Doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.007
Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher. 2016. Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems. Landscape Urban Plan. 154, 8-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.016
Jouini, M., J. Burte, Y. Biard, N. Benaissa, H. Amara, and C. Sinfort. 2019. A framework for coupling a participatory approach and life cycle assessment for public decision-making in rural territory management. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 1017-1027. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.269
König, B., K. Diehl, K. Tscherning, and K. Helming. 2013. A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management. Research Policy 42(1), 261-272. Doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006
Kuhmonen, T. 2018. Systems view of future of wicked problems to be addressed by the common agricultural policy. Land Use Policy 77, 683-695. Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.004
Leibenstein, H. 1984. On the economics of conventions and institutions: an exploratory essay. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 74-86.
Leverenz, C.S. 2014. Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Computers and Composition 33, 1-12. Doi. 10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.001
Littaye, A. 2016. The multifunctionality of heritage food: the example of pinole, a Mexican sweet. Geoforum 76, 11-19. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.08.008
Luckey, D.S. and K.P. Schultz. 2001. Defining and coping with wicked problems: the case of Fort Ord building removal. MSc thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA.
Max-Neef, M., A. Elizalde, and M. Hopenhayn. 1994. Desarrollo a escala humana: conceptos, aplicaciones y algunas reflexiones. Vol. 66. Icaria Editorial, Barcelona, Spain.
McKee, A., M. Guimarães, and T. Pinto-Correia. 2015. Social capital accumulation and the role of the researcher: an example of a transdisciplinary visioning process for the future of agriculture in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 50, 88-99. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.006
Miguélez, M. 2009. Hacia una epistemología de la complejidad y transdisciplinariedad. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 14(46), 11-31
Millar, M. 2013. Interdisciplinary research and the early career: the effect of interdisciplinary dissertation research on career placement and publication productivity of doctoral graduates in the sciences. Res. Policy 42(5), 1152-1164. Doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.004
Molina, J.P. 2010. Keys for rural territorial development. Agron. Colomb. 28(3), 421-427.
Norris, P.E., M. O’Rourke, A.S. Mayer, and K.E. Halvorsen. 2016. Managing the wicked problem of transdisciplinary team formation in socio-ecological systems. Landscape Urban Plan. 154, 115-122. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.008
Olivé, L. 2011. Interdisciplina y transdisciplina desde la filosofía. Ludus Vitalis, XIX(35), 251-256.
Pacanowsky, M. 1995. Team tools for wicked problems. Organ. Dyn. 23(3), 36-51. Doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(95)90024-1
Pachón, F. 2013. Food sovereignty and rural development: beyond food security. Agron. Colomb. 31, 362-377.
Pachón, F., W. Bokelmann, and C. Ramirez. 2016. Rural development thinking, moving from the green revolution to food sovereignty. Agron. Colomb. 34(2), 267-276. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56639
Pachón, F., W. Bokelmann, and C. Miranda. 2017a. Heritage and patrimony of the peasantry framework to address rural development and its application in Colombia. Acta Agron. 66, 347-359. Doi: 10.15446/acag.v66n3.60949
Pachón, F., W. Bokelmann, and C. Miranda. 2017b. Heritage and patrimony of the peasantry framework and rural development indicators in rural communities in Mexico. Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural 55, 199-226. Doi: 10.1590/1234-56781806-94790550201
Parrado, A. and J. Molina. 2014. Mercados campesinos: modelo de acceso a mercados y seguridad alimentaria en la región central de Colombia. Oxfam, Bogota.
Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. J. Peasant Stud. 36(3), 663-706. Doi: 10.1080/03066150903143079
Probst, G. and A. Bassi. 2014. Tackling complexity: a systemic approach for decision makers. Greenleaf publishing, Sheffield, UK.
Raasch, C., V. Lee, S. Spaeth, and C. Herstatt. 2013. The rise and fall of interdisciplinary research: the case of open source innovation. Res. Policy 42(5), 1138-1151. Doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.010
Rittel, H.W. and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4(2), 155-169. Doi: 10.1007/ BF01405730
Roberts, N. 2000. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. Int. Public Manage. Rev. 1(1), 1-19.
Roberts, N. 2012. Tackling wicked problems in Indonesia: a bottomup design approach to reducing crime and corruption. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA.
Rosset, P. 2003. Food sovereignty: global rallying cry of farmer movements. Food First Backgrounder 9(4), 1-4.
Schejtman, A. and J. Berdegué. 2003. Desarrollo territorial rural. RIMISP, Santiago.
Schultz, S., S. Arndt, G. Lutz, A. Petersen, and C. Turvey. 2002. Alcohol use among older persons in a rural state. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 10(6), 750-753. Doi: 10.1097/00019442-200211000-00014
Scoones, I. 2015. Sustainable rural livelihoods and rural development. Fernwood Publishing, Winnipeg, Canada. Doi: 10.2458/v23i1.20254
Shen, L., S, Jiang, and H, Yuan. 2012. Critical indicators for assessing the contribution of infrastructure projects to coordinated urban-rural development in China. Habitat Int. 36(2), 246.
Doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.003
Sun, W., X. Xu, Z. Lv, H. Mao, and J. Wu. 2019. Environmental impact assessment of wastewater discharge with multi-pollutants from iron and steel industry. J. Environ. Manage. 245, 210-215.
Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.081
Tietjen, A. and G. Jørgensen. 2016. Translating a wicked problem: a strategic planning approach to rural shrinkage in Denmark. Special Issue Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: more awareness, greater acceptance, and better adaptation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 154, 29-43. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.009
van Rijnsoever, F.J. and L. Hessels. 2011. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res. Policy 40(3), 463-472. Doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
Wittman, H., A.A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe. 2010. The origins and potential of food sovereignty. pp. 1-14. In: Wittman, H.K., A.A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe (eds.). Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature and community. Pambazuka, Oxford, United Kingdom.
World Bank. 2000. Rural Development Indicators Handbook. Washington, D.C.
Xiang, W.N. 2013. Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: awareness, acceptance, and adaptation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 110, 1-4. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.006
Zemelman, H. 2001. Pensar teórico y pensar epistémico: los retos de las ciencias sociales latinoamericanas. Instituto Pensamiento y Cultura en América Latina, A.C. (IPECAL), Mexico.
Zijp, M.C., L. Posthuma, A. Wintersen, J. Devilee, and F.A. Swartjes. 2016. Definition and use of solution-focused sustainability assessment: a novel approach to generate, explore and decide on sustainable solutions for wicked problems. Environ. Int. 91, 319-331. Doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.006
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Agronomía Colombiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Reproduction and quotation of material appearing in the journal is authorized provided the following are explicitly indicated: journal name, author(s) name, year, volume, issue and pages of the source. The ideas and observations recorded by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views and policies of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Mention of products or commercial firms in the journal does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement on the part of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia; furthermore, the use of such products should comply with the product label recommendations.
The Creative Commons license used by Agronomia Colombiana journal is: Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike (by-nc-sa)
Agronomia Colombiana by Centro Editorial of Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/.
