Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens
Sustratos comerciales y concentraciones de nutrientes en la producción de microvegetales de rúgula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290Keywords:
Eruca sativa Miller, crops, soilless cultivation, protected environment (en)Eruca sativa Miller, cultivos, cultivo de sustrato, ambiente protegido (es)
Downloads
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different substrates and concentrations of nutrient solutions in the production of arugula (Eruca sativa Miller) microgreens grown in a protected environment at the campus of the Faculty of Agronomy of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The treatments consisted of the combination of five commercial substrates, CSC® vermiculite (S1), Green-Up phenolic foam (S2), S10 Beifiur® organic (S3), Carolina Soil® seedlings (S4), and Carolina Soil® organic (S5) and three concentrations of nutrients in the nutrient solution (0, 50, and 100%). A 5x3 factorial arrangement was used, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. The addition of nutrients in the irrigation solution favored substrates S1, S4, and S5. Substrate S2 showed better performance with the addition of 50% of the total concentration of nutrients. Substrate S3 without the addition of the nutrient solution showed average values very close to the use of the nutrient solution, which can be considered in the evaluation of production costs of microgreens, generating savings to producers.
El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los efectos de diferentes sustratos y concentraciones de soluciones nutritivas en la producción de microvegetales de rúgula (Eruca sativa Miller) cultivados en un ambiente protegido en el campus de la Facultad
de Agronomía de la Universidad Federal de Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), en Porto Alegre, Brasil. Los tratamientos consistieron en la combinación de cinco sustratos comerciales, CSC® vermiculita (S1), espuma fenólica Green-Up (S2), S10 Beifiur® orgánico (S3), Carolina Soil® plántulas (S4) y Carolina Soil® orgánico (S5) y tres concentraciones de nutrientes en la solución nutritiva (0, 50 y 100%). Se utilizó un arreglo factorial 5x3, en un diseño experimental completamente al azar con tres repeticiones. La adición de nutrientes en la solución de riego favoreció a los sustratos S1, S4 y S5. El sustrato S2 mostró un mejor desempeño con la adición del 50% de la concentración total de nutrientes. El sustrato S3 sin la adición de la solución nutritiva mostró valores promedio muy cercanos al uso de la solución nutritiva, lo que se puede tener en cuenta en la evaluación de costos de producción de microvegetales, generando ahorros para los productores.
References
Abreu, M. F., Dias, R. S., Abreu, C. A., & Gonzalez, A. P. (2012). Reavaliação dos critérios constantes na legislação brasileira para análises de substratos. Bragantia, 71(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052012000100016
Caldeira, M. V., Delarmelina, W. M., Peroni, L., Gonçalves, E. O., & Silva, A. G. (2013). Lodo de esgoto e vermiculita na produção de mudas de eucalipto. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 43(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632013000200002
Fermino, M. H., & Kämpf, A. N. (2003). Uso do solo Bom Jesus com condicionadores orgânicos como alternativa de substrato para plantas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, 9(1–2), 33–41.
Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 35(6), 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001
Kämpf, A. N. (2000). Produção comercial de plantas ornamentais. Agropecuária.
Menegaes, J. F., Filipetto, J. E., Rodrigues, A. M., & Santos, O. S. (2015). Produção sustentável de alimentos em cultivo hidropônico. Revista Monografias Ambientais, 14(3), 102–108.
Paradiso, V. M., Castellino, M., Renna, M., Gattullo, C. E., Calasso, M., Terzano, R., Allegretta, I., Leoni, B., Caponio, F., & Santamaria, P. (2018). Nutritional characterization and shelf-life of packaged microgreens. Food and Function, 9(11), 5629–5640. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FO01182F
Pfeiffer, A., Silva, E., & Colquhoun, J. (2015). Innovation in urban agricultural practices: responding to diverse production environments. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000537
Rattin, J. E., Andriolo, J. L., & Witter, M. (2003). Acumulação de massa seca e rendimento de frutos de tomateiro cultivado em substrato com cinco doses de solução nutritiva. Horticultura Brasileira, 21(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362003000100005
Regan, R. P. (2014). Evaluating alternative growing media components. In K. M. Wilkinson, D. L. Haase, & J. R. Pinto (Eds.), National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations – 2013 (pp. 50–53). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Ribeiro, M. C. C., Marques, M. B., & Amaro-Filho, J. (2001). Efeito da salinidade na germinação de sementes de quatro cultivares de girassol (Helianthus annuus L.). Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 23(1), 281–284.
Santos, O. S., Müller, L., Pires, C. C., Tonetto, C. J., Medeiros, S. L. P., Frescura, R. B. M., & Haut, V. (2004). Produção de forragem hidropônica de cevada e milho e seu uso na alimentação de cordeiros. UFSM/CCR.
Silva, F. V., Duarte, S. N., Lima, C. J. G. S., Dias, N. S., Santos, R. S. S., & Medeiros, P. R. F. (2013). Cultivo hidropônico de rúcula utilizando solução nutritiva salina. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 8(3), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v8i3a1689
Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press.
Weber, C. F. (2017). Microgreen farming and nutrition: a discovery-based laboratory module to cultivate biological and information literacy in undergraduates. The American Biology Teacher, 79(5), 375–386.
Xiao, Z., Lester, G. E., Luo, Y., & Wang, Q. (2012). Assessment of vitamin and carotenoid concentrations of emerging food products: edible microgreens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 7644–7651. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf300459b
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Avinash Sharma, Mainu Hazarika, Punabati Heisnam, Himanshu Pandey, V. S. Devadas, Munnu Wangsu, Bhagya D. Kartha. (2023). Factors Affecting Production, Nutrient Translocation Mechanisms, and LED Emitted Light in Growth of Microgreen Plants in Soilless Culture. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology, 3(9), p.701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00260.
2. Betina Luiza Lerner, Andre Samuel Strassburger, Gilmar Schäfer. (2024). Cultivation of arugula microgreens: seed densities and electrical conductivity of nutrient solution in two growing seasons. Bragantia, 83 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20230183.
3. Awais Ali, Genhua Niu, Joseph Masabni, Antonio Ferrante, Giacomo Cocetta. (2024). Integrated Nutrient Management of Fruits, Vegetables, and Crops through the Use of Biostimulants, Soilless Cultivation, and Traditional and Modern Approaches—A Mini Review. Agriculture, 14(8), p.1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081330.
4. Claudia Ortega Realpe, Edna Katalina Medina, Oscar Fernández. (2022). Avances de la Secretaría Distrital de Salud en la implementación de huertas agroecológicas en zonas urbanas y periurbanas de Bogotá, una estrategia que integra la salud ambiental y la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional. Bogotá 2021. Boletín Epidemiológico Distrital - Bed, 18(11), p.4. https://doi.org/10.56085/01238590.430.
5. Henrique Baeninger Pescarini, Vitor Gonçalves da Silva, Simone da Costa Mello, Luis Felipe Villani Purquerio, Fernando Cesar Sala, Thais Queiroz Zorzeto Cesar. (2023). Updates on Microgreens Grown under Artificial Lighting: Scientific Advances in the Last Two Decades. Horticulturae, 9(8), p.864. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080864.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Agronomía Colombiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Reproduction and quotation of material appearing in the journal is authorized provided the following are explicitly indicated: journal name, author(s) name, year, volume, issue and pages of the source. The ideas and observations recorded by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views and policies of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Mention of products or commercial firms in the journal does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement on the part of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia; furthermore, the use of such products should comply with the product label recommendations.
The Creative Commons license used by Agronomia Colombiana journal is: Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike (by-nc-sa)
Agronomia Colombiana by Centro Editorial of Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/.