Published

2021-01-01

Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens

Sustratos comerciales y concentraciones de nutrientes en la producción de microvegetales de rúgula

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290

Keywords:

Eruca sativa Miller, crops, soilless cultivation, protected environment (en)
Eruca sativa Miller, cultivos, cultivo de sustrato, ambiente protegido (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Albertina Radtke Wieth Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Horticultura e Silvicultura - Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-8603
  • Wagner Dutra Pinheiro Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Horticultura e Silvicultura - Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-3115
  • Tatiana da Silva Duarte Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Horticultura e Silvicultura - Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-0853

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different substrates and concentrations of nutrient solutions in the production of arugula (Eruca sativa Miller) microgreens grown in a protected environment at the campus of the Faculty of Agronomy of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The treatments consisted of the combination of five commercial substrates, CSC® vermiculite (S1), Green-Up phenolic foam (S2), S10 Beifiur® organic (S3), Carolina Soil® seedlings (S4), and Carolina Soil® organic (S5) and three concentrations of nutrients in the nutrient solution (0, 50, and 100%). A 5x3 factorial arrangement was used, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. The addition of nutrients in the irrigation solution favored substrates S1, S4, and S5. Substrate S2 showed better performance with the addition of 50% of the total concentration of nutrients. Substrate S3 without the addition of the nutrient solution showed average values very close to the use of the nutrient solution, which can be considered in the evaluation of production costs of microgreens, generating savings to producers.

El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los efectos de diferentes sustratos y concentraciones de soluciones nutritivas en la producción de microvegetales de rúgula (Eruca sativa Miller) cultivados en un ambiente protegido en el campus de la Facultad
de Agronomía de la Universidad Federal de Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), en Porto Alegre, Brasil. Los tratamientos consistieron en la combinación de cinco sustratos comerciales, CSC® vermiculita (S1), espuma fenólica Green-Up (S2), S10 Beifiur® orgánico (S3), Carolina Soil® plántulas (S4) y Carolina Soil® orgánico (S5) y tres concentraciones de nutrientes en la solución nutritiva (0, 50 y 100%). Se utilizó un arreglo factorial 5x3, en un diseño experimental completamente al azar con tres repeticiones. La adición de nutrientes en la solución de riego favoreció a los sustratos S1, S4 y S5. El sustrato S2 mostró un mejor desempeño con la adición del 50% de la concentración total de nutrientes. El sustrato S3 sin la adición de la solución nutritiva mostró valores promedio muy cercanos al uso de la solución nutritiva, lo que se puede tener en cuenta en la evaluación de costos de producción de microvegetales, generando ahorros para los productores.

References

Abreu, M. F., Dias, R. S., Abreu, C. A., & Gonzalez, A. P. (2012). Reavaliação dos critérios constantes na legislação brasileira para análises de substratos. Bragantia, 71(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052012000100016

Caldeira, M. V., Delarmelina, W. M., Peroni, L., Gonçalves, E. O., & Silva, A. G. (2013). Lodo de esgoto e vermiculita na produção de mudas de eucalipto. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 43(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632013000200002

Fermino, M. H., & Kämpf, A. N. (2003). Uso do solo Bom Jesus com condicionadores orgânicos como alternativa de substrato para plantas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, 9(1–2), 33–41.

Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 35(6), 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001

Kämpf, A. N. (2000). Produção comercial de plantas ornamentais. Agropecuária.

Menegaes, J. F., Filipetto, J. E., Rodrigues, A. M., & Santos, O. S. (2015). Produção sustentável de alimentos em cultivo hidropônico. Revista Monografias Ambientais, 14(3), 102–108.

Paradiso, V. M., Castellino, M., Renna, M., Gattullo, C. E., Calasso, M., Terzano, R., Allegretta, I., Leoni, B., Caponio, F., & Santamaria, P. (2018). Nutritional characterization and shelf-life of packaged microgreens. Food and Function, 9(11), 5629–5640. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FO01182F

Pfeiffer, A., Silva, E., & Colquhoun, J. (2015). Innovation in urban agricultural practices: responding to diverse production environments. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000537

Rattin, J. E., Andriolo, J. L., & Witter, M. (2003). Acumulação de massa seca e rendimento de frutos de tomateiro cultivado em substrato com cinco doses de solução nutritiva. Horticultura Brasileira, 21(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362003000100005

Regan, R. P. (2014). Evaluating alternative growing media components. In K. M. Wilkinson, D. L. Haase, & J. R. Pinto (Eds.), National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations – 2013 (pp. 50–53). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Ribeiro, M. C. C., Marques, M. B., & Amaro-Filho, J. (2001). Efeito da salinidade na germinação de sementes de quatro cultivares de girassol (Helianthus annuus L.). Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 23(1), 281–284.

Santos, O. S., Müller, L., Pires, C. C., Tonetto, C. J., Medeiros, S. L. P., Frescura, R. B. M., & Haut, V. (2004). Produção de forragem hidropônica de cevada e milho e seu uso na alimentação de cordeiros. UFSM/CCR.

Silva, F. V., Duarte, S. N., Lima, C. J. G. S., Dias, N. S., Santos, R. S. S., & Medeiros, P. R. F. (2013). Cultivo hidropônico de rúcula utilizando solução nutritiva salina. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 8(3), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v8i3a1689

Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press.

Weber, C. F. (2017). Microgreen farming and nutrition: a discovery-based laboratory module to cultivate biological and information literacy in undergraduates. The American Biology Teacher, 79(5), 375–386.

Xiao, Z., Lester, G. E., Luo, Y., & Wang, Q. (2012). Assessment of vitamin and carotenoid concentrations of emerging food products: edible microgreens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 7644–7651. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf300459b

How to Cite

APA

Wieth, A. R., Pinheiro, W. D. and Duarte, T. da S. (2021). Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens. Agronomía Colombiana, 39(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290

ACM

[1]
Wieth, A.R., Pinheiro, W.D. and Duarte, T. da S. 2021. Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens. Agronomía Colombiana. 39, 1 (Jan. 2021), 5–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290.

ACS

(1)
Wieth, A. R.; Pinheiro, W. D.; Duarte, T. da S. Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens. Agron. Colomb. 2021, 39, 5-11.

ABNT

WIETH, A. R.; PINHEIRO, W. D.; DUARTE, T. da S. Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens. Agronomía Colombiana, [S. l.], v. 39, n. 1, p. 5–11, 2021. DOI: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/87290. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2024.

Chicago

Wieth, Albertina Radtke, Wagner Dutra Pinheiro, and Tatiana da Silva Duarte. 2021. “Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens”. Agronomía Colombiana 39 (1):5-11. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290.

Harvard

Wieth, A. R., Pinheiro, W. D. and Duarte, T. da S. (2021) “Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens”, Agronomía Colombiana, 39(1), pp. 5–11. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290.

IEEE

[1]
A. R. Wieth, W. D. Pinheiro, and T. da S. Duarte, “Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens”, Agron. Colomb., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 5–11, Jan. 2021.

MLA

Wieth, A. R., W. D. Pinheiro, and T. da S. Duarte. “Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens”. Agronomía Colombiana, vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 5-11, doi:10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.87290.

Turabian

Wieth, Albertina Radtke, Wagner Dutra Pinheiro, and Tatiana da Silva Duarte. “Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens”. Agronomía Colombiana 39, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 5–11. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/87290.

Vancouver

1.
Wieth AR, Pinheiro WD, Duarte T da S. Commercial substrates and nutrient concentrations in the production of arugula microgreens. Agron. Colomb. [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 14];39(1):5-11. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/87290

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations4

1. Avinash Sharma, Mainu Hazarika, Punabati Heisnam, Himanshu Pandey, V. S. Devadas, Munnu Wangsu, Bhagya D. Kartha. (2023). Factors Affecting Production, Nutrient Translocation Mechanisms, and LED Emitted Light in Growth of Microgreen Plants in Soilless Culture. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology, 3(9), p.701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00260.

2. Betina Luiza Lerner, Andre Samuel Strassburger, Gilmar Schäfer. (2024). Cultivation of arugula microgreens: seed densities and electrical conductivity of nutrient solution in two growing seasons. Bragantia, 83 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20230183.

3. Claudia Ortega Realpe, Edna Katalina Medina, Oscar Fernández. (2022). Avances de la Secretaría Distrital de Salud en la implementación de huertas agroecológicas en zonas urbanas y periurbanas de Bogotá, una estrategia que integra la salud ambiental y la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional. Bogotá 2021. Boletín Epidemiológico Distrital - Bed, 18(11), p.4. https://doi.org/10.56085/01238590.430.

4. Henrique Baeninger Pescarini, Vitor Gonçalves da Silva, Simone da Costa Mello, Luis Felipe Villani Purquerio, Fernando Cesar Sala, Thais Queiroz Zorzeto Cesar. (2023). Updates on Microgreens Grown under Artificial Lighting: Scientific Advances in the Last Two Decades. Horticulturae, 9(8), p.864. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080864.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

678

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.