Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Valores culturales y acción colectiva en Colombia: una segmentación ciudadana desde la teoría de Hofstede
CULTURAL VALUES AND COLLECTIVE ACTION IN COLOMBIA: CITIZEN SEGMENTATION BASED ON HOFSTEDE'S THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v38n111.125127Palabras clave:
Cultura política, Acción colectiva, Valores culturales, Ciudadanía (es)Political culture, Collective action, Cultural values, Citizenship (en)
Descargas
Este artículo examina cómo los valores culturales influyen en la acción colectiva en Colombia, a partir de una segmentación ciudadana basada en la teoría de Hofstede. Utilizando datos de la World Values Survey y análisis de clústeres, se identifican tres perfiles ciudadanos: institucional, crítico colectivista e indulgente desconectado. Los hallazgos muestran que dimensiones como la indulgencia, el colectivismo y la distancia al poder explican patrones diferenciados de participación, moralidad y confianza. Se argumenta que la cultura política colombiana no es homogénea, sino fragmentada en disposiciones axiológicas contradictorias que configuran ciudadanías múltiples. El estudio aporta evidencia empírica sobre el poder explicativo de los valores frente a variables estructurales clásicas.
This article explores how cultural values shape collective action in Colombia through a citizen segmentation grounded in Hofstede’s theory. Using World Values Survey data and cluster analysis, three citizen profiles are identified: institutional, critical collectivist, and indulgent disconnected. Findings reveal that dimensions such as indulgence, collectivism, and power distance account for divergent patterns of participation, morality, and trust. The study argues that Colombian political culture is not homogeneous, but fragmented into conflicting axiological dispositions that define multiple forms of citizenship. It offers empirical evidence of the superior explanatory power of cultural values over classical structural variables.
Referencias
Abdul-Baki, R., García, M., & Ochoa, R. (2024). Youth sustainability movements in Latin America: Towards an expanded model of environmental citizenship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 142235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142235
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
Alva, E., Urcia, M., & Vivas, V. (2023). Civic engagement of future citizens: An insight from Peruvian students’ attitudes towards relevant societal issues as predictors of expected conventional political participation. Child Indicators Research, 16, 2187–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10049-7
Álvarez, C., Romero, S., & Pereira, J. (2023). Collective action beyond the state: Culture and politics in peripheral territories. The Extractive Industries and Society, 11, 101091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101091
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bang, H., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17(6), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(200006)17:6<449::aid-mar2>3.0.co;2-8
Barber, N. A., Bishop, M., & Gruen, T. (2014). Who pays more (or less) for pro-environmental consumer goods? Using the auction method to assess actual willingness-to-pay. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.010
Bejanyan, K., Marshall, T. C., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). Associations of collectivism with relationship commitment, passion, and mate preferences: Opposing roles of parental influence and family allocentrism. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0117374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117374
Chrzová, B. (2024). Bosnian-Herzegovinian citizens in the making – The citizenship debate in the time of social mobilizations. Nationalities Papers, 52(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2022.110
Dalton, R. J. (2009). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. CQ Press.
Đorđević, V., & Ramet, S. P. (2022). The importance of civic culture—A conclusion. In S. P. Ramet et al. (Eds.), Civic and uncivic values in the Czech Republic (pp. 243–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91225-3_11
Fernandez, K., Robichau, R. W., Alexander, J. K., Mackenzie, W. I., & Scherer, R. F. (2022). How a nonprofitness orientation influences collective civic action: The effects of civic engagement and political participation. Voluntas, 33, 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00445-4
Franceschinis, C., Thiene, M., Scarpa, R., Rose, J., Moretto, M., & Cavalli, R. (2017). Adoption of renewable heating systems: An empirical test of the diffusion of innovation theory. Energy, 125, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.060
Gaxiola, M. (2019). Ciudadanía múltiple y fragmentación social en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 12(2), 55–72.
Haerpfer, C. W., Inglehart, R. F., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., ... & Puranen, B. (2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
Higueras‐Castillo, E., Liébana‐Cabanillas, F. J., Muñoz‐Leiva, F., & Molinillo, S. (2019). The role of collectivism in modeling the adoption of renewable energies: A cross‐cultural approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 2143–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02235-4
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Acts of Citizenship. Zed Books.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Korpi, W. (1989). Power, politics, and state autonomy in the development of social citizenship: Social rights during sickness in eighteen OECD countries since 1930. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095608
Lundberg, E., & Abdelzadeh, A. (2024). The role of youth extracurricular activities and political intentions in later political participation and civic engagement. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12443
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
Montt, M., & Rehner, J. (2013). Cultura, América Latina y Asia. Documento de Trabajo 08. FLACSO Chile.
McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.20.1.93.17291
Muñoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2017.03.003
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Raudenská, P., & Pospíšilová, T. (2022). Trust and democratic satisfaction in post-communist Europe. In V. Ðorđević & S. Ramet (Eds.), Civic and Uncivic Values in the Czech Republic (pp. 235–249). Springer.
Ramet, S. P., & Ðorđević, V. (2022). Civic and uncivic values in the Czech Republic. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91225-3_11
Potochnick, S., & Stegmaier, M. (2020). Latino political participation by citizenship status and immigrant generation. Social Science Quarterly, 101(1), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12747
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Senbel, M., Ngo, V. D., & Blair, E. (2014). Social mobilization of climate change: University students conserving energy through multiple pathways for peer engagement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.001
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182.
Torcal, M. (2014). The decline of political trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic performance or political responsiveness? American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1542–1567.
Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845
UNDP (2004). La democracia en América Latina: Hacia una democracia de ciudadanas y ciudadanos. Naciones Unidas.
Van Hoorn, A. (2015). Individualist–collectivist culture and trust radius: A multilevel approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(2), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114551053
World Values Survey Association. (2020). World Values Survey Wave 7: Colombia 2017–2020 – Technical Specifications. Retrieved from https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp
Wodak, R. (2023). Discourse, conflict, and collective memory: The rise of radical right discourses in East-Central Europe. In R. Wodak & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse and Democracy (pp. 362–375). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003341666-22_chapterpdf
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Análisis Político
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0.
Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Creative Commons license. Atribution-NonComercial-NonDerivs 3.0 Unported.
