Published

2022-06-07

Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation

Escala de Calidez en Enfermería (ECAE): construcción y validación empírica

Escala de Calor Humano em Enfermagem (ECHE): construção e validação empírica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138

Keywords:

Nursing Care, Nurse-Patient Relations, Empathy, Trust, Psychometrics (en)
Cuidados de Enfermagem, Relações Enfermeiro-Paciente, Empatia, Confiança, Psicometria (pt)
Atención de Enfermería, Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente, Empatía, Confianza, Psicometría (es)

Downloads

Authors

Objective: To construct and validate the Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS) through the development of a standardized measurement of nurses' warmth, perceived from the perspective of patients, and identify the behaviors and factors associated with this feeling of warmth.

Materials and methods: The NWS was developed following the scale construction methodology under a triphasic model. The construction of items was elaborated based on the results of a previously published integrative review that consolidated the construct and the related variables. A qualitative phase was also incorporated to evaluate the latent variable. Content validity was assessed with 10 expert judges. An item try-out was conducted with 476 patients in health institutions. Exploratory factor analysis —through the common factor method and oblique rotation— was used for the item reduction process.

Results: The construct “Nursing Warmth” was established after the theoretical and empirical phases of the study. The literature review and interviews with 23 patients and 25 nursing professionals provided a set of behaviors divided into 2 categories: verbal and nonverbal behaviors. Exploratory factor analysis allowed identifying 5 factors and 35 items. The reliability was estimated through Cronbach's alpha. The identified factors are: F1-Nonverbal connection-relationship with the other (0.943), F2-Empathy (0.909), F3-Verbal connection-relationship with the other (0.914), F4-Inclusion (0.858), and F5-Confidence (0.852). The Tucker-Lewis Index was 0.901.

Conclusions: The NWS demonstrates evidence of reliability and validity. This tool may be useful in clinical settings and for teaching and research addressing interpersonal nursing skills.

Objetivo: construir y validar la Escala de Calidez de Enfermería (ECAE) mediante el desarrollo de una medida estandarizada de la calidez de la enfermería desde la perspectiva de los pacientes, además de identificar los comportamientos y factores asociados con la calidez.

Materiales y método: la ECAE fue desarrollada según la metodología de construcción de escalas y empleando un modelo trifásico. La construcción de ítems se elaboró con los resultados de una revisión integrativa previamente publicada, que consolidó el constructo y las variables relacionadas. Se incorporó además una fase cualitativa con el fin de evaluar la variable latente. La validez de contenido fue testeada con 10 jueces expertos. Se realizó la validación de los ítems con 476 pacientes de instituciones de salud. Para el proceso de reducción de ítems se utilizó el análisis factorial exploratorio, mediante el método de factores comunes y rotación oblicua.

Resultados: luego de las fases teórica y empírica del estudio, se estableció el constructo “Calidez en Enfermería”. La revisión de la literatura y las entrevistas a 23 pacientes y 25 profesionales en enfermería proporcionaron un conjunto de comportamientos divididos en dos categorías: conductas verbales y conductas no verbales. El análisis factorial exploratorio identificó 5 factores y 35 ítems. La confiabilidad se estimó con Alfa de Cronbach. Los factores identificados son: F1-Conexión no verbal (0,943), F2-Empatía (0,909), F3-Conexión verbal (0,914), F4-Inclusión (0,858) y F5-Confianza (0,852). El índice de Tucker-Lewis fue de 0,901.

Conclusiones: la ECAE demuestra evidencias de confiabilidad y validez. Esta herramienta puede ser útil en el ámbito clínico y en la enseñanza e investigación de habilidades interpersonales en Enfermería.

Objetivo: construir e validar a Escala de Calor Humano em Enfermagem (ECHE) mediante o desenvolvimento de uma medida padronizada do calor humano da enfermagem sob a perspectiva dos pacientes, além de identificar os comportamentos e fatores associados com o calor humano.

Materiais e método: a ECHE foi desenvolvida de acordo com a metodologia de construção de escalas e utilizando um modelo trifásico. A construção dos itens foi elaborada com os resultados de uma revisão integrativa publicada previamente, que consolidou o construto e as variáveis relacionados. Uma fase qualitativa também foi incorporada para avaliar a variável latente. A validade do conteúdo foi testada com 10 juízes especialistas. Os itens foram validados com 476 pacientes de instituições de saúde. Para o processo de redução de itens, foi utilizada a análise fatorial exploratória por meio do método fatorial comum e da rotação oblíqua.

Resultados: após as fases teórica e empírica do estudo, foi estabelecido o construto “calor humano em enfermagem”. A revisão da literatura e as entrevistas com 23 pacientes e 25 profissionais de enfermagem forneceram um conjunto de comportamentos divididos em duas categorias: comportamentos verbais e não verbais. A análise fatorial exploratória identificou cinco fatores e 35 itens. A confiabilidade foi estimada com o alfa de Cronbach. Os fatores identificados são F1-Conexão não verbal (0,943), F2-Empatia (0,909), F3-Conexão verbal (0,914), F4-Inclusão (0,858) e F5-Confiança (0,852). O índice de Tucker-Lewis foi de 0,901.

Conclusões: a ECHE demonstra evidência de confiabilidade e validade. Essa ferramenta pode ser útil no cenário clínico e no ensino e pesquisa de habilidades interpessoais em Enfermagem.

References

(1) Olana-Fite R; Assefa M; Demissie A; Belachew T. Predictors of therapeutic communication between nurses and hospitalized patients. Heliyon. 2019;5(10):E02665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02665

(2) Lee K; Kim SH. What is the ‘Good Nurse’?: An integrative literature review. MLU. 2019;19(1):743-748. https://ijop.net/index.php/mlu/article/view/1009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-1283.2019.00130.0

(3) Howe LC; Leibowitz KA; Crum AJ. When your doctor "Gets It" and "Gets You:" The critical role of competence and warmth in the patient-provider interaction. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00475

(4) Pastorelli C; Zuffianò A; Lansford JE; Thartori E; Bornstein MH; Chang L et al. Positive youth development: Parental warmth, values, and prosocial behavior in 11 cultural groups. J Youth Dev. 2021;16(2-3):379-401. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.1026

(5) Martí MA. La calidez humana: un regalo compartido. Madrid: Ediciones Teconte; 2018.

(6) Xesfingi S; Vozikis A. Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: Assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1327-4

(7) Ng LK. The perceived importance of soft (service) skills in nursing care: A research study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;85:104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104302

(8) Fiske ST. Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018;27(2):67-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825

(9) Simon JC; Styczynski N; Gutsell JN. Social perceptions of warmth and competence influence behavioral intentions and neural processing. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020;20:265-275. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00767-3

(10) Lagos ZE. Escala Calidez de Enfermagem (ECAE): construção e validação [tesis]. São Paulo: Escola de Enfermagem; 2017. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/7/7139/tde-21092018-120904/

(11) DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2017.

(12) Muñiz J. Introducción a la psicometría: teoría clásica y TRI. 1st ed. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide; 2018.

(13) Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. EIMJ. 2019;11(2):49-54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

(14) Noble H; Smith J. Reviewing the literature: Choosing a review design. Evid Based Nurs. 2018;21(2):39-41. http://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102895

(15) Lagos SZE; Mattos-Pimenta CA; Urrutia MT. La calidez en enfermería: formulación de constructo y variables relacionadas. Inv Enf. 2016;18(1):95-113. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie18-1.cefc

(16) Neuendorf K. The content analysis guidebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878

(17) Lynn, M. Determination and quantification of content validity index. Nursing Research. 1986;35(6):382-386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

(18) Watson JC. Establishing evidence for internal structure using exploratory factor analysis. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2017;50(4):232-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336931

(19) Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology. 2018;9(8):2207-2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126

(20) American Psychological Association. APA task force on psychological assessment and evaluation guidelines. Washington, D.C.: APA; 2020. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychological-assessment-evaluation.pdf

(21) Xia Y; Yang Y. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behav Res. Methods. 2019;51:409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

(22) Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

(23) Watkins MW. Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. J Black Psychol. 2018;44(3):219-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807

(24) Knekta E; Runyon C; Eddy S; Brickman P. One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2019;18(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064

(25) IBM Knowledge Center. Análisis factorial: rotación. Madrid: IBM Corporation; 2021. https://www.ibm.com/docs/es/spss-statistics/SaaS?topic=analysis-factor-rotation

(26) Goretzko D; Pham TTH; Bühner M. Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:3510-3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2

(27) Pérez GB; Arroyo MLP; Nonsoque VMA; Sánchez HB; Guevara LM. Transformar la asistencia de necesidad básica en un momento de cuidado. Investg. Enferm. Imagen Desarrollo. 2020;22:1-9. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie22.tanb

(28) Imnamkhao S; Sangchart B; Imnamkhao W. Warmth: A concept analysis. JNSH. 2021;44(1):76-88. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nah/article/view/244477

(29) González NC. Como comunicamos las/os enfermeras/os: una reflexión necesaria. BENESSERE. 2018;2(1):44-54. https://doi.org/10.22370/bre.21.2017.1329

(30) Benítez-Ramos SI. Cotidiano del profesional de enfermería, en el cuidado del adulto mayor. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2017. https://ru.dgb.unam.mx/handle/DGB_UNAM/TES01000758312

(31) Kallergis G. The contribution of the relationship between therapist-patient and the context of the professional relationship. Psychiatriki. 2019;30(2):165-174. https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2019.302.165

(32) De-Marchi C. Sonreír. Amabilidad y buen humor en la vida cotidiana. Pamplona: EUNSA; 2017.

(33) Triana-Restrepo MC. La empatía en la relación enfermera-paciente. Av Enferm. 2017;35(2):121-122. https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v35n2.66941

(34) Mufato LF; Gaíva MMA. Empatía en enfermería y el contexto de la relación enfermero-paciente: consideraciones críticas. Cultura de los cuidados. 2019,23(54):48-58. https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2019.54.06

(35) Baus C; McAleer P; Marcoux K; Belin P; Costa A. Forming social impressions from voices in native and foreign languages. Sci Rep. 2019;9:414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36518-6

(36) República de Chile. Ministerio de Salud. Ley 20584. Regula los derechos y deberes que tienen las personas en relación con acciones vinculadas a su atención en salud. 24 de abril de 2012. https://www.minsal.cl/sites/default/files/files/Ley%2020584%20Derechos%20y%20Deberes.pdf

(37) Vallejo-Medina P; Gómez-Lugo M; Marchal-Bertrand L; Saavedra-Roa A; Soler F; Morales A. Developing guidelines for adapting questionnaires into the same language in another culture. Ter Psicol. 2017;35(2):159-172. http://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48082017000200159

How to Cite

VANCOUVER

1.
Lagos Z, de Mattos Pimenta CA, Urrutia MT. Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation. Av. enferm. [Internet]. 2022 Feb. 4 [cited 2026 Mar. 8];40(2):267-82. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/avenferm/article/view/100138

ACM

[1]
Lagos, Z., de Mattos Pimenta, C.A. and Urrutia, M.T. 2022. Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation. Avances en Enfermería. 40, 2 (Feb. 2022), 267–282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138.

ACS

(1)
Lagos, Z.; de Mattos Pimenta, C. A.; Urrutia, M. T. Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation. Av. enferm. 2022, 40, 267-282.

APA

Lagos, Z., de Mattos Pimenta, C. A. & Urrutia, M. T. (2022). Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation. Avances en Enfermería, 40(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138

ABNT

LAGOS, Z.; DE MATTOS PIMENTA, C. A.; URRUTIA, M. T. Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation. Avances en Enfermería, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 2, p. 267–282, 2022. DOI: 10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/avenferm/article/view/100138. Acesso em: 8 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Lagos, Zita, Cibele Andrucioli de Mattos Pimenta, and María Teresa Urrutia. 2022. “Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation”. Avances En Enfermería 40 (2):267-82. https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138.

Harvard

Lagos, Z., de Mattos Pimenta, C. A. and Urrutia, M. T. (2022) “Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation”, Avances en Enfermería, 40(2), pp. 267–282. doi: 10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138.

IEEE

[1]
Z. Lagos, C. A. de Mattos Pimenta, and M. T. Urrutia, “Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation”, Av. enferm., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 267–282, Feb. 2022.

MLA

Lagos, Z., C. A. de Mattos Pimenta, and M. T. Urrutia. “Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation”. Avances en Enfermería, vol. 40, no. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 267-82, doi:10.15446/av.enferm.v40n2.100138.

Turabian

Lagos, Zita, Cibele Andrucioli de Mattos Pimenta, and María Teresa Urrutia. “Nursing Warmth Scale (NWS): Development and empirical validation”. Avances en Enfermería 40, no. 2 (February 4, 2022): 267–282. Accessed March 8, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/avenferm/article/view/100138.

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

1109

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.