Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Domestic wastewater treated with Sagittaria latifolia in constructed wetlands
Aguas residuales domésticas tratadas con Sagittaria latifolia en humedales artificiales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n226.105263Palabras clave:
basic pollutants; removal efficiency; free flow constructed wetlands; subsurface flow constructed wetlands; macrophytes; kinetic coefficient (en)contaminantes básicos; eficiencia de remoción; humedales artificiales de flujo libre; humedales artificiales de flujo subsuperficial; macrófitas; coeficiente cinético (es)
Descargas
Constructed wetlands are viable alternatives for the removal of multiple pollutants. The performance of Sagittaria latifolia in free flowing and subsurface wetlands in removing pollutants from domestic waters was evaluated. 12 wetlands will be followed, three free with species and three without species, three subsurface with species and three without species, with retention times of 6.7 days for the free and 3.5 days for the subsurface. The subsurface with species presented an effluent with turbidity of 4.4±0.8 NTU, color of 143.9±27.4 UC and 33.9±25.7 mgL-1 of COD. The free samples with species presented turbidity of 10.1±2.8 NTU, color of 346.3±87.0 UC and 74.7±30.0 mgL-1 of COD. The wetland with the best performance was the subsurface with species, eliminating turbidity, color, and COD in 95.9, 89.4, 95.7% respectively, obtaining a COD kinetic coefficient of 0.34 (free flow) and 0.89 days-1 (subsurface).
Los humedales artificiales son alternativas viables para la remoción de múltiples contaminantes. Se evaluó el desempeño de Sagittaria latifolia en humedales de flujo libre y subsuperficial en la remoción de contaminantes en aguas domésticas. Se establecieron 12 humedales, tres libres con especie y tres sin especies, tres subsuperficial con especie y tres sin especies, con tiempos de retención de 6.7 días para los libres y de 3.5 días para los subsuperficiales. Los subsuperficiales con especie presentaron un efluente con turbiedad de 4.4±0.8 UNT, color de 143.9±27.4 UC y 33.9±25.7 mgL-1 de DQO. Los libres con especie presentaron turbiedad de 10.1±2.8 UNT, color de 346.3±87.0 UC y 74.7±30.0 mgL-1 de DQO. El humedal con mejor rendimiento fue el subsuperficial con especie, removiendo turbiedad, color y DQO en 95.9, 89.4, 95.7% respectivamente, obteniendo un coeficiente cinético de DQO de 0.34 (flujo libre) y 0.89 días-1 (subsuperfial).
Referencias
Van de Moortel, A.M.K., Rousseau, D.P.L., Tack, F.M.G., De Pauwc, N., A comparative study of surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands for treatment of combined sewer overflows: a greenhuose experiment. Ecological Engineering 35, pp. 175-183, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.08.015
Marín-Muñiz, J.L., Removal of pollutants from wastewater through artificial wetlands established in the municipality of Actopan, Veracruz, Mexico. Mexican Journal of Engineering Chemistry, 15, pp. 553-563, 2016.
Dires, S., Birhanuc, T., Ambelud, A. and Sahilua, G., Antibiotic resistant bacteria removal of subsurface flow constructed wetlands from hospital wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 6, pp. 4265-4272, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.034
Kadlec, R.H. and Wallace, S.D., Treatment wetlands, 2nd ed., CRC Press, USA, 2009, 336 P.
Snyder, B.F., The inclusion of ecosystem service valuations in bioenergy cost analysis. A case study of constructed wetlands in the neotropics. Ecological Economics, 156, pp. 196-201, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.005
García, O.J.A., López, O.G. and Torres, B.C.A., Evaluation of support media in artificial wetlands with Sagittaria latifolia vegetation in the removal of basic contaminants. CIBA Ibero-American Journal of Biological and Agricultural Sciences, 8, pp. 16-51, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ciba.v8i15.82
Rehmana, K., Imrana, A., Amina, I. and Afzal, M., Inoculation with bacteria in fl oating treatment wetlands positively modulates the phytoremediation of oil fi eld wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 349, pp. 242-251, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.013
Wanga, R., Zhaoa, X., Liub, H. and Wua, H., Elucidating the impact of influent pollutant loadings on pollutants removal in agricultural waste-based constructed wetlands treating low C/N wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 273, pp. 529-537, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.044
Arivoli, A. and Mohanraj, R., Efficacy of Typha augustifolia based vertical flow constructed wetland system in pollutant reduction of domestic wastewater. International Journal of Environment Sciences 3, pp. 1497-1508, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6088/ijes.2013030500020
Saeed, T., Al -Muyeed, A., Afrin, R., Rahman, H. and Sun, G., Pollutant removal from municipal wastewater employing baffled subsurface flow and integrated surface flow-floating treatment wetlands. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 26, pp. 726-736, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60476-3
Mustapha, H.I., van Bruggen, J.J.A. and Lens, P.N.L., Optimization of petroleum refinery wastewater treatment by vertical flow constructed wetlands under tropical conditions, Plant species selection and polishing by a horizontal flow constructed wetland. Water Air Soil Pollution, 229, pp. 137-154, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3776-3
Pétémanagnan, O.J.M., Lacina, C., Tiho, S. and Gourène, G., Comparison of macrofauna communities in sediments of the beds of vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Panicum maximum (Jacq.) treating domestic wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 35, pp. 1237-1242, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.05.007
Rock, S. and Jackson, L., Phytoremediation of organics Action Team. EPA 542-F-97-014, 1997.
USEPA, Phytoremediation Resource Guide. EPA 542-B-99-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Technology Innovation Office, Washington, DC, USA, 20460, 1999, 56 P.
Sánchez-Araujo, V.G., Palomino-Pastrana, P.A. and Malpartida-Yapias, R.J., Efficiency of artificial wetlands of totora and watercress on pig farm effluents, Peru. Alpha Magazine, 5(14), pp. 192-203, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33996/alfareview.v5i14.110
Wood, J.D., Gordon, R., Madani, A. and Stratton, G.W., A long term assessment of phosphorus treatment by a constructed wetland receiving dairy wastewater. Wetlands 28, pp. 715-723, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/07-163.1
Thalla, A.K., Devatha, C.P., Anagh, K. and Sony, E., Performance evaluation of horizontal and vertical flow constructed wetlands as tertiary treatment option for secondary effluents. Applied Water Science, 9, pp. 1-9, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1014-9
Solis, S.R., Lopez, O.G., Bautista, M.R.G., Hernandez, B.J.R. and Romellón, C.M.J., Evaluation of free-flowing and subsurface artificial wetlands in the removal of pollutants from wastewater using different species of macrophyte vegetation. Interscience, 41(1), pp. 40-47, 2016.
Bueno, J., Álvarez, F. and Santiago, S., Biodiversity of the State of Tabasco, Mexico. National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 2005.
Zachritz, W.H. and Fuller, J.W., Performance of an artificial wetlands filter treating facultative lagoon effluent at Carville, Louisiana. Water Environment Research, 65(1), pp. 46- 52, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.65.1.6
Lenhart, H.A., Hunt, W.F. and Burchell, M.R., Harvestable nitrogen accumulation for five storm water wetland plant species, trigger forstorm water control measure maintenance?. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE, 138(9), pp. 972-978, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000550
Gallegos, R.J., López, O.G., Bautista, M.R.G. and Torres, B.C.A., Evaluation of free flow constructed wetlands with Sagittaria latifolia and Sagittaria lancifolia in domestic wastewater treatment. Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas, 10(2), pp. 49-65, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.inagbi.2017.03.005
Crites, R. and Tchobanoglous, G., Wastewater treatment in small towns. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, S.A., Bogota, Colombia, 2004, 776 P.
CONAGUA, Drinking water, sewerage and sanitation manual. design of municipal wastewater treatment plants, artificial wetlands. General Subdirectorate of Potable Water, Drainage and Sanitation, Mexico. 2015, 134 P.
López, O.G., Torres, B.C.A., Bautista, M.R.G., Hernández, B.J.R., Gutiérrez, B.J.J., de la Cruz, L.E. and Ferrer, S.M.I., Design of experimental free-flow and subsurface artificial wetland systems. In: Contreras, S.W.M., ed., Scientific Perspective from the Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. 1st edition. Tabasco Mexico. 2014, pp. 133-146.
Briones-Sánchez, G. and García-Casillas, I., Capacity of water in canals and pipes. 3rd ed. Editorial Thresholds, Mexico, 2014, 100 P.
Rodríguez-Miranda, J.P., Gómez, E., Garavito, L. and López, F., Comparison study of domestic wastewater treatment using lentils and water buchón in artificial wetlands. Technology and Water Sciences, pp. 59-68, 2010.
Delgadillo, O., Camacho, A., Pérez, L. and Andrade, M., Purification of residual waters by means of artificial wetlands, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Andean Center for the Management and Use of Water (Centro AGUA). Cochabamba, Bolivia, 2010, 105 P.
CONAGUA, Drinking water, sewerage and sanitation manual. design of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Pretreatment and primary treatment. Subdirectorate General for Potable Water, Drainage and Sanitation. Mexico, 2015, 82 P.
Mora, C.D.L., Saucedo, R.A., González, I.J., Gómez, R.S. and Flores, L.H.E., Effect of water temperature on the reaction rate constant of pollutants in a wetland constructed for the treatment of pig wastewater. Mexican Journal of Livestock Sciences, 11(Suppl. 2), pp. 1-17, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v11s2.4681
Vymazal, J., Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380, pp. 48-65, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014
Fan, J., Zhang, J., Ngoc, H.H., Guo, W., and Yin X., Improving low-temperature performance of surface flow constructed wetlands using Potamogeton crispus L. plant. Bioresource Technology, 218, pp. 1257-1260, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.110
SEMARNAT, Mexican Official Standard NOM-001-SEMARNAT-2021, which establishes the permissible limits of pollutants in wastewater discharges in receiving bodies owned by the nation. Published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on January 5, 2022. Mexico, 2022, 15 P.
López, O.G., Bautista, M.R.G., Valdes, M.A., Torres, B.C.A., López, R.V., Pérez, S.E. and Pampillón, G.L., Spatial distribution behavior of basic pollutants in a subsurface-flow wetland with Thalia geniculata. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 2(2), pp. 145-160, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/EI-V2-N2-145-160
USEPA, Design Manual. Constructed wetlands and aquatic plant systems for municipal water treament. EPA/625/1-88/022. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, USA, 1998, 92 P.
Hadad, H.R., Maine, M.A. and Bonetto, C.A., Macrophyte growth in a pilot scale constructued wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 63, pp. 1744-1753, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.014
Winanti, E.T., Rahmadyanti, E. and Fajarwati, I.N., Ecological approach of campus wastewater treatment using constructed wetland. IOP Conf. Series, Materials Science and Engineering, 288, pp. 01-09, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012062
Mietto, A., Politeo, M., Breschigliaro, S. and Borin, M., Temperature influence on nitrogen removal in a hybrid constructed wetland system in northern Italy, Ecological Engineering, 75, pp. 291-302, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.027
DOF, Agreement establishing the ecological criteria for water quality CE-CCA-001/89. Official Gazette of the Federation, Wednesday, December 13th, 1989. Semarnap, National Water Commission, based on: Secretariat of Urban Development and Ecology. 1989. [online]. [Consultation date: May 29th, 2020]. Available at: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?code=4837548&date=12/13/1989.
Bedoya, P.J.C., Ardila, A.A.N. and Reyes, C.J.M., Evaluation of an artificial subsurface flow wetland in the treatment of wastewater generated in the Colegio Mayor de Antioquia university institution, Colombia. International Journal of Environmental Pollution, 30(3), pp. 275-283, 2014.
Romellón-Cerino, M.J., Estrada-Pérez, N. and López-Ocaña, G., Removal and kinetics of basic contaminants in serial constructed wetlands. Renewable Energy, Biomass & Sustainability (REB&S), 3(1), pp. 24-34, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56845/rebs.v3i1.32
Thomaz, S.M., Ecosystem services provided by freshwater macrophytes. Hydrobiologia, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04739-y
Parde, D., Patwa, A., Shukla, A., Vijay, R., Killedar, D. J. and Kumar, R, A review of constructed wetland on type, treatment, and technology of wastewater. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101261
Saeed, T. and Sun, G., The removal of nitrogen and organics in vertical flow wetland reactors: predictive models. Bioresource Technology 102, pp. 1205-1213, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.096
Wang, H., Sheng, L. and Xu, J., Clogging mechanisms of constructed wetlands: a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, art. 126455, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126455
Kulshreshtha, N.M., Verma, V., Soti, A., Brighu, U. and Gupta, A.B., Exploring the contribution of plant species in the performance of constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology Reports, 18, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101038
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Diego Domínguez-Solís, María Concepción Martínez-Rodríguez, Héctor Guadalupe Ramírez-Escamilla, Lorena Elizabeth Campos-Villegas, Roman Domínguez-Solís. (2025). Constructed Wetlands as a Decentralized Treatment Option for Domestic Wastewater: A Systematic Review (2015–2024). Water, 17(10), p.1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101451.
2. Rituparna Saha, Amit Biswas. (2024). Smart Agritech. , p.351. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394302994.ch13.
3. María R. Quevedo, Paola S. González, Analía S. Llanes, Cynthia Magallanes-Noguera, Cintia E. Paisio. (2026). Mesocosm-based assessment of Schoenoplectus americanus for domestic wastewater phytoremediation: physiological, biochemical, and metabolomic insights. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-37641-y.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 DYNA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.
