Publicado
Designing a process quality control framework using Monte Carlo simulation
Diseño de un sistema de control de calidad de procesos usando simulación Monte Carlo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n229.107557Palabras clave:
decision making framework; Monte Carlo simulation; process variables analysis; quality control improvement (en)sistema de toma de decisiones; simulación Monte Carlo; análisis de variables de procesos; mejoramiento del control de la calidad (es)
Descargas
Quality control seeks to collect and analyze large amounts of data to take appropriate corrective actions and ensure that products or services meet quality requirements. This study proposed a methodological framework to analyze the quality control process employing Monte Carlo simulation. The methodology consists of four steps: (i) Establishment of probability distributions, (ii) Construction of the mathematical model, (iii) Running the simulation, and (iv) Analysis of the results. The application of the methodological framework in a carbonated beverage production made it possible to ensure with 99% confidence that one of the most important quality characteristics of the product, the degrees Brix, varies in a range of ± 0.02. The results show the methodology allows to broadly map the process variables behavior and to make decisions on optimal levels for quality monitoring and control.
El Control de Calidad busca recoger y analizar grandes cantidades de datos para iniciar las acciones correctivas adecuadas, garantizando que los productos o servicios cumplen los requisitos de calidad. Este trabajo propone un marco metodológico para analizar el proceso de control de calidad mediante Simulación Monte Carlo. La metodología consta de cuatro pasos: (i) Determinación de las distribuciones de probabilidad, (ii) Construcción del modelo matemático, (iii) Ejecución de la simulación, and (iv) Análisis de resultados. La aplicación del marco metodológico en una producción de bebidas carbonatadas permitió asegurar con un 99% de confianza que una de las características de calidad más importantes del producto, los grados Brix, varía en un rango de ± 0.02. Los resultados muestran que la metodología permite mapear en forma amplia el comportamiento de las variables del proceso y tomar decisiones sobre niveles óptimos para el monitoreo y control de la calidad.
Referencias
Ma, X.Z., and Lv, W.Y., Joint optimization of production and maintenance using Monte Carlo method and metaheuristic algorithms. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, pp. 1–22, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3670495
Otsuka, A., and Nagata, F. International Journal of Production Economics Quality design method using process capability index based on Monte-Carlo method and real-coded genetic algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, pp. 358–364 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.016
Caspeele, R., From quality control to structural reliability: where Bayesian statistics meets risk analysis. Heron, 59(2–3), pp. 79–100, 2014.
Morán-Zabala, J.P. and Cogollo-Flórez, J.M., Contribution of quality management to sustainable supply chain performance. Dimensión Empresarial, 20(2), pp. 94-116, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v20i2.2871
He, Z., Hu, H., Zhang, M., and Yin, X., Product quality prediction based on process data: taking the gearbox of Company D as an example. Quality Engineering, 34(3), pp. 409–422, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2022.2063743
Liza, R., Fenton, G.A., Lake, C.B., and Griffiths, D.V., An analytical Approach to assess quality control sample sizes of cement- based solidification/stabilization. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54(3), pp. 419–427, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0218
Starks, T.H., and Flatman, G.T., RCRA ground-water monitoring decision procedures viewed as quality control schemes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 16(1), pp. 19-37 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399592
Acebes, F., Pajares, J., Galán, J.M., and López-Paredes, A., A project monitoring and control system using EVM and Monte Carlo simulation. In Project Management and Engineering Research, pp. 31-40, 2014. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26459-2_3
Hubbard, D.W. Dual-Axial Motion control of a magnetic levitation system using Hall-Effect sensors. In 2019 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pp. 3064–3073, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2015.2479404
Alqahtani, M., Buijs, A., and Day, S.E., Progress in Nuclear energy simulation approach and code functionality assessment using deterministic and Monte Carlo codes system for U-235 core-follow depletion calculation. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 129, art. 103501, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103501
Chen, D.G. and Chen, J.D., Monte-Carlo simulation-based statistical modeling. Singapore: Springer, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3307-0
Sarnobat, S.S., and Raval, H.K., Experimental investigation and analysis of the influence of tool edge geometry and work piece hardness on surface residual stresses, surface roughness and work-hardening in hard turning of AISI D2 steel. Measurement, 131, pp. 235–260, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.048
Wen, X.L., Zhao, Y.B., Wang, D.X., and Pan, J., Adaptive Monte Carlo and GUM methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error. Precision Engineering, 37(4), pp. 856-864, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.05.002
Saviano, A.M., and Lourenço, F.R., Measurement uncertainty estimation based on multiple regression analysis (MRA) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations – Application to agar diffusion method. Measurement, 115, pp. 269–278, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.057
Wood, R., A simulation study of the Westgard multi-rule quality-control system for clinical laboratories. Clinical Chemistry, 36(3), pp. 462-465, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/36.3.462
Samuel, T.R., Pignatiello Jr, J.J., and Calvin, J.A., Identifying the time of a step change with X control charts. Quality Engineering, 10(3), pp. 521-527, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119808919166
Sładek, J., and Gąska, A., Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method. Measurement, 45(6), pp. 1564-1575, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.020
Lu, H., Kim, E., and Gutierrez, M., Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) -based uncertainty analysis of rock mass quality Q in underground construction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 94, art. 103089, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103089
Kruth, J.P., Van Gestel, N., Bleys, P., and Welkenhuyzen, F., Uncertainty determination for CMMs by Monte Carlo simulation integrating feature form deviations. CIRP Annals, 58(1), pp. 463-466, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.028
Aggogeri, F., Barbato, G., Barini, E.M., Genta, G., and Levi, R., Measurement uncertainty assessment of coordinate measuring machines by simulation and planned experimentation. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4(1), pp. 51-56, 2011.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.01.007
Farzinfar, M., Li, Y., Verde, A. R., Oguz, I., Gerig, G., and Styner, M.A., DTI quality control assessment via error estimation from Monte Carlo simulations. In Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 8669, pp. 641-648, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2006925
Liu, J., Pang, C.P., an Jiang, R., Economic optimisation in automotive body manufacturing quality control based on multivariate Bayesian control chart. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 18(1), pp. 125-138, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2014.064344
Park, C., Ouyang, L., and Wang, M., Robust g -type quality control charts for monitoring nonconformities. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 162, art. 107765, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107765
Silva, G.P., Taconeli, C.A., Zeviani, W.M., and Guimaraes, I.S., An improved quality control chart to monitor the mean based on ranked sets. 2017. Available at: arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.04979
Tian, J., Wu, J., and Chiu, Y., Ultramicroscopy Monte Carlo simulation and theoretical calculation of SEM image intensity and its application in thickness measurement. Ultramicroscopy, 187, pp. 13–19, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.004
Gómez-Marín, C.G., Arango-Serna, M.D., and Serna-Urán, C.A., Agent-based microsimulation conceptual model for urban freight distribution. Transportation Research Procedia, 33, pp. 155-162, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.088
Iranmanesh, H., Parchami, A., and Sadeghpour-Gildeh, B., Statistical testing quality and its Monte Carlo simulation based on fuzzy specification limits. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(3), pp. 1-17, 2022.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2022.6940
Li, P. C., Shih, H.C., and Ma, H.W., Applying probabilistic material flow analysis for quality control and management of waste recycling in steelmaking. Waste Management, 144, pp. 67-75, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.03.011
Cukurova, F., Gustavson, B.P., Griborio-Guzman, A.G., and Levin, L.A., A quantitative approach to the spread of variance in translational research using Monte Carlo simulation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), pp. 1-12, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09921-3
Bilbao-Meseguer, I., Barrasa, H., Rodríguez-Gascón, A., Asín-Prieto, E., Maynar, J., Sánchez-Izquierdo, J.Á., Solinís, M. and Isla, A., Optimization of levetiracetam dosing regimen in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Journal of Intensive Care, 10(1), pp. 1-8, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00611-w
Roth, D., Larsson, E., Ljungberg, M., and Sjögreen Gleisner, K., Monte Carlo modelling of a compact CZT-based gamma camera with application to 177Lu imaging. EJNMMI Physics, 9(1), pp. 1-21, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00463-1
Ji, W., and AbouRizk, S.M., Simulation-based analytics for quality control decision support: Pipe Welding case study. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32(3), pp. 1–9, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000755
Pacella, M., Semeraro, Q., and Anglani, A., Manufacturing quality control by means of a Fuzzy ART network trained on natural process data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17(1), pp. 83–96, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2003.11.005
Leou, R.C., Teng, J.H., Lu, H.J., Lan, B.R., Chen, H.T., Hsieh, T.Y., and Su, C.L., Stochastic analysis of electric transportation charging impacts on power quality of distribution systems. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 12(11), pp. 2725–2734, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.0112
Jiang, F., and Dong, S., Collision failure risk analysis of falling object on subsea pipelines based on machine learning scheme. Engineering Failure Analysis, 114, art. 104601, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104601
Shangguan, J., Guo, H., and Yue, M., Robust energy management of plug-in hybrid electric bus considering the uncertainties of driving cycles and vehicle mass. Energy, 203, pp. 117836, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117836
Inman, M., Parker, K., Strueby, L., Lyon, A. W., and Lyon, M.E., A simulation study to assess the effect of analytic error on neonatal glucose measurements using the Canadian Pediatric Society Position Statement action thresholds. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 14(3), pp. 519–525, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819884923
Ioannides, A.M., and Tingle, J.S., Monte Carlo simulation for flexible pavement reliability. Airfield and Highway Pavements 2021: Pavement Design, Construction, and Condition Evaluation, pp. 13–25, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483503.002
Hejazi, T.H., Seyyed‐Esfahani, M., and Mahootchi, M., Optimization of degree of conformance in Multiresponse–Multistage systems with a simulation-based metaheuristic. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(4), pp. 645–658, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1622
Jiang, T., and Skrivervik, A.K., Monte-Carlo method for EMF exposure distribution assessment in 5G base station. In 16th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP, pp. 1–5, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/EuCAP53622.2022.9769472
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Jean Paul Morán-Zabala, Jesus Alejandro Alzate-Grisales, Mario Alejandro Bravo-Ortiz, Mario Andrés Valencia-Diaz, Cristian Giovanny Gómez-Marín, Alejandra Maria Restrepo-Franco, Juan Miguel Cogollo-Flórez. (2024). A simulation-based optimization model for quality control in solid waste collection process. Production, 34 https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20240021.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 DYNA

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.




