Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
The evolution of eco-innovation and its impact on the political, social, and environmental spheres in the period 1996-2022: state of the art and bibliometric study
La evolución de la ecoinnovación y su impacto en los ámbitos político, social y ambiental en el período 1996-2022: estado del arte y estudio bibliométrico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n228.108644Palabras clave:
eco-innovation; bibliometric analysis; state of the art; project management (en)eco-innovación; análisis bibliométrico; estado del arte; gestión de proyectos (es)
Descargas
Eco-innovation has emerged in support of sustainable development, in collaboration with the Sustainable Development Goals, in such a way that governments and institutions have integrated it as a strategic part. This work aims to show eco-innovations state of the art through a bibliometric analysis, identifying its progress in the business, political, social, and environmental fields through a cross-sectional visualization of the literature from 1996-2022. Documents were extracted from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, totaling 3939; These were filtered and analyzed in Tableau, Sci-Mat and VOSviewer software. The results indicate that it has been a growing topic since the year 2000, identifying principal authors, countries, and journals and their relationship in the business, social, political, and environmental fields, as well as its influence on emerging research topics such as circular economy, environmental economy, life cycle, eco-efficiency, energy efficiency, environmental management, among others.
La eco-innovación ha surgido en apoyo al desarrollo sostenible, en colaboración con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, de tal modo que gobiernos e instituciones la han integrado como parte estratégica. El objetivo del presente trabajo es mostrar el estado del arte de la eco-innovación por medio de un análisis bibliométrico, identificando su progreso en el ámbito empresarial, político, social y ambiental, a través de una visualización transversal de la literatura en el periodo de 1996-2022. Se extrajeron documentos de las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus, sumando un total de 3939; estos se filtraron y analizaron en los softwares Tableau, Sci-Mat y VOSviewer. Los resultados indican que es un tema en crecimiento a partir del año 2000 identificando principales autores, países, revistas y su relación en el ámbito empresarial, social, político y ambiental; así como su influencia en temas de investigación emergentes como lo son economía circular, economía ambiental, ciclo de vida, ecoeficiencia, eficiencia energética, gestión ambiental, entre otros.
Referencias
Baran, J., Proposal of ecodesign supporting set. 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference and EXPO, SGEM 2015, 3(5), pp. 461-468, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b53/s21.060
Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., and Evans, S., A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, pp. 42-56, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Bocken, N.M.P., Farracho, M., Bosworth, R., and Kemp, R., Corrigendum to “The front-end of eco-innovation for eco-innovative small and medium sized companies” [J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 31(2014) pp. 43-57]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 46, pp. 84-85, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.01.001
Börner, K., Chen, C., and Boyack, K.W., Visualizing knowledge domains. Information science and technology [online]. 37, 2003. Available at: http://www.asis.org/Publications/ARIST/Vol37/BornerFigures.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Bris, G.Y.L., Serhan, H., Duchaine, S., Ferrandi, J.M., Trystram, G., Yannou-Le Bris, G., Serhan, H., Duchaine, S., Ferrandi, J.M., and Trystram, G., Feedback for ecodesign and ecoinnovation. Ecodesign and ecoinnovation in the food industries, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119687375
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Del Río, P., and Könnölä, T., Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), pp. 1073-1083, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014
Cluzel, F., Yannou, B., Millet, D., and Leroy, Y., Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 4329-4343, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.002
Cobo, M.J., Lõpez-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., and Herrera, F., SciMAT: a new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), pp. 1609-1630, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
Cuerva, M.C., Triguero-Cano, Á., and Córcoles, D., Drivers of green and non-green innovation: Empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, pp. 104-113, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.049.
Dangelico, R.M., Green product innovation: where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), pp. 560-576, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886
Dangelico, R.M., and Pujari, D., Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), pp. 471-486, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0
De Medeiros, J.F., Duarte-Ribeiro, J.L., and Cortimiglia, M.N., Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, pp. 76-86, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.035.
Demirel, P., and Kesidou, E., Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: Government policies and firm motivations. Ecological Economics, 70(8), pp. 1546-1557, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.019
Demirel, P., and Kesidou, E., Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), pp. 847-857, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2286
Garcia-Sanchez, I.M., Gallego-Alvarez, I., and Zafra-Gomez, J.L., Do the ecoinnovation and ecodesign strategies generate value added in munificent environments?. Business strategy and the environment, 29(3), pp. 1021-1033, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2414
Geissdoerfer, M., Bocken, N.M.P., and Hultink, E.J., Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process - A workshop based on a value mapping process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, pp. 1218-1232, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020
Gómez-Luna, E., Fernando-Navas, D., Aponte-Mayor, G., y Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A., Metodología para la revisión bibliográfica y la gestión de información de temas científicos, a través de su estructuración y sistematización. DYNA, 81(184), pp. 158-163, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/DYNA.V81N184.37066
Gupta, H., and Barua, M.K., Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, pp. 242-258, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.125
Hojnik, J., and Ruzzier, M., What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, pp. 31-41, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006
Horbach, J., Do eco-innovations need specific regional characteristics? An econometric analysis for Germany. Review of Regional Research-Jahrbuch fur Regionalwissenschaft, 34(1), pp. 23-38, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-013-0079-4
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., and Rennings, K., Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact - The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, pp. 112-122, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
Jaenicke, M., Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), pp. 557-565, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011
Jaenicke, M., “Green growth”: from a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability. Energy Policy, 48, pp. 13-21, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045
Kemp, R., Eco-innovation and transitions. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 1, pp. 103-123, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/EFE2009-001007
Kevork, E.K., and Vrechopoulos, A.P., CRM literature: conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(1), pp. 48-85, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500910928362
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., and Hekkert, M., Barriers to the Circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, pp. 264-272, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
Klewitz, J., and Hansen, E.G., Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, pp. 57-75, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., and Huang, M., The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, pp. 41-49, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123
Liao, Z., Content analysis of China’s environmental policy instruments on promoting firms’ environmental innovation. Environmental Science & Policy, 88, pp. 46-51, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.013
Liao, Z., Corporate culture, environmental innovation, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), pp. 1368-1375, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2186
Liao, Z., Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a firm’s environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), pp. 849-857, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2036
Liao, Z., Market orientation and FIRMS’ Environmental Innovation: the moderating role of environmental attitude. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), pp. 117-127, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1988
Liao, Z., Social capital and firms’ environmental innovations: the moderating role of environmental scanning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), pp. 1493-1501, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2207
Liao, Z., Is environmental innovation conducive to corporate financing? The moderating role of advertising expenditures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), pp. 954-961, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2409
López-Herrera, A.G., Cobo, M.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., and Herrera, F., A bibliometric study about the research based on hybridating the fuzzy logic field and the other computational intelligent techniques: a visual approach. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 7(1), pp. 17-32, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/his-2010-0102
Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., and Sala, S., Life cycle assessment of bio-based products: a disposable diaper case study. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(5), pp. 1036-1047, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0556-6
Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., and Sala, S., Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, pp. 28-41, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051
Munoz-Leiva, F., Porcu, L., and Del Barrio-Garcıa, S., Discovering prominent themes in integrated marketing communication research from 1991 to 2012: a co-word analytic approach. International Journal of Advertising, 34(4), pp. 678-701, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1009348
Noyons, E.C.M., Moed, H.F., and Luwel, M., Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J
Oltra, V., Kemp, R., and de Vries, F.P., Patents as a measure for eco-innovation. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 13(2), pp. 130-148, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2010.034303
Paula-Pinheiro, M.A., Jugend, D., Dematte-Filho, L.C., and Armellini, F., Framework proposal for ecodesign integration on product portfolio management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, pp. 176-186, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.005
Pujari, D., Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), pp. 76-85, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006
Radonjic, G., Pisnik, A., and Krajnc, D., Product ecodesign in companies with ISO 14001 certified environmental management system. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14(1), pp. 167-181, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2015.018
Rennings, K., Redefining innovation - Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), pp. 319-332, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
Reyes, T., and Rohmer, S., The Trojan horse method as a vector of ecodesign integration: A case study at a French SME. 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 09 [online]. pp. 173-184, 2009. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84859260087&partnerID=40&md5=583d063a6d136420f040fdbbea21c225
Rodríguez-López, M.E., Alcántara-Pilar, J.M., Del Barrio-García, S., and Muñoz-Leiva, F., A review of restaurant research in the last two decades: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, art. 2387, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102387
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., and Kendall, A., A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, pp. 542-559, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014
Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., and Van Wee, B., Technological diversity of emerging eco-innovations: a case study of the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, pp. 211-220, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.011
Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., and Van Wee, B., The competitive environment of electric vehicles: an analysis of prototype and production models. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2, pp. 49-65, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.011
Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., and Van Wee, B., The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, pp. 183-194, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.01.004
Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., and Davia, M.A., Leaders and laggards in environmental innovation: an empirical analysis of SMEs in Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), pp. 28-39, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1854
Tyl, B., Vallet, F., Bocken, N.M.P., and Real, M., The integration of a stakeholder perspective into the front end of eco-innovation: a practical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp. 543-557, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.145
Van-Eck, N.J., and Waltman, L., Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), pp. 1053-1070, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Van-Hemel, C., and Cramer, J., Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), pp. 439-453, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00013-6
van Leeuwen, T., Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_17
Zabalza-Bribián, I., Valero-Capilla, A., and Aranda-Usón, A., Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), pp. 1133-1140, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Edwin Paipa-Sanabria, María Belén Orozco-Lopez, Felipe Escalante-Torres, Clara Paola Camargo-Díaz, Julian Andres Zapata-Cortes. (2024). Exploring the Landscape of Eco-Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis of Concepts and Trends in the Manufacturing and Shipbuilding Industries. Sustainability, 16(12), p.5188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125188.
2. Gulnara Dzhunushalieva, Ramona Teuber. (2024). Roles of innovation in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(2), p.100472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100472.
3. Hongyang Li, Ruoqing Lyu, Jianfeng Sheng, Vanessa Menadue, Martin Skitmore. (2025). Enhancing eco-efficiency in china’s construction industry: measurement, drivers, and policy implications using an EBM–tobit approach. International Journal of Construction Management, , p.1. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2566896.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 DYNA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.
