Publicado

2015-05-01

Effects of management commitment and organization of work teams on the benefits of Kaizen: Planning stage

Efectos del compromiso gerencial y organización de equipos de trabajo en los beneficios del Kaizen: Etapa de planeación

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n191.51157

Palabras clave:

kaizen, management commitment, coordination of teams, partial least squares (PLS) (en)
kaizen, compromiso gerencial, organización de equipos de trabajo, mínimos cuadrados parciales (PLS) (es)

Autores/as

  • Midiala Oropesa-Vento Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
  • Leonardo Rivera Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial. Universidad del Valle
  • Diego F. Manotas Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial. Universidad del Valle
This paper presents an analysis of the effects of management commitment and organization of work teams in the benefits of implementing Kaizen in industrial enterprises during planning stages. To gather information, 200 questionnaires were applied to 68 companies distributed in the states of Tabasco, Sinaloa and Chihuahua in Mexico and in the province of Camagüey, Cuba. We used the methodology of least partial squares with the WarpPLS 4.0 software to develop a model of structural equations that explains such effects. The results show that when there is a high level of managerial commitment, this impacts the profits and competitiveness of companies positively. We also found that the organization of work teams has positive impacts on competitive benefits and these, in turn, on economic benefits. As a result of this study, we present the impact of certain critical success factors of Kaizen on the benefits of its implementation, which is a key factor in its sustainability over time.

Este trabajo presenta un análisis de los efectos que tienen el compromiso gerencial y la organización de equipos de trabajo en los beneficios de la implementación del kaizen en las empresas industriales durante su etapa de planeación. Para buscar la información se aplicaron 200 cuestionarios a 68 empresas distribuidas en los estados de Tabasco, Sinaloa y Chihuahua en México y también en la provincia de Camagüey. Cuba. Para obtener un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales explicativo de los efectos, se utilizó la metodología de mínimos cuadrados parciales usando WarpPLS 4.0. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que cuando existe un alto compromiso gerencial se tiene impactos positivos en los beneficios económicos y competitivos de las empresas. Asimismo, la organización de equipos de trabajo tiene impactos positivos sobre los beneficios competitivos y estos a su vez sobre los beneficios económicos obtenidos. Como resultado de este estudio se muestra el impacto que tienen determinados factores críticos de éxito del Kaizen, en los beneficios de implementación del mismo, elemento primordial para su sostenibilidad en el tiempo.

Referencias

Kumar, S. and Harms, R., Improving business processes for increased operational efficiency: A case study, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (7), pp. 662-674, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/17410380410555907

Ramadani, V. and Gerguri, S., Theoretical framework of innovation and competitiveness and innovation program in Macedonia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23 (2), pp. 268-276, 2011.

Medina, C. and Espinosa, M., Innovation in modern organizations. Management and Strategy, 5, pp. 85-102, 1994.

Cooney, R. and Sohal, A., Teamwork and total quality management: A durable partnership. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15 (8), pp. 1131 - 1142, 2004. DOI: 10.1080/1478336042000255442

Gondhalekar, S., Babu, S. and Godrej, N., Towards using Kaizen process dynamics: A case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12 (9), pp. 192-209, 1995. DOI: 10.1108/02656719510101286

Bateman, N., Sustainability: The elusive element of process improvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (3), pp. 261-276, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/01443570510581862

Van de Ven, A., Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science 32 (5), pp. 590-607, 1996. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590

Burch, M.K, Lean Kaizen events and longevity determinants of sustainable improvement, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA, 2008.

Sheridan, J.H., A new attitude. Industry Week, 249 (10), pp.16, 2000.

Daniel, D., Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, 39, pp. 110-121, 1961.

Terziovski, M. and Sohal, A.S., The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation strategies in Australian manufacturing firms Lithuania. Technovation, 20 (10) pp. 539-550, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00173-X

Juran, J., Juran on leadership for quality. A manual for managers. Madrid, Spain: Díaz Santos, 1990

Suarez, B. and Miguel, J., In search of an area of sustainability: An empirical study of the implementation of the Continuous Improvement Process in Spanish Town Councils. INNOVATE Journal of Administrative and Social Sciences, 19 (35), pp. 47-64, 2009.

Barraza, M.F., Smith, T. and Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Lean Kaizen public service: An empirical approach in Spanish local governments, The TQM Journal, 21 82) pp.143-167, 2009.

Lefcovich, M., Advantages and benefits of Kaizen. [on line], 2007. [date of reference: September 10th of 2011]. Available at: http://www.tuobra.unam.mx/published/040816180352.html

Vonk, J., Business process improvement through Kaizen permits, Spectrum, 78 (2), pp. 33-34, 2005.

Watson, L., Striving for continuous improvement with fewer resources. Kaizen, Marshall Star, pp. 1-5, 2002.

Wheatley, B., Innovation, ISO registration, CMA, 72 (5), pp.23-23, 1998.

Tenenhaus, M., Component-based structural equation modelling. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 19 (7-8), pp 87-886, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/14783360802159543

Woodman, R., Saweyr, J. and Griffin, R., Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18 (2), pp. 293-321, 1993. DOI: 10.2307/258761, 10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517

Bhatnagar, R. and Sohal, A.S., Supply chain competitiveness: Measuring the impact of location factors, uncertainty and manufacturing practices. Technovation, 25 (5), pp. 443-456, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.012, 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00172-X

Romero, R., Noriega, S., Escobar, C. and Avila, D., Critical success factors: A competitiveness strategy. CULCYT, 6 (31), pp. 5-14, 2009.

Nordgaard, A., Ansell, R., Jaeger, L. and Drotz, W., Ordinal scales of conclusions for the value of evidence. Science and Justice, 50 (1), pp. 31-31, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.11.025

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M., PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19 (2), pp. 139-151, 2011. DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Rigdon, E.E., Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simpler methods. Long Range Planning, 45 (5,6), pp. 341-358, 2011.

Yuan, K. and Bentler, P., New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. USA. 2001.

Dale, B., Boaden, R., Willcox, M. and McQuater, R., Sustaining total quality management: What are the key issues. TQM Magazine, 9 (2), pp. 372-380, 1997. DOI: 10.1108/09544789710178668

Suarez, B., Michael, J. and Castillo, I., The implementation of Kaizen in Mexican organizations. An empirical study. GCG, 5 (4), pp. 60-74. 2011.

Han, S.B., The effects of ISO 9000 registration efforts on total quality management practices and business performance. PhD. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island, United States, 151 P., 2000.

Swamidass, P.M., A comparison of the plant location strategies of foreign and domestic manufacturers in the U.S., Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (2), pp. 310-316, 1998.

Martin, K.. Kaizen-White collar: Events rapid improvement office, services and technical processes, IIE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Nashville, TN, May 22, 2007.

Ortiz, C., All out Kaizen: A continuous improvement plan delivers change to the production floor and dollars to the bottom line. Industrial Engineer, 38 (4), pp.30-30, 2006.

Bicheno, J., Kaizen and Kaikaku. Manufacturing operations and supply chain management: The LEAN approach, in: Taylor, D., and Brunt, D., eds, London, UK. Thomson Learning, pp. 175-184. 2001.

Terziovski, M. and Sohal, A.S., The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation strategies in Australian manufacturing firms Lithuania. Technovation, 20 (10) pp. 539-550, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00173-X

Shumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G., A Beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. 3A. Ed., LLC Inc. New York, Taylor and Francis Group, 2010, 2 P.

Khurana, A. and Talbot, B., The internationalization process model-through the lens of the global color picture tube industry. Journal of Operations Management, 16 (2-3), pp.215-239, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00039-9

Lionnet, P., Innovation: The Process, ESA Training Workshop. Lisbon, 2003.

Olaya, A. The economics of innovation and technological change: A theoretical approach from the Schumpeterian thought. Strategic Sciences Journal, 16 (20), pp. 237-246, 2008.

Sheridan, J.H., Kaizen Blitz, Industry Week, 246 (16), pp.18-27, 1997.

Sabatini, J., Turning Japanese, Automotive Manufacturing & Production, 112 (10), pp. 66-69, 2000.

Rigdon, E.E., Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: in praise of simpler methods. Long Range Planning, 45 (5,6), pp. 341-358, 2011.

Correa-E., A. and Gómez-M., R.A., Information technologies in the supply chain. DYNA, 76 (157), pp.37-48, 2009.

Creswell, J., America's Elite Factories, Fortune, 144 (4), pp. 206A-206L, 2001.

Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S., Using multivariate statistics. 4th Ed., Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 2001, P. 77.

Nemoto, M., Total quality control for management. Strategies and techniques from Toyota and Toyoda Gosei. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Inc., 1987.

Brown, M., Guide to data analysis. Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 2002.

Garza, E., Kaizen continuous improvement. Redalyc.Org, 8 (3), pp. 330-333, 2005.

Martinez, A.C.L., Self-report reading strategy used among Spanish university students of English. RESLA, 21, pp. 161-179, 2008.

Hernández, R., Fernandez, C. and Baptista, P., Research methodology. McGraw-Hill Publishing, Mexico, 1991.

Manos, A., Lean Kaizen: A simplified approach to process improvement. ASQ Quality Press, pp. 47-49, 2006.

Avelar-Sosa, L., García-Alcaraz, J.L., Cedillo-Campos, M.G. and Adarme-Jaimes, W., DYNA, 81 (186), pp. 208-217, 2014. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v81n186.39958

Cronbach, L.J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3), pp.297-334, 1951. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555

García-Rivera J.L., Iniesta, D.G., Alvarado, A., Critical success factors for Kaizen implementation in manufacturing industries in Mexico. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68 (1-4) pp. 537-545, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-4750-2.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

990

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

[1]
M. Oropesa-Vento, J. L. García-Alcaraz, L. Rivera, y D. F. Manotas, «Efectos del compromiso gerencial y organización de equipos de trabajo en los beneficios del Kaizen: Etapa de planeación», DYNA, vol. 82, n.º 191, pp. 76–84, may 2015, doi: 10.15446/dyna.v82n191.51157.