Publicado

2016-10-01

Influencia de la proporción de mezcla en la codigestión anaerobia de biorresiduos municipales con lodos de aguas residuales domésticas sobre la producción de metano

Influence of the mixing ratio on the anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biowaste with domestic wastewater sludge on methane production

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v83n199.57382

Palabras clave:

Biorresiduos municipales, Codigestión anaerobia, Energía renovable, Hidrólisis, Lodo primario (es)
Anaerobic co-digestion, Hydrolysis, Municipal biowaste, Primary sludge, Renewable energy (en)

Autores/as

La codigestión anaerobia (CA) es una de las opciones viables para superar las desventajas de la mono-digestión. Esta investigación presenta los resultados del Potencial Bioquímico de Metano (PBM) donde se evaluó la CA de biorresiduos municipales (BM) de una localidad que realiza separación en la fuente y recolección selectiva con lodos de aguas residuales domésticas (LARD) provenientes de una planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales en diferentes proporciones de mezcla. Se evaluó la producción de metano mediante el modelo modificado de Gompertz y la hidrólisis a través del modelo cinético de primer orden, ya que esta es la etapa limitante en la CA de residuos sólidos. La proporción de mezcla LARD:BM donde se lograron las mayores producciones de metano (105.6 mLCH4·gSV-1), mejores constantes de hidrólisis (Kh) y fases de latencia cortas (menores a 3.3 días) fue 20:80.
Anaerobic co-digestion (A-Co) is a viable option to overcome the disadvantages of mono-digestion. This research presents the results of biochemical methane potential assays (BMPs) assessing the A-Co of municipal biowastes (MBW) from one city which perform source separation and selective collection with domestic wastewater sludge (DWS) from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in different DWS: MBW mixing ratios. Besides methane production, it was evaluated the hydrolysis (through a first-order kinetics model and the modified Gompertz model), since this is the limiting step of the A-Co of solid wastes. The results showed that A-Co of DWS with MBW is feasible and that DWS: MBW mixing ratio generated a synergistic effect in the process. The mixing ratio DWS:MBW that produced the largest quantities of methane (105.6 mLCH4·gVS-1), optimal hydrolysis constants (Kh) and shortest lag phase (under 3.3 days) was 20:80.

Referencias

Jingura, R. and Matengaifa, R., Optimization of biogas production by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in Zimbabwe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(5), pp. 1116-1120, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.015

Wang, H. and Wang, C., Municipal solid waste management in Beijing: characteristics and challenges. Waste Management & Research, 31(1), pp. 67-72, 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X12468199

Oviedo-Ocaña, R., Marmolejo-Rebellón, L. and Torres-Lozada, P. Evaluation of the adittion of wood ashes to control the pH of substrates in municipal biowaste composting. Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología, 15(3), pp. 469-478, 2014. DOI:10.1016/S1405-7743(14)70355-5

Martín-González, L., Colturato, L., Font, X. and Vicent, T. Anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste with FOG waste from a sewage treatment plant: Recovering a wasted methane potential and enhancing the biogas yield. Waste Management, 30(10), pp. 1854-1859, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.029

Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M., Fonoll, X., Peces, M. and Astals, S., A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, pp. 412-427, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039

Balussou, D., Kleyböcker, A., McKenna, R., Möst, D. and Fichtner, W., An economic analysis of three operational co-digestion biogas plants in Germany. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 3(1), pp, 23-41, 2012. DOI 10.1007/s12649-011-9094-2

Hartmann, H. and Ahring, B., Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of co-digestion with manure. Water Research, 39(8), pp. 1543-1552, 2005. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.001

Lesteur, M., Bellon-Maurel, V., Gonzalez, C., Latrille, E., Roger, J., Junqua, G. and Steyer, J., Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: a review. Process Biochemistry, 45(4), pp. 431-440, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2009.11.018

Ponsá, S., Gea, T. and Sánchez, A., Anaerobic co-digestion of theorganic fraction of municipal solid waste with several pure organic co-substrates. Biosystems Engineering, 108(4), pp. 352-360, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.01.007

Callaghan, F., Wase, D., Thayanity, K. and Forster, C., Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure, Biomass Bioenergy, 22(1), pp. 71-77, 2002. DOI:10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00057-5

Tandukar, M. and Pavlostathis, S., Co-digestion of municipal sludge and external organic wastes for enhanced biogas production under realistic plant constraints. Water Research, 87, pp. 432-445, 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.031

Zhang, P., Estudio y propuesta de mejora del proceso de depuración de la EDAR de Zhongyuan (China). Tesisi de Grado en Ciencias Ambientales, Escuela Politecnica Superior de Gandia, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, España, 2013.

Xu, G., Yan, Z., Wang, Y. andWang, N., Recycle of Alum recovered from water treatment sludge in chemically enhanced primary treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(2-3), pp. 663-669, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.008

Poon, C. and, Chu, C., The use of ferric chloride and anionic polymer in the chemically assisted primary sedimentation process. Chemosphere, 39(10), pp. 1573-1582, 1999. DOI:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00055-7

Trzcinski, A. and Stuckey, D., Determination of the hydrolysis constant in the biochemical methane potential test of municipal solid waste. Environmental Engineering Science, 29(9), pp. 848-854, 2012. DOI:10.1089/ees.2011.0105

Kafle, G., Kim, S. and Sung, K., Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: A lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics. Bioresoruce Technology, 127, pp. 326-336, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.032

Sakurai, K., Método sencillo del análisis de residuos sólidos, Lima-Peru, CEPIS/OPS, Peru, 2000.

Mukherjee, S., Kumar, S. and Devotta, S., Influence of Nitrogen of Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste in a Laboratory Scale. Journal of the IPHE [Online]. 9(4), 2008. [date of reference March 25th of 2016]. Available at: http://indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/Influence%20of%20nitrogen.pdf

Parra-Orobio et al / DYNA 83 (199), pp. 86-93, December 2016.

Sharma, K., Mishra, I., Sharma, M. and Saini, J., Effect of Particle Size on Biogas Generation from Biomass Residues. Biomass, 17(4), pp. 251-263, 1988. DOI:10.1016/0144-4565(88)90107-2

ICONTEC., Norma Técnica Colombiana 5167. Productos para la Industria Agrícola, Productos Orgánicos Usados como Abonos o Fertilizantes y Enmiendas de Suelo, Colombia, 2004, 32 P.

APHA. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, Washington D.C., A.W.W.A.a.W.E. Federation, Estados Unidos, 2005.

Espinosa, M., López, M., Pellón, A., Mayarí, R. y Fernández, A., La fracción orgánica de los residuos sólidos urbanos como fuente potencial de producción de biogás. Revista CENIC Ciencias Biológicas [Online]. 38(1), 2007. [date of reference March 25th of 2016]. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=181221557003

Sterling, M., Lacey, R., Engler, C. and Ricke, S., Effects of Ammonia Nitrogen on H2 and CH4 production during anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle manure. Bioresource Technology, 77(1), pp. 9-18, 2001. DOI:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00138-3

Hidalgo, D. and Martín-Marroquína, J., Effects of inoculum source and co-digestion strategies on anaerobic digestion of residues generated in the treatment of waste vegetable oils. Journal of Environmental Management, 142, pp. 17-22, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.004

Aquino, S., Chernicharo, C., Foresti, E. Florencio, M. e Monteggia, L., Metodologias para determinação da atividade metanogênica específica (Ame) em lodos anaeróbios. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 12(2), pp. 192-201, 2007. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-41522007000200010

Owen, W., Stuckey, D., Healy, J., Young, L. and McCarty, P., Bioassay for Monitoring Biochemical Methane Potential and Anaerobic Toxicity. Water Research, 13(6), pp. 485-492, 1979. DOI:10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5

Giménez, J., Martí, N., Ferrer, J. and Seco, A., Methane recovery efficiency in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SANMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater: Evaluation of methane losses with the effluent. Bioresoruce Technology, 118, pp. 67-72, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.019

Raposo, F., Banks, C., Siegert, I., Heaven, S. and Borja, R., Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochemistry, 41(6), pp. 1444-1450, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.012

Chen, X., Yan, W., Sheng, K. and Sanati, M., Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste. Bioresource Technology, 154, pp. 215-221, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.054

Chiumenti, A., Modern composting technologies. USA: Emmaus, PA: JG Press., 2005.

Liew, L., Shi, J. and Li, Y., Methane production from solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass, Biomass and Bioenergy, 46, pp. 125-132, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.014

Lay, J., Li, Y., Noike, T., Endo, J. and Ishimoto, S., Analysis of enviomental factors affecting methane production from high-solids organic. Water Science and Technology, 36(6-7), pp. 493-500, 1997. DOI:10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00560-X

Pesta, G., Anaerobic digestion of organic residues and waste, USA: Springer New York, 2007.

Zupančič, G. and Roš, M., Determination of chemical oxygen demand in substrates from anaerobic treatment of solid organic waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 3(1), pp. 89-98, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-011-9087-1

Abdulkarim, B.I. and Abdullahi, M.E., Effect of buffer (NaHCO3) and waste type in high solid thermophilic anaerobic digestion, International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2, pp. 980-984, 2010

Sundberg, C., Franke-Whittle, I., Kauppi, S., Yu, D., Romantschuk, M., Insam, H. and Jönsson, H., Characterisation of source-separated household waste intended for composting. Bioresource Technology, 102(3), pp. 2859-2867, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.075

Parawira, W., Murto, M., Zvauya, R. and Mattiasson, B., Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with

sugar beet leaves. Renewable Energy, 29(11), pp. 1811-1823, 2004. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.005

Mata-Alvarez, J., Macé, S. and Llabares, P., Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresoruce Technology, 74(1), pp. 3-16, 2000. DOI:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7

Takáčová, A., Mackluľak, T., Smolinská, M., Hutňan, M. and Olejníková, P., Influence of selected biowaste materials pre-treatment on their anaerobic digestion. Chemical Paper, 66(2), pp. 129-137, 2012. DOI: 10.2478/s11696-011-0107-1

Chen, X., Romano, R. and Zhang, R., Anaerobic digestion of food wastes for biogas production. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 3(4), pp. 61-71, 2010. DOI: 10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2010.04.0-0

Juanga, J., Optimizing dry anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, MSc. Thesis, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005.

Torres-Lozada, P., Díaz-Granados, J. and Parra-Orobio, B.A., Effects of the incorporation of drinking water sludge on the anaerobic digestion of domestic wastewater sludge for methane production. Water Science and Technology, 72(6), pp. 1016-1021, 2015. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2015.291

Cirne, D., Paloumet, X., Björnsson, L., Alves, M. and Mattiasson, B., Anaerobic Digestion of Lipid-Rich Waste—Effects of Lipid Concentration. Renewable Energy, 32(6), pp. 965-975, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.003

Demirel, B. and Scherer, P., The Roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 7(2), pp. 173-190, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-008-9131-1

Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Giordano, A., Liotta, F., Panico, A. and Pirozzi, F., Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 11(4), pp. 325-341, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-012-9277-8

Davidsson, Å., Lövstedt, C., la Cour Jansen, J., Gruvberger, C. and Aspegren, H., Co-digestion of grease trap sludge and sewage sludge. Waste Management, 28(6), pp. 986-992, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.024

Iacovidou, E., Ohandja, D. and Voulvoulis, N., Food waste co-digestion with sewage sludge - Realising its potential in the UK. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, pp. 267-274, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.029

Kim, H., Han, S. and Shin, H., Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste using temperature-phased anaerobic digestion process. Water Science and Technology [Online]. 50(9), 2004. [date of reference March 25th of 2016]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15581001

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

767

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

[1]
“Influencia de la proporción de mezcla en la codigestión anaerobia de biorresiduos municipales con lodos de aguas residuales domésticas sobre la producción de metano”, DYNA, vol. 83, no. 199, pp. 86–93, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.15446/dyna.v83n199.57382.