Argumentation-based Intention Formation Process
Proceso de formación de intenciones basado en argumentación
Palabras clave:
intention formation, argumentation, goal processing, intelligent agents. (en)formación de intenciones, argumentación, procesamiento de objetivos, agentes inteligentes. (es)
Descargas
Citas
Bratman, M., Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Castelfranchi, C. and Paglieri, F., The role of beliefs in goal dynamics: prolegomena to a constructive theory of intentions, Synthese. 155(2), Morveli-Espinoza, M. et al / Revista DYNA, 86(208), pp. 82-91, January - March, 2019. 91 pp. 237-263, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-006-9156-3.
Besnard, P. and Hunter, A., Argumentation based on classical logic. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 133-152, Springer, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_7.
Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), pp. 321-357, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X.
Chen, W., Durfee, E. and Dumas, M., Human agent collaboration in a simulated combat medical scenario. International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, pp.367-375, 2009. DOI: 10.1109/CTS.2009.5067503.
Farinelli, A., Grisetti, G., Iocchi, L., Cascio, S.L. and Nardi, D., Design and evaluation of multi-agent systems for rescue operations, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'03), Las Vegas, Nevada (USA), 2003, pp. 3138-3143.
Sugiyama, H., Tsujioka, T. and Murata, M., Real-time exploration of a multi-robot rescue system in disaster areas. Advanced Robotics, 27(17), pp. 1313-1323, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2013. 838333.
Taboada, M., Cabrera, E., Epelde, F., Iglesias, M.L. and Luque, E., Using an agent-based simulation for predicting the effects of patients derivation policies in emergency departments. Procedia Computer Science, 18, pp. 641-650, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013. 05.228.
Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Castolo, O., Rosas, J., A multi-agent based platform for virtual communities in elderly care, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2003. 2, pp. 421-428, 2003. DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2003.1248730 .
Khalil, K.M., Abdel-Aziz, M., Nazmy, T.T. and Salem, A.B.M., Multi-agent crisis response systems-design requirements and analysis of current systems, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems, [online]. 2009. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2543.
Kakas, A.C., Torroni, P. and Demetriou, N., Agent planning, negotiation and control of operation, Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press, [online]. 2004, pp. 13-17. Available at: http://www.frontiersinai.com/ecai/ecai 2004/ecai04/pdf/ p0013.pdf
Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Stathis, K. and Toni, F., Computational logic foundations of kgp agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research .33, pp. 285-348, 2008. DOI: 10.1613/ jair.2596.
Berariu, T., An argumentation framework for BDI agents. Intelligent Distributed Computing VII. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 511, pp. 343-354, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01571-2_40.
Kakas, A., Amgoud, L., Kern-Isberner, G., Maudet, N. and Moraitis, P., ABA: Argumentation based agents. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 2011, pp. 9-27. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_2.
Amgoud, L., A formal framework for handling conflicting desires, Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning and uncertainty, 2003, pp. 552-563. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_45.
Amgoud, L. and Kaci, S., On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 2004, pp. 192-207. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_13.
Rahwan, I. and Amgoud, L., An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 2006, pp. 347-354. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_5.
Morveli-Espinoza, M., Possebom, A., Puyol-Gruart, J. and Tacla, A., Dealing with incompatibilities among goals. 16th Conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, [online]. 2017, pp. 1649-1651. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3091392
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 DYNA

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.




