Publicado

2018-07-01

Synergistic effects in anaerobic codigestion of chicken manure with industrial wastes

Efectos sinérgicos en la codigestión anaerobia de gallinaza y residuos industriales

Palabras clave:

anaerobic codigestion, chicken manure, industrial wastes, mixture design, synergistic effects (en)
codigestion anaerobia, diseño de mezcla, efectos sinérgicos, gallinaza, residuos industriales (es)

Autores/as

Synergy in anaerobic codigestion is described as positive interactions between a substrate and cosubstrate(s). Synergistic effects increase methane production over the weighted average methane production from monodigestion. Limited current knowledge defines synergy as a parameter in the plant control and design and in solving operational problems. In this study, synergy was determined in the anaerobic codigestion of chicken manure with industrial wastes (sugarcane molasses, cheese whey, and crude glycerol). A simplex lattice mixture design was used to determine mixing ratios. Synergy was assessed in terms of substrate composition and ammonia inhibition. The greatest synergistic effects were achieved with ternary mixtures. Synergy was also noticed when total ammonia nitrogen concentrations decreased and the organic load increased. Nonetheless, it was concluded that synergy could be reliably achieved when cosubstrate supplementation reduces ammonia inhibition and increases methane production as increases in organic load.
La sinergia en la codigestión anaeróbica se describe como interacciones positivas entre sustrato y co sutratos. Los efectos sinérgicos aumentan la producción de metano con respecto a la monodigestión. Actualmente, se cuenta con un conocimiento limitado sobre las aplicaciones de la sinergia como parámetro para la solución de problemas operativos en sistemas anaerobios. En este estudio se determinó la sinergia en la codigestión anaeróbica de gallinaza con residuos industriales (melaza de caña de azúcar, lactosuero, y glicerol crudo). Las proporciones de mezclas fueron determinadas a partir de un diseño de mezcla simplex. La sinergia se evaluó en términos de composición de sustrato e inhibición de amoniaco. La sinergia se evidencia cuando reduce la inhibición del amoníaco y aumenta la producción de metano a medida que incrementa la carga orgánica, siendo el efecto más favorable en mezclas terciarias.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Wang, M., Sun, X., Li, P., Yin, L., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., Li, W. and Zheng, G., A novel alternate feeding mode for semi-continuos anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with chicken manure. Bioresour. Technol., 164, pp. 309-314, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.077

-Batista, J., Castro, L. and Escalante, H., Effect of chicken manure organic load on biomethane potential. Colomb. J. Biotechnol., 17(1), pp. 18-23, 2015. DOI: 10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v17n1.39971

Niu, Q., Qiao, W., Qiang, H., Hojo, T. and Li, Y., Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: Stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresour. Technol., 137, pp. 358-367, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.080

Abouelenien, F., Namba, Y., Kosseva, M., Nishio, N. and Nakashimada, Y., Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes. Bioresour. Technol., 159, pp. 80-87, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.050

Xie, S., Wickham, R. and Nghiem, L., Synergistic effect from anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradatio, 116, pp. 191-197, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.037

Zhang, T., Yang, Y., Liu, L., Han, Y., Ren, G. and Yang, G., Improved biogas production from chicken manure anaerobic digestion using cereal residues as co-substrates. Energy&Fuels, 28, pp. 2490-2495, 2014. DOI: 10.1021/ef500262m

Li, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, C., Liu, G., He, Y. and Liu, X., Biogas production from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions. Bioresour. Technol., 149, pp. 406-412, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.091

Labatut, R., Angenent, L. and Scott, N., 2011. Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol., 102, pp. 2255-2264, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035

Sharma, D., Espinosa-Solares, T. and Huber, D.H., Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of poultry litter and thin stillage. Bioresour. Technol., 136, pp. 251-256, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.005

Astals, S., Batstone, D.J., Mata-Alvarez, J. and Jensen, P.D., Identification of synergistic impacts during anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Bioresour. Technol., 169, pp. 421-427, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.024

Pagés-Díaz, J., Pereda-Reyes, I., Taherzadeh, M., Sárvári-Horváth, I. and Lundin, M., Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues: synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays. Chem. Eng., J. 245, pp. 89-98, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.008

Raposo, F., Borja, R., Martín, M.A., Martín, A., de la Rubia, M.A. and Rincón, B., Influence of inoculum–substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem. Eng. J., 149, pp. 70-77, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.001

Tanimu, M., Ghazi, T., Harun, M. and Idris, A., Effect of feed loading on biogas methane production in batch mesophilic anaerobic digesters treating food waste. Int. J. Chem. Environ. Eng., 5(1), pp. 39-44, 2014.

Wang, B., Strömberg, S., Li, C., Nges, I., Nistor, M., Deng, L. and Liu, J., Effects of substrate concentration on methane potential and degradation kinetics in batch anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol., 194, pp. 240-246, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.034

Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M.S., Fonoll, X., Peces, M. and Astals, S., A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Ren. Sustain. Energy Rev., 36, pp. 412-427, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039

Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J.L., Guwy, A.J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P. and van Lier, J.B., Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol., 59 (5), pp. 927-934, 2009. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.040

APHA., 21th edition standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American public health association, Washington. ISBN 978-0-87553-047-5, 2005.

Malta, E., Ferraz, F., Ribeiro, N., Oliveira, J., Frota, M. and Frische-Neto, R., Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. Comun. Sci. 7(1), pp. 30-37, 2016. DOI: 10.14295/cs.v7i1.432

Neumann, P., Torres, A., Fermoso, F.G., Borja, R. and Jeison, D., Anaerobic co-digestion of lipid-spent microalgae with waste activated sludge and glycerol in batch mode. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 100, pp. 85-88, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.01.020

Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X. and Ren, G., Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, pp. 540-555, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032

Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Giordano, A., Liotta, F., Panico, A., Pirozzi, F., Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Rev Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 11(4), pp. 325-341, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-012-9277-8

Galí, A., Benabdallah, T., Astals, S. and Mata-Alvarez, J., Modified version of ADM1 model for agro-waste application. Bioresource Technology, 100, pp. 2783-2790, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.052

Viana, M.B., Freitas, A.V., Leitão, R.C., Pinto, G.A.S. and Santaella, S.T., Anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol: a review. Environ. Technol. Rev., 1(1), pp. 81-92, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.692723

Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G. and Han, X., Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol., 120, pp. 78-83, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.112, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.069