Publicado

2018-04-01

Hydrogen production in a novel configuration of UASB reactor under different hydraulic retention time

Producción de hidrogeno utilizando una nueva configuración de reactor anaerobio UASB bajo diferentes tiempos de retención hidráulica

Palabras clave:

Biopack® rings, total volatile acids, UASB reactors (en)
anillos de Biopack, ácidos totales volátiles, reactor UASB (es)

Autores/as

The aim of this work was to evaluate the production of hydrogen in a conventional and hybrid Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors by modifying the hydraulic retention time (HRT). Both reactors operated continuously close to 135 days, with organic loading rate (OLR) of 11.26 kgCOD.m-3.d-1 at 12, 8 and 4 h. In the hybrid reactor, Biopack® rings with polyurethane foam at its center were used. The results showed that the UASB hybrid reactor achieved a stable and continuous production of over 60% of hydrogen gas at each HRT, related to carbon dioxide reduction until the end of the operation. The ANOVA and TUKEY tests, with a 95% reliability level, showed that there was a significant difference between the HRT evaluated, observing that the highest hydrogen production was obtained with 4 h of HRT. In the conventional UASB reactor, there was no stability during the operation time.
El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la producción de hidrógeno en un reactor anaerobio de manto de lodos y flujo ascendente (UASB) convencional y otro híbrido, modificando el tiempo de retención hidráulica (TRH). Los dos reactores operaron cerca de 135 días continuamente, con una carga orgánica volumétrica de 11.26 kgDQO.m-3.d-1 y valores TRH de 12, 8 y 4 h. En el reactor híbrido se utilizaron anillos de marca Biopack, adicionando espuma de poliuretano en su centro. Los resultados mostraron que la producción de hidrógeno en el reactor UASB híbrido fue estable y superior al 60% en cada uno de los TRH, relacionada con la reducción de dióxido de carbono hasta el final de la operación. Las pruebas de ANOVA y TUKEY mostraron que existen diferencias significativas entre los TRH evaluados, con un nivel de confiabilidad del 95%, observando que la mayor producción de hidrógeno fue obtenida con un TRH de 4 h. En el reactor UASB convencional no se detectó estabilidad en la producción de hidrógeno durante el tiempo de operación.

Citas

Peixoto, G., Saavedra, N.K., Varesche, M.B.A. and. Zaiat, M., Hydrogen production from soft-drink wastewater in an upflow anaerobic packed-bed reactor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(15), pp. 8953-8966, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.014.

Li, W.W. and Yu, H.Q., Biohydrogen production with high-rate bioreactors, 1st ed. Elsevier Inc., 2011. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385099-7.00025-5.

Kahyaoğlu, M., Şahin, Ö. and Saka, Ö., Biohydrogen production from waste substrates as a clean energy energy sources, Part A recover. Util. Environ. Eff., 34(12), pp. 1084-1103, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/15567031003753546.

Yu, H., Zhu, Z., Hu, W. and Zhang, H., Hydrogen production from rice winery wastewater in an upflow anaerobic reactor by using mixed anaerobic cultures, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27(11-12), pp. 1359-1365, 2002. DOI:10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00073-3.

Chang, C. and Feng-Yuan, L., Biohydrogen production using an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 29(1), pp. 33-39, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3199(03)00082-X.

Castelló, E, García y Santos, C., Iglesias, T, Paolino,W., Wenzel, W., Borzacconi, J.L. and Etchebehere, C., Feasibility of biohydrogen production from cheese whey using a UASB reactor: Links between microbial community and reactor performance, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(14), pp. 5674-5682, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.060.

Intanoo, P., Chaimongkol, P. and Chavadej, S., Hydrogen and methane production from cassava wastewater using two-stage upflow

anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) with an emphasis on maximum hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 41(14), pp. 6107-6114, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.1.125

Lew, B., Tarre, S., Belavski, M. and Green, M., UASB reactor for domestic wastewater treatment at low temperatures: A comparison between a classical UASB and hybrid UASB-filter reactor, Water Sci. Technol., 49(11-12), pp. 295-301, 2004.

Ramakrishnan, A. and Surampalli, R.Y., Comparative performance of UASB and anaerobic hybrid reactors for the treatment of complex phenolic wastewater, Bioresour. Technol., 123, pp. 352-359, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.072.

Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., Quan, X,, Jing, Y. and Dai, S., Rapid startup of a hybrid UASB-AFF reactor using bi-circulation, Chem. Eng. J., 155(1-2), pp. 266-271, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.08.005.

Gavala, H.N., Skiadas, I.V. and Ahring, B.K., Biological hydrogen production in suspended and attached growth anaerobic reactor systems, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31(9), pp. 1164-1175, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.09.009.

Guo, W.Q., Ren, N.Q., Chen, Z.B., Liu, B.F., Wang, X.J., Xiang, W.S. and Ding, J., Simultaneous biohydrogen production and starch wastewater treatment in an acidogenic expanded granular sludge bed reactor by mixed culture for long-term operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33(24), pp. 7397-7404, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.039.

Si, B., Liu, Z., Zhang,Y., Li, J., Shen, R., Zhu, Z. and Xing, X., Towards biohythane production from biomass: Influence of operational stage on anaerobic fermentation and microbial community, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 41(7), pp. 4429-4438, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.045.

Karadag, D., Köroʇlu, O.E., Ozkaya, B. and Cakmakci, M., A review on anaerobic biofilm reactors for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater, Process Biochem., 50(2), pp. 262-271, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.11.005.

Choi, W.-H., Shin,C.-H., Son,S-M., Ghorpade, P.A., Kim, J-J. and Park, J-Y., Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent using combined high-rate anaerobic reactors., Bioresour. Technol., 141, pp. 138-44, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.055.

Mendez, A., Torres, Y. and Chaparro, R.T., Effect of organic loading rate in hydrogen production with different support materials in anaerobic fixed-bed reactors., Rev. Ing. Investig. y Tecnol., XVIII(2), pp. 223-232, 2017.

Chen, W., Tseng, Z., Lee, K. and Chang, J., Fermentative hydrogen production with CGS5 isolated from anaerobic sewage sludge, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 30(10), pp. 1063-1070, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.09.008.

Fernandes, B.S, Saavedra, N.K., Maintinguer, S.I., Sette, L.D., Oliveira, V.M., Varesche, M.B. and Zaiat, M., The effect of biomass immobilization support material and bed porosity on hydrogen production in an upflow anaerobic packed-bed bioreactor., Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 170(6), pp. 1348-66, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-013-0262-7.

Fontes-Lima, D.M., Moreira, W.K. and Zaiat, M., Comparison of the use of sucrose and glucose as a substrate for hydrogen production in an upflow anaerobic fixed-bed reactor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38(35), pp. 15074-15083, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.003.

APHA, Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 21th ed. Washington, 2005.

Herbert, D., Phipps, P.J. and Strange, R.E., Chemical analysis of microbial cells, Chem. Anal. Microb. Cells, pp. 209-344, 1971. DOI: 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70641-X.

Kim, W., Shin, S.G., Lim, J. and Hwang, S., Effect of temperature and hydraulic retention time on volatile fatty acid production based on bacterial community structure in anaerobic acidogenesis using swine wastewater, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 36(6), pp. 791-798, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00449-013-0905-7.

Khan, M.A., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W.S., Liu, Y., Nghiem, L.D, Hai, F.I., Deng, L.J., Wang, J. and Wu, Y., Optimization of process parameters for production of volatile fatty acid, biohydrogen and methane from anaerobic digestion, Bioresour. Technol., 219, pp. 738-748, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.073.

Fezzani, B. and Cheikh, R.B., Two-phase anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastes in semi-continuous digesters at mesophilic temperature, Bioresour. Technol., 101(6), pp. 1628-1634, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.067.

Cysneiros, D., Banks, C.J., Heaven, S. and Karatzas, K.A.G.. The effect of pH control and ‘hydraulic flush’ on hydrolysis and Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA) production and profile in anaerobic leach bed reactors digesting a high solids content substrate, Bioresour. Technol., 123, pp. 263-271, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.060.

Intanoo, P., Rangsunvigit, P., Namprohm, W., Thamprajamchit, B., Chavadej, J. and Chavadej, S., Hydrogen production from alcohol wastewater by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor under thermophilic operation: Nitrogen and phosphorous uptakes and transformation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(15), pp. 11104-11112, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.129.

Wijekoon, K.C., Visvanathan, C. and Abeynayaka, A., Effect of organic loading rate on VFA production, organic matter removal and microbial activity of a two-stage thermophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor, Bioresour. Technol., 102(9), pp. 5353-5360, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.081.

Show, K.Y. and Tay, J.H., Influence of support media on biomass growth and retention in anaerobic filters, Water Res., 33(6), pp. 1471-1481, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00352-2.

Mu, Y., Wang, G. and Yu, H.Q., Response surface methodological analysis on biohydrogen production by enriched anaerobic cultures, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 38(7), pp. 905-913, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.08.016.

Chang, F. and Lin, C., Fermentative hydrogen production using granulated sewage sludge microflora, J. Environ. Eng.Manag., 17(1), pp. 57-62, 2007.

Yun, J.H. and Cho, K.S., Effect of hydraulic retention time on suppression of methanogens during a continuous biohydrogen production process using molasses wastewater, J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A, 0(0), pp. 1-8, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2016.1221221.

Nualsri, C., Reungsang, A. and Plangklang, P., Biochemical hydrogen and methane potential of sugarcane syrup using a two-stage anaerobic fermentation process, Ind. Crops Prod., 82, pp. 88-99, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.002.

Liu, Z., Lv, F., Zheng, H., Zhang, C., Wei, F. and Xing, X.H., Enhanced hydrogen production in a UASB reactor by retaining microbial consortium onto carbon nanotubes (CNTs), Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(14), pp. 10619-10626, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.057.

Mohammadi, P., Ibrahim, S. and Mohamad-Annuar, M.S., High-rate fermentative hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket-fixed film reactor, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 92(10), pp. 1811-1817, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.04.023.

Chang, J., Lee, K. and Lin, P., Biohydrogen production with fixed-bed bioreactors, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27, pp. 1167-1174, 2002.

Krishnan, S., Singh, L., Sakinah, M., Thakur, S., Wahid, Z.A. and Sohaili, J., Effect of organic loading rate on hydrogen (H2) and methane (CH4) production in two-stage fermentation under thermophilic conditions using palm oil mill effluent (POME), Energy Sustain. Dev., 34, pp. 130-138, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.002.