Publicado

2018-10-01

FDR ECH2O sensor performance in Spodosols

Desempeño de un sensor FDR ECH2O en Espodosuelos

Palabras clave:

EC-5, sandy soil, volumetric water content, sensor, capacitance. (en)
EC-5, suelo arenoso, contenido volumétrico de agua, sensor, capacitancia. (es)

Autores/as

Frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) is widely used to measure the soil water contents. However, the soil composition effects on FDR calibration has to be quantified to reduce the need for further calibration. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate the accuracy of EC-5 for measuring soil water content in sandy soils and (2) develop soil-specific sensor calibration curve. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were collected in a Sopossol profile (07º 37’ 30’’ S, 34º 57’ 30’’ W) representative of region sugarcane grown, in northeast of Brazil. Regression statistics analysis showed good accuracy and RMSE = 0.01 m3 m-3, while without specific calibration the RMSE = 0.06 m3 m-3. The EC-5 sensor should be subjected to field-specific calibration in sandy soils due to the low field capacity and water content during the growing season.

La Reflectometría en el dominio de frecuencia (FDR) es ampliamente utilizada para medir el contenido de agua en el suelo. Sin embargo los efectos de la composición del suelo en la calibración de FDR deben cuantificarse para reducir la necesidad de una calibración adicional. Los objetivos fueron (1) evaluar la precisión del sensor EC-5 para medir el contenido de agua del suelo en suelos arenosos y (2) desarrollar la curva de calibración del sensor específica del suelo. Se colectaron muestras de suelo disturbadas y no disturbadas en el perfil de suelo de Espodosuelo (07º 37’ 30’’ S, 34º 57’ 30’’ W) en um area representantiva de la región productora de caña de azúcar, en el Noreste de Brasil. Los resultados del análisis de regresión mostraron una buena precisión y la RMSE = 0.01 m3 m-3,mientras que sin calibración específica la RMSE = 0.06 m3 m-3. El sensor EC-5 debe someterse a calibración específica en suelos arenosos debido a la baja capacidad de campo y contenido de agua en el periodo de crecimiento.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Evans, R., Sneed, R.E. and Cassel, D.K., Irrigation scheduling to improve water and energy use efficiencies. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service [Online], AG 452–4, 1996. [date of reference: April 4th of 2018]. Available at: https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/irrigation-scheduling-to-improve-water-and-energy-use-efficiency

Evans, R., Sneed, R.E. and Hunt, J.H., Irrigation management strategies to improve water and energy-use efficiencies. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service [Online], AG 452-5, 1996. [date of reference: March 6th of 2018]. Available at: https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/irrigation-management-strategies-to-improve-water-and-energy-use-efficiencies

McMichael, B. and Lascano, R.J., Laboratory evaluation of a commercial dielectric soil water sensor. Vadose Zone Journal, 2(4), pp. 650-654, 2003. DOI: 10.2136/vzj2003.6500

Kinzli, K., Manana, N. and Oad, R., Comparison of laboratory and field calibration of a soil-moisture capacitance probe for various soils. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138(4), pp. 310-321, 2012. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000418.

Mittelbach, H., Lehner, I. and Seneviratne, S.I., Comparison of four soil moisture sensor types under field conditions in Switzerland. Journal of Hydrology, 430, pp. 39-49, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.041.

Kodešová, R., Kodeš, V. and Mraz, A., Comparison of two sensors ECH2O EC-5 and SM200 for measuring soil water content. Soil and Water Research, 6(2), pp. 102-110, 2011. DOI: 10.17221/6/2011-SWR

Johnson, A.I., Methods of measuring soil moisture in the field. Washington, United States Government Printing Office, 1962, 29 P.

Saito, T., Fujimaki, H. and Inoue, M., Calibration and simultaneous monitoring of soil water content and salinity with capacitance and four-electrode probes. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4(6), pp. 683-692, 2008. DOI: 10.3844/ajessp.2008.683.692

Cobos, D.R. and Chambers, C., Calibrating ECH2O soil moisture sensors application note. Pullman, Washington, Decagon Devices Inc., 2010, 7 P.

Jones, S.B., Blonquist, J.M., Robinson, D.A., Rasmussen, V.P. and Or, D., Standardizing characterization of electromagnetic water content sensors. Vadose Zone Journal, 4(4), pp. 1048-1058, 2005. DOI: 10.2136/vzj2004.0140

Decagon Devices Inc., EC-5 soil moisture sensor: Operator’s Manual. Pullman, Washington, Decagon Devices Inc., 2016, 22 P.

Spelman, D., Kinzli, K. and Kunberger, T., Calibration of the 10HS soil moisture sensor for Southwest Florida agricultural soils. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 139(12), pp. 965-971, 2013. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000647

Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation - EMBRAPA., Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 3ª ed., Brasília, Embrapa, 2013, 353 P.

Willmott, C.J., On the validation of models. Physical geography, 2(2), pp. 184-194, 1981. DOI: 10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213

Varble, J.L. and Chávez, J.L., Performance evaluation and calibration of soil water content and potential sensors for agricultural soils in eastern Colorado. Agricultural Water Management, 101(1), pp. 93-106, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.09.007

Richards, L.A., Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook No. 60 [Online], Washington, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 1954. [date of reference: March 27th of 2018]. Available at: https://www.ars.usda.gov/pacific-west-area/riverside-ca/us-salinity-laboratory/docs/handbook-no-60/