Support vector machines applied to fast determination of the geographical coordinates of earthquakes, The case of El Rosal seismological station, Bogotá Colombia
Máquinas de vectores de soporte aplicadas a la determinación rápida de coordenadas geográficas de terremotos Caso de la estación sismológica El Rosal, Bogotá Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n209.75444Palabras clave:
earthquake early warning, rapid response, earthquake geographic coordinates, latitude, longitude, seismic event, Bogotá Colombia, support vector machine (SVM), seismology (en)alerta temprana de terremoto, respuesta rápida, coordenadas geográficas, latitud, longitud, evento sísmico, Bogotá Colombia, máquina de vector de soporte (MVS), sismología (es)
Descargas
Abstract
The objective of this research was to determine seismic events latitude and longitude using support vector machines (SVMs) and seismic records from “El Rosal” station, which is located 40 kilometers northwest of Bogotá, Colombia. A total of 504 SVMs models were tested to determine latitude and 504 models for longitude, with various combinations of complexity factor and kernel function exponent, applied to earthquakes of 2, 2.5, 3 and 3.5 ML in time windows of 15 , 10 and 5 seconds. The best results showed errors of 40 kilometers for latitude and 30 kilometers for longitude, with respect to the place where the earthquakes were generated. These outcomes might be improved by applying additional descriptors during SVMs training stages, such descriptors can be related to Fourier frequency spectra, predominant period and wavelet transform coefficients.
Resumen
El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar la latitud y la longitud de eventos sísmicos utilizando algoritmos de máquinas de vectores de soporte (MVS) y registros sísmicos de la estación "El Rosal", ubicada a 40 kilómetros al noroeste de Bogotá. Un total de 504 modelos de MVS fueron probados para determinar la latitud y 504 modelos para la longitud, con varias combinaciones de factor de complejidad y exponente de la función kernel, aplicados a terremotos de 2, 2.5, 3 y 3.5 ML en ventanas de tiempo de 15, 10 y 5 segundos. Los mejores resultados mostraron errores de 40 kilómetros para la latitud y 30 kilómetros para la longitud, con respecto al lugar donde se generaron los terremotos. Estos resultados podrían mejorarse mediante la aplicación de descriptores adicionales durante las etapas de entrenamiento de las MVS, dichos descriptores pueden estar relacionados con los espectros de frecuencia de Fourier, el período predominante y los coeficientes de transformada de la ondícula.
Referencias
Ojeda, A., Martinez, S., Bermudez, M. & Atakan, K., 2002. The new accelerograph network for Santa Fe De Bogota, Colombia. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake engineering, October - December, 22(9-12), p. 791–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00100-8.
Odaka, T. et al., 2003. A new method for quickly estimating epicentral distance and magnitude from a single seismic record. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February, 93(1), pp. 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020008.
Anderson, J. G. & Chen, Q., 1995. Beginnings of earthquakes in the Mexican subduction zone on srong-motion accelerograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August, 85(4), pp. 1107-1115. https://doi.org//85/4/1107/102623.
Espinosa Aranda, J. M. et al., 1995. Mexico City seismic alert system. Seismol. Res. Lett., November, 66(6), pp. 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.66.6.42.
Wu, Y. M., Shin, T. C. & Tsai, Y. B., 1998. Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October, 88(5), pp. 1254-1259.
Wu, Y. M. & Teng, T. l., 2002. A virtual Sub-Network approach to earthquake early warning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June, 92(5), pp. 2008-2018.
Allen, R. M. & Kanamori, H., 2003. The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California. Science, May, Issue 300, pp. 685-848. DOI: 10.1126/science.1080912
Ochoa, L. H., Niño, L. F. & Vargas, C. A., 2014. Severity Classification of a Seismic Event based on the Magnitude-Distance Ratio Using Only One Seismological Station. Earth Sciences Research Journal, December, 18(2), pp. 115-122. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v18n2.41083.
Zhang, M., Tian, D., & Wen, L., 2014. A new method for earthquake depth determination: stacking multiple-station autocorrelograms. (A. Access, Ed.) Geophysical Journal International (197), 1107-1116. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu044.
Lin, K.-W., & Sanford, A., 2001. Improving Regional Earthquake Locations Using Modified G Matrix and Fussy Logic. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 82-93.
Sambrige, M., & Gallagher, K., 1993. Earthquake hypocenter locations using geneticalgorithms. Bulleting of the Seismological Society of America, 1467-1491. http://rses.anu.edu.au/~malcolm/papers/pdf/sg93.pdf
Magotra, N., Ahmed, N. & Chael, E., 1987. Seismic event detection and source location using single station (three components) data. Bulleting of the Seismological Society of America, June, 77(3), pp. 958-971.
Roberts, R. G., Christoffersson, A. & Cassidy, F., 1989. Real-time detection, phase identification and source location estimation using single station three component seismic data. Geophysical Journal, June, 97(3), pp. 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb00517.x
Saita, J. & Nakamura, Y., 2003. The early warning systems for mitigation of disasters caused by earthquakes and tsunamis. In: J. Zschau & A. Kuppers, eds. Early Warning Systems for Natural Disaster Reduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55903-7_58.
Talandier, J., Reymond, D. & Oka, E. A., 1987. Use of variable mantle magnitude for the rapid one-station estimation of teleseismic moments. Geophysical Research Letters, August, 14(8), pp. 840-843. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL014i008p00840.
Reymond, D., Hyvernaud, O. & Talandier, J., 1991. Automatic detection, location and quantification of earthquakes. Pure and Applied Geophysics, March, 135(3), pp. 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879470.
Reymond, D., Hyvernaud, O. & Talandier, J., 1991. Automatic detection, location and quantification of earthquakes. Pure and Applied Geophysics, March, 135(3), pp. 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879470.
Ochoa, L. H., Niño, L. F. & Vargas, C. A., 2017. Fast magnitude determination using a single seismological station record implementing machine learning techniques. Sciences Direct, Geodesy and Geodynamic, March, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.03.010.
Ochoa, L. H., Niño, L. F. & Vargas, C. A., 2018. Fast estimation of earthquake epicenter distance using a single seismological station with machine learning techniques. DYNA, 85 (204), pp. 161-168. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v85n204.68408.
Ochoa, L. H., Niño, L. F. & Vargas, C. A., 2018. Fast Determination of Earthquake Depth Using Seismic Records of a Single Station, Implementing Machine Learning Techniques. Ingeniería e Investigación, 38(2), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v38n2.68407.
Bermúdez, M. L. & Rengifo, F., 2002. EL ROSAL: La Estación Sismológica del CTBTO en Colombia. Bogotá, Primer Simposio Colombiano de Sismología, p. 8.
Wu, Y. M. & Zhao, L., 2006. Magnitude estimation using the first three seconds P-wave amplitude in earthquake early warning. Geophys. Res. Lett., August, 33(16), p. L16312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026871.
Wu, Y. M. & Kanamori, H., 2005. Rapid assessment of damage potential of earthquakes in Taiwan from beginning of P waves. Bulleting of the Seismological Society of America, February, 93(1), pp. 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040193.
Magotra, N., Ahmed, N. & Chael, E., 1989. Single-station seismic event detection and location. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, January, 27(1), pp. 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.20270.
Taylor, J. S. & Cristianini, N., 2004. Kernel Methods for Pattern Recognition. First ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
Hsiao, N., 2011. A new prototype system for earthquake early warning system in Taiwan. soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.008.
Chen, D.-Y., Hsiao, N.-C. & Wu, Y.-M., 2015. The Earthworm Based Earthquake Alarm Reporting System in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April, 105(2A), pp. 568-57.
Sheen, D.-H., 2015. A Robust Maximun-Likelihood Earthquake Location Method for Early Warning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(3), pp. 1301-1313. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140188.
Zhang, H. et al., 2016. An Earthquake Early Warning System in Fujian, China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(2), pp. 755-765. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150143.
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Michail Nikolaevich Brykov, Ivan Petryshynets, Catalin Iulian Pruncu, Vasily Georgievich Efremenko, Danil Yurievich Pimenov, Khaled Giasin, Serhii Anatolievich Sylenko, Szymon Wojciechowski. (2020). Machine Learning Modelling and Feature Engineering in Seismology Experiment. Sensors, 20(15), p.4228. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154228.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 DYNA

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.




