Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Fingerprint analysis of FTIR spectra of polymers containing vinyl acetate
Análisis en la huella dactilar de espectros FTIR de polímeros que contienen etileno
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n209.77513Palabras clave:
vibration, intensity, overlapping, crystallinity, linear chains. (en)vibración, intensidad, sobrelapadas, cristalinidad, cadenas lineales. (es)
Descargas
The analysis of materials using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has a unique area called the fingerprint region for each compound. However, this area is almost never discussed because of its complexity due to the large number of signals that appear in it. In this work, the fingerprint region analysis of the ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) with different percentages of vinyl acetate (VA) (18%, 28%, 40%) was performed. In comparison with other instrumental techniques, the crystallinity and structural arrangement of the EVA copolymers were determined simply and economically. The crystallinities for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40 were 24.39%, 6.95% and1.03%, respectively. In terms of structural ordering, the number of linear chains of EVA copolymer decreases as the concentration of VA increases, which favors the reduction of degrees of freedom and the formation of hydrogen bonds.
El análisis de los materiales por espectrometría infrarroja con transformada de Fourier (FTIR) poseen una zona llamada huella dactilar única para cada compuesto, sin embargo, esta zona casi nunca se discute por su complejidad debida al gran número de señales que en ella aparecen. En este trabajo se realizó el análisis de la huella dactilar del copolímero etileno-acetato de vinilo (EVA) con diferentes porcentajes de acetato de vinilo (VA) (18%, 28%, 40%). En comparación con otras técnicas instrumentales, la cristalinidad y el ordenamiento
estructural de los copolímeros de EVA fueron determinados de forma sencilla y económica. La cristalinidad para el EVA18, EVA28 y EVA40 fueron 24.39%, 6.95% y 1.03%, respectivamente. En cuanto al ordenamiento estructural, la cantidad de cadenas lineales del copolímero EVA disminuye conforme aumenta la concentración de vinil acetato (VA), lo cual favorece la disminución de los grados de libertad y la formación de puentes de hidrógeno.
Recibido: 26 de enero de 2019; Revisión recibida: 28 de marzo de 2019; Aceptado: 11 de abril de 2019
Abstract
The analysis of materials using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has a unique area called the fingerprint region for each compound. However, this area is almost never discussed because of its complexity due to the large number of signals that appear in it. In this work, the fingerprint region analysis of the ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) with different percentages of vinyl acetate (VA) (18%, 28%, 40%) was performed. In comparison with other instrumental techniques, the crystallinity and structural arrangement of the EVA copolymers were determined simply and economically. The crystallinities for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40 were 24.39%, 6.95% and 1.03%, respectively. In terms of structural ordering, the number of linear chains of EVA copolymer decreases as the concentration of VA increases, which favors the reduction of degrees of freedom and the formation of hydrogen bonds.
Keywords:
vibration, intensity, overlapping, crystallinity, linear chains.Resumen
El análisis de los materiales por espectrometría infrarroja con transformada de Fourier (FTIR) poseen una zona llamada huella dactilar única para cada compuesto, sin embargo, esta zona casi nunca se discute por su complejidad debida al gran número de señales que en ella aparecen. En este trabajo se realizó el análisis de la huella dactilar del copolímero etileno-acetato de vinilo (EVA) con diferentes porcentajes de acetato de vinilo (VA) (18%, 28%, 40%). En comparación con otras técnicas instrumentales, la cristalinidad y el ordenamiento estructural de los copolímeros de EVA fueron determinados de forma sencilla y económica. La cristalinidad para el EVA18, EVA28 y EVA40 fueron 24.39%, 6.95% y 1.03%, respectivamente. En cuanto al ordenamiento estructural, la cantidad de cadenas lineales del copolímero EVA disminuye conforme aumenta la concentración de vinil acetato (VA), lo cual favorece la disminución de los grados de libertad y la formación de puentes de hidrógeno.
Palabras clave:
vibración, intensidad, sobrelapadas, cristalinidad, cadenas lineales.1. Introduction
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a nondestructive chemical characterization technique that encompasses the wave number range of 12500 cm-1 to 10 cm-1 of the electromagnetic spectrum (Fig. 1). This spectral zone is divided into three regions: near-infrared (12500 cm-1 - 4000 cm-1), mid-infrared (4000 cm-1 - 200 cm-1) and far-infrared (200 cm-1 - 10 cm-1) [1-4]. This instrumental technique is based on the dipole moment (μ) and the molecular vibrational frequency. The first term is based on the polarity of a chemical bond (+δ - δ-) within a covalently linked molecule (e.g., +δH-Clδ-), if the value of μ is different from zero it is possible to absorb IR radiation. The second term is based on the frequency of the IR radiation (emitted by the IR spectrometer lamp), which must correspond to the molecular vibrational frequency of the chemical bond for which its vibration is possible. When these conditions are fulfilled, the molecular bond can experience different types of vibrations, which are grouped into two categories, stretching vibrations (changes in bond length) and bending (changes in the bond angle).
Figure 1: Electromagnetic spectrum and infrared radiation.
Within these two categories, vibration signals can appear in the range of 1200 cm-1 to 600 cm-1, which is called the “fingerprint region” of the chemical bond studied or a sample. In this region, the molecular vibrations are unique for each compound, therefore, this area is very important accurately to characterize chemical compounds [5-10]. It should be noted that the fingerprint region falls within the mid-infrared, which is also called fundamental infrared because organic molecules and most inorganic substances absorb IR in this region. The fingerprint region is very important to characterize structures such as polymers. Polymers are macromolecules formed by repetitive units called monomers which are covalently bonded. The crystallinity and structural order, two very important characteristics of a polymeric material to define its application, are generally determined using X-ray diffraction and nuclear magnetic resonance, respectively. It is known that operationally these two characterization techniques require a high consumption of electrical energy and expensive reagents to perform an analysis compared with an FTIR analysis. Therefore, this last instrumental technique becomes a very important tool to obtain information about the crystallinity and structural ordering of a polymeric material from the fingerprint region analysis of its IR spectrum. However, this area is almost never discussed because of its complexity due to the large number of signals that appear in it. In the literature, we find IR analysis for homopolymers such as rubber and poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) [11-12]. However, there are few studies related to the fingerprint region analysis of a copolymer such as ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) [13-14].
Currently, there are a wide variety of polymers with unique characteristics and properties, for example, polyethylene (PE) and poly (ethyl vinyl acetate) (EVA). EVA is a transparent and flexible plastic used mainly in the adhesives industry and as a drug-eluting device [15-17]. In Fig. 2, the chemical structure of EVA is presented.
Figure 2: Chemical structure of the EVA.
On the other hand, the chemical characterization of polymers by IR using their fingerprint region is very complex because in this area multiple signals appear and that is why it is used infrequently. However, the analysis of this region is very important to identify the environment of the monomers and determine the structural characteristics of the polymer. The difference between the EVA polymers is the concentration of the vinyl acetate (VA) group, their FTIR spectra according to the literature are very similar and difficult to assign what is what by this instrumental technique.
In this paper, the fingerprint regions of three FTIR spectra of EVA polymers were analyzed and their structural differences and crystallinities were determined.
2. Materials and methods
EVA was used with different percentages of VA (18%, 28%, 40%) from the company Dupont CoTM. The instrumental characterization was performed using a PerkinElmer FTIR model Spectrum 100 in a range of 4000-550 cm-1 with 16 scans at room temperature. The second derivative and area value of the curve of the vibration signals was obtained using the Origin 8.5 software. Each vibration signal has its own slopes, maxima or minima and concavity, therefore the application of the second derivative of an FTIR spectrum allows uncoupling of two or more overlapping vibration signals.
3. Results and discussion
Infrared spectra of the three EVA polymers are presented in Fig. 3. Qualitative analysis with the naked eye is possible to differentiate between the spectrum of EVA18 with respect to EVA28 and EVA40 by vibration signals of stretching at 3300 cm-1 and the bending vibrations at 1640 and 1560 cm-1 corresponding to the hydroxyl group (-OH), the conjugated carbonyl (-C=O) and the methylene group near the ester group (-CH2CO2-), respectively. These vibration frequencies are similar to those reported in the literature for these groups [18].
Figure 3: IR spectra of EVA 18, 28 and 40.
Although the VA monomer does not have -OH in its structure, there is a chemical interaction between the carbonyl group with a neighboring hydrogen atom to form hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4) and conjugated carbonyls, either with the methylene of the VA or of the ethylene monomer. The intensity of the vibration signal at 3300 cm-1 of the EVA18 is lower than with the other two polymers.
Figure 4: Hydrogen bonds in the EVA structure.
This was expected due to differences in VA group concentration between the three polymers. However, it is more difficult to differentiate between the IR spectra of the EVA40 and EVA28, although the VA concentration is higher in the first polymer. The presence of the signals at 1560 and 1640 cm-1 indicates that there is probably a chemical interaction between the chains of the EVA reducing the number of linear chains present in its structure, as well as its crystallinity. However, this information is verified from the analysis of the fingerprint region. In Fig. 5 the IR fingerprint regions of the three EVA polymers are presented.
Figure 5: Fingerprint of the three EVA polymers.
The vibration signal at 607 cm-1 corresponds mainly to the deformation vibration of the methylene groups (-CH2-) of the EVA monomer. From the IR spectra, it is observed that this signal increases its intensity when the concentration of VA increases, this is EVA18 ˂ EVA28˂ EVA40. The area under the curve of this vibration signal for each of the spectra verifies this visual appreciation (Fig. 6).
Figure 6: Area of the vibration signals at 607 cm-1 for the three EVA polymers.
Obtaining an area of 78.2, 122.7 and 125.6 u2 for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40, respectively. The vibration signal at 720 cm-1 corresponds mainly to in-plane bending or rocking of the methylenes (-CH2-) of the ethylene monomer and as expected, the intensity of this signal decreases in the order EVA18 ˃ EVA28 ˃ EVA40 (Fig. 7).
Figure 7: Area of the vibration signals at 720 cm-1 for the three EVA polymers.
The area under the curve of this signal verifies this trend: 295.6, 238 and 239 u2, for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40, respectively. Although practically, the EVA28 and EVA40 have the same value. The EVA18 presents a vibration signal at 730 cm-1, which has the shape of “a small shoulder” on the vibration signal at 720 cm-1. This small shoulder indicates that a part of the PE chains has a linear conformation. This signal is overlaid in the EVA28 and EVA40 spectra, but in the second derivative of these spectra, it is clearer to observe the signal, Fig. 8. The second derivative allows uncoupling of two or more vibration signals that are overlapping. In addition, from this second derivative, it is easier to differentiate between the EVA28 and EVA40 spectra. The relationship between the areas under the signal curve at 730 cm-1 allowed finding that there is a decrease of 85% in the linear conformation in EVA28 and 97% in EVA40, both with respect to the EVA18. This decrease is related to the crystallinity of the three polymers due to the linear conformation of the chains favoring the crystalline zones of the EVA.
Figure 8: Second derivative of the vibration signal at 730 cm-1 of the three EVA polymers.
Therefore, a lower crystallinity is expected in the EVA40 with respect to the other two polymers. An approximation of the value of the crystallinity could be obtained from Eq. 1 proposed by the authors of this work.
where AV is the area under the curve of the vibration signal at 730 cm-1 and AC is the area under the curve of the vibration signal at 720 cm-1, producing a crystallinity value of 24.39%, 6.95% and 1.03% for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40, respectively.
These results of crystallinity agree with those reported in the literature for EVA, which has a crystallinity percentage interval of 0-40% [19]. It should be mentioned that the increase in the crystallinity of the EVA polymer is a function of the content of the monomeric ethylene unit, so if the monomeric unit content of VA in the EVA polymer tends to zero, the crystallinity content would increase to more than 40% but would not reach a value of 100% because theoretically there is no totally crystalline polymer because the spatial conformation of the polymer chains during its synthesis is not uniform. Therefore, the analysis of the fingerprint region allows qualitatively to determine the presence of crystalline areas and make an estimate of this. There are other instrumental techniques that allow the determination of crystallinity quantitatively, such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), but it is a more expensive methodology [20].
In addition, the analysis of the fingerprint region allows a qualitative estimation of the linear structure of the polymer and by the XRD technique, it is complex to determine it. On the other hand, the vibration signal at 960 cm-1 corresponds to the skeletal movement of the methylene groups (-CH2-)n and it is observed that there is a similarity in the three EVA spectra (Fig. 5). The second derivative of this signal shows that there are significant differences between the EVA18 with respect to the other two polymers, Fig. 9.
Figure 9: Second derivative of the vibration signal at 960 cm-1 of the three EVA polymers.
This difference in the number of peaks and their intensity is due to the greater freedom of movement of the methylene groups that the EVA18 has with respect to the other two polymers. This vibrational movement is similar to a dance floor where the dancers are the methylene groups. The VA group decreases this movement, that is, it reduces the degrees of freedom of the polymer chain when its concentration in the polymer increases. On the other hand, the vibration signal at 1020 cm-1 corresponds to the H-C-O bond bending of the VA monomer. The EVA40 has a higher concentration of H-C-O, therefore, the intensity of its signal is greater with respect to the other two polymers as shown in Fig. 10.
Figure 10: Area under the curve of the vibration signal at 1020 cm-1 of the three EVA polymers.
The area under the curve of this vibration signal is 437, 641 and 659 u2 for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40, respectively. The vibration signal at 1120 cm-1 also corresponds to the H-C-O bond bending of the VA group (Fig. 5).
This signal is very similar in the three polymers; however, in the second derivative, we observed significant differences due to the increase in VA concentration (Fig. 11). In this vibration signal, all the interactions of the -C-O bond with respect to all neighboring atoms are observed. This signal is like a dance floor where the dancers are the group -C-O, the larger the more amorphous the EVA polymer. Therefore, this movement is a function of the concentration of the VA group.
Figure 11: Second derivative of the vibration signal at 1120 cm-1 of the three EVA polymers.
Other signals that appear in the three IR spectra of the EVA polymers (Fig. 1) are at 2920 cm-1, 2850 cm-1, 1736 cm-1, 1465 cm-1, 1371 cm-1 and 1237 cm-1, which correspond to the stretching vibration (asymmetric) of the CH2, the stretching vibration (symmetric) of the CH, the stretching vibration of the carbonyl group (C=O) of saturated ester, the vibration of in-plane bending or scissoring-bending of the methylene (-CH2-), the rocking out-of-plane vibration of CH of the methyl group and to the in-plane rocking vibration signal of the -CH2- group. These vibration signals are similar to those reported in the literature for these groups or chemical bonds [21]. All these results indicate that the flexural vibrations are more intense when the polymer is more amorphous because there is less steric impediment for the bending vibrations, and vice versa, the more crystalline the polymer, the less intense the vibration bending signals are.
4. Conclusions
The fingerprint region is unique for each compound and provides very important information to differentiate polymers that are composed of the same repetitive units. From the analysis of the fingerprint region of the infrared spectrum of the EVA polymer, it is possible to obtain information about its crystallinity and structural arrangement, obtaining crystallinity values of 24.39%, 6.95% and 1.03% for EVA18, EVA28 and EVA40, respectively. The number of linear chains of the EVA copolymer increases as the VA concentration decreases. The VA decreases the degrees of freedom of the ethylene monomer and favors the formation of hydrogen bonds. This analysis of the EVA fingerprint region can be applied to other polymers.
References
Referencias
Fuentes-Navarta, M., Bosch-Ojeda, C. and Sánchez-Rojas, F.,
Application of medium infrared spectroscopy in process analytical
chemistry, Bol. Soc. Quím. Méx., 2(3), pp. 93-103, 2008.
Barraza-Garza, G., De la Rosa, L., Martínez-Martínez, A., Castillo-Michel, H., Cotte, M. and Alvarez-Parrilla, E., Infrared
microspectroscopy with Fourier transform (FTIRM) in the study of
biological systems, Rev. Latinoam. Quím., 41(3), pp. 125-148, 2013.
Aparicio-Marenco, D., Ariza-Daza, J., Calvo-Trujillo, M., Daza-
Cuello, J. and Echávez-Plata, E., Infrared spectroscopy: an alternative technique for the identification of microorganisms, Ciencia y Salud,4(1), pp. 123-131, 2012
Ashraf, A.I., Frederick, R.V., and Jacqueline, S., Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy: principles and applications, in: Paré, J.R.J. and Bélanger, J.M.R., Techniques and Instrumentation in Analytical
Chemistry, Elsevier, 1997, pp. 93-139. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-
(97)80013-3
Skoog, D., Principles of instrumental analysis. México: Cengage
Learning Editores, 2007.
Pavia, D.L., Lampman, G.M., Kriz, G.S. and Vyvyan, J.A.,
Introduction to spectroscopy. Thomson Learning, Inc., USA, 2001.
Silverstein, R.M., Francis, X., Kiemle, D.J. and Bryce, D.L.,
Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 2012.
Barrow, G., Introduction to molecular spectroscopy. McGraw-Hill,New York, 1962.
Drago, R.S., Physical methods in chemistry. Philadelphia: Saunders,1977.
Siegfried, W. and Reinhard H.H.N., Pharmaceutical applications of Mid-IR and Raman spectroscopy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 57(8), pp.1144-1170, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.01.022
Chalmers, J.M., Infrared spectroscopy in analysis of polymers and rubbers, in: Meyers, R.A. and Provder, T., Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, Wiley, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/9780470027318.a2015
Florian, H., Govyadinov, A., Amarie, S., Nuansing, W., Keilmann, F. and Hillenbrand, R., Nano-FTIR absorption spectroscopy of molecular fingerprints at 20 nm spatial resolution, Nano Letters, 12(8), pp. 3973-3978, 2012. DOI: 10.1021/nl301159v
Bellamy, M.K., Using FTIR-ATR spectroscopy to teach the internal standard method, J. Chem. Educ., 87(12), pp. 1399-1401, 2010. DOI:10.1021/ed100544m.
Xiangdao, H., Songtao, L., Zheng, C. and Feipeng, X., Applications of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy technologies on asphalt materials, Measurement, 121, pp. 304-316, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.001.
Seymour, R., Carraher, C.E. and Aereal-Guerra, R., Introduction to the chemistry of polymers. Reverté Ed., USA, 2002.
Pramanik, N., Mohapatra, S., Bhargava, P. and Pramanik, P., Chemical synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite (HAp)-poly (ethylene co vinyl alcohol) (EVA) nanocomposite using a phosphonic acid coupling agent for orthopedic applications, Mater. Sci. Eng., 29(1),228-236, 2009.
Qeiroz, A.A., Abraham, G.A. and Zazuco-Higa, O., Controlled release of 5-fluorouridine from radiation-crosslinked poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) films, Acta Biomaterialia, 2(6), pp. 641-650, 2006.
Pandomos, E. and Martín-Madero, M.C., Problems of organic
structural determination by spectroscopy IR. España, 1979.
Almanza-Montero, O.A., Foamed polymers based on polyethylene and
ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer: general and cellular structure,
Momento, 23, pp. 1-20, 2001. DOI: 10.15446/mo
González-Cantellano, M.A. and Montaño-Zetina, L.M., Spectroscopy and its technology: a historical review and its importance for the 21st century, Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ.,9(6), pp. 1-14, 2015.
Silverstein, R.M., Francis X.W. and Kiemle, D.J., Spectrometric
identification of organic compounds. Seventh Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2005.
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Barbara Mikolaszek, Marzena Jamrógiewicz, Krystyna Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska, Małgorzata Sznitowska. (2022). Microscopic and Spectroscopic Imaging and Thermal Analysis of Acrylates, Silicones and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients in Adhesive Transdermal Patches. Polymers, 14(14), p.2888. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142888.
2. Raíssa T. R. Carvalho, Allan da Silva Santos, Anny Marry Teixeira Marques, Luiz C. M. Palermo, Claudia R. E. Mansur. (2024). Experimental Design to Optimize the Extraction and Properties of an Alternative Gum from Crotalaria Juncea Seeds. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 32(4), p.1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-023-03068-6.
3. Kamil Kwieciński, Marta Chrószcz-Porębska, Izabela Barszczewska-Rybarek, Jarosław Żmudzki, Anna Mertas, Sebastian Jurczyk, Paweł Popielski, Grzegorz Chladek. (2025). Effect of Antimicrobial Filler on Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA) Composites Property. Materials, 18(21), p.4993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18214993.
4. Ahmed M.A. El-Seidy, Marwan A. Elbaset, Fatma A.A. Ibrahim, Sherif A. Abdelmottaleb Moussa, Samir AE Bashandy. (2023). Nano cerium oxide and cerium/zinc nanocomposites characterization and therapeutic role in combating obesity via controlling oxidative stress and insulin resistance in rat model. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 80, p.127312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127312.
5. G. Trifeldaite-Baranauskiene, E. Stankute, A. Aniskevich, D. Zeleniakiene, K. Zukiene. (2024). Preparation and Characterisation of Composites from Industrial Waste: Wood Flour and Expanded Ethylene Vinyl Acetate. Mechanics of Composite Materials, 60(3), p.433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-024-10201-6.
6. Raíssa Carvalho, Carolina Pedrosa, Alyce Leal, Luiz Palermo, Claudia Mansur. (2021). Extraction, characterization and rheological behavior of galactomannans in high salinity and temperature conditions. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, 26(7), p.573. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2021.1930748.
7. Zsolt I. Németh, Rita Rákosa. (2023). Congruence Concept for Comparison of Spectra. Applied Spectroscopy, 77(4), p.350. https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028231152497.
8. Yan Ding, Mengxin Zhang, Zhiyu Zhou, Jing Jiao, Wei Huang, Hongyun Hu. (2025). Pyrolysis behavior of multi-component photovoltaic modules waste: A coupled STA-FTIR-MCC and modeling approach. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 192, p.107292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107292.
9. Md. Saddam Sheikh, A. H. Bhuiyan, Mohammad Jellur Rahman. (2023). Direct current conduction mechanism in the methyl acrylate–vinyl acetate composite thin films. Scientific Reports, 13(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44413-y.
10. Laiming Yu, Wentong Yang, Kai Chen, Minghui Bao, Yani Liu, Qixin Yang, Ning Xu, Tiancheng Qu. (2026). Shape memory polymer-integrated composite foam for dynamically tunable microwave absorption. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 1075, p.189231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2026.189231.
11. Victor de Carvalho Rodrigues, Iara Zanella Guterres, Beatriz Pereira Savi, Izabella Thaís Silva, Gislaine Fongaro, Gean Vitor Salmoria. (2022). 3D-Printed EVA Devices for Antiviral Delivery and Herpes Virus Control in Genital Infection. Viruses, 14(11), p.2501. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112501.
12. Anna Król-Górniak, Viorica Railean, Paweł Pomastowski, Tomasz Płociński, Michał Gloc, Renata Dobrucka, Krzysztof Jan Kurzydłowski, Bogusław Buszewski. (2023). Comprehensive study upon physicochemical properties of bio-ZnO NCs. Scientific Reports, 13(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27564-w.
13. F. Abd-El-Raoof, A.A. Hegazy, M.A. Rashwan, W.S. Mohamed, A. Tawfik. (2022). Dual-functional polymer-modified magnesium oxychloride cement pastes: Physico-mechanical, phase, and microstructure characterizations. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, p.104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104898.
14. Kitae Park, Jamilur R. Ansari, Jongchul Seo. (2026). Upcycling polypropylene waste to synthesize nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots: Effects of O2 atmosphere and UV treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 14(5), p.123796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2026.123796.
15. Farida A. Ali, Binita Nanda, Laxmidhar Sahoo, Priyabrata Pattanaik, P. Ganga Raju Achary. (2022). Bend sensor based on conducting polymer for the detection of human physiology. Materials Today: Proceedings, 67, p.1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.166.
16. Youngmin Moon, Heesu Kim, Minh Hai Nguyen, Chi Keung Song, Woo‐jin Song, Sangbaek Park. (2025). Harnessing Native Li2CO3 Layers on Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) for High‐Performance Tri‐Layer Composite Electrolytes in Semi‐Solid‐State Batteries. Small, 21(50) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202509544.
17. Wenzheng Zhu, Beining Zhang, Zhao Zhao, Xue Huai, Jiacheng Miao, Jun Liu, Xiaoyan Zhou. (2026). Fabrication and characterization of anthocyanin/ε-polylysine composite films and their application for freshness preservation of simmered Chinese pork meatballs. LWT, 253, p.119613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2026.119613.
18. Akram Fadhl Al-mahmodi, Yamuna Munusamy, Mahmood Riyadh Atta, Mathialagan Muniyadi, Sim Siong Leong. (2024). Optimization of synthesis parameters for polyamide 610: Strategic tailoring for superior latent heat performance. Surfaces and Interfaces, 51, p.104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104692.
19. Sinem Tunçer Çağlayan. (2025). Biopolymer-based oral films integrated with probiotic active compounds for improved health applications. Archives of Microbiology, 207(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-04207-w.
20. G. Vajitha, Kritika Jashrapuria, T. Pushparaj Gandhi, P. Lipika, Swatantra P. Singh, Shihabudheen M. Maliyekkal. (2025). Scalable and cost-effective ultra-dispersible graphene oxide blended ultrafiltration mixed matrix membrane: Assessment of mechanical, water flux, and anti-biofouling properties. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 194, p.35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.11.108.
21. Swayam Aryam Behera, Sugato Hajra, Swati Panda, Alok Kumar Sahu, Perumal Alagarsamy, Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Hoe Joon Kim, P. Ganga Raju Achary. (2024). Synergistic energy harvesting and humidity sensing with single electrode triboelectric nanogenerator. Ceramics International, 50(19), p.37193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.110.
22. Yahya Kaya, Petek Balcı, Süleyman Özen, Ali Mardani, Ali Kara. (2025). Activation of Polypropylene (PP) Fiber Surface with 1-Vinyl-1,2,4-triazole and Vinyl Acetate: Synthesis, Characterization, and Application in Cementitious Systems. Materials, 18(5), p.1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051071.
23. Dmitriy A. Bazhanov, Uliana V. Nikulova, Ramil R. Khasbiullin, Nikita Yu. Budylin, Elizaveta V. Ermakova, Aleksey V. Shapagin. (2025). Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymer as a Polyfunctional Modifier for Low-Viscosity Photosensitive Compositions. Polymers, 17(20), p.2787. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17202787.
24. MONA F. ALI, HALA A. M. AFIFI, AML M. LOTFY. (2021). ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON A FIRED STUCCO WINDOW IN THE ISLAMIC ART MUSEUM STORE OF CAIRO, EGYPT. Journal of Science and Arts, 21(3), p.789. https://doi.org/10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-21.3-b01.
25. Itamar Kaffman, Roy Posmanik. (2026). Decoupling salinity and carbon function during hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobic digestate. Waste Management, 223, p.115714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115714.
26. Brenda Arias Cárdenas, Ana Maria Lacasta, Laia Haurie, Antonia Navarro. (2025). Bio-Based Building Materials - Proceedings of ICBBM 2025. RILEM Bookseries. 61, p.347. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92874-1_28.
27. Swayam Aryam Behera, Hang-Gyeom Kim, Il Ryu Jang, Sugato Hajra, Swati Panda, Naratip Vittayakorn, Hoe Joon Kim, P. Ganga Raju Achary. (2024). Triboelectric nanogenerator for self-powered traffic monitoring. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 303, p.117277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2024.117277.
28. Victor V. Kislyuk, Vladyslav M. Shyvaniuk, Volodymyr V. Trachevskij, Svitlana M. Ostapyuk, Yuriy A. Polushkin, Sergiy O. Kotrechko. (2022). Mechanical properties of the encapsulant material for photovoltaics. Journal of Materials Science, 57(45), p.21117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07900-7.
29. Songita Sonowal, Ram Prasad. (2024). Exploring the effect of tea dust magnetic biochar on agricultural crops grown in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Green Processing and Synthesis, 13(1) https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2024-0109.
30. Alejandro Restrepo Carmona, Henry A. Colorado Lopera. (2022). A new composite made from Luffa Cylindrica and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA): Mechanical and structural characterization for its use as Mouthguard (MG). Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 126, p.105064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105064.
31. Bastien Vassort, Vendula Prázná, Anna Nguyen, Bhavana Kapalli, Noah Whitney, Ruben Mevius, Veronique Hehl, Dunya Handor, Nikita Shah, Kate Seymour, Giuditta Perversi. (2022). The Future of Heritage Science and Technologies. Advanced Structured Materials. 179, p.119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15676-2_9.
32. Kitae Park, Jamilur R. Ansari, Jongchul Seo. (2025). Synthesis of white carbon quantum dots for the upcycling of highly durable olefin plastics. Materials Today Nano, 31, p.100670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2025.100670.
33. Gabrielly Cristina Galvão Xavier, Fernando Carlos de Sousa, Marcelo Luis Kuhn Marchioro, Robert F. H. Dekker, Mário Antônio Alves da Cunha. (2026). Plastination of biological materials using a vinyl-based polymer as an alternative method for preserving anatomical specimens. Scientific Reports, 16(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49665-y.
34. Folayemi J. Isaac-Bamgboye. (2026). Citrus Fruit Processing By-Products. Methods and Protocols in Food Science. , p.117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-5088-2_11.
35. Thattantavide Anju, Golla Nagaraju Gari Saritha, Nirala Ramchiary, Ajay Kumar. (2024). Assessing the impact of different cooking methods on nutrients, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of traditional food plants. Food Chemistry Advances, 4, p.100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100677.
36. Joseph M. Slocik, Patrick B. Dennis, Zhifeng Kuang, Anthony Pelton, Rajesh R. Naik. (2021). Creation of stable water-free antibody based protein liquids. Communications Materials, 2(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-021-00222-2.
37. Tilottoma Kargupta, N Pooja, Md. Hafizur Rahman, Inesh Vij, Rajib Biswas, Sanchita Roy, Nirmal Mazumder. (2025). An insight into thermal, chemical, and structural characterization of biopolymers. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07549-2.
38. G. Trifeldaite-Baranauskiene, E. Stankute, A. Aniskevich, D. Zeleniakiene, K. Zukiene. (2024). Preparation and Characterisation of Composites from Industrial Waste: Wood Flour and Expanded Ethylene Vinyl Acetate. Mechanics of Composite Materials, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-024-10202-5.
39. A K M Mashud Alam, Chunhui Xiang. (2025). Development of a Colorimetric Polydiacetylene Nanocomposite Fiber Sensor for Selective Detection of Organophosphate Pesticides. ACS Omega, 10(12), p.12346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c11365.
40. Jorge González-Morales, Jadra Mosa, Mario Aparicio. (2026). Bifunctional platinum group metal-free iron–manganese catalyst for long-term rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio, 65(2), p.100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2026.100489.
41. Valentina Antonaci, Gaia de Marzo, Laura Blasi, Virgilio Brunetti, Enrico Binetti, Luca Fachechi, Sergio Marras, Antonio Qualtieri, Francesco Rizzi, Massimo De Vittorio. (2026). Biodegradable chitosan-cellulose and sub-spherical nanocrystals composite piezoelectric thin film. npj Flexible Electronics, 10(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-026-00550-8.
42. Fatemeh Nejabati, Homeira Ebrahimzadeh. (2023). Electrospun nanofibers for extraction of thymoquinone from Nigella-Stevia prior to detection using electrochemical biosensor based on GCE/rGO/CuO. Microchemical Journal, 189, p.108545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.108545.
43. Nathan G. Brady, Shamus L. O'Leary, Garrett C. Moormann, Manish K. Singh, John Watt, George D. Bachand. (2023). Mycosynthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Exhibits Fungal Species Dependent Morphological Preference. Small, 19(15) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205799.
44. O.N. Madimutsa, L. Macheka, F. Matiza Ruzengwe, J. Mubaiwa, F.A. Manditsera. (2023). Effects of seasonal variation and geographical location on the nutritional composition of mopane worm (Gonimbrasia belina). Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 9(10), p.1297. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2022.0157.
45. Sebastian Bruckschlögl, Chaojie Cheng, Peter Thissen, Benjamin Busch, Christoph Hilgers, Frank Dehn. (2026). Hydrogen reactivity with wellbore and polymer-modified cements: experimental insights for safe underground hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 210, p.153578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153578.
46. Sayani Das, Tanuja Singh, Manishita Nandi, Pranab Ghosh, Susanta Sinha Roy. (2026). A systematic investigation on tribological characteristics of lubricant additives developed from liquid crystals blended in biodegradable oils co-polymerized with octyl acrylate. RSC Advances, 16(37), p.40623. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA09054G.
47. Chandra Prakash Gocher, Nancy Pandita, Rudra Prosad Choudhury, Vishnupriya Bhakthavatsalam. (2022). Understanding microstructural heterogeneity in low and high molecular weight fractions of polydisperse polyisobutylene by SEC and NMR for its reactivity. Journal of Polymer Research, 29(11) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-022-03289-8.
48. Stefano Radice, Domenico Ferrari, Stefano Millefanti, Marco Gregori. (2025). PVDC multilayer sorting challenge: A spectroscopy study and on field application. Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment, 9, p.100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scenv.2024.100188.
49. Bipindra Pandey, Shankar Thapa, Mahalakshmi Suresha Biradar, Bhoopendra Singh, Jaya Bahadur Ghale, Pramod Kharel, Prabhat Kumar Jha, Ram Kishor Yadav, Sujan Dawadi, Poojashree V., Ghulam Mustafa. (2024). LC-MS profiling and cytotoxic activity of Angiopteris helferiana against HepG2 cell line: Molecular insight to investigate anticancer agent. PLOS ONE, 19(12), p.e0309797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309797.
50. Md Saddam Sheikh, Md Juel Sarder, A.H. Bhuiyan, Mohammad Jellur Rahman. (2023). Structural and optical behaviours of methyl acrylate-vinyl acetate composite thin films synthesized under dynamic low-pressure plasma. Heliyon, 9(8), p.e18524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18524.
51. Abdelkarim Chaouiki, Maryam Chafiq, Young Gun Ko. (2023). Nature-inspired architecture combining organic–inorganic frameworks: Unique structure and active sites toward a stable anti-corrosion coating. Applied Materials Today, 32, p.101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2023.101852.
52. Basman Shareef, Huda Ibrahim Al Qadhi , Shayma'a Jamal Ahmed, Mohammed Amran, Zaid Osama Ibrahim. (2023). Implementation of Eruca sativa Extract for the Preparation of Nano-Selenium Particles. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ), 5, p.26. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v5i.141.
53. Tauana Batistella, Maria Johann Fensterseifer, Loise Silveira da Silva, Gustavo Ferrari, Gean Vitor Salmoria. (2026). Investigation on 3D printing and injection molding of intrauterine devices with antimicrobial and anticancer activity. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 143(7-8), p.4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-17733-2.
54. Krzysztof Przybył, Krzysztof Koszela, Franciszek Adamski, Katarzyna Samborska, Katarzyna Walkowiak, Mariusz Polarczyk. (2021). Deep and Machine Learning Using SEM, FTIR, and Texture Analysis to Detect Polysaccharide in Raspberry Powders. Sensors, 21(17), p.5823. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175823.
55. Juwairiya Tanveer, Debmalya Banerjee, Baishali Dey, Deblu Sahu, J. Sivaraman, Maciej Jarzebski, Floirendo Flores, Doman Kim, Hayeong Kim, P. Balasubramanian, Kunal Pal. (2025). Selected materials techniques for evaluation of attributes of sourdough bread with Kombucha SCOBY. REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE, 64(1) https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2025-0133.
56. V. A. Poluektova, N. I. Cherkashina, E. P. Kozhanova, D. S. Matveenko. (2023). Innovations and Technologies in Construction. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 307, p.134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20459-3_17.
57. Sai Teja Lanka, Niclas Galih Anak Moses, Raja Rajeswary Suppiah, Belladonna Troxylon Maulianda. (2022). Physio-chemical interaction of Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate copolymer on bonding ability in the cementing material used for oil and gas well. Petroleum Research, 7(3), p.341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.10.003.
58. Nada Hussien Ielewi, Faiza M. Abdul-Ameer. (2025). The Effect of Adding Bioactive Glass Infused with Strontium on the Surface Hardness and Surface Roughness Properties of a Heat-Cured Acrylic-Based Soft Liner. Prosthesis, 7(4), p.69. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7040069.
59. Fanny Traon, Yves Grohens, Yves-Marie Corre. (2022). Entanglement density, macromolecular orientation, and their effect on elastic strain recovery of polyolefin films. Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting, 38(2), p.306. https://doi.org/10.1177/87560879211058768.
60. Tendani Mphaga, T. N. Mhlongo, Sithembele Zikalala, James Topkin. (2023). Identification and quantification of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants by spectroscopic and microscopic techniques in Johannesburg East, South Africa. Water Practice & Technology, 18(12), p.3124. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2023.215.
61. R. Perez-Gonzalez, E. Araujo, W. Ge, S. Cherepanov, A. Zakhidov, V. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, A. Encinas, J. Oliva. (2020). Carbon nanotube anodes decorated with Ag NWs/Ni(OH)2 NWs for efficient semitransparent flexible solid state supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta, 354, p.136684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136684.
62. Kitae Park, Kambiz Sadeghi, Pradeep Kumar Panda, Jongwon Seo, Jongchul Seo. (2022). Ethylene vinyl acetate/low-density polyethylene/oyster shell powder composite films: Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial properties for biomedical applications. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 134, p.104301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104301.
63. D. H. Cuate-Gomez, J. M. Lugo, L. Treviño-Yarce, R. D. Maldonado, A. Garzón-Román. (2024). Optical and morphological characterization of erbium phthalocyanine thin films on unpolished/polished substrates for enhanced solar water heating efficiency. Emergent Materials, 7(5), p.2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-023-00615-8.
64. Victor Kislyuk, Vladyslav Shyvaniuk, Sergiy Kotrechko. (2025). Creep lifetime of ethylene vinyl acetate co-polymer film after pre-load relaxation. Polymer Bulletin, 82(5), p.1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-024-05567-5.
65. Eduard-Marius Lungulescu, Radu Setnescu, Sorin Ilie, Mauro Taborelli. (2022). On the Use of Oxidation Induction Time as a Kinetic Parameter for Condition Monitoring and Lifetime Evaluation under Ionizing Radiation Environments. Polymers, 14(12), p.2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122357.
66. Giulia Tamburini, Stefano Bertagnoli, Giulia Tarricone, Sergio Piva, Adele Sassella, Roberto Lorenzi, Alberto Paleari. (2023). Early stages of X-ray induced molecular unit modifications in poly(lactic acid). Polymer Degradation and Stability, 216, p.110485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2023.110485.
67. Zhang Ru Bong, Rohan Mahendra Shah, Xavier Wezen Chee, Siaw San Hwang, Irine Runnie Henry Ginjom. (2024). Simple and Rapid Characterization of Sarawak Stingless Bee Honey Using Melissopalynological and ATR-FTIR Analysis. Food Analytical Methods, 17(5), p.773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-024-02608-7.
68. Gustavo Ferrari, Loise Silveira da Silva, Tauana Batistella, Sophia Mannes, João Pedro Vaz Silveira, Caio Prange Piva, Luiz Alberto Kanis, Gean Vitor Salmoria. (2025). 3D printing of intrauterine device loaded with silver sulfadiazine to the treatment of fungal diseases. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 137(1-2), p.105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15127-4.
69. Madeleine Ewing, Anne Carter, Gillian Osmond. (2021). Conservation of a Termite-Damaged Acrylic Painting: Treatment Solutions for Gordon Bennett’s Number three (2004). AICCM Bulletin, 42(2), p.118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10344233.2022.2104548.
70. Fatemeh Nejabati, Shima Amini, Homeira Ebrahimzadeh. (2023). Electrospun PVC/EVA/CS/Str nanofibers: an efficient sorbent for extraction of trace level of Atrazine and Ametryn in food samples. Chemical Papers, 77(11), p.6991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-023-02991-1.
71. Renu Garhwal, Anuradha Bhardwaj, Harish Kumar, Karnam Sangwan, Ankur Kumari, Bhavya, Manjjri Singal, Varij Nayan, Yash Pal, Tarun Kumar Bhattacharya, B. N. Tripathi. (2025). Biochemical, dielectric and surface characteristics of freeze-dried donkey milk powder. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 36(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2024.2442358.
72. Francesca Ambroselli, Fabiana Canini, Luca Lanteri, Martina Marconi, Claudia Mazzuca, Claudia Pelosi, Vittorio Vinciguerra, Elizabeth Wicks, Laura Zucconi. (2023). A Hydroalcoholic Gel-Based Disinfection System for Deteriogenic Fungi on the Contemporary Mixed Media Artwork Poesia by Alessandro Kokocinski. Heritage, 6(3), p.2716. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030144.
73. Guoqin Luo, Jiashan Jiang, Shiyu Wei, Chao Huang, Dongmei Chen, Bixue Zhu, Shunlin Zhang. (2024). Introducing sulfonic acid polymers into MOF nanochannels for ultra-high Ba2+ adsorption capacity and proton conductivity. Separation and Purification Technology, 343, p.127133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127133.
74. Seyed Mohammadsadegh Jafari Alavi, Zahra Maghsoud, Parisa Fatemi Khadar, Suzan Abrishami. (2025). Designing styrene-acrylate interpenetrating polymer networks with tunable damping and acoustic properties using waterborne core-shell nanoparticles. Progress in Organic Coatings, 207, p.109392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109392.
75. Mohammad Arafat, Paris Fouladian, Anthony Wignall, Yunmei Song, Ankit Parikh, Hugo Albrecht, Clive A. Prestidge, Sanjay Garg, Anton Blencowe. (2020). Development and In Vitro Evaluation of 5-Fluorouracil-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer-Related Obstruction. Pharmaceutics, 13(1), p.17. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010017.
76. Navneet Sood, Mithilesh Kumar Jha, Shailendra Bajpai. (2021). Studies on the effect of low density polyethylene on ethylene vinyl acetate/styrene butadiene styrene blends for yoga mat applications. SPE Polymers, 2(4), p.325. https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10050.
77. Diego Hernán Cuate Gómez, Jesús Manuel Lugo Quintal, Carlos Zuñiga Islas, Abel Garzón Roman, José Luis Sosa Sánchez. (2026). Development of a Non-Invasive Biosensor Utilizing an Erbium Phthalocyanine Colloid for Potential Glucose Detection in Saliva. Crystals, 16(6), p.371. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16060371.
78. Prapatsorn Kaewkam, Apichaya Kanchanapaetnukul, Janista Khamyan, Nattapon Phadmanee, Kun-Yi Andrew Lin, Krisana Kobwittaya, Sanya Sirivithayapakorn. (2022). UV-assisted TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of virgin LDPE films: Effect of UV-A, UV-C, and TiO2. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10(4), p.108131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108131.
79. Marcelo Assis, Luiz Gustavo P. Simoes, Guilherme C. Tremiliosi, Dyovani Coelho, Daniel T. Minozzi, Renato I. Santos, Daiane C. B. Vilela, Jeziel Rodrigues do Santos, Lara Kelly Ribeiro, Ieda Lucia Viana Rosa, Lucia Helena Mascaro, Juan Andrés, Elson Longo. (2021). SiO2-Ag Composite as a Highly Virucidal Material: A Roadmap that Rapidly Eliminates SARS-CoV-2. Nanomaterials, 11(3), p.638. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030638.
80. Khodor I. Nasser, José M. Liñeira del Río, Enriqueta R. López, Josefa Fernández. (2020). Synergistic effects of hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles and phosphonium ionic liquids as hybrid lubricant additives. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 311, p.113343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113343.
81. Wolfgang Lakata, Markus Koch, Mario Grueneberg, Christoph Leithold, Gerald Auboeck. (2026). Design and characterization of a high signal-to-noise ratio 40 kHz multiplex sum-frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy setup. Review of Scientific Instruments, 97(5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0308226.
82. Catarina Santos, Ana Ramos, Ângelo Luís, Maria E. Amaral. (2023). Production and Characterization of k-Carrageenan Films Incorporating Cymbopogon winterianus Essential Oil as New Food Packaging Materials. Foods, 12(11), p.2169. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112169.
83. Oznur Yildirim, Dogukan Tunay, Bestami Ozkaya. (2023). Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis conditions of chemical pretreated cotton stalk using response surface methodology for enhanced bioethanol production yield. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(8), p.6623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01692-7.
84. Mohd Khairul Afiq, Hoo Tien Nicholas Kuan, Christopher Joyle Indor. (2025). Mechanical Properties of Durian/Luffa Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite. Key Engineering Materials, 1007, p.9. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-gv0C48.
85. Colette Breheny, Declan Mary Colbert, Gilberto Bezerra, Joseph Geever, Luke M. Geever. (2025). UV-Induced Aging in Thermochromic Pigment-Integrated Food-Grade Polymers: A Performance Assessment. Applied Sciences, 15(11), p.6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116039.
86. Kritika Jashrapuria, Utkarsh Misra, Pawan Kumar, Swatantra P. Singh. (2026). Breaking the permeability-selectivity-fouling trade-off: Electroconductive PES-LIG-GO composite membrane with integrated passive and active biofouling control. Chemical Engineering Journal, , p.179807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.179807.
87. Amirhossein Karimi, Gilberto S. N. Bezerra, Clement L. Higginbotham, John G. Lyons. (2026). Evaluation of the Drug–Polymer Compatibility and Dissolution Behaviour of Fenbendazole–Soluplus® Solid Dispersions Prepared by Hot-Melt Extrusion. Polymers, 18(3), p.333. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030333.
88. Joana Eliza de Santana, Antônio Elias dos Santos Neto, Fábio Gabriel Silva de Andrade, Aldebarã Fausto Ferreira, Marcos Gomes Ghislandi, Maurício Alves da Motta Sobrinho. (2026). Waste-derived zeolite from sugarcane bagasse ash and water treatment plant sludge for sustainable industrial dye removal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 33(7), p.2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-37455-y.
89. Sefa Celik, Sevim Akyuz, Aysen E. Ozel. (2023). Development, Properties, and Industrial Applications of 3D Printed Polymer Composites. Advances in Chemical and Materials Engineering. , p.170. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6009-2.ch010.
90. Prachya Watasit, Suparat Rukchonlatee, Artit Ausavasukhi, Chonlada Ritvirulh, Tawan Sooknoi. (2021). AtmosphericCO2/CH4permeability ofEVAcopolymer/SiO2composite membrane for biogas purification. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138(42) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51229.
91. Opa Fajar Muslim, Ariadne Lakshmidevi Juwono, Dwi Novriadi, Tulus Tulus. (2021). Physical Properties of Polyethylene and Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Foam Mixtures. Materials Science Forum, 1028, p.255. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1028.255.
92. Mohammed Fuseini, Moustafa Mahmoud Yousry Zaghloul, Marwa F. Elkady, Ahmed H. El-Shazly. (2022). Evaluation of synthesized polyaniline nanofibres as corrosion protection film coating on copper substrate by electrophoretic deposition. Journal of Materials Science, 57(10), p.6085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-06994-3.
93. Fakhri-Eddin N. Lahfaidh, Nathanael Guigo, Luc Vincent, Nicolas Sbirrazzuoli. (2025). Shedding light on the impact of a dissolution-precipitation recycling process on crystallization and thermal stability of PBS. Polymer Testing, 150, p.108924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.108924.
94. Oumaima Bendalahcen, Siham Ez-Zahraoui, Rachid Bouhfid, Jones Alami, Mounir El Achaby, Fatima-Zahra Semlali. (2025). Valorization of purified mining phosphate sludge as a functional filler in ethylene-vinyl acetate–coated cellulose-based packaging papers. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 333, p.148853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148853.
95. Woo-Hyun Kim, Won-Jo Choi, Jeong-Eun Kim, Joonho Choi, Yong-Deok Hong, Jin Nam, Won-Seok Park, Soon-Mi Shim. (2023). Kinetic conversion of BIOGF1K enriched in compound K from in vitro 3-D human tissue model. Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery, 5, p.100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crphar.2023.100165.
96. Farnaz Hadizadeh, Shahruz Nasirian. (2023). A flexible self-powered ultra-violet photodetector based on sandwiched zinc oxide nanorods between polyaniline layers. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 34(34) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-11584-3.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 DYNA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.
