Publicado

2020-01-01

Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model

Análisis y evaluación sísmica de un modelo computacional para un puente prefabricado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143

Palabras clave:

Precast bridge, computational model, OpenSees, shake table tests (en)
Puente prefabricado, modelo computacional, OpenSees, ensayos de mesa sísmica (es)

Autores/as

A large-scale, two-span bridge model constructed by assembling precast elements was tested under a series of bi-axial ground motions
simulated on a shake table at the Earthquake Engineering Laboratory at the University of Nevada, Reno. The response of the bridge was
estimated before the tests using a three-dimensional computational model developed in OpenSees software. After the tests, key measured
seismic responses were compared to those predicted by the computational model to assess the modeling assumptions. Relatively large
errors for the displacements, base shears, and hysteretic response of the bridge were observed. The influence of the earthquake loading,
materials, connectivity of the precast elements, and boundary conditions in the computational model on the errors are discussed in this
paper. Future modeling directions are proposed to reduce these errors.

Un puente de gran escala, de dos vanos, construido con varios elementos prefabricados fue ensayado bajo sismos biaxiales simulados en una mesa sísmica del Laboratorio de Ingeniería Sísmica de la Universidad de Nevada, Reno. La respuesta sísmica del puente fue estimada antes de los ensayos usando un modelo numérico tridimensional desarrollado en el software OpenSees. Algunas respuestas importantes medidas durante los ensayos fueron comparadas con los resultados predichos por el modelo numérico con el fin de validar las hipótesis de modelamiento. La comparación reveló diferencias relativamente grandes en términos de desplazamientos, cortante basal, y respuesta
histerética. La influencia de la excitación sísmica, los materiales, la conectividad de los elementos prefabricados, y las condiciones de frontera en los errores son discutidas en el artículo. Varias directrices de modelamiento son propuestas para reducir los errores.

Referencias

Caltrans, Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria: Version 1.7. Department of Transportation - State of California, Sacramento, CA, 2013.

J. Benjumea, Experimental and Analytical Seismic Studies of a Two-Span Bridge System with Precast Concrete Elements and ABC Connections, Ph.D. dissertation, USA, University of Nevada, Reno, 2019m pp. 887.

F. McKenna, M. Scott, and G. Fenves, Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 24 (1), pp. 95–107, 2010.

C. Cruz-Noguez and M. Saiidi, Experimental and Analytical Seismic Studies of a Four-Span Bridge System with Innovative Materials, Report No. CCEER-10-04, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, University of Nevada, Reno, 2010.

I. Mantawy, I. Thonstad, D. Sanders, J. Stanton, and M. Eberhard, Analytical Study Assessment of a Bridge with Pretensioned Rocking Columns for Rapid Construction, in 39th IABSE Symposium – Engineering the Future, 2017, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE, 2017.

J. B. Mander, M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park, Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete, Journal of Structural Engieerings, 114 (8), pp. 1804–1826, 1988.

A. Aviram, K. Mackie, and B. Stojadinović, Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California, Report No. UCB/PEER 2008/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, 2008.

Caltrans, California Amendments to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Sacramento, CA: Department of Transportation - State of California, 2014.

L. Carden, A. Itani, and I. Buckle, Seismic Performance of Steel Girder Bridge Superstructures with Conventional Steel Frames, Report MCEER-08-0001, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, 2008.

E. Amirihormozaki, G. Pekcan, and A. Itani, Analytical Modeling of Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway Bridges for Seismic Analysis, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 19 (2), pp. 220–248, 2015.

G. Lee, C. Huang, J. Song, and J. O’Connor, Seismic Performance Evaluation of Precast Girders with Field-Cast Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) Connections, Report No. MCEER-14-0007, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, 2014.

M. Mehraein and M. Saiidi, Seismic Performance of Bridge Column-Pile-Shaft Pin Connections for Application in Accelerated Bridge Construction, Report No. CCEER-16-01, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, University of Nevada, Reno, 2016.

CSi, CSiBridge 2016 - Integrated 3-D Bridge Analysis, Design and Rating. Computers & Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA, 2016.

PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Ground Motion Database, NGA-West2 Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Regimes, 2014. Available: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.

B. Thoen and P. Laplace, Offline Tuning of Shaking Tables, in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE, 2017, 2004, p. 960.

L. Marsh, I. Buckle, and J. Kavazanjian, LRFD Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridges Reference Manual. Report No.FHWA NHI-15-004, Federal Highway Administration., Washington, D.C., 2014.

M. Zadeh and M. Saiidi, Effect of Strain rate on Stress-Strain Properties and Yield Propagation in Steel Reinforcing Bars, Report No. CCEER-07-02, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, University of Nevada, Reno. Reno, NV, 2007.

M. Kulkarni and S. Shah, Response of Reinforced Concrete Beams at High Strain Rates, ACI Structural Journal, 95 (6), pp. 705–715, 1998.

H. Zhang, H. Li, C. Li, and G. Cao, Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Structures Considering Strain Rate Effect, Construction and Building Materials, 173, pp. 672–686, 2018.

N. Wehbe, M. Saiidi, and D. Sanders, Effect of confinement and flares on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Report No. CCEER 97-2, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, University of Nevada, Reno, 1997.

J. Zhao and S. Sritharan, Modeling of Strain Penetration Effects in Fiber-Based Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, ACI Structural Journal, 104 (2), pp. 133–141, Mar. 2007.

M. Tazarv and M. Saiidi, UHPC-Filled Duct Connections for Accelerated Bridge Construction of RC Columns in High Seismic Zones, Engineering Structures, 99, pp. 413–422, 2015.

Cómo citar

IEEE

[1]
J. Benjumea, M. Saiidi, y A. Itani, «Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model», DYNA, vol. 87, n.º 212, pp. 80–89, ene. 2020.

ACM

[1]
Benjumea, J., Saiidi, M. y Itani, A. 2020. Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model. DYNA. 87, 212 (ene. 2020), 80–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143.

ACS

(1)
Benjumea, J.; Saiidi, M.; Itani, A. Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model. DYNA 2020, 87, 80-89.

APA

Benjumea, J., Saiidi, M. & Itani, A. (2020). Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model. DYNA, 87(212), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143

ABNT

BENJUMEA, J.; SAIIDI, M.; ITANI, A. Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model. DYNA, [S. l.], v. 87, n. 212, p. 80–89, 2020. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/80143. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Benjumea, José, Mehdi Saiidi, y Ahmad Itani. 2020. «Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model». DYNA 87 (212):80-89. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143.

Harvard

Benjumea, J., Saiidi, M. y Itani, A. (2020) «Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model», DYNA, 87(212), pp. 80–89. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143.

MLA

Benjumea, J., M. Saiidi, y A. Itani. «Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model». DYNA, vol. 87, n.º 212, enero de 2020, pp. 80-89, doi:10.15446/dyna.v87n212.80143.

Turabian

Benjumea, José, Mehdi Saiidi, y Ahmad Itani. «Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model». DYNA 87, no. 212 (enero 1, 2020): 80–89. Accedido marzo 15, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/80143.

Vancouver

1.
Benjumea J, Saiidi M, Itani A. Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model. DYNA [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2020 [citado 15 de marzo de 2026];87(212):80-9. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/80143

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations6

1. Mianyue Yang, Ai Qi, Jiayu Zhang, Yongjian Chen. (2023). Design methodology and modified shear constitutive model of the shear pin connection. Structures, 47, p.1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.105.

2. José Benjumea, M. “Saiid” Saiidi, Ahmad Itani. (2021). Large-Scale Biaxial Shake-Table Studies of a Precast Bridge Model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 147(7) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003060.

3. Hongtao Dai, Hongshuo Sun. (2024). Seismic performance assessment of typical vertical light industrial building structures based on IDA method. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1) https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00625.

4. J. W. Ngan, C. C. Caprani. (2022). ospgrillage: A bridge deck grillage analysis preprocessor for OpenSeesPy. Journal of Open Source Software, 7(77), p.4404. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04404.

5. Xinliang Zheng, Yi Xie, Qiangyi Li. (2022). Visual Multimedia Intelligent Computing System for Seismic Performance of Bridge Structure Based on Object-Oriented Technology. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, p.1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8250649.

6. José Benjumea, M. “Saiid” Saiidi, Ahmad Itani. (2021). Biaxial Seismic Performance of a Two-Span Concrete Bridge Model with Six ABC Connections. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 26(8) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001753.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

824

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.