Publicado

2019-10-01

Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla

Estrato socioeconómico como variable sustituta del ingreso del hogar en la investigación de transporte. Evaluación para Bogotá, Medellín, Cali y Barranquilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821

Palabras clave:

socioeconomic strata, household income, Colombia, transport models, ordered logit (en)
estratos socioeconómicos, ingresos del hogar, Colombia, modelos de transporte, logit ordinal (es)

Autores/as

In Colombia, a socioeconomic stratification (SES) system of households based on the physical characteristics of the dwelling and its surroundings is implemented in order to set subsidies to public services. Many studies use this classification as a proxy variable for the household income, mainly because of the ease to retrieve data. This investigation proposes an evaluation of the SES as an explanatory variable for the household income. Ordered logit regressions were estimated for the cities of Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla, where the dependent variable corresponds to the SES. Even though there is a positive correlation between SES and household income, the relation depends on certain characteristics of the household as it size, vehicle availability and percentage of workers and students. The results were validated by comparing trip generation models. By including the significant attributes from the ordinal regressions, trip generation models with income and SES had similar fit, which suggests that using the SES as a proxy variable for the income, might be appropriate as long as their correspondence is checked according to household characteristics.

En Colombia se ha desarrollado un sistema de estratificación de viviendas basado en las características físicas del inmueble y su entorno, con el fin de establecer tarifas diferenciales a servicios públicos. Diversos estudios de transporte usan esta clasificación como variable sustituta del ingreso del hogar debido a la facilidad relativa para obtener dicha información. Este artículo realiza una evaluación del estrato como variable explicativa del ingreso del hogar desde la perspectiva de estudios de transporte. Se estimaron modelos de regresión logit ordinal para Bogotá, Medellín, Cali y Barranquilla, usando el ingreso como variable dependiente y el estrato del hogar como variable independiente. Se encontró que a pesar de que existe una correlación positiva entre el estrato y los ingresos del hogar, esta relación depende de ciertas características del hogar como su tamaño, la disponibilidad de vehículo y la proporción de trabajadores y estudiantes. Estos resultados se validaron mediante la comparación de modelos de generación de viajes por hogar. Al incluir los atributos significativos de las regresiones ordinales, se obtienen ajustes similares para modelos de generación de viajes con ingreso y estrato, lo que indica que usar el estrato como sustituto del ingreso puede ser adecuado, siempre y cuando se controle previamente la correspondencia entre las variables de las características del hogar.

Referencias

Ortuzar, J.D. and Willumsen, L.G., Modelling Transport, 4th Ed.,

Oxford, England, 2011.

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).

Metodología de estratificación socioeconómica urbana para servicios

públicos domiciliarios. Enfoque conceptual. Bogotá, Colombia, 2015.

Alzate, M.C., La estratificación socioeconómica para el cobro de los

servicios públicos domiciliarios en Colombia ¿Solidaridad o

focalización?, Bogotá, 2006.

Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). Evaluación de la

estratificación socioeconómica como instrumento de clasificación de

los usuarios y herramienta de asignación de subsidios a los servicios

públicos domiciliarios. Bogotá, Colombia, 2008.

Secretaría Distrital de Planeación. La estratificación en Bogotá:

Impacto social y alternativas para asignar subsidios. Bogotá,

Colombia, 2016.

Sepulveda, C., Lopez, D., Gallego, J.M., Acosta, J., Bernal, L.,

Bonilla, J. y Tejedor, F., Los límites de la estratificación, en busca de

alternativas. En: Sepulveda, C., Lopez, D. y Gallego, J.M., Eds., 1st

ed.. Editorial Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia, 2014.

Econometría S.A., Revisión de la metodología de estratificación

socioeconómica de Santa Fe de Bogotá. Bogotá, Colombia, 1999.

Bogliacino, F., Jimenez, L. y Reyes, D., Identificar la incidencia de la

estratificación socioeconómica urbana sobre la segregación de los

hogares Bogotános. Investigaciones y Productos CID, 24, 2015.

Bocarejo, J.P. and Oviedo, D.R., Transport accessibility and social

inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation

of transport investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp.

-154, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.004

Marquet, O., Bedoya, V.R. and Miralles-Guasch, C., Local

accessibility inequalities and willingness to walk in Latin-American

cities: Findings from Medellín, Colombia. International Journal of

Sustainable Transportation, 11(3), pp. 186-196, 2016. DOI:

1080/15568318.2016.1230804

Delmelle, E.C. and Casas, I., Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid

transit-based accessibility patterns in a developing country: the case

of Cali, Colombia. Transport Policy, 20, pp. 36-46, 2012. DOI:

1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.001

Guzman, L.A. and Bocarejo, J.P., Urban form and spatial urban equity

in Bogotá, Colombia. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, pp.

-4506, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.345

Guzman, L.A. and Oviedo, D., Accessibility, affordability and equity:

Assessing “pro-poor” public transport subsidies in Bogotá. Transport

Policy, 68 (June), pp. 37-51, 2018. DOI:

1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.012

Arellana, J., Daly, A., Hess, S., de Dios-Ortúzar, J. and Rizzi, L.I.,

Development of surveys for study of departure time choice: two-stage

approach to efficient design. Transportation Research Record,

(1), pp. 9-18, 2012. DOI: 10.3141/2303-02

Larrañaga, A.M., Rizzi, L.I., Arellana, J., Strambi, O. and Cybis,

H.B.B., The Influence of built environment and travel attitudes on

walking: a case study of Porto Alegre, Brazil. International Journal of

Sustainable Transportation, 10(4), pp. 332-342, 2016. DOI:

1080/15568318.2014.933986

Jara-Díaz, S.R. and Ortúzar, J. de D., Introducing the expenditure rate

in the estimation of mode choice models. Journal of Transport

Economics and Policy, 23(3), pp. 293-308, 1989.

Amador, F.J., González, R.M. and Ortúzar, J. de D., On confounding

preference heterogeneity and income effect in discrete choice models.

Networks and Spatial Economics, 8(2-3), pp. 97-108, 2008. DOI

1007/s11067-007-9043-6

Oviedo-Hernandez, D. and Titheridge, H., Mobilities of the

periphery: informality, access and social exclusion in the urban fringe

in Colombia. Journal of Transport Geography, 55, pp. 152-164, 2016.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.12.004

Teunissen, T., Sarmiento, O., Zuidgeest, M. and Brussel, M.,

Mapping equality in access: the case of Bogotá’s sustainable

transportation initiatives. International Journal of Sustainable

Transportation, 9(7), pp.457-467, 2015. DOI:

1080/15568318.2013.808388

Munoz-Raskin, R., Walking accessibility to bus rapid transit: does it

affect property values?. The case of Bogotá, Colombia. Transport

Policy, 17(2), pp. 72-84, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.11.002

Jaramillo, C., Lizárraga, C. and Grindlay, A.L., Spatial disparity in

transport social needs and public transport provision in Santiago de

Cali (Colombia). Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp. 340-357,

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.014

Márquez, L., Días, M., Ortiz, D. y Central, U., Transferibilidad

geográfica de modelos de generación de viajes urbanos: comparación

de modelos de regresión y tasas de viajes para algunas ciudades

colombianas. Ingeniería y Desarrollo, 34(1), pp. 225-247, 2016.

Ramos, R., Cantillo, V., Arellana, J. and Sarmiento, I., From

restricting the use of cars by license plate numbers to congestion

charging: Analysis for Medellín, Colombia. Transport Policy, 60, pp.

-130, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.012

Cantillo, V., Arellana, J. and Rolong, M., Modelling pedestrian

crossing behaviour in urban roads: a latent variable approach.

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,

, pp. 56-67, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008

Delgado-Lindeman, M., Arellana, J. and Cantillo, V., Willingness to

pay functions for emergency ambulance services. Journal of Choice

Modelling, 30, pp. 28-37, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.12.001

McCullagh, P., Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the

Royal Statistical Society, 26(2), pp. 211-252, 1964.

Cómo citar

IEEE

[1]
V. Cantillo-García, L. A. Guzman, y J. Arellana, «Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla», DYNA, vol. 86, n.º 211, pp. 258–267, oct. 2019.

ACM

[1]
Cantillo-García, V., Guzman, L.A. y Arellana, J. 2019. Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla. DYNA. 86, 211 (oct. 2019), 258–267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821.

ACS

(1)
Cantillo-García, V.; Guzman, L. A.; Arellana, J. Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla. DYNA 2019, 86, 258-267.

APA

Cantillo-García, V., Guzman, L. A. & Arellana, J. (2019). Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla. DYNA, 86(211), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821

ABNT

CANTILLO-GARCÍA, V.; GUZMAN, L. A.; ARELLANA, J. Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla. DYNA, [S. l.], v. 86, n. 211, p. 258–267, 2019. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/81821. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Cantillo-García, Victor, Luis A. Guzman, y Julian Arellana. 2019. «Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla». DYNA 86 (211):258-67. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821.

Harvard

Cantillo-García, V., Guzman, L. A. y Arellana, J. (2019) «Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla», DYNA, 86(211), pp. 258–267. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821.

MLA

Cantillo-García, V., L. A. Guzman, y J. Arellana. «Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla». DYNA, vol. 86, n.º 211, octubre de 2019, pp. 258-67, doi:10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821.

Turabian

Cantillo-García, Victor, Luis A. Guzman, y Julian Arellana. «Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla». DYNA 86, no. 211 (octubre 1, 2019): 258–267. Accedido marzo 16, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/81821.

Vancouver

1.
Cantillo-García V, Guzman LA, Arellana J. Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla. DYNA [Internet]. 1 de octubre de 2019 [citado 16 de marzo de 2026];86(211):258-67. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/81821

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations56

1. Luis A. Guzman, Santiago Gómez Cardona, Jorge Luis Ochoa. (2024). Increased ridership and improved affordability: Transforming public transport subsidies in developing contexts. Research in Transportation Economics, 108, p.101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101492.

2. Luis A. Guzman, Hernán Darío Enríquez, Phillip Hessel. (2021). BRT system in Bogotá and urban effects: More residential land premiums?. Research in Transportation Economics, 90, p.101039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101039.

3. Garis Coronell, Víctor Cantillo, Alfredo J. Ojeda-Diaz, Paula Welsch. (2025). Prudent behavior of young pedestrians: What are the determinants?. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 17(3), p.334. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2024.2409811.

4. Daniel Oviedo, Orlando Sabogal-Cardona. (2022). Arguments for cycling as a mechanism for sustainable modal shifts in Bogotá. Journal of Transport Geography, 99, p.103291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103291.

5. Luis A. Guzman, Juan Esteban Sanchez, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia, Santiago Gomez Cardona, Olga L. Sarmiento. (2025). A lifeline for the disconnected: A longitudinal study of a cable car's impact on accessibility, satisfaction, and leisure activities. Transport Policy, 165, p.85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.015.

6. Luis A. Guzman, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia. (2024). Exploring the effects of public transport subsidies on satisfaction and ridership. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 56, p.101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101168.

7. Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Jorge Bolívar, Armando Vélez, Juliana Gómez, Filipe Moura. (2024). Bicycle parking allocation and its equity implications: The case of Bogota, Colombia. Latin American Transport Studies, 2, p.100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.latran.2024.100022.

8. Ely Izquierdo-Herazo, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Margareth Gutiérrez, Raúl Ramos, Víctor Cantillo. (2026). How do regulations and safety perceptions affect the willingness to use e-scooters?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 204, p.104828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104828.

9. Jose Soto, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Sergio A. Useche. (2022). Public transportation and fear of crime at BRT Systems: Approaching to the case of Barranquilla (Colombia) through integrated choice and latent variable models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 155, p.142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.001.

10. Jorge Luis Ochoa Rincón. (2023). Modelo de elección de modos de transporte: Evidencia de un experimento social controlado. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4575115.

11. Y. Nuñez, N. Hoyos, J. Arellana. (2023). High land surface temperatures (LSTs) disproportionately affect vulnerable socioeconomic groups in Barranquilla, Colombia. Urban Climate, 52, p.101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101757.

12. Maria A. Wilches-Mogollon, Olga L. Sarmiento, Andrés L. Medaglia, Felipe Montes, Luis A. Guzman, Mauricio Sánchez-Silva, Darío Hidalgo, Karla Parra, Andrés F. Useche, Jose D. Meisel, Hansel Ochoa-Montero, Natalia Rodríguez Castañeda. (2024). Impact assessment of an active transport intervention via systems analytics. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 128, p.104112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104112.

13. Zheng Wu, Yihua Zhang, Mingyu Zhang. (2024). Unveiling the causal effects of China’s minimum living standard guarantee on household transportation expenditures: A causal forest analysis. Transport Policy, 159, p.1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.09.021.

14. Mariajosé Nieto-Combariza, Andrea San Gil, Adriana Quesada, Dayana Agudelo, Julian Arellana, Daniel Oviedo. (2024). Motorized three-wheelers and their potential for just mobility in Caribbean urban areas. Data & Policy, 6 https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.45.

15. Luis A. Guzman, Jorge Luis Ochoa, Santiago Gómez Cardona, Ignacio Sarmiento-Barbieri. (2025). Pro-poor transport subsidies: More user welfare and faster travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 195, p.104454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104454.

16. Diego A. Escobar G, William Sarache, Erick Jiménez-Riaño. (2022). The impact of a new aerial cable-car project on accessibility and CO2 emissions considering socioeconomic stratum. A case study in Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, p.130802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130802.

17. Santiago Mesa-Garcia, Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia, Juan de Dios Ortúzar, Germán Lleras. (2026). Motorcycle ownership and use in Bogotá, Colombia: Unveiling novel factors through a hybrid modelling approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 205, p.104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104836.

18. Ivana Stankov, Jose D. Meisel, Olga Lucia Sarmiento, Xavier Delclòs-Alió, Dario Hidalgo, Luis A. Guzman, Daniel A. Rodriguez, Ross A. Hammond, Ana V. Diez Roux. (2024). Uncovering physical activity trade-offs in transportation policy: A spatial agent-based model of Bogotá, Colombia. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01570-1.

19. Luis A. Guzman, Javier Peña, Juan Antonio Carrasco. (2020). Assessing the role of the built environment and sociodemographic characteristics on walking travel distances in Bogotá. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, p.102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102844.

20. Luis A. Guzman, Philipp Hessel. (2022). The effects of public transport subsidies for lower-income users on public transport use: A quasi-experimental study. Transport Policy, 126, p.215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.016.

21. Luis A. Guzman, Julian Arellana, Daniel Oviedo, Carlos Alberto Moncada Aristizábal. (2021). COVID-19, activity and mobility patterns in Bogotá. Are we ready for a ‘15-minute city’?. Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, p.245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008.

22. Luis Márquez, Víctor Cantillo, Gema del Pilar García. (2024). Will BRT ridership return after the COVID-19 pandemic? An analysis for Colombia. Travel Behaviour and Society, 37, p.100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100861.

23. Margareth Gutiérrez, Víctor Cantillo, Julián Arellana, Juan de Dios Ortúzar. (2021). Estimating bicycle demand in an aggressive environment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(4), p.259. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1734886.

24. Luis A. Guzman, Andres Ignacio Vecino Ortiz, Vanessa Guzman Mesa, Jose Pablo Camargo, Katharine A. Allen, Adnan A. Hyder. (2020). The relationships between correct helmet use, enforcement presence, and mortality in a Latin-America city: The case study of Bogotá, Colombia. Traffic Injury Prevention, 21(7), p.500. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1805737.

25. Maria Attard, Luis A. Guzman, Daniel Oviedo. (2023). Urban space distribution: The case for a more equitable mobility system. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 14, p.101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101096.

26. Juan D. Caicedo, Joan L. Walker, Marta C. González. (2021). Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Transit Demand During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Bogotá’s BRT System. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.642344.

27. Andrea Arevalo-Tamara, Angela Caicedo, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Sergio A. Useche. (2022). Distracted driving in relation to risky road behaviors and traffic crashes in Bogota, Colombia. Safety Science, 153, p.105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105803.

28. María Paula Cárdenas Charry, Maria Paula Jassir Acosta, José Miguel Uribe Restrepo, Magda Cepeda, Pablo Martinez Camblor, Leonardo Cubillos, Sophia M. Bartels, Sergio Castro, Lisa A. Marsch, Carlos Gómez-Restrepo. (2021). Relationship between the sociodemographic characteristics of participants in the DIADA project and the rate of compliance with follow-up assessments in the initial stage of the intervention. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English ed.), 50, p.102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.06.006.

29. María Paula Cárdenas Charry, Maria Paula Jassir Acosta, José Miguel Uribe Restrepo, Magda Cepeda, Pablo Martínez Camblor, Leonardo Cubillos, Sophia M. Bartels, Sergio Castro, Lisa A. Marsch, Carlos Gómez-Restrepo. (2021). Relación entre las características sociodemográficas de los participantes del proyecto DIADA y la tasa de cumplimiento al seguimiento en la fase inicial de la intervención. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 50, p.106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcp.2020.11.019.

30. Luis A. Guzman, Julian Arellana, William Felipe Castro. (2022). Desirable streets for pedestrians: Using a street-level index to assess walkability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 111, p.103462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103462.

31. Luis A. Guzman, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia, Angie Criado, Lauren Bisi, Andrés I. Vecino-Ortiz, Abdulgafoor M. Bachani. (2026). Individual gain, societal pain: When personal mobility solutions become public problems. Journal of Transport & Health, 48, p.102252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102252.

32. María del Mar Rodas-Zuleta, Santiago Cardona, Diego A. Escobar. (2022). Gender-based violence and Women’s mobility, findings from a medium-sized Colombian city: A quantitative approach. Journal of Transport & Health, 25, p.101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101376.

33. Luis A. Guzman, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia, Daniel Oviedo, Julian Arellana. (2023). How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies. Journal of Transport Geography, 112, p.103683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103683.

34. Orlando Sabogal-Cardona, Daniel Oviedo, Lynn Scholl, Amado Crotte, Felipe Bedoya-Maya. (2021). Not my usual trip: Ride-hailing characterization in Mexico City. Travel Behaviour and Society, 25, p.233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.07.010.

35. Julián Arellana, Stephanie Fernández, Miguel Figueroa, Víctor Cantillo. (2022). Analyzing pedestrian behavior when crossing urban roads by combining RP and SP data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 85, p.259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.01.012.

36. Daniel Oviedo, Luis A. Guzman, Julian Arellana, Orlando Sabogal-Cardona, Carlos Moncada, Lynn Scholl. (2022). Transport and Pandemic Experiences. Transport and Sustainability. , p.107. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-994120220000017006.

37. Samuel Heroy, Isabella Loaiza, Alex Pentland, Neave O’Clery. (2023). Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but predominantly for the wealthy. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(4), p.958. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221141439.

38. César A. Merchán-Núñez, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Luisa F. Morales-Moreno, Aquiles Darghan, Sonia C. Mangones M., Lenin A. Bulla-Cruz. (2026). Exploring peer-to-peer paid carpooling in Bogotá: A path to sustainable shared mobility. Travel Behaviour and Society, 44, p.101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2026.101243.

39. Santiago Cardona-Urrea, Jaime Soza-Parra, Dick Ettema. (2026). Activity participation among disadvantaged communities and the impact of an aerial cable car: The case of TransMiCable, Bogotá. Cities, 169, p.106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106568.

40. Luis A. Guzman, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia, Julian Arellana, Olga L. Sarmiento. (2023). User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá. Transportation, 50(3), p.751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10260-x.

41. María F. Paba-Larios, Margareth Gutiérrez, Raúl Ramos, Víctor Cantillo. (2025). Modeling the influence of built environment on pedestrian perceptions in colombian cities. Transport Policy, 163, p.358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.024.

42. Luis A. Guzman, Julian Arellana, Vilma Alvarez. (2020). Confronting congestion in urban areas: Developing Sustainable Mobility Plans for public and private organizations in Bogotá. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134, p.321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.019.

43. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia, Juan Pablo Nieto-Uribe, Santiago Mesa-Garcia, German A. Barrero, Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda. (2024). Evaluating Airport Terminals from the Users’ Perspective: Are Service, Experience, Liking, and Satisfaction Equivalent?. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2678(6), p.926. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231201108.

44. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia, Daniel Rosas-Satizabal, Rafael Unda, Susan Handy. (2021). The decision to start commuting by bicycle in Bogotá, Colombia: Motivations and influences. Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, p.57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.02.003.

45. Julián Arellana, María Saltarín, Ana Margarita Larrañaga, Virginia I. González, César Augusto Henao. (2020). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, p.310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.010.

46. Luis A. Guzman, Julian Arellana, Victor Cantillo-García, Juan de Dios Ortúzar, Michela Le Pira. (2021). Revisiting the Benefits of Combining Data of a Different Nature: Strategic Forecasting of New Mode Alternatives. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, p.1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6672961.

47. Stephanie Fernandez Pernett, Johanna Amaya, Julián Arellana, Victor Cantillo. (2022). Questioning the implication of the utility-maximization assumption for the estimation of deprivation cost functions after disasters. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, p.108435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108435.

48. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia, Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, Willis Simancas, Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda. (2022). Understanding transit user satisfaction with an integrated bus system. Journal of Public Transportation, 24, p.100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100037.

49. Luis A. Guzman, Daniel Oviedo, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia. (2024). Is proximity enough? A critical analysis of a 15-minute city considering individual perceptions. Cities, 148, p.104882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104882.

50. Diana Higuera-Mendieta, Pablo Andrés Uriza, Sergio A. Cabrales, Andrés L. Medaglia, Luis A. Guzman, Olga L. Sarmiento. (2021). Is the built-environment at origin, on route, and at destination associated with bicycle commuting? A gender-informed approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, p.103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103120.

51. Luis A. Guzman, Ricardo Camacho, Arturo Rodriguez Herrera, Carlos Beltrán. (2022). Modeling population density guided by land use-cover change model: a case study of Bogotá. Population and Environment, 43(4), p.553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-022-00400-5.

52. Manuel A. Santana Palacios. (2025). Unpacking data representation issues in distributional accessibility impact assessments: Lessons from Bogotá's urban gondola. Journal of Transport Geography, 127, p.104258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104258.

53. Luis A. Guzman, Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia, Angie Criado, Olga L. Sarmiento, Carlos Moncada. (2026). What street do you like? Exploring the subjective perception of public spaces in unequal and segregated cities. Cities, 168, p.106460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106460.

54. Alfredo J. Ojeda Diaz, Víctor Cantillo, Julián Arellana. (2023). Understanding how individuals perceive changes in the built environment and the transport system after implementing a BRT system. The case of Barranquilla, Colombia. Journal of Transport Geography, 110, p.103623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103623.

55. Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Luis Llerena-Sierra, Víctor Cantillo. (2025). E-scooters: how do latent and socioeconomic factors affect their usage in the global south? Implications for policy planning. Transportation Planning and Technology, 48(2), p.255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2024.2359492.

56. Tatiana Cantillo, Víctor Cantillo, Lucy Garcia, Víctor Cantillo-Garcia. (2022). Uncovering the wage differential between formal and informal jobs: Analysis from the Colombian Caribbean region. Latin American Economic Review, , p.1. https://doi.org/10.47872/laer.v31.24.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

2527

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.