Publicado

2020-07-01

Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production

Hidrólisis enzimática de almidón de trigo para la producción de jarabes glucosidados

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669

Palabras clave:

Enzymatic hydrolysis, Wheat starch, enzymatic deactivation, product inhibition, substrate enzyme ratio (en)
Hidrólisis enzimática, almidón de trigo, desactivación enzimática, inhibición por producto, relación enzima sustrato (es)

Autores/as

An analysis of the enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch was performed. The gelatinization stage was carried out between 90-95°C for 15min. In the liquefaction stage, a commercial α-amylase was used with an enzyme-substrate ratio (E/S ratio) 0.036%w/w at 60°C and pH 5.8 for 4h. In the saccharification stage, a commercial amyloglucosidase was used with an E/S ratio of 0.11% w/w at 60°C and pH 4.3 for 6h. A second hydrolysis was evaluated using a E/S ratio of  0.18%w/w in the saccharification stage. Two methods of enzymatic deactivation, boiling temperatures and pH were evaluated. Inhibitory effects were studied by adding 180g/L of glucose to the process. It is concluded that increases in the E/S ratio decrease reaction times but reaches similar concentrations than lower ratios, the most efficient enzymatic deactivation method is pH. In the inhibition tests, it was determined that there are no glucose inhibitory effects.

Se realizó un análisis de la hidrólisis enzimática de almidón de trigo. La etapa de gelatinización se dio entre 90-95°C durante 15min. En la etapa de licuefacción se usó una α-amilasa comercial con una relación enzima-sustrato (relación E/S) 0.036%p/p a 60°C y pH 5.8 durante 4h. En la etapa de sacarificación se usó una amiloglucosidasa comercial con una relación E/S 0.11%p/p a 60°C y pH 4.3 durante 6h. Se evaluó una segunda hidrólisis usando en la etapa de sacarificación una relación E/S 0.18%p/p. Se evaluaron dos métodos de desactivación enzimática, temperaturas de ebullición y pH. Se estudiaron efectos inhibitorios adicionando 180g/L de glucosa al proceso. Se concluye que aumentos de la relación E/S disminuye tiempos de reacción, pero alcanza concentraciones similares que relaciones menores, el método de desactivación enzimática más eficiente es por pH. En los ensayos de inhibición se determinó que no existen efectos inhibitorios por glucosa.

Referencias

T. Tovar Benítez, Caracterización morfológica y térmica del almidón de maíz (Zea mays L) obtenido por diferentes métodos de aislamiento. Pachuca, México: Tesis de Pregrado. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, 2008.

K. A. Ruiz Cruz, Modelado del proceso de hidrólisis enzimática de almidónes gelatinizados del fruto de la planta de banano. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, 2012.

J. W. Donovan, “Phase transitions of the starch–water system,” Biopolymers, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 263–275, 1979.

B. I. D. Evans and D. R. Haisman, “The effect of temperature range of potato starch,” Starch - Stärke, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 224–231, 1982.

L. Roman, M. Gomez, C. Li, B. R. Hamaker, and M. M. Martinez, “Biophysical features of cereal endosperm that decrease starch digestibility,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 165, pp. 180–188, 2017.

F. Zhu, “Structures , properties , modifications , and uses of oat starch,” Food Chem., vol. 229, pp. 329–340, 2017.

B. A. Cinelli, Produção de etanol a partir da fermentação simultânea à hidrólise do amido granular de resíduo agroindustrial. Tesis de Maestría. Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro, Brasil, 2012.

Z. Ji, L. Yu, H. Liu, X. Bao, Y. Wang, and L. Chen, “Effect of pressure with shear stress on gelatinization of starches with different amylose/amylopectin ratios,” Food Hydrocoll., vol. 72, pp. 331–337, 2017.

H. Kong et al., “Heat pretreatment improves the enzymatic hydrolysis of granular corn starch at high concentration,” Process Biochem., vol. 64, no. June 2017, pp. 193–199, 2018.

L. Li, M. Blanco, and J. Jane, “Physicochemical properties of endosperm and pericarp starches during maize development,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 630–639, 2007.

L. M. M. Tijskens, R. Greiner, E. S. A. Biekman, and U. Konietzny, “Modeling the Effect of Temperature and pH on Activity of Enzymes : The Case of Phytases,” 2001.

S. Morales, H. Alvarez, and C. Sanchez, “Dynamic models for the production of glucose syrups from cassava starch,” Food Bioprod. Process., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2008.

E. Betiku, O. O. Akindolani, and A. R. Ismaila, “Enzymatic hydrolysis optimization of sweet potato ( ipomoea batatas ) peel using a statistical approach,” Journal, Brazilian, vol. 30, no. 03, pp. 467–476, 2013.

B. Jeddou et al., “Potato peel as feedstock for bioethanol production : A comparison of acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis,” Ind. Crop. Prod., vol. 52, pp. 144–149, 2014.

Z. Li, W. Liu, Z. Gu, C. Li, and Y. Hong, “The effect of starch concentration on the gelatinization and liquefaction of corn starch,” Food Hydrocoll., vol. 48, pp. 189–196, 2015.

G. M. Zanin, F. F. D. E. Moraes, and F. F. De Moraes, “Modeling cassava starch saccharification with amyloglucosidase,” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., vol. 57–58, no. 1, pp. 617–625, 1996.

A. A. Ruiz and H. Alvarez, “Escalamiento de Procesos Quimicos y Bioquimicos basado en un Modelo Fenomenológico,” Inf. Tecnol., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 33–52, 2011.

D. B. Johnston and A. J. McAloon, “Protease increases fermentation rate and ethanol yield in dry-grind ethanol production,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 154, pp. 18–25, 2014.

H. Kim and K. C. Huber, “Physicochemical properties and amylopectin fine structures of A- and B-type granules of waxy and normal soft wheat starch,” J. Cereal Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 256–264, 2010.

E. Agama-Acevedo, E. Juárez-García, S. Evangelista-Lozano, O. L. Rosales-Reynoso, and L. A. Bello-Pérez, “Characteristics of maize starch and relationship with its biosynthesis enzymes,” Agrociencia, vol. 47, pp. 1–12, 2013.

J. A. Quintero, J. A. Dávila, J. Moncada, O. H. Giraldo, and C. A. Cardona Alzate, “Analysis and characterization of starchy and cellulosic materials after enzymatic modification,” Dyna, vol. 83, no. 197, p. 44, 2016.

M. Sjoo and L. Nilsson, Starch in Food. Structure, Function and Applications. Duxford: Woodhead Publishing, 2017.

J. Rosicka-Kaczmarek, I. Kwaśniewska-Karolak, E. Nebesny, and A. Komisarczyk, The Functionality of Wheat Starch. Lodz: Starch in Food, 2017.

H. Zabed, G. Faruq, A. N. Boyce, J. N. Sahu, and P. Ganesan, “Evaluation of high sugar containing corn genotypes as viable feedstocks for decreasing enzyme consumption during dry-grind ethanol production,” J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., vol. 58, pp. 467–475, 2016.

M. S. Pino et al., “Bioreactor design for enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass under the biorefinery concept,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 347, pp. 119–136, Sep. 2018.

S. N. Poonam and A. Pandey, Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residues Utilisation. Northern Ireland: Springer Science+Business Media B, 2009.

M. Shuler L and F. Kargi, Bioprocess Engineering Basic Concepts, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentie Hall PTR, 2002.

A. Gonzalez Tello, F. Camacho Rubio, and A. Robles Medina, “hidrolizados enzimáticos de interés en la iaa,” Aliment. equipos y Tecnol., p. 7, 1989.

H. Liu, F. Xie, L. Yu, L. Chen, and L. Li, “Thermal processing of starch-based polymers,” Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 34, pp. 1348–1368, 2009.

P. Guo, J. Yu, L. Copeland, S. Wang, and S. Wang, “Mechanisms of starch gelatinization during heating of wheat flour and its effect on in vitro starch digestibility,” Food Hydrocoll., vol. 82, no. June, pp. 370–378, 2018.

P. Malumba, L. Doran, S. Danthine, C. Blecker, and F. Béra, “The effect of heating rates on functional properties of wheat and potato starch-water systems,” LWT - Food Sci. Technol., vol. 88, no. August 2017, pp. 196–202, 2018.

B. Ozbek and Y. Semra, “a -Amylase inactivation during wheat starch hydrolysis process,” Process Biochem., vol. 37, pp. 87–95, 2001.

V. A. Lima, A. Knob, J. T. V. Resende, M. D. Martins, E. P. Guerra, and C. R. Pereira, “Enzymatic conversion of sweet potato granular starch into fermentable sugars: Feasibility of sweet potato peel as alternative substrate for α-amylase production,” Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., vol. 11, no. June, pp. 231–238, 2017.

D. Yankov, E. Dobreva, V. Beschkov, and E. Emanuilova, “Study of optimum conditions and kinetics of starch hydrolysis by means of thermostable a-amylase,” vol. 8, pp. 665–667, 1986.

P. Kovaa et al., “Hydrolysis of wheat B-starch and characterisation of acetylated maltodextrin zen Sárka,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 98, pp. 43–49, 2013.

R. M. Collares et al., “Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of cassava to obtain fermentable sugars,” J. Zhejiang Univ., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 579–586, 2012.

Cómo citar

IEEE

[1]
J. C. Acosta Pavas, L. Alzate Blandón, y Ángela A. Ruiz Colorado, «Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production», DYNA, vol. 87, n.º 214, pp. 173–182, jul. 2020.

ACM

[1]
Acosta Pavas, J.C., Alzate Blandón, L. y Ruiz Colorado, Ángela A. 2020. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production. DYNA. 87, 214 (jul. 2020), 173–182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669.

ACS

(1)
Acosta Pavas, J. C.; Alzate Blandón, L.; Ruiz Colorado, Ángela A. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production. DYNA 2020, 87, 173-182.

APA

Acosta Pavas, J. C., Alzate Blandón, L. & Ruiz Colorado, Ángela A. (2020). Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production. DYNA, 87(214), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669

ABNT

ACOSTA PAVAS, J. C.; ALZATE BLANDÓN, L.; RUIZ COLORADO, Ángela A. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production. DYNA, [S. l.], v. 87, n. 214, p. 173–182, 2020. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/82669. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Acosta Pavas, Juan Camilo, Laura Alzate Blandón, y Ángela Adriana Ruiz Colorado. 2020. «Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production». DYNA 87 (214):173-82. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669.

Harvard

Acosta Pavas, J. C., Alzate Blandón, L. y Ruiz Colorado, Ángela A. (2020) «Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production», DYNA, 87(214), pp. 173–182. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669.

MLA

Acosta Pavas, J. C., L. Alzate Blandón, y Ángela A. Ruiz Colorado. «Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production». DYNA, vol. 87, n.º 214, julio de 2020, pp. 173-82, doi:10.15446/dyna.v87n214.82669.

Turabian

Acosta Pavas, Juan Camilo, Laura Alzate Blandón, y Ángela Adriana Ruiz Colorado. «Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production». DYNA 87, no. 214 (julio 1, 2020): 173–182. Accedido marzo 6, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/82669.

Vancouver

1.
Acosta Pavas JC, Alzate Blandón L, Ruiz Colorado Ángela A. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch for glucose syrup production. DYNA [Internet]. 1 de julio de 2020 [citado 6 de marzo de 2026];87(214):173-82. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/82669

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations13

1. Daniel Padierna-Vanegas, Juan Camilo Acosta-Pavas, Laura María Granados-García, Héctor Antonio Botero-Castro. (2022). Modeling Based Identifiability and Parametric Estimation of an Enzymatic Hydrolysis Process of Amylaceous Materials. ACS Omega, 7(17), p.14544. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06193.

2. Wan Sieng Yeo, Mieow Kee Chan, Nurul Adela Bukhari. (2022). Intelligent Computing & Optimization. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 371, p.927. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93247-3_88.

3. Musdalifa Musdalifa, Amran Laga, Andi N. F. Rahman. (2024). Glucose syrup production through enzymatic methods and acid hydrolysis using different starch sources: a systematic review. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 18(11), p.8976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02852-9.

4. Ioelovich Michael. (2024). Application of Thermodynamic Methods to the Study of Plant Biomass and Its Components—A Review. Applied Biosciences, 3(4), p.577. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3040036.

5. Fadia Al-Malki, Saad Alamri, Mohamed Hashem. (2025). Availability and saccharification of starchy biowastes for bioethanol production in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences, 11(1), p.159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00156-8.

6. Musdalifa, Andi Nur Faidah Rahman, Amran Laga. (2025). Effect of substrate and enzyme concentration on isomerization process in fructose syrup production from sago starch. Food Science and Preservation, 32(1), p.30. https://doi.org/10.11002/fsp.2025.32.1.30.

7. Bethelhem Teshome, Mikiyas Abewaa, Jemal Abdu, Magesh Rangaraju, Ashagrie Mengistu, Solomon Tibebu, Tigabu Haddis. (2025). Optimization of glucose syrup extraction from Colocasia esculenta starch using enzymatic hydrolysis. Results in Chemistry, 16, p.102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102397.

8. Luis Caballero-Sanchez, Pedro E. Lázaro-Mixteco, Alejandra Vargas-Tah, Agustín J. Castro-Montoya. (2023). Pilot-scale bioethanol production from the starch of avocado seeds using a combination of dilute acid-based hydrolysis and alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbial Cell Factories, 22(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02110-5.

9. Lara Aguiar Borges, Kazumi Kawasaki Ramos, Mária Herminia Ferrari Felisberto, Priscilla Efraim. (2025). Towards enzymatic conversion of non-conventional starchy materials for glucose syrup production: A review. Food Research International, 218, p.116907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116907.

10. Babatunde Olawoye, Olusola Samuel Jolayemi, Babawande Adeboye Origbemisoye, Timilehin David Oluwajuyitan, Oyekemi Popoola-Akinola. (2023). Starch: Advances in Modifications, Technologies and Applications. , p.83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35843-2_4.

11. Camila Cabeza, Amal El Gohary Ahmed, Mario Minauf, Karin Wieland, Michael Harasek. (2025). Starch hydrolysates, their impurities and the role of membrane-based technologies as a promising sustainable purification method at industrial scale. Food Research International, 209, p.116300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116300.

12. Neda Rousta, Coralie Hellwig, Steven Wainaina, Lukitawesa Lukitawesa, Swarnima Agnihotri, Kamran Rousta, Mohammad J. Taherzadeh. (2021). Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus oryzae for Food: From Submerged Cultivation to Fungal Burgers and Their Sensory Evaluation—A Pilot Study. Foods, 10(11), p.2774. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112774.

13. Jonathan Serrano-Febles, Jesús Luis-Orozco, Héctor Luis Ramírez, Leissy Gómez-Brizuela, Carlos Martín, Ariel García-Cruz. (2025). Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of corn starch to obtain glucose syrups by genetic algorithm. DYNA, 92(235), p.83. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v92n235.116302.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

1934

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.