Publicado

2020-01-01

Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review

Apoyo para tomar decisiones sobre la selección de camiones de transportes de carga: una revisión sistemática

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668

Palabras clave:

trucks selection, multicriteria decision, systematic review, qualitative and quantitative methods. (en)
selección de camiones, revisión sistemática, decisión multi-criterios, métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos. (es)

Autores/as

Trucks are attached to many industries in different sectors like an industrial equipment. For this reason, select a truck without consider the best attributes for the company could cause futures problems. Therefore, this article presents a systematic review of studies that approach quantitative and qualitative decision-making support methods and attributes that help on collecting of precision data. Thus, a framework was created to describe the factors and characteristics of studies, like the application types, hybrid models, sources and data validation. As result, 11 articles were selected from 893, published in English. And from the accepted articles valuation, multicriteria methods and a quality tool were found both applicated in decision-making support. Also, all the criteria, sub-criteria and attributes applicated by all the 11 authors in the methods were presented in this article and they were classified in 12 factors to simplify them.

Los camiones de transporte de carga son utilizados por empresas de transporte u otras que los utilizan como equipamiento industrial. Para diferentes contextos, seleccionar un camión sin considerar los atributos que mejor se adaptan a la empresa puede causar problemas operacionales y afectar el control de calidad. El objetivo del trabajo es describir una revisión sistemática de estudios científicos que proponen métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos para apoyar la selección de camiones y los atributos que ayudan a obtener informaciones de rendimiento sobre los vehículos. Primero se clasificaron los estudios científicos por diversos factores y características como, por ejemplo, combinaciones de métodos y modelos, tipo de aplicación, origen y validación de datos reunidos. Después se seleccionaron 11 trabajos de 893 estudios científicos, publicados en inglés. Y a partir de la revisión de los estudios, se encontraron métodos multi-criterios y una herramienta de calidad aplicada para apoyar la toma de decisiones. También se presentaron todos los criterios, sub-criterios y atributos utilizados por los autores en la aplicación de los métodos y para simplificarlos se clasificaron a partir de 12 factores.

Referencias

Baykasoǧlu, Adil et al. Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 40, n. 3, p. 899–907, 2013.

Bodziony, Przemysław; Kasztelewicz, Zbigniew; Sawicki, Piotr. The Problem of Multiple Criteria Selection of the Surface Mining Haul Trucks. Archives of Mining Sciences, v. 61, n. 2, p. 223–243, 2016.

Buehler, Anna Maria et al. Diretrizes Metodológicas Elaboração De Revisão Sistemática E Metanálise De Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados. Brasília: [s.n.]., 2012.

Chen, Shun-chien; Lee, Amy H I. Performance Measurement of SMEs’ Employees by Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Theory. International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation, p. 110–113, 2010.

Cortes, Julian Andres Zapata; Serna, Martin Darío Arango; Martínez, Sandra Patricia Moreno. Expertchoice © Decision Support System Implementation For Vehicle Selection In A Colombian Shipyard Implementación Del Sistema De Soporte De Desiciones. Dyna, v. 173, p. 53–60, 2012.

Guarnieri, Patricia. Síntese dos Principais Critérios, Métodos e Subproblemas da Seleção de Fornecedores Multicritério. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1–25, 2015.

Infante, Carlos Eduardo Durange de Carvalho; MENDONÇA, Fabricio Molica De; VALLE, Rogerio de Aragão Bastos Do. Análise de robustez com o método Electre III: o caso da região de Campo das Vertentes em Minas Gerais. Gestão & Produção, v. 21, n. 2, p. 245–255, 2014.

Kitchenham, Barbara; Charters, Stuart. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature reviews in Software Engineering. Engineering, v. 45, n. 4ve, p. 1051, 2007.

Marler, R. Timothy; Arora, Jasbir S. The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: New insights. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, v. 41, n. 6, p. 853–862, 2010.

Marzouk, M. Utility theory model for equipment selection. Construction Innovation, v. 6, n. 1, p. 21–32, 2006.

Momc, Vladimir et al. Evaluation of vehicle fleet maintenance management indicators by application of DEMATEL and ANP ˇ ilovic. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 39, p. 10552–10563, 2012.

Paternoster, Nicolò et al. Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, v. 56, n. 10, p. 1200–1218, 2014.

Sampaio, R. F.; Mancini, M. C. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, v. 11, n. 1, p. 83–89, 2007.

Sousa Junior, Wilson Trigueiro De et al. Multi-Criteria Decision at a mining company to highway truck selection Aid Methodology Applied To Highway Truck Selection At A Mining Company. REM: R. Esc. Minas, Ouro Preto, v. 67, n. 3, p. 285–290, 2014.

Torres-Carrión, Pablo Vicente et al. Methodology for Systematic Literature Review applied to Engineering and Education. p. 1364–1373, 2018.

Cómo citar

IEEE

[1]
L. Dos Santos Jesus, G. C. L. Leal, E. V. Cardoza Galdamez, y F. R. Lima Junior, «Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review», DYNA, vol. 87, n.º 212, pp. 169–178, ene. 2020.

ACM

[1]
Dos Santos Jesus, L., Leal, G.C.L., Cardoza Galdamez, E.V. y Lima Junior, F.R. 2020. Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review. DYNA. 87, 212 (ene. 2020), 169–178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668.

ACS

(1)
Dos Santos Jesus, L.; Leal, G. C. L.; Cardoza Galdamez, E. V.; Lima Junior, F. R. Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review. DYNA 2020, 87, 169-178.

APA

Dos Santos Jesus, L., Leal, G. C. L., Cardoza Galdamez, E. V. & Lima Junior, F. R. (2020). Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review. DYNA, 87(212), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668

ABNT

DOS SANTOS JESUS, L.; LEAL, G. C. L.; CARDOZA GALDAMEZ, E. V.; LIMA JUNIOR, F. R. Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review. DYNA, [S. l.], v. 87, n. 212, p. 169–178, 2020. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/83668. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Dos Santos Jesus, Liandra, Gislaine Camila Lapasini Leal, Edwin Vladimir Cardoza Galdamez, y Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior. 2020. «Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review». DYNA 87 (212):169-78. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668.

Harvard

Dos Santos Jesus, L., Leal, G. C. L., Cardoza Galdamez, E. V. y Lima Junior, F. R. (2020) «Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review», DYNA, 87(212), pp. 169–178. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668.

MLA

Dos Santos Jesus, L., G. C. L. Leal, E. V. Cardoza Galdamez, y F. R. Lima Junior. «Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review». DYNA, vol. 87, n.º 212, enero de 2020, pp. 169-78, doi:10.15446/dyna.v87n212.83668.

Turabian

Dos Santos Jesus, Liandra, Gislaine Camila Lapasini Leal, Edwin Vladimir Cardoza Galdamez, y Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior. «Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review». DYNA 87, no. 212 (enero 1, 2020): 169–178. Accedido marzo 13, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/83668.

Vancouver

1.
Dos Santos Jesus L, Leal GCL, Cardoza Galdamez EV, Lima Junior FR. Decision-Making Support of Truck Selection: A Systematic Review. DYNA [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2020 [citado 13 de marzo de 2026];87(212):169-78. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/83668

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations5

1. Ajith Tom James, Adnan Qayyum Khan, Mohammad Asjad, Girish Kumar, Vedpal Arya. (2024). Identification and evaluation of challenges in commercial vehicle transport business in India post-implementation of BS-VI emission norms. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 54, p.101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101122.

2. Ergun Arı, Mehtap Dursun. (2024). An Integrated Bayesian Best–Worst Method and Consensus-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Approach for Evaluating Alternative Aircraft Models from a Sustainability Perspective. Symmetry, 16(8), p.1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16081086.

3. Ajith Tom James, Dhruval Vaidya, Mustufa Sodawala, Sunny Verma. (2021). Selection of bus chassis for large fleet operators in India: An AHP-TOPSIS approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 186, p.115760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115760.

4. Héctor Enrique Escobar Olguín, Yisvi Saray Ochoa Corona, Ulises Trujillo Zacarias, Efraín Flores Calvillo, Faustino Esquivel Domínguez. (2024). Gestión del conocimiento. Perspectiva multidisciplinaria (libro 66). , p.251. https://doi.org/10.59899/Ges-cono-66-C13.

5. Héctor Enrique Escobar-Olguín, Maricruz Covarrubias-Solís , Julio César Villarreal-Lira. (2023). El impacto de la Rotación de Personal en una Empresa Transportista: Un estudio de caso. Vinculatégica EFAN, 9(6), p.79. https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga9.6-447.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

767

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.