A Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS model to supplier performance evaluation
Un modelo Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS para la evaluación del desempeño de los proveedores
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n216.88320Palabras clave:
supplier performance evaluation, hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS method, multicriteria decision-making, supply chain management. (en)evaluación del desempeño del proveedor, método hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS, toma de decisiones multicriterios, gestión de la cadena de suministro. (es)
Descargas
Supplier performance evaluation is a decision-making problem that involves quantitative and qualitative metrics. Although several models that allow the use of linguistic terms such as "low" and "high" to evaluate suppliers, none of them enables the application of linguistic expressions, which is especially useful when decision makers hesitates to express their evaluations. This study proposes a model based on the Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS method to support the supplier performance evaluation. A pilot application was carried out in an automotive company considering 8 suppliers and 10 criteria. When compared to previous similar approaches, the proposed model presented the following advantages: it enables the use of linguistic expressions to assess the supplier performance in each criterion; it groups suppliers with similar levels of performance to develop appropriate management actions; and does not limit the number of criteria and suppliers evaluated.
La evaluación del desempeño de proveedores es un problema de toma de decisiones que involucra métricas cuantitativas y cualitativas. Aunque existen varios modelos que permiten el uso de términos lingüísticos como "bajo" y "alto" para evaluar a los proveedores, ninguno de esos permite la aplicación de expresiones lingüísticas, lo cual es especialmente útil cuando los tomadores de decisiones dudan en expresar sus evaluaciones. Este estudio propone un modelo basado en el método Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS para apoyar la evaluación del desempeño de los proveedores. Se realizó una aplicación piloto en una empresa automotriz considerando 8 proveedores y 10 criterios. En comparación con los modelos similares anteriores, el modelo propuesto presenta las siguientes ventajas: permite el uso de expresiones lingüísticas para evaluar el desempeño del proveedor en cada criterio; agrupa a proveedores con niveles similares de desempeño para desarrollar acciones apropiadas; y no limita el número de criterios y proveedores evaluados.
Referencias
Glock, C.H., Grosse, E.H. and Ries, J.M., Decision support models for supplier development: systematic literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Production Economics, 193, pp.798-812, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.025.
Lima-Junior, F.R. and Carpinetti, L.C.R., Combining SCOR model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management, International Journal of Production Economics, 174, pp.128-141, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.023.
Dey, P.K., Bhattacharya, A. and Ho, W., Strategic supplier performance evaluation: a case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organization, International Journal of Production Economics, 166, pp.192-214, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.021.
Osiro, L., Lima-Junior, F.R. and Carpinetti, L.C.R., A Fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development, International Journal of Production Economics, 153, pp. 95-112, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.02.009.
Ho, L.H., Feng, S.Y., Lee, Y.C. and Yen, T.M., Using modified IPA to evaluate supplier’s performance: multiple regression analysis and DEMATEL approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), pp.7102-7109, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.034.
Igarashi, M., De Boer, L. and Fet, A.M., What is required for greener supplier selection?. A literature review and conceptual model development, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, pp. 247-263, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2013.06.001.
Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L. and Herrera, F., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems, 20, pp.109-119, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2011.2170076.
Beg, I. and Rashid, T., TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy linguistic term sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28, pp.1162-1171, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/int.21623.
Xu, Z. and Zhang, S., An overview on the applications of the hesitant fuzzy sets in group decision-making: Theory, support and methods, Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6, pp.1-20, 2019.
Bertrand, J.W.M. and Fransoo, J.C., Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modelling, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), pp.241-264, 2002.
Rezaei, J. and Ortt, R., Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 225, pp.75-84, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.037.
Görener, A., Ayvaz, B., Kusakci, A.O. and Altinok, E., A. Hybrid Type-2 Fuzzy based supplier performance evaluation methodology: the Turkish Airlines technic case, Applied Soft Computing, 56, pp.436-445, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.026.
Aksoy, A. and Öztürk, N., Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), pp. 6351-6359, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.104.
Liou, J.J.H., Chuang, Y.C. and Tzeng, G.H., A Fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement, Information Sciences, 266, pp. 199-217, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.09.025.
Sahu, N.K., Datta, S. and Mahapatra, S.S., Green supplier appraisement in fuzzy environment, Benchmarking, 21, pp. 412-429, 2014. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2012-0042.
Sarkar, A. and Mohapatra, P.K.J., Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: a method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(3), pp.148-163, 2006.
Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. and Garg, C., An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains, J. of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.1686-1698, 2017.
Santos, L.F.D.O.M, Osiro, L. and Lima, R.H.P., A model based on 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation and Analytic Hierarchy Process for supplier segmentation using qualitative and quantitative criteria, Expert Systems with Applications, 79, pp. 53-64, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.032.
Liu, Y., Eckert, C., Yannou, G. and Petit, G., A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, pp.196-212, 2019.
Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L. and Herrera, F., A group decision-making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Information Sciences, 241, pp. 28-42, 2013.
Lima Junior, F.R., Carvalho, G.M.R., Carpinetti, L.C.R., A methodology based on fuzzy inference and SCOR® model for supplier performance evaluation. Gestão & Produção, 23, pp. 515-534, 2016. DOI: 10.1590/0104-530x2625-15.
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Genett Isabel Jiménez-Delgado, Hugo Hernandez-Palma, Dionicio Neira-Rodado, Bellanith Lucena-León Castro, Anderson Nieto-Granados, Dairo Novoa, Felipe Acosta-Ortega, Osman Redondo-Bilbao, Jairo Martinez-Ventura. (2025). HCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 15375, p.282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76806-4_21.
2. Diana Kalibatienė, Jolanta Miliauskaitė. (2022). Digital Business and Intelligent Systems. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 1598, p.31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09850-5_3.
3. Francisco Rodrigues Lima-Junior, Mery Ellen Brandt de Oliveira, Carlos Henrique Lopes Resende. (2023). An Overview of Applications of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets in Supply Chain Management: The State of the Art and Future Directions. Mathematics, 11(13), p.2814. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11132814.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 DYNA

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.




