Método de modelado conceptual de procesos de negocio a niveles ontológico y situado con alcance de arquitectura empresarial
Conceptual modeling method of business processes at ontological and situational levels with enterprise architecture scope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n216.92206Palabras clave:
modelo de procesos de negocio, conocimiento ontológico, conocimiento situado, conocimiento funcional, conocimiento de contexto, arquitectura empresarial (es)business process model;, ontological knowledge;, situated knowledge;, functional knowledge;, contextual knowledge;, Sustainable enterprise architecture (en)
El artículo aborda la importancia de generar modelos de procesos de negocio (MPN) con calidad desde la perspectiva conceptual. Esta perspectiva considera los conocimientos ontológico y situado, orientados a lograr MPN consistentes y coherentes. Para ello se propone un método de modelado conceptual de proceso con alcance de arquitectura empresarial, considerando el conocimiento ontológico de procesos de negocio, del dominio funcional con el que opera dicho proceso y del contexto organizacional. Los últimos conducen al conocimiento situado de un proceso, expresado en forma de requisitos funcionales, variables del contexto y modelos de referencia, lo cual guía y justifica los MPN obtenidos. El método fue aplicado en el proceso de generación de ofertas comerciales de una empresa proveedora de servicios de informatización. Como resultado, se pudo constatar la aplicabilidad del método y su valor para gestionar la calidad de los MPN a través de indicadores que visualizan brechas de mejora conceptual.
The article addresses the importance of generating business process models (BPM), with quality, from a conceptual perspective. This perspective considers the ontological and situated knowledge oriented to achieve consistent and coherent BPM. A conceptual process modeling method is proposed, been aware of enterprise architecture conceptualization, and considering the business process ontological knowledge, the functional knowledge with which the process operates, as well as the organizational context. Functional and contextual knowledge lead to the business process situated knowledge, expressed throughout functional requirements, context variables and reference models, which guide and justify the obtained BPM. The method was applied in generating a commercial offer process that belongs to an IT service company. As a result, it was possible to verify the applicability of the method and its value to manage the quality of the BPM through indicators that visualize conceptual improvement gaps.
Referencias
Mohapatra, S. and Choudhury, A., Readiness framework for business process re‐engineering. Strategic Change, 25(5), pp. 509-524, 2016.
Anastassiu, F., Santoro, M., Recker, J. and Rosemann, M., The questfor organizational flexibility: driving changes in business processesthrough the identification of relevant context. Business ProcessManagement Journal, 22(4), pp. 763-790, 2016. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-01-2015-0007
Song, R., Vanthienen, J., Cui, W., Wang, Y. and Huang, L., Towardsa comprehensive understanding of the context concepts in context-aware business processes, in: S-BPM ONE'19, Seville, Spain pp. 1-10, 2019. DOI: 10.1145/3329007.3329020
Moreno-Montes de Oca, I., Snoeck, M., Reijers, H.A. and Rodríguez-Morffi, A., A systematic literature review of studies on businessprocess modeling quality. Information and Software Technology, 58, pp. 187-205, 2015.
Pinggera, J. et al., Styles in business process modeling: an exploration and a model. Software & Systems Modeling, 14(3), pp. 1055-1080, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10270-013-0349-1
Martínez, L.A., Reyes-Garcia, F. y Moreno-Montes de Oca, I.,SAD_BPMN v3.0. Herramienta para la evaluación de modelos deprocesos de negocio, in: II Conferencia Internacional deProcesamiento de la Información (CIPI 2019), 2019. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.32668.54408
Uludağ, Ö., Harders, N.M. and Matthes, F., Documenting recurringconcerns and patterns in large-scale agile development, in: 24th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, Irsee,Germany, Article 27, 2019. DOI: 10.1145/3361149.3361176
Elsbach, K. and Stigliani, I., New information technology and implicit bias. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(2), pp. 185-206, 2019. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2017.0079
Razavian, M., Vanderfeesten, I. and Turetken, O., Towards a solutionspace for BPM issues based on debiasing techniques, in: International Conference on Business Process Management, 2017, pp. 384-390.,
Liedtka, J., Perspective: linking design thinking with innovationoutcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of ProductInnovation Management, 32(6), pp. 925-938, 2015.
Turetken, O., Vanderfeesten, I. and Claes, J., Cognitive style andbusiness process model understanding, in: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 2017, pp. 72-84.
Ariouat, H., Hanachi, C., Andonoff, E. and Benaben, F.A., Conceptual framework for social business process management, in: International Conference on Knowledge Based and Intelligent Information andEngineering System, Marseille, France, 2017, pp. 703-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.151
Fan, S., Hua, Z., Storey, V.C. and Zhao, J.L., A process ontology based approach to easing semantic ambiguity in business process modeling. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 102(C), pp. 57-77, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2016.01.001
Zacarias, M., Martins, P.V. and Gonçalves, A., An agile businessprocess and practice meta-model. Procedia Computer Science, 121, pp. 170-177, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.024
Mei, M.M. and Andry, J.F., The Alignment of Business process inevent organizer and enterprise architecture using TOGAF. JUTI:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi, 17(1), pp. 21-29, 2019.
Tambo, T. and Clausen, N.D., Business process management,continuous improvement and enterprise architecture: in the jungle ofgovernance, in: Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems,Cham, 2018, pp. 41-54.
Ortega-González, Y.C., Blanco-González, J., Cobiellas-Herrera, L.M.,Delgado-Fernández, M. y Pavón-González, Y., Diagnóstico delconocimiento ontológico de una comunidad de práctica en el dominiode los sistemas de información. Ingeniería Industrial, 35(1), pp. 60-73, 2014.
Nicholas, C., 3E’s Enterprise architecture framework (thatencompasses business process, information systems, and informationtechnology). Rochester Institute of Technology, RIT Scholar Works,United State of America, [online]. 2016, 5P. Available at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/article/1809
Zuhori, S., Asif-Zaman, M. and Mahmud, F., Ontological knowledgeextraction from natural language text, in: Proceedings of 20th International Conference of Computer and Information Technology(ICCIT), 2017, pp. 22-24. DOI: 10.1109/ICCITECHN.2017.8281776
Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Tan, J., Jiang, G. and Zhu, Q., Effects of risks onthe performance of business process outsourcing projects: The moderating roles of knowledge management capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), pp. 627-639, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.02.002
Bitkowska, A., Business process management centre of excellence as a source of knowledge. Business, Management and Education, 16(1),pp. 121-132, 2018. DOI: 10.3846/bme.2018.2190
Geerts, W., Steenbeek, H. and van Geert, P., Assessing situatedknowledge. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(3), pp.134-146, 2018. DOI: 10.18488/journal.61.2018.63.134.146
Trufanova, E., Situated knowledge and the ideal of objectivity inscience. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 54(4), pp. 99-110, 2017. DOI: 10.5840/eps201754475
Bontinck, G., Cumps, B., Viaene, S., Bille, W. and Vanden-Brande, J., From enterprise architect to opportunity architect. 2016. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1293.0967
Mojca, I.Š., Brina, B., Ljubica, M.G. and Jan, M., Propositions on theinteraction of organizational culture with other factors in the context of BPM adoption. Business Process Management Journal, 24(2), pp. 425-445, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-02-2017-0023
António, R.S. and Michael, R., An ecological environment for BPMstakeholders' collaboration. Business Process Management Journal,18(1), pp. 20-42, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/14637151211214993
Che, M. and Perry, D.E., Exploring architectural design decisionmanagement paradigms for global software development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 23(09), pp. 8-13, 2013.
Dina, T., Process architecture development using Riva and ARIS:comparative study. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3), pp.837-858, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-04-2016-0086
Ouali, S., Mhiri, M. and Gargouri, F., A meta-modeling approach tocreate a multidimensional business knowledge model based on BPMN, in: International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design andApplications, Cham, 2018, pp. 806-815. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76348-4_77
Ahmad, M., Odeh, M. and Green, S., Metrics for assessing the basicalignment between business process and enterprise informationarchitectures with reference to the BPAOntoEIA framework, in:International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT),2018, pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1109/ACIT.2018.8672715
Che, M., Managing architectural design decision documentation andevolution, University of Texas, USA, 2014.
Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J., Valverde, F. and Pastor, O., Capabilitydesign with CDD, in: Sandkuhl, K. and Stirna, J., Eds., CapabilityManagement in Digital Enterprises, Springer Cham., 2018, pp. 101-116. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90424-5_6
Aleatrati-Khosroshahi, P., Hauder, M., Volkert, S., Matthes, F. and Gernegroß, M., Business capability maps: current practices and use cases for enterprise architecture management, in: 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2018. DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2018.581
Santoro, F.M., Baião, F., Revoredo, K. and Nunes, V.T., Modeling and using context in business process management: a research agend, ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK, 2017. DOI:10.21494/ISTE.OP.2017.0130.
Heidari, F., Business process quality computation computing non-functional requirements to improve business processes, Ph.D.Dissertation, Department of Multi Actor Systems, TechnischeUniversiteit Delft, Netherlands, 2015.
Siagian, H., Semuel, H. and Widjaja, W.G., The Effect oforganizational culture and manufacturing strategy on firm performance through business process re-engineering. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 7(3), pp. 191,2017.
Medina-León, A., Nogueira-Rivera, D., Hernández-Nariño, A. y Comas-Rodriguez, R., Procedimiento para la gestión por procesos:métodos y herramientas de apoyo. Ingeniare. Revista chilena deingeniería, 27(2), pp. 328-342, 2019. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-33052019000200328
Öneren, M., Tayfun, A. and Yurdakul, G., Developing competitivestrategies based on SWOT analysis in Porter’s five forces model byDANP. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 9(2), pp. 511-528, 2017.
Chang, H.H. and Huang, W.C., Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 43(1), pp. 158-169, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.08.016
Lema, S.R., Implementación de análisis modal de fallos y efectos(AMFE). 3C Tecnologia, 8(1), pp. 64-75, 2019.
Geiger, M., Harrer, S., Lenhard, J. and Wirtz, G., BPMN 2.0: the stateof support and implementation. Future Generation Computer Systems,80, pp. 250-262, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.01.006
Bures, M., Cerny, T., Frajtak, K. and Ahmed, B.S., Testing theconsistency of business data objects using extended static testing ofCRUD matrices. Cluster Computing, 22(1), pp. 963-976, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-1118-7
Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M. and Ruiz-Cortés, A., A template-based approach for responsibility management in executable businessprocesses. Enterprise Information Systems, 12(5), pp. 550-586, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2017.1390166
Yin, R.K., Case study research design and methods, 5th ed. ThousandSAGE, Oaks, CA, USA, 2014, 282 P.
Pavón-González, Y., Puente-Baró, L., Infante-Abreu, M. y Blanco-González, J., Experiencia de trabajo para la configuración del ERPOdoo en pequeños negocios. Caso de éxito en TostoneT. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 26(3), pp. 514-527, 2018.
Ortega-González, Y.C., Delgado-Fernández, M., Hernández-Güell, C., Pavón-González, Y. e Infante-Abreu, M., Catálogo de patrones ymétodos de exploración de ontologías para la sistematización delconocimiento en la integración de las tecnologías de informaciónRevista Cubana de Transformación Digital, 1(3), pp. 124-142, 2020.
Hepp, M., Good relations: an ontology for describing products andservices offers on the Web. Knowledge Engineering: Practice andPatterns. Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2008, pp. 329-346.
Borade J. and Khalkar, V.R., Software project effort and costestimation techniques. International Journal of Advanced Research inComputer Science and Software Engineering, 3(8), pp. 730-739, 2013.
Fitsilis, P., Gerogiannis, V. and Anthopoulos, L., Ontologies forsoftware project management: a review, Journal of SoftwareEngineering and Applications, 7(13), pp. 1096-1110, 2014.
Jarrar, M., Verlinden, R. and Meersman, R., Ontology-Based customer complaint management, in: OTM Confederated InternationalConferences. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, pp. 594-606, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39962-963
Cómo citar
IEEE
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 DYNA

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El autor o autores de un artículo aceptado para publicación en cualquiera de las revistas editadas por la facultad de Minas cederán la totalidad de los derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de manera gratuita, dentro de los cuáles se incluyen: el derecho a editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir en artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.




