Publicado

2021-11-19

Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow

Interpretación de pruebas de presión y derivada de presión en un pozo completamente perforado en un yacimiento multicapa con flujo cruzado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439

Palabras clave:

parámetro de flujo interporoso;, metodología TDS;, coeficiente de almacenaje, semipermeabilidad (en)
interporosity flow parameter;, TDS (Tiab´s Direct Synthesis) technique;, storativity coefficient;, semipermeability. (es)

Autores/as

Several models have been introduced for the characterization of multilayer reservoirs. However, some have failed to provide results when the skin factor of the layers is negative. Therefore, in this work, a model applying the concept of the maximum effective hole diameter has been used to simulate pressure tests in multilayer reservoirs. The pressure behavior of such systems is similar to that of naturally fractured double porosity reservoirs. Then, using the unique features of the log–log plot of pressure and pressure derivative versus time, some expressions have been developed to characterize the reservoir. The equations are satisfactorily tested on three field examples.

Diversos autores han introducido varios modelos para la caracterización de yacimientos multicapas. Algunos modelos no proporcionan resultados cuando el factor de daño de las capas es negativo. En este trabajo, se utiliza un modelo que aplica el concepto de diámetro de pozo máximo efectivo para simular pruebas de presión en depósitos multicapa. El comportamiento de presión de tales sistemas es similar al de los yacimientos naturalmente fracturados de porosidad doble. Luego, utilizando algunas características únicas que se encuentran en la gráfica logarítmica de presión y derivada de presión versus tiempo, se desarrollan algunas expresiones para caracterizar el reservorio. Las ecuaciones se probaron satisfactoriamente en tres ejemplos de campo. De esta manera se lograría una caracterización de yacimiento más precisa que implicará una mejor administración del yacimiento.

Referencias

Al-Ajmi, N.M., Kazemi, H. and Ozkan, E., Estimation of storativity ratio in a layered reservoir with crossflow, 2003.in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, October 2003, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2003. DOI: 10.2118/84294-MS.

Bidaux, P., Whittle, T.M., Coveney, P.J., Gringarten, A.C., Analysis of pressure and rate transient data from wells in multilayered reservoirs: theory and application. in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, October 1992, Washington, D.C., USA, 1992. DOI: 10.2118/24679-MS.

Bishop, E., Determining individual characteristics of a two layered reservoir using the TDS Technique. Dr. Thesis. African University of Science and Technology. Abuja. Nigeria, 2017.

Bourdet, D., Pressure behavior of layered reservoirs with crossflow, in: SPE California Regional Meeting, March 1985, Bakersfield, California, USA, 1985. DOI: 10.2118/13628-MS.

Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J.A. and Pirard, Y.M., Use of pressure derivative in well test interpretation. SPE Formation Evaluation, 4, pp. 293-302, 1989. DOI: 10.2118/12777-PA.

Cheng-Tai, G., Single-phase fluid flow in a stratified porous medium with crossflow (includes associated paper 12946). Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24, pp. 97-106, 1984. DOI: 10.2118/11439-PA.

Ehlig-Economides, C.A. and Joseph, J., A new test for determination of individual layer properties in a multilayered reservoir. SPE Formation Evaluation 2, pp. 261-283, 1987. DOI: 10.2118/14167-PA.

Engler, T. and Tiab, D., Analysis of pressure and pressure derivative without type curve matching, 4. Naturally fractured reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 15, pp. 127-138, 1996. DOI: 10.1016/0920-4105(95)00064-X.

Escobar, F., Novel, integrated and revolutionary well test interpretation and analysis, 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81078.

Escobar, F.H., Recent advances in practical applied well test analysis, petroleum science and technology. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated, 2015.

Escobar, F.H., Hernández, D.P. and Saavedra, J.A., Pressure and pressure derivative analysis for long naturally fractured reservoirs using the TDS technique. DYNA, 77(163), pp. 102-114, 2010.

Escobar, F.H., Suescún-Díaz, D. and Galindo, J.M., Pressure and pressure derivative analysis with inter-reservoir crossflow rate between adjacent reservoir layers. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(22), pp. 1120-8415, 2020.

Escobar, F.H., Jongkittnarukorn, K. and Hernandez, C.M., The power of TDS technique for well test interpretation: a short review. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 9, pp. 731-752, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-018-0517-5

Escobar, F.H., Sánchez, J.A. and Cantillo, J.H., Rate transient analysis for homogeneous and heterogeneous gas reservoirs using the TDS technique. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro 3, pp. 45-59, 2008.

Escobar, F.H., Bonilla, L.F. and Hernández, C.M., A practical calculation of the distance to a discontinuity in anisotropic systems from well test interpretation. DYNA, 85(207), pp. 65-73. 2018. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v85n207.72281.

Gao, C. and Sun, H., Well test analysis for multilayered reservoirs with formation crossflow, well test analysis for multilayered reservoirs with formation crossflow. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812853-4.09976-2

Horner, D.R., Pressure Build-up in wells. Paper presented at the 3rd World Petroleum Congress, The Hague, the Netherlands, 1951. [18] Katz, M.L. and Tek, M.R., A theoretical study of pressure distribution and fluid flux in bounded stratified porous systems with crossflow. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 2, pp. 68-82, 1962. DOI: 10.2118/146-PA.

Kazemi, H. and Seth, M.S., Effect of anisotropy and stratification on pressure transient analysis of wells with restricted flow entry. Journal of Petroleum Technology 21, pp. 639-647, 1969. DOI: 10.2118/2153-PA.

Larsen, L., Determination of skin factors and flow capacities of individual layers in two-layered reservoirs. 1982. DOI: 10.2118/11138-MS.

Lefkovits, H.C., Hazebroek, P., Allen, E.E. and Matthews, C.S., A study of the behavior of bounded reservoirs composed of stratified layers. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 1, pp. 43-58. 1961. DOI: 10.2118/1329-G.

Matthews, C.S. and Russell, D.G., Pressure buildup and flow tests in wells, in: Matthews, C.S. and Russell, D.G., Eds., Monograph series. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 1967.

Miller, C.C., Dyes, A.B. and Hutchinson, C.A., Jr., The estimation of permeability and reservoir pressure from bottom hole pressure build-up characteristics. Journal of Petroleum Technology 2, pp. 91-104, 1950. DOI: 10.2118/950091-G.

Muskat, M., Use of data oil the build-up of bottom-hole pressures. Transactions of the AIME 123, pp. 44-48. 1937. DOI: 10.2118/937044-G.

Park, H. and Horne, R.N., Well test analysis of a multilayered reservoir with formation crossflow, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, October 1989. San Antonio, Texas, USA, 1989. DOI: 10.2118/19800-MS.

Prijambodo, R., Raghavan, R. and Reynolds, A.C., Well test analysis for wells producing layered reservoirs with crossflow. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 25, pp. 380-396, 1985. DOI: 10.2118/10262-PA.

Russell, D.G. and Prats, M., Performance of layered reservoirs with crossflow--single-compressible-fluid case. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 2, pp. 53-67, 1962. DOI: 10.2118/99-PA.

Sun, H., Liu, L., Zhou, F. and Gao, C., Exact solution of two-layer reservoir with crossflow under constant pressure condition, in: Society of Petroleum Engineers SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference - Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 2003. DOI: 10.2118/81043-MS.

Tempelaar-Lietz, W., Effect of Oil production rate on performance of wells producing from more than one horizon. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1, pp. 26-31, 1961. DOI: 10.2118/1368-G.

Tiab, D., Analysis of pressure and pressure derivatives without type-curve matching: I-skin and wellbore storage, in: SPE Production Operations Symposium, March 1993, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 1993. DOI: 10.2118/25426-MS.

Cómo citar

IEEE

[1]
F. H. Escobar, J. Jafet Navia, y D. . Suescún-Diaz, «Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow», DYNA, vol. 88, n.º 219, pp. 94–101, nov. 2021.

ACM

[1]
Escobar, F.H., Jafet Navia, J. y Suescún-Diaz, D. 2021. Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow. DYNA. 88, 219 (nov. 2021), 94–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439.

ACS

(1)
Escobar, F. H.; Jafet Navia, J.; Suescún-Diaz, D. . Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow. DYNA 2021, 88, 94-101.

APA

Escobar, F. H., Jafet Navia, J. & Suescún-Diaz, D. . (2021). Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow. DYNA, 88(219), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439

ABNT

ESCOBAR, F. H.; JAFET NAVIA, J.; SUESCÚN-DIAZ, D. . Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow. DYNA, [S. l.], v. 88, n. 219, p. 94–101, 2021. DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/97439. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Escobar, Freddy Humberto, José Jafet Navia, y Daniel Suescún-Diaz. 2021. «Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow». DYNA 88 (219):94-101. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439.

Harvard

Escobar, F. H., Jafet Navia, J. y Suescún-Diaz, D. . (2021) «Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow», DYNA, 88(219), pp. 94–101. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439.

MLA

Escobar, F. H., J. Jafet Navia, y D. . Suescún-Diaz. «Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow». DYNA, vol. 88, n.º 219, noviembre de 2021, pp. 94-101, doi:10.15446/dyna.v88n219.97439.

Turabian

Escobar, Freddy Humberto, José Jafet Navia, y Daniel Suescún-Diaz. «Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow». DYNA 88, no. 219 (noviembre 19, 2021): 94–101. Accedido marzo 13, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/97439.

Vancouver

1.
Escobar FH, Jafet Navia J, Suescún-Diaz D. Pressure and Pressure Derivative Interpretation of a Well in a Completed-Perforated Multilayer Reservoir with Crossflow. DYNA [Internet]. 19 de noviembre de 2021 [citado 13 de marzo de 2026];88(219):94-101. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/97439

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Isabela V. Viana, Renan V. Bela, Malú Grave, Sinesio Pesco, Abelardo B. Barreto. (2024). An analytical model for injectivity tests in multilayered reservoir with formation crossflow. GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics, 15(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-024-00247-y.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

497

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.