Cronometría del ritmo en cuatro lenguas colombianas: emberá-chamí, kamsá, kogui, y wayúu
The Timing of Rhythm in Four Colombian Languages: Emberá-Chamí, Kamsá, Kogui, and Wayúu
Medição do ritmo em quatro línguas colombianas: emberá–chamí, kamsá, kogui e wayúu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/fyf.v31n1.70448Keywords:
ritmo, cronometría, prosodia, lenguas indígenas colombianas, tipología fonológica (es)rhythm, timing, prosody, indigenous Colombian languages, phonological typology (en)
línguas indígenas colombianas, medição, prosódia, ritmo, tipologia fonológica (pt)
Downloads
References
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Aguirre, D. (1999). Embera. München: Lincom Europa.
Boersma, P., & D. Weenink (2017). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Software]. Versión 6.0.29. Consultado en http://www.praat.org/
Carter, P. M. (2005). Quantifying rhythmic differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English. En R. Gess & E. Rubin, Theoretical and experimental approaches to romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th linguistic symposium on romance languages (LSRL) (pp. 63-75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Easterday, S., Timm, J., & Maddieson, I. (2011). The effects of phonological structure on the acoustic correlates of rhythm. ICPhS XVII, 623-626.
Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production with calculations based on X-ray studies of Russian articulations. The Hague: Mouton.
Global Recordings Network. http://globalrecordings.net
González de Pérez, M. S., & Rodríguez de Montes, M. L. (2000). Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: una visión descriptiva. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.
Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in laboratory phonology, 7, 515-546.
Gralow, F. L. (1976). Fonología del chamí. Sistemas fonológicos de idiomas colombianos, 3, (pp. 29-42). Bogotá: Ministerio de Gobierno e Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
Gralow, F. L. (1985). Coreguaje: Tone, stress and intonation. En R. Brend (ed). From phonology to discourse: Studies in six Colombian languages. Language data. Amerindian series (vol. 9, pp. 3-11). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Herrera, E. (2002). Las estructuras fonéticas de la lengua emberá. En M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Mereira, & H. van der Voort (eds.), Current Studies on South American Languages (Indigenous Languages of Latin America, 3). (pp. 111-126).Leiden: Research School of Asian, African and Amerindian Languages (CNWS).
Keels, J. (1985). Guayabero: Phonology and morphophonemics. En From phonology to discourse: Studies in six Colombian languages (vol. 9, pp. 57-87). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Consultado en http://www.sil.org/acpub/repository/18724.pdf
Kent, R. D., & Read, C. (2002). The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. San Diego, California: Singular/Thomson Learning.
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwells Publishers.
Landaburu, J. (2000). Clasificación de las lenguas indígenas de Colombia. En M. González de Pérez, M. L. Rodríguez de Montes (eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: una visión descriptiva (pp. 25-48). Santafé de Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.
Low, E. L., & Grabe, E. (1999). A Contrastive study of Prosody and lexical stress placement in Singapore English and British English. Language and Speech, 42(1), 39-56.
Maddieson, I., Flavier, S., Marsico, E., & Pellegrino, F. (2014). LAPSyD: Lyon-Albuquerque Phonological Systems Databases (Version 1.0.). Consultado en http://www.lapsyd.ddl.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/lapsyd/
McDowell, J. (s/f). Kamsá Collection. Consultado en: www.ailla.utexas.org
Meléndez, M. (2000). Reseña bibliográfica del kamsá. En M. González de Pérez & M. L. Rodríguez de Montes (eds.), Lenguas Indígenas de Colombia una Visión Descriptiva (pp. 35-37). Bogotá: Insituto Caro y Cuervo.
Nespor, M., Shukla, M., & Mehler, J. (2011). Stress-timed vs. Syllable-timed languages. En M. Van. Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (pp. 1147-1159). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pike, K. L. (1945). The Intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press.
Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265-292.
Romano, A., & Mairano, P. (2010). Speech rhythm measuring and modelling: pointing out multi-layer and multi-parameter assessments. En M. Russo, Prosodic Universals. Comparative Studies in Rhythmic Modeling and Rhythmic Typology (pp. 79-116). Napoli: Aracne.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Forma y Función
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Forma y Función subscribes to the Open Journal System, which means that access to it is open. Access to the Journal’s content is free and immediate under the principle that freely available research contributes to global dissemination of knowledge and the academic exchange propitious to links among scientific communities. Users can search, read, copy, download, and share all of the published texts. Their use is authorized as long as credit is granted to the authors of the texts and to Forma y Función as the original source of the publication. The commercial use of copies and distribution of content is not permitted, nor the adaption, derivation or transformation of any of these without the prior authorization of the authors and the editor of Forma y Función.
The contents of the journal are published as open access under Common Creative License Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0. For more information on the license terms, please consult: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.
In line with the open access policy, Forma y Función does not charge for the processing of submitted texts or for publication.