Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Margaret Cavendish acerca del escepticismo, los sueños y la fantasía (fancy)
Margaret Cavendish on Skepticism, Dreams, and fancy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v72n10Supl.111010Palabras clave:
M. Cavendish, escepticismo, fantasia, sueños (es)M. Cavendish, skepticism, fancy, dreams (en)
Descargas
Este artículo analiza la posición de Margaret Cavendish sobre la realidad y la ficción en los sueños y su papel dentro del escepticismo moderado de su filosofía. Cavendish sostiene que no hay distinción entre las representaciones que se tienen en los sueños y en la vigilia, no considera que la diferencia entre la realidad y la ficción sea tajante o relevante; de modo que, si bien promueve un discurso filosófico que articula la razón que busca conocer la realidad y la fantasía (fancy) que construye ficciones, considera que solo las fantasías poéticas “elevadas” son competentes para la con-
strucción de este discurso.
This article discusses Margaret Cavendish's position on reality and fiction in dreams and her role within the moderate skepticism of her philosophy. While Cavendish argues that there is no distinction between dream-like and waking depictions, she does not consider the difference between fact and fiction to be sharp or relevant. We will argue that, although Cavendish promotes a philosophical discourse that articulates reason –that seeks to know reality— and fancy —which constructs fictions—, considers that only "elevated" poetic fantasies are competent for the construction of this discourse.
Referencias
Acevedo-Zapata, Diana María. “Margaret Cavendish. Escritura, estilo Y filosofía natural.” Kriterion 58.137 (2017): 271-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-512x2017n13703dmaz
Bour, Isabelle, et al., eds. “Perception and the Senses / Sens et Perception.” Études Épistémè 30 (2016).
Boyle, Deborah. “Margaret Cavendish’s Non-feminist Natural Philosophy.” Configurations 12.2 (2004): 195-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2006.0002
Boyle, Deborah. “Margaret Cavendish on Perception, Self-Knowledge, and Probable Opinion.” Philosophy Compass 10.7 (2015): 438-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12232
Boyle, Deborah. The Well-Ordered Universe: The Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0375
Broad, Jacqueline. “Margaret Cavendish and Joseph Glanvill: Science, Religion, and Witchcraft.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38.3 (2007): 493-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.06.002
Calvente, Sofía. “La crítica de Margaret Cavendish a la filosofía experimental a la luz de su metafísica.” Daimon, Revista internacional de filosofía (2021).
Cavendish, Margaret. [pf] Poems and fancies. J. Martin and J. Allestrye, 1653.
Cavendish, Margaret. [ppo] The philosphical and physical opinions. J. Martin and J. Allestrye, 1655.
Cavendish, Margaret. [wo] The worlds olio written by the Right Honorable. J. Martin and J. Allestrye, 1655.
Cavendish, Margaret. [gnp] Natures Pictures. J. Martin and J. Allestrye, 1656.
Cavendish, Margaret. [ods] Orations of divers sorts accommodated to divers places. 1662.
Cavendish, Margaret. Playes written by the thrice noble, illustrious and excellent princess, the Lady Marchioness of Newcastle. A. Warren, for John Martin, James Allestrye, and Tho. Dicas, 1662.
Cavendish, Margaret. [pl] Philosophical Letters. 1664.
Cavendish, Margaret. [bw] The description of a new world, called the blazing-world. A. Maxwell, 1668. trad. El mundo resplandeciente. Editado y traducido por María
Antonia Martí Escayol, Siruela, 2017.
Cavendish, Margaret. [oep] Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. Edited by Eileen O’Neill. Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164504
Childers, Danny. “Wit in the Early Modern Literary Marketplace.” Diss. The University of Southern Mississippi, 2014. 283.
Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye. Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Clucas, Stephen. “Variation, Irregularity and Probabilism.” A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Edited by Stephen Clucas.
Ashgate, 2003. 109-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0074180900208231
Cunning, David. Cavendish. Routledge, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657929
Descartes, René. [at] Oeuvres completes. Editado por Charles Adam y Paul Tannery. Vrin-cnrs, 1964-1974.
Glanvill, Joseph. Scepsis scientifica: Or confest ignorance, the way to science; in an essay of the vanity of dogmatizing, and confident opinion. With a reply to the exceptions of the learned Thomas Albius. Eversden, 1665.
Hock, Jessie. “Fanciful Poetics and Skeptical Epistemology in Margaret Cavendish’s Poems and Fancies.” Studies in Philology 115.4 (2018): 766-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2018.0029
James, Susan. “‘Hermaphroditical Mixtures’: Margaret Cavendish on Nature and Art.” Early Modern Women on Metaphysics. Edited by Emily Thomas. Cambridge University Press, 2018. 31-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316827192.003
Lewis, Eric. “The Legacy of Margaret Cavendish.” Perspectives on Science 9.3 (2001): 341-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/10636140160176189
Michaelian, Kourken. “Margaret Cavendish’s epistemology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17.1 (2009): 31-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608780802548259
Monroy Nasr, Zuraya. “Epistemología y sujeto en la filosofía anti-mecanicista de Margaret Cavendish.” Revista latinoamericana de filosofía 29.2 (2003): 185-198.
Price, Bronwen. “Feminine Modes of Knowing and Scientific Enquiry: Cavendish’s Poetry as a Case Study.” Women and Literature in Britain. Cambridge University
Press, 1996. 117-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/142.1.117
Sarasohn, Lisa. “A Science Turned Upside Down: Feminism and the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish.” Huntington Library Quarterly 47 (1984): 289-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3817365
Sarasohn, Lisa. The natural philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and fancy during the scientific revolution. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.465
Sarasohn, Lisa. “Fideism, negative theology and Christianity in the thought of Margaret Cavendish.” God and Nature in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish. Edited by B.R. Siegfried and Lisa Sarasohn. Routledge, 2016. 93-106.
Sherman, Anita. “The Skeptical Fancies of Margaret Cavendish: Reoccupation.” Skepticism in Early Modern English Literature: The Problems and Pleasures of Doubt. Cambridge University Press, 2021. 137-175. [https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903813.005] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903813.005
Stanley, Thomas. The history of philosophy, in eight parts. Humphrey Moseley and Thomas Dring, 1656.
Suzuki, Mihokos. “The Essay Form as Critique: Reading Cavendish’s The world’s Olio through Montaigne and Bacon (and Adorno).” Prose Studies 22.3 (1999): 1-16. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01440359908586682] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01440359908586682
Zuluaga, Mauricio. “El problema pirrónico en Descartes.” Descartes y sus interlocutores. Doce ensayos de interlocución con Descartes. Coordinado por Laura Benitez Grobet y Alejandra Velázquez Zaragoza. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2021. 73-90.
Cómo citar
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
De acuerdo con la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional. Se autoriza copiar, redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, siempre y cuando se conceda el crédito a los autores de los textos y a Ideas y Valores como fuente de publicación original. No se permite el uso comercial de copia o distribución de contenidos, así como tampoco la adaptación, derivación o transformación alguna de estos sin la autorización previa de los autores y de la dirección de Ideas y Valores. Para mayor información sobre los términos de esta licencia puede consultar: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.
.jpg)
