Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Extramisionismo vs. Intramisionismo. Matices de una Controversia Científica
Extramissionism vs Intramissionism. Nuances of a Scientific Controversy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v71n8Supl.103585Keywords:
controversia científica, extramisionismo, intramisionismo, percepción visual, sensación (es)scientific controversy, extramissionism, intramissionism, visual perception, sensation (en)
Downloads
En el artículo se examina la controversia entre extramisionismo e intramisionismo a propósito de la percepción visual. Se defiende que la evaluación del cierre de la controversia depende del explanandum que rastrea el filósofo/historiador en la reconstrucción que persigue. Si enfatizamos en los mecanismos causales, la controversia se cerró en favor del intramisionismo. Si enfatizamos en aspectos asociados con la intencionalidad o con la forma como ciertas afecciones mentales refieren a objetos externos, la controversia conduce a una conciliación entre intramisionismo causal y extramisionismo mental. Finalmente, si ponemos en duda la necesidad de una distinción entre interno/externo, la controversia se disuelve por carecer de sentido.
We examine the controversy between extramissionism and intramissionism concerning visual perception. We argue that the assessment of the closure of the controversy depends on the explanandum that the philosopher/historian traces in the reconstruction they pursue. If one focuses on the causal mechanisms, the controversy ended in favor of intramissionism. If we focus on aspects associated with intentionality or how mental states refer to external objects, the controversy leads to a conciliation between causal intramissionism and mental extramissionism. Finally, if we question the need for an internal/external distinction, the controversy dissolves for being meaningless.
References
Agustín. Las confesiones. Traducido por Ángel Custodio Vega. Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 2005.
Alhacén. “De Aspectibus (I-III).” Alhacén’s Theory of Visual Perception. Edited and translated by A. Mark Smith. American Philosophical Society, 2001.
Alhacén. “De Aspectibus (I-III).” The Optics of Ibn Al Haytham, Books I-III. On Direct Vision. Edited and translated by A. I. Sabrá. The Warburg Institute University of London, 1989.
Aristóteles. Acerca de la generación y la corrupción. Traducido por Ernesto La Croce y Alberto Bernabé Pajares. Gredos, 1987a.
Aristóteles. Acerca de la sensación. Tratados breves de la historia natural. Traducido por Ernesto La Croce y Alberto Bernabé Pajares. Gredos, 1987b. 183-231.
Aristóteles. Acerca del alma. Traducido por Tomás Calvo Martínez. Gredos, 1978.
Aristóteles. Reproducción de los animales. Traducido por Ester Sánchez. Gredos, 1994.
Bacon, Roger. De multiplicatione specierum. Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature. Edited and translated by David Lindberg. St. Augustine’s Press, 1998.
Bacon, Roger. Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages. Edited and translated by David Lindberg. Clarendon Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198239925.book.1
Berkeley, George. “An Essay Toward a New Theory of Vision.” Philosophical Works. Everyman, [1709] 1975. 1-70.
Berkeley, George. “The Theory of Vision Vindicated and Explained.” Philosophical Works. Everyman, [1733] 1975. 277-304.
Cardona, Carlos Alberto. “Kepler: Analogies in the Search for the Law of Refraction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 59 (2016): 22-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.05.004
Cardona, Carlos Alberto. La pirámide visual: evolución de un instrumento conceptual. Editorial de la Universidad del Rosario, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/th9789587844801
Cardona, Carlos Alberto y Gutiérrez, Juliana. “The Law of Refraction and Kepler’s Heuristic.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 74.1 (2020): 45-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-019-00236-w
Chen-Morris, Raz. “From Emblems to Diagrams: Kepler’s New Pictorial Language of Scientific Representation.” Renaissance Quarterly 62.1 (2009) : 134-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/598374
Cusa, Nicolás de. Idiota de mente (The Layman: About Mind). Traducido por Clyde Lee Miller. Abaris Books, [1450] 1979.
Descartes, René. “Le traité de la lumière.” Oeuvres de Descartes. Édité par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery. vol. xi. Ministerio de Instrucción Pública, [1664] 1909. 3-118.
Descartes, René. “L’homme.” Oeuvres de Descartes. Édité par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery. vol. xi. Ministerio de Instrucción Pública [1664] 1909. 119-215.
Euclides. Óptica. Traducido por Paloma Ortiz García. Gredos, 2000.
Field, Judith V. “Two Mathematical Inventions in Kepler’s ‘Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17.4 (1986): 449-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(86)90004-X
Galeno. On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. Translated by Margaret Tallmadge May. Cornell University Press, 1968.
Gibson, Jerome J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press, [1979] 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
Heath, Thomas. A History of Greek Mathematics. Dover Publications, Inc., [1921] 1981.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. Das Sehen des Menschen. Leopold Voss, 1855.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. “The facts in Perception.” Hermann von Helmholtz Epistemological Writings. Edited by Paul Hertz and Moritz Schlick. D. Reidel Publishing Company, [1878] 1977. 115-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1115-0_4
Helmholtz, Hermann von. Treatise on Physiological Optics [tpo]. Translated by James P. C. Southhall. 3a ed. Dover Publications, Inc., [1909] 2005.
Kepler, Johannes. “Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena quibus astronomiae pars optica traditor.” Gesammelte Werke [gw]. Edited by F. Hammer. vol. ii. C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, [1604] 1939.
Kepler, Johannes. Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo & Optical Part of Astronomy. Translated by William H. Donahue. Green Lion Press. [1604] 2000.
Lička, L. “The Visual Process: Immediate or Successive? Approaches to the Extramission Postulate in 13th Century Theories of Vision.” Medieval Perceptual Puzzles. Theories of Sense Perception in the 13th and 14th Centuries. Edited by E. Băltută. Brill, 2020. 73-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004413030_005
Lindberg, David. Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. The University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Müller, Johannes. Elements of Physiology. Translated by William Baly. Lea and Blanchard, 1843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11920-000
Platón. Teeteto. Diálogos v. Traducido por Álvaro Vallejo Campos. Gredos, 1988.
Platón. Timeo. Diálogos vi. Traducido por M. Ángeles Durán y Francisco Lisi. Gredos, 1992.
Raynaud, Dominique. “Intramission versus Extramission in Oxford.” Scientific Controversies: A Socio-Historical Perspective on the Advancement of Science. Transaction Publishers, 2015. 133-162.
Risner, Friedrich, ed. Opticae thesaurus Alhazeni Arabis libri septem... Item Vitellonis Thuringopoloni libri decem. Per episcopios, 1572.
Ronchi, Vasco. Optics: The Science of Vision. Translated by Edward Rosen. Dover Publications, Inc., [1955] 1991.
Shapiro, Alan. “Images: Real and Virtual, Projected and Perceived, from Kepler to Dechales.” Inside the Camera Obscura - Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Edited by Wolfgang Lefèvre. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschafts Geschichte, 2007.
How to Cite
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonComnercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Internacional License authorizes copying and redistributing the material in any means or format, provided that credit is granted to the authors and to Ideas y Valores as the source of the original publication. Copying or distributing the contents of the journal for commercial purposes is not allowed; neither is the adaptation, derivation, or transformation of the contents, without previous authorization by the authors and the editors of Ideas y Valores. For further information regarding the terms of this license, please consult http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.
1.jpg)
.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
