Psychometric Validation of the Risky Sexual Behaviors Scale in Mexican Adults
Validación psicométrica de la escala de conductas sexuales de riesgo en adultos mexicanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v34n1.109781Keywords:
Psychometric analysis, risky sexual behavior, adults, Mexicans (en)propiedades psicometricas, Población mexicana, Sexualidad, conductas de riesgo, adultos (es)
Downloads
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a growing public health problem in Latin America. One key factor in diminishing their spread is the reduction of risky sexual behaviors, which requires reliable and valid information on the subject. This study aimed to validate a scale for measuring risky sexual behaviors in adults from Mexico City. We worked with 750 participants (56.66% women and 43.34% men) between 18 and 60. An initial version of the scale was administered online after obtaining informed consent. The scale’s distribution, discrimination, reliability, and validity were analyzed. A 23-item scale was obtained with good reliability (ordinal α = .91). It exhibited a six-factor structure that explained 47% of the variance and demonstrated good fit (χ2/gl = 2.84, p < .01; CFI = .96; RMSEA = .05, 95% CI [.04-.05]; SRMR = .08). The scale is reliable and valid for measuring risky sexual behaviors in Mexican adults.
Las infecciones de transmisión sexual son un problema de salud pública que va en aumento en América Latina, un factor clave para reducirlas es disminuir las conductas sexuales de riesgo, por lo que se requiere información confiable y válida al respecto. El objetivo fue validar una escala para medir conductas sexuales de riesgo en adultos de la Ciudad de México. Se trabajó con 750 participantes, 56.66% mujeres y 43.34% hombres, entre los 18 y los 60 años. Se aplicó una versión inicial de la escala en línea después de obtener consentimiento informado. Se llevó a cabo el análisis de la distribución, discriminación, confiabilidad y validez de escala. Se obtuvo una escala con 23 reactivos, buena confiabilidad (α ordinal=.91), con una estructura con seis factores que explica el 47% de la varianza y tiene adecuado ajuste (χ2/gl=2.84, p<.01; CFI=.96; RMSEA=.05 95%IC (.04-.05); SRMR=.08). La escala es confiable y válida para medir conductas sexuales de riesgo en adultos mexicanos.
References
Alfonso, L., Santillano, I., Figueroa, L., Rodríguez, A.E., & García, L. (2020). Prevención de las conductas sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes del municipio Consolación del Sur. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río, 24(4), e4318. Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-31942020000400011&lng=es&tlng=es.
Alfonso, L., & Figueroa, L. (2017). Conductas sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes desde el contexto cubano. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río, 21(2), 143-151. Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-31942017000200020&lng=es&tlng=es.
Badillo, M., Mendoza, X., Barreto, M., & Díaz, A. (2020). Risky sexual behaviors and associated factors among university students in Barranquilla, Colombia, 2019. Enfermería global, 19(59), 422-449. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.412161.
Castilla, J., Barrio, G., Belza, M.J., & de la Fuente, L. (1999). Drug and alcohol consumption and sexual risk behavior among young adults: results from a national survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 56(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00008-3.
Edwards, M. C., & Wirth, R. J. (2009). Measurement and the study of change. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911163
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Giguère, K., Béhanzin, L., Guédou, F.A., Leblond, F.A., Goma-Matsétsé, E., Zannou, D.M., Affolabi, D., Kêkê, R.K., Gangbo, F., Bachabi, M., & Alary, M. (2019). Biological Validation of Self-Reported Unprotected Sex and Comparison of Underreporting Over Two Different Recall Periods Among Female Sex Workers in Benin. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6(2), ofz010, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz010
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw Hill.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kenny, D. A., & Milan, S. (2012). Identification: A nontechnical discussion of a technical issue. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp.145–163). New York: Guilford Press
Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. The R Journal. 6. 151-162. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-031.
La Du, T. J., & Tanaka, J. S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.625
Li, C. H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
Maart, S., & Jelsma, J. (2010). The sexual behavior of physically disabled adolescents. Disability and rehabilitation, 32(6), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280902846368
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.
Mercer, C. H., Wellings, K., & Johnson, A. M. (2014). What is new about Natsal-3?. Sexually transmitted infections, 90(2), 80–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051292
Mirzaei, M., Ahmadi, K., Saadat, S. H., & Ramezani, M. A. (2016). Instruments of high-risk sexual behavior assessment: a systematic review. Materia socio-medica, 28(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2016.28.46-50
Montero, I., & León, O. (2002). Clasificación y descripción de las metodologías de investigación en Psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2(3), 503-508.
Morrison-Beedy, D., Carey, M.P., Feng, C., & Tu, X.M. (2008). Predicting Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Adolescent and Young Women Using a Prospective Diary Method. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20263.
Ondé, D. (2020). Revisión del Concepto de Causalidad en el Marco del Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación RIDEP, 54(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP54.1.09
Ondé, D., & Alvarado, J.M. (2022). Contribución de los Modelos Factoriales Confirmatorios a la Evaluación de Estructura Interna desde la Perspectiva de la Validez. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica. RIDEP, 66(5), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP66.5.01
Organización de las Naciones Unidas ONU. (1 de diciembre de 2020). El VIH, un grave problema de salud pública en América Latina exacerbado por la pandemia. Noticias ONU Mirada global Historias humanas. https://news.un.org/es/story/2020/12/1484902
Organización de las Naciones Unidas ONU. (10 de octubre de 2022). ONUSIDA convoca reunión de emergencia ante la subida de contagios por VIH en 28 naciones. Noticias ONU Mirada global Historias humanas. https://news.un.org/es/story/2022/10/1516037
Paniagua, D., Alvarado, J.M., Olivares, M., Romero-Suárez, M., & Aguayo-Estremera, R. (2022). Estudio de Seguimiento de las Recomendaciones sobre Análisis Factorial Exploratorio en RIDEP. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica. RIDEP, 66(5), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP66.5.10
Pengpid, S., & Peltzer, K. (2021). Sexual risk behaviour and its correlates among adolescents in Mozambique: results from a national school survey in 2015, SAHARA-J. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 18(1), 26-32, https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2020.1858947
Programa Conjunto de las Naciones Unidas sobre el VIH/sida ONUSIDA. (2022). In danger: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2022. Geneva: Programa Conjunto de las Naciones Unidas sobre el VIH/sida ONUSIDA. Recuperado de https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2022-global-aids-update_en.pdf
Raghupathy, S., & Hahn-Smith, S. (2011). Reliability of the high school Youth Risk Behavior Survey when administered online. International Quarterly of community health education, 32(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.2190/IQ.32.2.d
Revelle, W. (2022). Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.2.5, retrieved June 9, 2022, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
Rodrigues, D. L., Lopes, D., Pereira, M., Prada, M., & Garrido, M. V. (2020). Predictors of Condomless Sex and Sexual Health Behaviors in a Sample of Portuguese Single Adults. The Journal of sexual medicine, 17(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.005
Rodríguez, L.F., & Becerra, A. (2022). Percepciones asociadas a conductas sexuales de riesgo. Horizonte Sanitario, 21(2), 292-298. https://doi.org/10.19136/hs.a21n2.4562
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Shamah-Levy, T., Romero-Martínez, M., Barrientos-Gutiérrez, T., Cuevas-Nasu, L., Bautista-Arredondo, S., Colchero, M.A., Gaona-Pineda, E.B., Lazcano-Ponce, E., Martínez-Barnetche, J., Alpuche-Arana, C., Rivera-Dommarco, J. (2022). Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2021 sobre Covid-19. Resultados nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. https://doi.org/10.21149/12280
Saeteros, R., Pérez, J., & Sanabria, G. (2015). Conducta de riesgo y problemas sexuales y reproductivos de estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos. Conducta de riesgo y problemas sexuales y reproductivos de estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos. Humanidades Médicas, 15(3), 421-439. Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S172781202015000300003&lng=es&tlng=es.
Schroder, K. E., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: I. Item content, scaling, and analytical data options. Annals of behavioral medicine: a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 26(2), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2602_02
Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2007). Código ético del psicólogo. Trillas. http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/documentos/pdf/comite_etica/CODIGO_ETICO_SMP.pdf.
Thepthien, B., & Celyn. (2022) Risky sexual behavior and associated factors among sexually-experienced adolescents in Bangkok, Thailand: findings from a school web-based survey. Reproductive Health, 19, 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01429-3
Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 209-231). New York: Guilford Press.
Wijekularathna, D.K., Manage A.W., & Scariano, S. M. (2019). Power analysis of several normality tests: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 51(3), 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1658780
Whittaker, A. (2012). Research skills for social work. London: Sage
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.